metawiki - User contributions [en]

Abortion

2026-04-08T12:07:49Z

Fractalguy:

[[File:Abortion-pro-choice-quality-versus-quantity-ethics-morality.jpg|thumb|[[Quality of life versus quantity of life|Quality of Life]] addresses fundamental issues that [[Freedom]] of Choice does not]]

Which side of the abortion argument you fall comes down to a fundamental point of view on what is the most important [[moral]] objective. This can be boiled down to [[quality of life versus quantity of life]] and is discussed in detail on that page.<blockquote>''"If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament."'' -[[wikipedia:Florynce_Kennedy|Florynce Kennedy]]</blockquote>Since [[Quality of Life]] and [[happiness]] are the highest [[moral]] objective, the [[happiness]] of the living must take priority over that of [[Theoretical people|theoretical future humans]]. When you factor in the fact that personal [[freedom]] is a key component of [[happiness]], there is a strong [[utilitarian]] argument in favor of personal choice.

== Definition of Life ==

Anti-abortion arguments hinge on a debatable technical definition of human life, combined with the [[moral trump card]] of "thou shalt not kill". This is despite the many other exceptions they often make to that rule, such as the [[death penalty]] and [[war]]. The prohibition against murder in [[religion]] is often interpreted as applying only to members of the [[in-group]]. It's easier to accept a blameless fetus as a member of your [[community]] than it is a [[Death penalty|murderer]] or a foreigner.

== Can You Kill Someone Who is Inside You Without Your Permission? ==

Let's assume that [[life]] does begin at conception. When are you allowed to take a [[life]] [[legally]]?

Most people would agree that if someone is forcing themselves on you, putting parts of their body inside of you without your consent, you have the right to use deadly force in self-defense. At the very least, you have the right to remove their body parts from your body.

If an unwanted fetus is a living human that has full rights to [[life]] like any other person, it is still a separate person who is inside your body without permission. You have the right to remove the body of any person who is inside you without permission. Abortion should be [[legal]] due to the [[wikipedia:Castle_doctrine|castle doctrine]]. Even if abortion is [[murder]], it is justified by self-defense. To support the [[wikipedia:Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution|second amendment]] and oppose abortion rights is hypocritical. Either you have the right to defend yourself or you don't.

== Abortion Videos ==

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eR2tI7Irfdo||center|Pro-Life Pastor's Sermon on Abortion|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZ4mZVEhmaU||center|The Ethics of Abortion|frame}}

== Abortion Music ==

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxQwEnD-Phc||center|The New Haven Women's Liberation Rock Band - Abortion Song|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_khxS2tOWX0||center|Black Uhuru - Abortion|frame}}

Abortion

2026-04-08T11:57:21Z

Fractalguy:

[[File:Abortion-pro-choice-quality-versus-quantity-ethics-morality.jpg|thumb|[[Quality of life versus quantity of life|Quality of Life]] addresses fundamental issues that [[Freedom]] of Choice does not]]

Which side of the abortion argument you fall comes down to a fundamental point of view on what is the most important [[moral]] objective. This can be boiled down to [[quality of life versus quantity of life]] and is discussed in detail on that page.<blockquote>''"If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament."'' -[[wikipedia:Florynce_Kennedy|Florynce Kennedy]]</blockquote>Since [[Quality of Life]] and [[happiness]] are the highest [[moral]] objective, the [[happiness]] of the living must take priority over that of [[Theoretical people|theoretical future humans]]. When you factor in the fact that personal [[freedom]] is a key component of [[happiness]], there is a strong [[utilitarian]] argument in favor of personal choice.

== Definition of Life ==

Anti-abortion arguments hinge on a debatable technical definition of human life, combined with the [[moral trump card]] of "thou shalt not kill". This is despite the many other exceptions they often make to that rule, such as the [[death penalty]] and [[war]]. The prohibition against murder in [[religion]] is often interpreted as applying only to members of the [[in-group]]. It's easier to accept a blameless fetus as a member of your [[community]] than it is a [[Death penalty|murderer]] or a foreigner.

== Are You Allowed to Murder Someone Who is Inside You Without Your Permission? ==

Let's assume that [[life]] does begin at conception. When are you allowed to take a [[life]] [[legally]]?

