MediaWiki API result

{
    "batchcomplete": "",
    "continue": {
        "gapcontinue": "Recursion",
        "continue": "gapcontinue||"
    },
    "warnings": {
        "main": {
            "*": "Subscribe to the mediawiki-api-announce mailing list at <https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/mediawiki-api-announce.lists.wikimedia.org/> for notice of API deprecations and breaking changes."
        },
        "revisions": {
            "*": "Because \"rvslots\" was not specified, a legacy format has been used for the output. This format is deprecated, and in the future the new format will always be used."
        }
    },
    "query": {
        "pages": {
            "159": {
                "pageid": 159,
                "ns": 0,
                "title": "Reading List",
                "revisions": [
                    {
                        "contentformat": "text/x-wiki",
                        "contentmodel": "wikitext",
                        "*": "[[File:Godel-escher-bach-eternal-golden-braid-douglas-hofstadter.jpg|thumb|300x300px|[[G\u00f6del|Just read this if you haven't already.]]]]\nA comprehensive list of books that apply to all of the subjects discussed on this [[wiki]] would be impossible. That's called a Library.\n\nHowever, [https://www.goodreads.com/review/list/175313676?shelf=metaculture this Goodreads Shelf] lists the ones that contributed most significantly to the [[Belief System|belief system]] described here. The top 42 on the list could be considered the [[necessary prerequisites]], but really as long as you read a few books from each of the main categories described on the [[webinar series]] page you should get enough background [[information]] and ideas to serve as a foundation.\n\nA Bachelor of Science with several elective courses in [[philosophy]] and [[psychology]] is also a solid foundation. However, if that was not your [[education]], it is still possible to fill in the gaps with good books.\n\nNot a reader? The [[Podcast]] page conveys many of the same ideas in a format you can consume while driving or working out.\n\nIt is safe to assume that the key ideas discussed in these books have been considered and assimilated into the body of work contained in this [[wiki]].\n\nWhile many very good fiction books are not included, a few that contribute significantly to modern [[philosophical]] discourse have been. [[Science]] fiction is especially adept at exploring the [[ethical]] implications of [[Technology|technological]] advancement in a way that non-fiction writers cannot, due to the necessity of wild speculation about the distant [[future]].\n\n<iframe key=\"reads\" level=\"www\" path=\"goodreads-metaculture.html\" frameborder=\"0\" id=\"iframewin\" width=\"100%\" height=\"600\"></iframe>"
                    }
                ]
            },
            "194": {
                "pageid": 194,
                "ns": 0,
                "title": "Reality",
                "revisions": [
                    {
                        "contentformat": "text/x-wiki",
                        "contentmodel": "wikitext",
                        "*": "[[File:Reality-consciousness-subjectivity.jpg|thumb|[[Simulation Theory|It's not a simulation]]]]\n[[metaculture]] assumes the truth of [[wikipedia:Philosophical_realism|philosophical realism]], or more specifically [[wikipedia:Scientific_realism|scientific realism]]. The reasons for this are:\n\n* No counter-example has ever been found to disprove the existence of an independent reality that conforms to the [[laws of physics]].\n* Alternative theories of reality assert the unverifiable, like [[Simulation Theory|simulations]], [[supernatural]] or [[wikipedia:Extra_dimensions|extradimensional]] beings that cannot be observed within the [[material]] [[universe]].\n* You eventually have to [[The Gambler|bet on which reality is most likely]]. That we live together in a [[universe]] that exists independently of us and conforms to the [[laws of physics]], or we live in a [[simulation]] or a [[Literalism|literal]] interpretation of [[scripture]] or some unknowable and eternally confusing plane of existence that is completely [[subjective]].\n\nGiven these options, [[The Gambler|the safest bet]] is obviously [[wikipedia:Scientific_realism|scientific realism]].\n\n[[wikipedia:Reality|Reality]] is real. [[Evidence-Based Best Practices|Now deal]].\n\n{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3DlhNgeqZk||center|What is Scientific Realism?|frame}}\n<br>\n{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQN3RH_xWJg||center|Tame Impala - Reality in Motion|frame}}"
                    }
                ]
            }
        }
    }
}