Taboo: Difference between revisions

From metawiki
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
== The Need for Modern Taboos ==
== The Need for Modern Taboos ==


As belief and participation in [[religion]] declines, so has the ability to enforce taboos and other cultural norms. In many cases this is a good thing. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_revolution sexual revolution] freed us from many unnecessarily and debilitating taboos, allowing people who enjoy [[sex]] outside of procreation (everyone) to openly be themselves. However, there are some [[traditional]] taboos that have been lost that we are starting to miss.
As belief and participation in [[religion]] declines, so has the ability to enforce taboos and other [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_norm social norms]. In many cases this is a good thing. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_revolution sexual revolution] freed us from many unnecessarily and debilitating taboos, allowing people who enjoy [[sex]] outside of procreation (everyone) to openly be themselves. However, there are some [[traditional]] taboos that have been lost that we are starting to miss.


Losing the taboo on vulgarity has led to a proliferation of abusive and hateful language both on [[social media]] and in in the mainstream [[media]]. There has been a slow and steady increase in the use of vulgarity ever since the first ''shit'' hit the airwaves on [https://www.avclub.com/remembering-a-more-innocent-time-before-tv-became-a-shi-1822031575 NYPD Blue]. Though it has made TV dialog more realistic, it has not improved the level of discourse. A new taboo is needed to improve civility and focus on having reasoned debate on important topics instead of using vulgarity to evoke emotional outrage and clickbait quotes.
Losing the taboo on vulgarity has led to a proliferation of abusive and hateful language both on [[social media]] and in in the mainstream [[media]]. There has been a slow and steady increase in the use of vulgarity ever since the first ''shit'' hit the airwaves on [https://www.avclub.com/remembering-a-more-innocent-time-before-tv-became-a-shi-1822031575 NYPD Blue]. Though it has made TV dialog more realistic, it has not improved the level of discourse. A new taboo is needed to improve civility and focus on having reasoned debate on important topics instead of using vulgarity to evoke emotional outrage and clickbait quotes.

Revision as of 10:47, 27 December 2023

See Taboo

Taboos are the way that culture enforces social norms of behavior that are not applicable to the legal system. The most common taboos throughout history revolve around our sexual morality, but they also include things like not farting in mixed company and extreme behaviors like cannibalism.

The Need for Modern Taboos

As belief and participation in religion declines, so has the ability to enforce taboos and other social norms. In many cases this is a good thing. The sexual revolution freed us from many unnecessarily and debilitating taboos, allowing people who enjoy sex outside of procreation (everyone) to openly be themselves. However, there are some traditional taboos that have been lost that we are starting to miss.

Losing the taboo on vulgarity has led to a proliferation of abusive and hateful language both on social media and in in the mainstream media. There has been a slow and steady increase in the use of vulgarity ever since the first shit hit the airwaves on NYPD Blue. Though it has made TV dialog more realistic, it has not improved the level of discourse. A new taboo is needed to improve civility and focus on having reasoned debate on important topics instead of using vulgarity to evoke emotional outrage and clickbait quotes.

Other new taboos that we really need:

Taboos Only Work On the In-Group

Only when bad behavior is shunned by our in-group will we be able to eliminate it from our culture. You cannot shun someone who doesn't want to hang out with you. If we want to raise the level of discourse the only thing we can do is lead by example and enforce the taboos in our in-group that we want to see in our opposition.

In the short term this may seem like political disarmament, where your in-group loses people to high ethical standards that are not being upheld by the opposition. But the opposition can either raise their own standards to match or cede the moral high ground and inevitably lose the support of decent people. The strategy of high ethical standards will always pay off in the long run.