== Abortion Videos ==

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eR2tI7Irfdo||center|Pro-Life Pastor's Sermon on Abortion|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZ4mZVEhmaU||center|The Ethics of Abortion|frame}}

== Abortion Music ==

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxQwEnD-Phc||center|The New Haven Women's Liberation Rock Band - Abortion Song|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_khxS2tOWX0||center|Black Uhuru - Abortion|frame}}

Universal health care

2026-04-08T11:54:06Z

Fractalguy:

[[File:Universal-healthcare-medicare-for-all-socialized-medicine.jpg|thumb|If you would consider taking a rideshare instead of an ambulance, your healthcare system is broken.]]
[[wikipedia:Universal_health_care|Universal Health Care]] has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to be the [[best practice]] for delivering robust health care to the [[Utilitarian|most people]] for the lowest cost. Virtually every metric, from cost, to health outcomes, to patient satisfaction, universal health care systems outperform private ones for all but the [[Money|richest]] people.<blockquote>''"If the goal of health-care reform is to provide comprehensive, [[universal]] health care in a cost-effective way, the only [[Honesty|honest]] approach is a single-payer approach."'' -[[wikipedia:Bernie_Sanders|Bernie Sanders]]</blockquote>
[[File:Socialized-medicine-is-terrifying-i-have-no-freedom.jpeg|right|frameless|300x300px]]
In a poor [[society]] it may not be practical to deliver universal health care when the basic infrastructure is not yet there. But once a certain level of [[wealth]] is obtained, health care shifts from a luxury to a necessity. And the [[injustice]] of having people go without basic care when a [[society]] has more than enough [[wealth]] to provide it becomes scandalous, especially if it ends up spending even more [[money]] per capita than countries that do cover [[everyone]].

Health [[misinformation]] is another huge [[Problems|problem]]. [https://www.sirishealth.org/ Siris Health] is a nonprofit dedicated to working with experts to provide curated, verified health [[information]] from healthcare experts to combat [[pseudoscience]] and promote [[education]].

[https://www.wi-phi.com/modules/bioethics/ The Bioethics module on Wi-Phi] offers a free course in the [[ethics]] of health care policy, [[euthanasia]] and [[abortion]], medical research, and biomedical enhancement.
[[File:Capitalists-should-never-be-allowed-near-a-healthcare-system.png|center|frameless|600x600px]]

[https://hiddenbrain.org/podcast/the-fee-for-service-monster/ Hidden Brain - The Fee-for-Service Monster]

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfsJXo1h1G0||center|What experts say about who has the world's best healthcare|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJ4TQ9q8rPc||center|Sicko (full movie)|frame}}
 
The fact that we don't have universal health care leads many people to turn to [[grifters]] and [[conspiracy theories]] to explain why our health is so poor.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTpf1QdgnDE||center|You Might Have Already Fallen for MAHA’s Conspiracy Theories|frame}}

== Music is Universal Health Care for the Soul ==
Thanks to the [[placebo effect]]!{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbXXocMUBxA||center|Ben Folds Five - Hospital Song|frame}}

In-group

2026-03-30T04:23:38Z

Fractalguy: /* No One is an Enemy */

[[File:The-Universal-In-Group.png|thumb|[[AI]] is inclusive of three-armed people as well]]There is a natural tendency for humans to define themselves in terms of [[wikipedia:In-group_and_out-group|in-groups and outsiders]].

This makes sense from an [[evolutionary]] perspective, but in a globally connected society it can lead to chaos. There are so many overlapping in-groups that cross all national and cultural borders that attempting to define them in any way creates tons of exceptions.

== The Cosmic Perspective ==
In his [https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mind-in-the-machine/202006/could-cosmic-religion-unite-divided-nation article in Psychology Today], [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/59093393-the-romance-of-reality Bobby Azarian] outlines what he calls "[https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mind-in-the-machine/202006/could-cosmic-religion-unite-divided-nation The Cosmic Perspective]" and why it is central to solving the major existential [[problems]] humanity faces.<blockquote>''"The real existential threats are income inequality, the pandemic, [[climate change]], unconstrained [[AI|A.I.]], and [[money]]’s influence in [[media]] and [[politics]]—these are things that threaten the entire human race. We need a [[worldview]] that aligns our interests because if it has immediate practical benefits, like financial benefits, people in need will adopt it. We may call this [[worldview]] that I am describing “the Cosmic [[Perspective]].” Under the Cosmic [[Perspective]], there is no “us versus them,” there’s only “we.” We’re all part of an interdependent [[Holistic|whole]], and we need leaders who understand this view—who [[Evidence-Based Best Practices|make decisions and policy based on data]], who put [[Science|empiricism]] above rigid [[ideology]] and [[dogma]], and who try to achieve the [[Utilitarian|greatest good for the greatest number of people]]."'' </blockquote>The [[metaculture]] [[wiki]] is an attempt to describe this cosmic [[perspective]] in order to disintegrate the boundaries between us an them, and provide a [[universal]] values based framework for unity.

