Supernatural: Difference between revisions

From metawiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
These should be interpreted as [[allegories]] for real people, motivations, and forces within the [[universe]], told by our ancestors with the accumulated wisdom of hundreds of generations of [[consciousness]]-havers.
These should be interpreted as [[allegories]] for real people, motivations, and forces within the [[universe]], told by our ancestors with the accumulated wisdom of hundreds of generations of [[consciousness]]-havers.


The [[Pantheistic]], [[self-creating]] [[universe]]-[[god]] is used in place of an external, supernatural [[god]] that cannot be observed and has no detectable impact on the [[laws of physics]], and begs the question "who created [[god]]?"
The [[Pantheistic]], [[self-creating]] [[universe]]-[[god]] is used in place of an external, supernatural [[god]] that cannot be observed, has no detectable impact on the [[laws of physics]], and begs the question "who created [[god]]?"


Before the invention of [[science]], the separation of the natural and the supernatural was much less pronounced. There was one common [[cultural]] language to talk about the [[universe]] and it involved spirits, angels, demons, gods, and all of the other [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archetype archetypes] of mythology. It's basically [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darmok Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra]--people communicate using common stories and [[cultural]] reference points, and [[scripture]] is the dictionary.
Before the invention of [[science]], the separation of the natural and the supernatural was much less pronounced. There was one common [[cultural]] language to talk about the [[universe]] and it involved spirits, angels, demons, gods, and all of the other [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archetype archetypes] of mythology. It's basically [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darmok Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra]--people communicate using common stories and [[cultural]] reference points, and [[scripture]] is the dictionary.

Revision as of 11:49, 27 December 2023

See Supernatural

metaculture rejects the existence of any and all supernatural beings and forces.

These should be interpreted as allegories for real people, motivations, and forces within the universe, told by our ancestors with the accumulated wisdom of hundreds of generations of consciousness-havers.

The Pantheistic, self-creating universe-god is used in place of an external, supernatural god that cannot be observed, has no detectable impact on the laws of physics, and begs the question "who created god?"

Before the invention of science, the separation of the natural and the supernatural was much less pronounced. There was one common cultural language to talk about the universe and it involved spirits, angels, demons, gods, and all of the other archetypes of mythology. It's basically Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra--people communicate using common stories and cultural reference points, and scripture is the dictionary.

When science comes along, all of a sudden we now know why the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. We know why the tide goes in and the tide goes out (with some exceptions). We know the origins of the universe. The stories are no longer the explanation, there is another explanation that makes a lot more sense. So what becomes of the stories?

Unlike atheists that tend to reject all notions of god along with the supernatural, metaculture embraces the traditions, rituals, symbolism, and connection to history that religion provides, while interpreting god and scripture in a way that is also fully compatible with science.