Big bang - Revision history

Fractalguy at 12:09, 13 July 2025

2025-07-13T12:09:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:09, 13 July 2025
Line 2:		Line 2:
	References to the big bang refer not necessarily to the original [[wikipedia:Big_Bang\|big bang theory]] but rather our latest, best understanding of the origins of the [[universe]] according to [[science]], regardless of what form it takes.		References to the big bang refer not necessarily to the original [[wikipedia:Big_Bang\|big bang theory]] but rather our latest, best understanding of the origins of the [[universe]] according to [[science]], regardless of what form it takes.

	~~As our understanding of the early moments of the [[universe]] evolves, the specifics of~~ whether all [[matter]] was concentrated in a single point that exploded into an expanding [[universe]], ~~or if~~ arose spontaneously across an infinite empty space, or any other theory that agrees with the observable data~~, makes no difference in how [[metaculture]] is understood~~. <blockquote>''"We're all in the big bang gang."'' -[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vi039BihSAk Cunk and Cox] </blockquote>The ~~only important point is that a~~ [[~~scientific~~]] [[~~creation story~~]] ~~ultimately exists that conforms~~ to the ~~actual~~ [[laws of physics]]~~, regardless of how accurately~~ our current ~~theories are able~~ to ~~describe it~~.		It makes no difference whether all [[matter]] was concentrated in a single point that exploded into an expanding [[universe]], arose spontaneously across an infinite empty space, oscillates between periods of expansion and contraction, or any other theory that agrees with the observable data. <blockquote>''"We're all in the big bang gang."'' -[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vi039BihSAk Cunk and Cox] </blockquote>The specifics of the way it happened are not going to be known with certainty within our [[Lifetime\|lifetimes]]. However, we can be certain that there was no [[supernatural]] entity involved, and the explanation we eventually find will conform to the [[laws of physics]]. We know that our current understanding of these laws is incomplete, but we also know that the [[universe]] behaves according to immutable [[universal]] forces. The rules that explain its behavior must eventually explain its origins.

	See [[Creation Story]] for details on the latest [[scientific]] theories of our origins and creative ways to explain it.		See [[Creation Story]] for details on the latest [[scientific]] theories of our origins and creative ways to explain it.

	{{#ev:youtube\|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzhIfN4UQv8\|\|center\|\|frame}}		{{#ev:youtube\|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzhIfN4UQv8\|\|center\|\|frame}}

Fractalguy at 23:06, 4 January 2025

2025-01-04T23:06:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:06, 4 January 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:Big-bang-galaxy-nebula-stars-space-universe.jpg\|thumb\|Another Big Bang By-Product]]		[[File:Big-bang-galaxy-nebula-stars-space-universe.jpg\|thumb\|Another Big Bang By-Product]]
	References to the [[big bang]] refer not necessarily to the original [[wikipedia:Big_Bang\|big bang theory]] but rather our latest, best understanding of the origins of the [[universe]] according to [[science]], regardless of what form it takes.		References to the big bang refer not necessarily to the original [[wikipedia:Big_Bang\|big bang theory]] but rather our latest, best understanding of the origins of the [[universe]] according to [[science]], regardless of what form it takes.

	As our understanding of the early moments of the [[universe]] evolves, the specifics of whether all [[matter]] was concentrated in a single point that exploded into an expanding [[universe]], or if arose spontaneously across an infinite empty space, or any other theory that agrees with the observable data, makes no difference in how [[metaculture]] is understood.		As our understanding of the early moments of the [[universe]] evolves, the specifics of whether all [[matter]] was concentrated in a single point that exploded into an expanding [[universe]], or if arose spontaneously across an infinite empty space, or any other theory that agrees with the observable data, makes no difference in how [[metaculture]] is understood. <blockquote>''"We're all in the big bang gang."'' -[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vi039BihSAk Cunk and Cox] </blockquote>The only important point is that a [[scientific]] [[creation story]] ultimately exists that conforms to the actual [[laws of physics]], regardless of how accurately our current theories are able to describe it.