== Foundation in Loyalty ==
The [[wikipedia:Moral_foundations_theory|moral foundations]] of loyalty and [[care]], are the primary drivers of in-group affinity. We want to help others, and we are loyal to those who have shown [[altruism]] to us. Shifting loyalties in [[culture]] have led to conflicts, where some emphasize loyalty to [[family]], [[community]], and [[tradition]], while others are more loyal to their principles of social [[justice]] and inclusivity, their chosen [[friends]], personal [[freedom]] and the pursuit of [[happiness]]. This represents a fundamental shift from local, [[community]]-focused group identities to a more expansive, [[universalist]] loyalty to [[human rights]]. While this is a laudable view of [[humanist]] [[ethical]] responsibility, when [[progressives]] regularly abandon the [[families]] and [[communities]] of their birth, their expanded sense of loyalty to humanity is cold comfort.

It is possible to be loyal to [[family]], [[community]], and [[universal]] [[humanist]] [[values]] at the same time, and finding a way to make that clear will be [[necessary]] for [[secular]], [[progressive]] values to appeal to all of our [[wikipedia:Moral_foundations_theory|moral foundations]].
[[File:Us-versus-them.png|center|frameless|600x600px]]

== Creating the Universal In-Group ==

The only morally defensible in-group when it comes to the [[utilitarian]] [[ethical]] calculus is all humans, and outside the realm of survival that should be expanded to also include all [[conscious]] beings, and all living things. Any [[hierarchical]] subdivision is inherently [[Justice|unjust]].

A primary goal of [[metaculture]] is to establish the [[Universalist|common source of our shared humanity]] in order to [[Culturally neutral|bridge the gaps between cultures]] and allow for the creation of a ''universal in-group''. This is what will enable us to finally get on the same page and work together to solve problems that face us on a global scale. [[Climate change]] and [[overpopulation]] leading us towards [[environmental]] collapse is the most pressing, though a future asteroid or alien invasion will also be easier to confront as a unified species.

[[Religion]] has been the primary way that humans have defined their in-groups and out-groups since the dawn of civilization. This is unlikely to change soon. Therefore, a [[universalist]] movement will be necessary to create a universal in-group. And since humans have an innate sense of [[logic]] and [[reason]], it will also need to adhere fully to the evidence revealed by [[science]]. Only a movement that fully embraces both will have a chance at creating a universal in-group.

== Ideological Differences in the Expanse of the Moral Circle ==
This oft-misinterpreted study in Nature called [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12227-0 Ideological Differences in the Expanse of the Moral Circle] provides [[evidence]] that shows [[progressives]] tend to have a more expanded "[[wikipedia:Moral_circle_expansion|moral circle]]" than [[conservatives]]. This result has been used to slander [[progressives]] as caring more about [[nature]] than [[family]], and to make typical accusations of [[wikipedia:Tribalism|tribalism]] and [[racism]] towards [[conservatives]]. [https://bigthink.com/strange-maps/moral-circles-heat-map/][https://www.patheos.com/blogs/scienceonreligion/2019/10/conservatives-have-smaller-moral-circles-than-progressives/]
[[File:Moral-circles-heatmap.png|center|thumb|600x600px|The infamous moral circles heatmap image]]
It is more correct to say that the expanded moral circle is a by-product of exposure and learning. If you lack the [[prerequisite]] knowledge or experience with other [[cultures]], or have had bad experiences and [[education]] that reinforced negative stereotypes, it is much harder to include those groups in your moral circle. When you have a [[scarcity]] mindset, you prioritize those closest to you much more highly in your [[hierarchy]] of values.

