Creationism: Difference between revisions

From metawiki
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Creationism-intelligent-design-divine-watchmaker-young-earth.jpg|thumb|If people were built from parts instead of grown, the Divine Watchmaker analogy would be apt. But that is not the case.]]
[[File:Creationism-intelligent-design-divine-watchmaker-young-earth.jpg|thumb|If people were built from parts instead of grown, the Divine Watchmaker analogy would be apt. But that is not the case.]]


These are theories of [[creation]] based on [[literal]] interpretations of [[scripture]].
[[wikipedia:Creationism|Creationism]] and [[wikipedia:Intelligent_design|Intelligent Design]] are theories of [[creation]] based on [[literal]] interpretations of [[scripture]].


A significant portion of the internet has been dedicated to debunking these claims so they won't be rehashed here. It's pretty obvious where the [[metaculture]] [[belief system]] stands on this issue.
A significant portion of the internet has been dedicated to debunking these claims so they won't be rehashed here. It's pretty obvious where the [[metaculture]] [[belief system]] stands on this issue.

Revision as of 08:03, 25 January 2024

If people were built from parts instead of grown, the Divine Watchmaker analogy would be apt. But that is not the case.

Creationism and Intelligent Design are theories of creation based on literal interpretations of scripture.

A significant portion of the internet has been dedicated to debunking these claims so they won't be rehashed here. It's pretty obvious where the metaculture belief system stands on this issue.

See Creationism or Intelligent Design on Wikipedia.

See also: Evolution, Creation Story, Literalism, Allegory, Simulation Theory

This video fights literalism with literalism.

Top Ten Biblical Problems for Young Earth Creationists


Catholics are much more reasonable on this issue than Evangelicals. Sometime hierarchy helps.

Can a Christian Believe in Evolution?


Snarky Puppy - Intelligent Design