Happiness and well-being: Difference between revisions

From metawiki
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
In [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism utilitarianism], the assumed goal of ethics and morality is the greatest amount of happiness and well-being for the greatest number of people.
In [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism utilitarianism], the assumed goal of ethics and morality is the greatest amount of happiness and well-being for the greatest number of people.
== Roots in Evolutionary Psychology ==


How do we know that this is the goal? [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_psychology Evolutionary psychology].
How do we know that this is the goal? [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_psychology Evolutionary psychology].
Line 13: Line 15:
When we live a life that gives us robust and varied sources of pleasure, while minimizing pain and hardship, we experience this as a general sense of well-being and happiness. Therefore, the [[utilitarian]] goal of maximizing happiness and well-being for the greatest number of people can be derived logically from the observation of our brain's neural network.
When we live a life that gives us robust and varied sources of pleasure, while minimizing pain and hardship, we experience this as a general sense of well-being and happiness. Therefore, the [[utilitarian]] goal of maximizing happiness and well-being for the greatest number of people can be derived logically from the observation of our brain's neural network.


For those that prefer a metaphor from pop culture, it's basically the point system from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Good_Place The Good Place].
== Whose Happiness Counts? ==
 
"Forward thinking" [[crypto-bros]] think that they can cleverly circumvent the need to care about the living by contributing to the theoretical happiness of future people. This is an ethical cop-out used to justify selfish behavior, such as using [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_altruism Effective Altruism] as an excuse to steal billions of dollars in a cryto pyramid scheme.
 
When calculating the utilitarian benefit of any action, the tangible effects on the living should be prioritized significantly above the needs of any theoretical humans. While we can't ignore our impact on future generations, we cannot prioritize their needs over our own either. Part of our happiness depends on knowing we are leaving a better world for our children, but a better world is always one that helps the living.
 
Prioritizing the needs of the living over the theoretical is also what makes [[abortion]] an ethical choice whenever it is desired. [[Quality of Life]] is the most important pursuit.
 
== Can a TV Show Explain It? ==
 
For those that prefer a metaphor from pop culture, it's basically the point system from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Good_Place The Good Place]. The show is basically an introductory course in ethics and is truly a ''good place'' to start learning about this subject.


[[File:Doug_Forcett.jpg]]
[[File:Doug_Forcett.jpg]]

Revision as of 16:52, 23 December 2023

In utilitarianism, the assumed goal of ethics and morality is the greatest amount of happiness and well-being for the greatest number of people.

Roots in Evolutionary Psychology

How do we know that this is the goal? Evolutionary psychology.

Our brains are a neural network based machine learning device designed for survival and reproduction. In machine learning, there are two mechanisms for producing a learning effect. Reinforcement, which effectively strengthens connections between neurons, and punishment which effectively weakens them.

Our brain's reward system causes actions that result in pro-survival outcomes to be reinforced, strengthening the connections between neurons that fired to create this action and increasing the likelihood that the action will happen again. Those that result in anti-survival outcomes are weakened so the negative action will be less likely. Humans experience these effects subjectively as pleasure and pain.

It follows logically that our brains are wired to maximize behaviors that result in pleasure and minimize painful ones.

Though the evolutionary goal of this wiring is survival and reproduction, the brain itself only responds to the internal reflexive pleasure and pain reactions regardless of their actual survival benefit. Hence our goal is not to maximize our lifespans and population, it is to maximize our experience of pleasure and pain.

When we live a life that gives us robust and varied sources of pleasure, while minimizing pain and hardship, we experience this as a general sense of well-being and happiness. Therefore, the utilitarian goal of maximizing happiness and well-being for the greatest number of people can be derived logically from the observation of our brain's neural network.

Whose Happiness Counts?

"Forward thinking" crypto-bros think that they can cleverly circumvent the need to care about the living by contributing to the theoretical happiness of future people. This is an ethical cop-out used to justify selfish behavior, such as using Effective Altruism as an excuse to steal billions of dollars in a cryto pyramid scheme.

When calculating the utilitarian benefit of any action, the tangible effects on the living should be prioritized significantly above the needs of any theoretical humans. While we can't ignore our impact on future generations, we cannot prioritize their needs over our own either. Part of our happiness depends on knowing we are leaving a better world for our children, but a better world is always one that helps the living.

Prioritizing the needs of the living over the theoretical is also what makes abortion an ethical choice whenever it is desired. Quality of Life is the most important pursuit.

Can a TV Show Explain It?

For those that prefer a metaphor from pop culture, it's basically the point system from The Good Place. The show is basically an introductory course in ethics and is truly a good place to start learning about this subject.