Politics: Difference between revisions
Fractalguy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Fractalguy (talk | contribs) |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Politics-change-reform-bipartisan-electoral.jpg|thumb|Every cardboard sign makes a difference]] | |||
A discussion of political theories and how their ideas contribute to what we know about [[best practices]] for governing a [[society]] and increasing the [[quality of life]]. | |||
== Best Practices in Government and Politics == | |||
The general principles of [[evidence-based]] governance should be modeled on the those countries with the highest [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quality_of_life Quality of Life] indicators. | The general principles of [[evidence-based]] governance should be modeled on the those countries with the highest [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quality_of_life Quality of Life] indicators. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 12: | ||
<li>[[Freedom of Speech]]</li> | <li>[[Freedom of Speech]]</li> | ||
<li>[[Religious Freedom]]</li> | <li>[[Religious Freedom]]</li> | ||
<li>[[Freedom]] in general</li> | |||
<li>[[Balance of power|Balance of Power]]</li> | |||
<li>[[Separation of Church and State]]</li> | <li>[[Separation of Church and State]]</li> | ||
<li>[[Public Education]]</li> | <li>[[Public Education]]</li> | ||
<li>[[Social Safety Net]]</li> | <li>[[Social Safety Net]]</li> | ||
<li>[[Universal Health Care]]</li> | <li>[[Universal Health Care]]</li> | ||
<li> | <li>[[Justice|Equal Justice for all citizens]]</li> | ||
<li>Mixed [[Economy]] with the best elements of [[Socialism]] and [[Capitalism]]</li> | <li>Mixed [[Economy]] with the best elements of [[Socialism]] and [[Capitalism]]</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
== Other Practices in Government and Politics == | |||
Not the best, but the rest. | |||
* [[Fascism]] | |||
* [[Authoritarianism]] | |||
* [[Communism]] | |||
* [[Socialism]] | |||
* [[Capitalism]] | |||
* [[Libertarian|Libertarianism]] | |||
The left/right political dynamic of the United States is often used as a reference point. However, they are more correctly framed in terms of [[Progressive]] and [[Libertarian]] political [[philosophies]] rather than the Democratic and Republican parties. This is because the actual political thinkers and developers of new policy are coming from these sub-groups, who are not always strictly affiliated with either party. It also somewhat ignores right-wing Christian Nationalism and [[Fascism]], which are scary and must be opposed, but offer few debatable policy positions. In a discussion of [[best practices]], we must consider actual policy rather than the exercise of raw [[power]]. | |||
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yYwnPvuTQE||center|The Evolution of World Democracies|frame}} | |||
<br> | |||
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUGLfN4oSCg||center|Jay Z - Politics as Usual|frame}} | |||
Revision as of 23:38, 31 January 2024
A discussion of political theories and how their ideas contribute to what we know about best practices for governing a society and increasing the quality of life.
Best Practices in Government and Politics
The general principles of evidence-based governance should be modeled on the those countries with the highest Quality of Life indicators.
In the countries with the greatest happiness and well-being, the following principles are nearly universal, with the happiest countries having the strongest systems in place for each.
- Democracy
- Freedom of Speech
- Religious Freedom
- Freedom in general
- Balance of Power
- Separation of Church and State
- Public Education
- Social Safety Net
- Universal Health Care
- Equal Justice for all citizens
- Mixed Economy with the best elements of Socialism and Capitalism
Other Practices in Government and Politics
Not the best, but the rest.
The left/right political dynamic of the United States is often used as a reference point. However, they are more correctly framed in terms of Progressive and Libertarian political philosophies rather than the Democratic and Republican parties. This is because the actual political thinkers and developers of new policy are coming from these sub-groups, who are not always strictly affiliated with either party. It also somewhat ignores right-wing Christian Nationalism and Fascism, which are scary and must be opposed, but offer few debatable policy positions. In a discussion of best practices, we must consider actual policy rather than the exercise of raw power.