If someone never learned algebra, would we call their inability to solve for x a [[moral]] failing? In the modern world, we need an [[education]] that teaches us what we need to know to thrive in a modern world. This includes algebra, and it includes the understanding that we live in a post-[[scarcity]] world where all people can be treated with dignity and rights without sacrificing the [[happiness]] of our loved ones. We also live in an interconnected world, where we depend on every aspect of our [[environment]] and [[nature]] thrive. These are [[truths]] about the world that the [[brain]] cannot understand without learning them from somewhere. Blame the system for the fact that so many have not been exposed to these [[ideas]].

Even those [[progressives]] that have embraced the [[wonder]] of the [[universe]] and [[love]] of all the interconnected things can still use some practice when it comes to [[Love|loving]] your enemy, especially on [[social media]]. There is always a bigger moral circle to be embraced.

In that spirit, we can also see the differences in moral circles as a matter of [[perspective]] and priority. We know that [[conservative]] thinking is more [[hierarchical]], so they naturally focus more on the fact that their inner circles as their highest priority. [[Progressives]] also prioritize their [[families]] over the rest of the [[universe]], but they also know that every human is equally deserving of [[moral]] consideration, and focus on this fact when answering survey questions. If push came to shove, of course they would likewise prioritize their close relations. But they recognize we live in an interconnected, post-[[scarcity]] world. The greater good is now best served by focusing on humanity [[holistically]], including its relationship to the [[environment]].

== Anything Less is Immoral ==
Any definition of in-group that is not [[universal]] is inherently immoral. As soon as you define an out-group that is less deserving of [[ethical]] consideration than the members of the in-group, you have laid the groundwork to justify [[hate]], [[racism]], [[misogyny]], [[war]], and every other manner of injustice. That kind of nonsense may have made sense when we were mostly separated by geography and resources were [[scarce]], but in an era of [[Connections|interconnected]] [[abundance]] it is [[necessary]] to expand our [[moral]] circle.

=== Basis in Cognitive and Moral Development Theory ===
The expansion of our zone of [[empathy]] (those who we consider part of our in-group and hence worthy of [[trust]] and [[altruism]]) is the key metric for cognitive, [[emotional]], and [[ethical]] growth according to every [[wikipedia:Cognitive_development|cognitive development]] theory in [[psychology]].

See the [[Necessary Prerequisite|Necessary Prerequisites]] page for more on these theories.

=== We Can Still Have Teams ===
Of course, we can still use the dynamics of [[wikipedia:Group_dynamics|group psychology]] to our advantage, as we do in competitive sporting events. The universal in-group applies specifically to [[ethical]] and [[moral]] questions around [[justice]] and [[equality]].

=== Enabled By The Post-Scarcity Economy ===
The ability to think this way is a product of the [[wikipedia:Post-scarcity|post-scarcity]] [[economy]]. When the resources needed for survival are scarce, our genetic tendencies cause us to prefer the needs of our closer in-groups like nation, [[community]] or tribe, and [[family]]. This makes sense from the perspective of [[wikipedia:Evolutionary_psychology|evolutionary psychology]], since our close relatives and neighbors share more of our DNA than those in foreign nations.

In an [[economic]] [[environment]] where everyone's basic needs can easily be met, it is our moral imperative to make sure that they are met ''for'' ''everyone''. For any individual, [[family]], or group to hoard wealth and resources while others starve is plainly immoral. This was not the case in the past, when [[war]] and famine were rampant and the [[technology]] to consistently provide enough [[food]] for everyone did not exist. This is why anti-[[racism]] is a distinctly modern phenomenon.

We need to adapt to the new, global, post-scarcity [[future]] that we now live in, and change our [[utilitarian]] moral calculus and the resulting [[social norms]] accordingly.

=== A Primary Cognitive Development Goal ===
The [[Necessary Prerequisite|necessary prerequisites]] page describes how many [[moral]] and [[wikipedia:Cognitive_development|cognitive development]] models use the expansion of in-group identity from the self, to the family, tribe, nation, humanity, [[conscious]] creatures, [[life]], the [[universe]], and [[everything]] as a primary metric for growth and [[enlightenment]]. This represents the [[Brains|brain's]] process of generalization that occurs during learning, since we are learning to [[love]] humanity, the [[universe]], and therefore ourselves in the process.