	The only important point is that a [[scientific]] [[creation story]] ultimately exists that conforms to the actual [[laws of physics]], regardless of how accurately our current theories are able to describe it.

	See [[Creation Story]] for details on the latest [[scientific]] theories of our origins and creative ways to explain it.		See [[Creation Story]] for details on the latest [[scientific]] theories of our origins and creative ways to explain it.

	{{#ev:youtube\|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzhIfN4UQv8\|\|center\|\|frame}}		{{#ev:youtube\|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzhIfN4UQv8\|\|center\|\|frame}}

Fractalguy at 17:17, 18 December 2024

2024-12-18T17:17:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:17, 18 December 2024
Line 5:		Line 5:

	The only important point is that a [[scientific]] [[creation story]] ultimately exists that conforms to the actual [[laws of physics]], regardless of how accurately our current theories are able to describe it.		The only important point is that a [[scientific]] [[creation story]] ultimately exists that conforms to the actual [[laws of physics]], regardless of how accurately our current theories are able to describe it.

			See [[Creation Story]] for details on the latest [[scientific]] theories of our origins and creative ways to explain it.

	{{#ev:youtube\|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzhIfN4UQv8\|\|center\|\|frame}}		{{#ev:youtube\|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzhIfN4UQv8\|\|center\|\|frame}}

Fractalguy at 14:27, 28 January 2024

2024-01-28T14:27:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:27, 28 January 2024
Line 2:		Line 2:
	References to the [[big bang]] refer not necessarily to the original [[wikipedia:Big_Bang\|big bang theory]] but rather our latest, best understanding of the origins of the [[universe]] according to [[science]], regardless of what form it takes.		References to the [[big bang]] refer not necessarily to the original [[wikipedia:Big_Bang\|big bang theory]] but rather our latest, best understanding of the origins of the [[universe]] according to [[science]], regardless of what form it takes.

	As our understanding of the early moments of the universe evolves, the specifics of whether all matter was concentrated in a single point that exploded into an expanding universe, or if arose spontaneously across an infinite empty space, or any other theory that agrees with the observable data, makes no difference in how [[metaculture]] is understood. The only important point is that a scientific [[creation story]] exists ~~and~~ conforms to the [[laws of physics]].		As our understanding of the early moments of the [[universe]] evolves, the specifics of whether all [[matter]] was concentrated in a single point that exploded into an expanding [[universe]], or if arose spontaneously across an infinite empty space, or any other theory that agrees with the observable data, makes no difference in how [[metaculture]] is understood.

			The only important point is that a [[scientific]] [[creation story]] ultimately exists that conforms to the actual [[laws of physics]], regardless of how accurately our current theories are able to describe it.

	{{#ev:youtube\|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzhIfN4UQv8\|\|center\|\|frame}}		{{#ev:youtube\|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzhIfN4UQv8\|\|center\|\|frame}}

Fractalguy at 14:14, 25 January 2024

2024-01-25T14:14:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:14, 25 January 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:Big-bang-galaxy-nebula-stars-space-universe.jpg\|thumb]]		[[File:Big-bang-galaxy-nebula-stars-space-universe.jpg\|thumb\|Another Big Bang By-Product]]
	References to the [[big bang]] refer not necessarily to the original [[wikipedia:Big_Bang\|big bang theory]] but rather our latest, best understanding of the origins of the [[universe]] according to [[science]], regardless of what form it takes.		References to the [[big bang]] refer not necessarily to the original [[wikipedia:Big_Bang\|big bang theory]] but rather our latest, best understanding of the origins of the [[universe]] according to [[science]], regardless of what form it takes.

