Environment: Difference between revisions
Fractalguy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Fractalguy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Protecting the environment is good. | Protecting the environment is good. | ||
So is creating a [[psychological]] environment where your [[incentives]] encourage your [[life choices]] and direct your "[[ | So is creating a [[psychological]] environment where your [[incentives]] encourage your [[life choices]] and direct your "[[willpower]]" towards your goals. But that's not the usage being discussed on this page. | ||
[[Climate change]] [[is bad]]. | [[Climate change]] [[is bad]]. | ||
Revision as of 08:29, 15 January 2024
Protecting the environment is good.
So is creating a psychological environment where your incentives encourage your life choices and direct your "willpower" towards your goals. But that's not the usage being discussed on this page.
Overpopulation is bad, but not in a racist way.
Nature is good.
Sustainability and Renewable Energy are good.
The fact that any of this is up for debate is worrisome.
Since most progressives are on board with this, here are some videos that explain why this important to those that need to hear it.