== No One is an Enemy ==
[[File:Us-versus-them-quote.jpg|right|frameless|321x321px]]
The Christian [[doctrine]] of [[wikipedia:Luke_6#Love_thy_enemies_(6:27%E2%80%9336)|love thy enemies]] is central to the teachings of [[wikipedia:Jesus|Jesus]], as well as the [[historical]] figures we epitomize for their [[Enlightenment|enlightened]] [[morality]], such as [[wikipedia:Mahatma_Gandhi|Ghandi]], [[wikipedia:Nelson_Mandela|Nelson Mandela]], the [[wikipedia:Dalai_Lama|Dalai Lama]], and [[wikipedia:Martin_Luther_King_Jr.|Martin Luthor King]]. Each of these figures [[wikipedia:Turning_the_other_cheek|turned the other cheek]] by leading non-violent resistance to violent forces of oppression, winning the hearts and minds of the public and easily claiming the moral high ground for their causes.

=== Enemy is Thoughtcrime ===
What do we gain from the concept of an enemy? Even if we [[love]] them, the very concept of an enemy implies the existence of an out-group, which is an immoral [[belief]].

In order to reinforce the notion of a universal in-group, the word ''enemy'' itself should be banished from the lexicon. It should never be used to refer to any human or group of humans, regardless of how reprehensible their actions may be. We must oppose those actions, and work to change the systems that [[incentivized]] them, but we cannot blame those whose [[free will]] was undermined by a crappy system.

Calling it [[wikipedia:Thoughtcrime|thoughtcrime]] is a tongue-in-cheek reference. You must [[Free will|choose]] to not use this term, and show others the benefits of doing so. It cannot be imposed by [[authority]]. That would be like telling you not to think about elephants right now. Do it. Stop thinking about elephants.

=== Dehumanization ===
When we label a group as an enemy, it is the first step towards [[wikipedia:Dehumanization|dehumanization]] on the path to [[genocide]]. Calling a group of people vermin or cockroaches is [[taboo]]. Enemy should be too.

It is an appeal to [[Emotion|emotions]] instead of [[reason]], and not any of the good ones.

It reinforces the "us versus them" mentality that keeps humanity from uniting and living out the Star Trek dream of uniting not just our planet, but Vulcan, Andoria, Tellar, and others too. No intelligent life form should be excluded!

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OR2tkKtUyTo||center|Who Counts as Human?|frame}}

=== Enemies Make Cruelty Fun ===
It's often said that "[https://substack.com/home/post/p-157717113 the cruelty is the point]" when it comes to [[fascism]]. When we are threatened by an enemy, the [[empathy]] reaction is reversed and we now take [[pleasure]] from inflicting [[Suffering|pain]] on them. It's the [[emotion]] you feel when the hero kills the bad guy at the end of the movie. Research shows that the [[love]] hormone oxytocin is also responsible for this [[hate]] reaction. [https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/the-imprinted-brain/201610/the-dark-side-of-oxytocin][https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-love-hate-relationship/][https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/natured-nurture/202305/the-love-hormone-promotes-aggression-too]

When you designate someone an enemy who is not actively engaging in physical [[violence]] against you, you only lay the groundwork for justifying an unprovoked attack on them. When [[misinformation]] is used to make an enemy of the less fortunate, you're seeing the [[fascist]] playbook at work.

=== Addiction to Revenge ===
The revenge fantasy is [[addictive]], just like any activity that gives us pleasure. When we inflict harm against those who have harmed us, our [[brains]] reward us. This makes sense from an [[evolutionary]] perspective, since it would obviously help any tribe that needs to fend off attackers, and helps regulate the behaviors of members. In modern [[society]], we subcontract revenge to the [[legal]] process.

This discussion with revenge expert James Kimmel Jr. is a fascinating look at the [[psychology]] of revenge, how we can become [[addicted]] to it both personally and [[Culture|culturally]], and how [[forgiveness]] is the cure.

{{#ev:youtube|https://youtu.be/zMWAL6UzFxo||center|James Kimmel Jr. (revenge and forgiveness expert)|frame}}

=== Rehumanization ===
This conversation examines ways we can rehumanize the enemy and resolve ongoing conflicts based on deep [[historical]] wounds.{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HY0lRBftR5A||center|Is it possible to rehumanize the enemy?|frame}}

== Seeking Commonalities in Conversations ==

Most online [[Persuasion|discourse]], especially that of the [[political]] or [[religious]] variety, takes on a [[confrontational]] tone. We tend to read other people's writing with an eye for differences between their ideas and our own, then take to the comments to defend our ideas against the perceived attack. This becomes a natural impediment to building bridges and creating that universal in-group.