Fractalguy at 22:10, 23 January 2024

2024-01-23T22:10:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:10, 23 January 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	References to the [[big bang]] refer not necessarily to the original [~~https~~:~~//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/~~Big_Bang big bang theory] but rather our latest, best understanding of the origins of the [[universe]] according to [[science]], regardless of what form it takes.		[[File:Big-bang-galaxy-nebula-stars-space-universe.jpg\|thumb]]
			References to the [[big bang]] refer not necessarily to the original [[wikipedia:Big_Bang\|big bang theory]] but rather our latest, best understanding of the origins of the [[universe]] according to [[science]], regardless of what form it takes.

	As our understanding of the early moments of the universe evolves, the specifics of whether all matter was concentrated in a single point that exploded into an expanding universe, or if arose spontaneously across an infinite empty space, or any other theory that agrees with the observable data, makes no difference in how [[metaculture]] is understood. The only important point is that a scientific [[creation story]] exists and conforms to the [[laws of physics]].		As our understanding of the early moments of the universe evolves, the specifics of whether all matter was concentrated in a single point that exploded into an expanding universe, or if arose spontaneously across an infinite empty space, or any other theory that agrees with the observable data, makes no difference in how [[metaculture]] is understood. The only important point is that a scientific [[creation story]] exists and conforms to the [[laws of physics]].

	{{#ev:youtube\|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzhIfN4UQv8\|\|center\|\|frame}}		{{#ev:youtube\|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzhIfN4UQv8\|\|center\|\|frame}}

Fractalguy at 15:32, 30 December 2023

2023-12-30T15:32:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:32, 30 December 2023
Line 2:		Line 2:

	As our understanding of the early moments of the universe evolves, the specifics of whether all matter was concentrated in a single point that exploded into an expanding universe, or if arose spontaneously across an infinite empty space, or any other theory that agrees with the observable data, makes no difference in how [[metaculture]] is understood. The only important point is that a scientific [[creation story]] exists and conforms to the [[laws of physics]].		As our understanding of the early moments of the universe evolves, the specifics of whether all matter was concentrated in a single point that exploded into an expanding universe, or if arose spontaneously across an infinite empty space, or any other theory that agrees with the observable data, makes no difference in how [[metaculture]] is understood. The only important point is that a scientific [[creation story]] exists and conforms to the [[laws of physics]].

			{{#ev:youtube\|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzhIfN4UQv8\|\|center\|\|frame}}

Fractalguy at 18:00, 23 June 2023

2023-06-23T18:00:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:00, 23 June 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	References to the [[big bang]] refer not necessarily to the original [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang big bang theory] but rather our latest, best understanding of the origins of the universe.		References to the [[big bang]] refer not necessarily to the original [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang big bang theory] but rather our latest, best understanding of the origins of the [[universe]] according to [[science]], regardless of what form it takes.

	As our understanding of the early moments of the universe evolves, the specifics of whether all matter was concentrated in a single point that exploded into an expanding universe, or if arose spontaneously across an infinite empty space, or any other theory that agrees with the observable data, makes no difference in how [[metaculture]] is understood. The only important point is that a scientific [[creation story]] exists and conforms to the laws of physics.		As our understanding of the early moments of the universe evolves, the specifics of whether all matter was concentrated in a single point that exploded into an expanding universe, or if arose spontaneously across an infinite empty space, or any other theory that agrees with the observable data, makes no difference in how [[metaculture]] is understood. The only important point is that a scientific [[creation story]] exists and conforms to the [[laws of physics]].

Fractalguy: Created page with "References to the big bang refer not necessarily to the original [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang big bang theory] but rather our latest, best understanding of the..."

2023-06-22T04:58:31Z

Created page with "References to the big bang refer not necessarily to the original [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang big bang theory] but rather our latest, best understanding of the..."

New page

References to the [[big bang]] refer not necessarily to the original [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang big bang theory] but rather our latest, best understanding of the origins of the universe.

As our understanding of the early moments of the universe evolves, the specifics of whether all matter was concentrated in a single point that exploded into an expanding universe, or if arose spontaneously across an infinite empty space, or any other theory that agrees with the observable data, makes no difference in how [[metaculture]] is understood. The only important point is that a scientific [[creation story]] exists and conforms to the laws of physics.