Perspective: Difference between revisions

From metawiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_of_view_(philosophy) Perspective, or Point of View], is used throughout the [[wiki]] to reinforce the notion that [[metaculture]] is simply a way of interpreting [[science]] and [[religion]] and makes no specific factual assertions about either beyond the [[Pantheistic]] assumption that [[god]] is not separate from the [[universe]] itself.
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_of_view_(philosophy) Perspective, or Point of View], is used throughout the [[wiki]] to reinforce the notion that [[metaculture]] is simply a [[subjective]] way of interpreting [[science]] and [[religion]] and makes no specific factual assertions about either beyond the [[Pantheistic]] assumption that [[god]] is not separate from the [[universe]] itself.  
 
[[metaculture]] is the perspective that the [[material]] [[universe]] is a very nice place to spend your [[life]] and requires non [[supernatural]] enhancement.
 
== Perspective Relates Disparate Subjects ==
 
Perspective is also used to tie all of the various [[scientific]] subjects and [[philosophical]] [[beliefs]] together into a common cause. For example, [[happiness]] is shown to be the goal of both our personal [[life]] and [[society]], so each topic that describes [[best practices]] in these areas will show how that recommendation improves [[utilitarian]] [[happiness]]. This helps you see the unified, [[generating equation|underlying goal]] of improving [[quality of life]] and how that impacts every aspect of our [[morality]] and [[culture]].
 
== Facts Versus Perspectives ==


[[metaculture]] is not about any specific path to [[happiness]], rather it's the notion that [[utilitarian]] [[happiness]] should be the primary goal for ourselves and our [[society]], and that [[life]] should come with an up-to-date guidebook on how to find it.
[[metaculture]] is not about any specific path to [[happiness]], rather it's the notion that [[utilitarian]] [[happiness]] should be the primary goal for ourselves and our [[society]], and that [[life]] should come with an up-to-date guidebook on how to find it.
Line 8: Line 16:


The ultimate [[reality]] of the [[universe]] that [[science]] reveals is much less important than the perspective that [[scientific]] [[reality]] is [[beautiful]] and [[life]] is full of [[happiness]] and [[meaning]]. These [[subjective]] notions depend solely on how you look at things.
The ultimate [[reality]] of the [[universe]] that [[science]] reveals is much less important than the perspective that [[scientific]] [[reality]] is [[beautiful]] and [[life]] is full of [[happiness]] and [[meaning]]. These [[subjective]] notions depend solely on how you look at things.


{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iueVZJVEmEs||center||frame}}
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iueVZJVEmEs||center||frame}}

Revision as of 12:23, 6 January 2024

Perspective, or Point of View, is used throughout the wiki to reinforce the notion that metaculture is simply a subjective way of interpreting science and religion and makes no specific factual assertions about either beyond the Pantheistic assumption that god is not separate from the universe itself.

metaculture is the perspective that the material universe is a very nice place to spend your life and requires non supernatural enhancement.

Perspective Relates Disparate Subjects

Perspective is also used to tie all of the various scientific subjects and philosophical beliefs together into a common cause. For example, happiness is shown to be the goal of both our personal life and society, so each topic that describes best practices in these areas will show how that recommendation improves utilitarian happiness. This helps you see the unified, underlying goal of improving quality of life and how that impacts every aspect of our morality and culture.

Facts Versus Perspectives

metaculture is not about any specific path to happiness, rather it's the notion that utilitarian happiness should be the primary goal for ourselves and our society, and that life should come with an up-to-date guidebook on how to find it.

It doesn't matter whether the universe started with the Big Bang, or if it always has existed, if there are multiple universes, how many dimensions there are, or any other cosmological specifics that have no bearing on whether reality operates according to physical laws that cannot be broken only revealed in greater detail through experiment.

It doesn't even matter if the universe follows a fractal pattern or if some other mathematical model represents it better. The fractal is a useful metaphor for understanding complex systems and a metaphor is often still valid even after we gain a deeper understanding of the real thing it describes. And while significant updates would be required to replace it, even the fractal god could be replaced if a better analog is found.

The ultimate reality of the universe that science reveals is much less important than the perspective that scientific reality is beautiful and life is full of happiness and meaning. These subjective notions depend solely on how you look at things.


Perspective for kids

Probably not for kids