In-group: Difference between revisions

From metawiki
(Created page with "There is a natural tendency for humans to define themselves in terms of in-groups and outsiders. This makes sense from an evolutionary perspective, but in a globally connecte...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
There is a natural tendency for humans to define themselves in terms of in-groups and outsiders.
There is a natural tendency for humans to define themselves in terms of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-group_and_out-group in-groups and outsiders].


This makes sense from an evolutionary perspective, but in a globally connected society it can lead to chaos. There are so many overlapping in-groups that cross all national and cultural borders that attempting to define them in any way creates tons of exceptions.
This makes sense from an evolutionary perspective, but in a globally connected society it can lead to chaos. There are so many overlapping in-groups that cross all national and cultural borders that attempting to define them in any way creates tons of exceptions.


The only morally defensible in-group is all humans, and outside the realm of survival that should be expanded to also include all living things. Any hierarchical subdivision is inherently unjust.
The only morally defensible in-group is all humans, and outside the realm of survival that should be expanded to also include all living things. Any hierarchical subdivision is inherently unjust.

Revision as of 11:49, 26 December 2023

There is a natural tendency for humans to define themselves in terms of in-groups and outsiders.

This makes sense from an evolutionary perspective, but in a globally connected society it can lead to chaos. There are so many overlapping in-groups that cross all national and cultural borders that attempting to define them in any way creates tons of exceptions.

The only morally defensible in-group is all humans, and outside the realm of survival that should be expanded to also include all living things. Any hierarchical subdivision is inherently unjust.