This can be counteracted with [[mindful]] reading. Instead of picking apart an argument and exposing its flaws, focus on the parts where you agree. Assume that the other person isn't an idiot, and possesses thoughts and knowledge beyond the few sentences you have read. If they are [[trolling]], ignore them. But if someone is willing to engage in conversation with you, and your goal is to build bridges, then it helps to give people the benefit of the doubt and focus the conversation on your common ground.

The [[Persuasion]] page covers this topic in detail.

== Enforcement of Norms ==

Enforcement of [[cultural]] norms through [[taboos]] is only effective within one's in-group. A global [[culture]] with a [[universal]] in-group will enable humanity to share and enforce [[Justice|non-legally binding]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_norm social norms] that will be needed to prevent bad actors, such as spreaders of [[misinformation]], from gaining influence on [[social media]] and other globally connected [[platforms]].

The most prominent modern example of evolving [[Social norms|social norm]] enforcement is [[cancel culture]]. While this has helped advance the causes of inclusivity and helped made [[racism]] and [[misogyny]] more [[taboo]], it also tends to only work on members of the in-group that is doing the cancelling. How many minor celebrities were canceled by [[Progressive|liberals]] in the media, only to be embraced by [[conservatives]]? Without the universal in-group, [[cancel culture]] tends to promote polarization and [[contrarian]] reactions as much as it reinforces the values of inclusivity.

Norm enforcement must also be [[fair]]. When it seems like people are being libeled unfairly, the [[trust]] in the [[taboo]] breaks down, and once again you encourage polarization over consensus.

It is necessary that a supermajority of people agree on the [[Cultural norms|norms]] being enforced and a [[fair]] system for applying them before they can be effective at reinforcing new [[cultural]] values instead of being a wedge that reinforces sectarianism.

== Universalist Strategies ==

The entire [[philosophy]] of [[metaculture]] is designed to encourage a mindset of unity and oneness, and to resist polarization and conflict. It uses an integrated, [[holistic]] strategy to bridging the divides between people and constructs its narrative around that goal. Even the [[wiki]] platform was chosen for its ability to allow the message to be translated to multiple [[languages]] or even presented differently for different [[generations]], [[religions]], or subcultures, in order to maximize its [[meaning]] to each reader.

Other strategies employed to reinforce the message of unity and the creation of the universal in-group include:

* [[Science]] and [[Evidence-Based Best Practices|evidence]] are the basis for all [[beliefs]]. No unprovable assertions are made.
* Finding common [[Goal|goals]] is used as the primary [[Persuasion|rhetorical]] strategy.
* Tries to provide [[something for everyone]] when addressing core values.
* Uses [[metaphor mapping]] to reinforce core beliefs instead of denying them.
* Focuses on [[holistic]] values and [[universal]] [[beliefs]] without taking positions on uncertain and polarizing issues unless the [[Evidence-Based Best Practices|evidence]] is overwhelming.

== Us Bias ==

We are inherently biased towards our in-group, preventing us from objective critical analysis of statements made by others within our in-group. This has been a major factor in the spread of [[misinformation]] on [[social media]].

In-group favoritism, as opposed to [[racism]], [[Misogyny|sexism]], and other forms of out-group hostility, is the most likely explanation for biases in hiring, club membership, and other admissions-based [[institutions]].[https://www.washington.edu/news/2014/05/19/favoritism-not-hostility-causes-most-discrimination-says-uw-psychology-professor/][https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749597802005381][https://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=149053]

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_MqKZxQjMI||center|In-group Bias|frame}}

== Them Bias ==

Defining an in-group necessitates defining an out-group, which if not ignored is usually considered an "enemy" or rival to be [[Contrarian|opposed]] at any opportunity. This can lead people away from critical thinking and towards [[contrarianism]].

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZMKhZE5SeM||center|Out-group Bias|frame}}

== The Paradox of Tolerance ==

[[wikipedia:Karl_Popper|Karl Popper's]] [[wikipedia:Paradox_of_tolerance|Paradox of Tolerance]] is an important related concept. If we are too tolerant of intolerance, it can erode the basis for a [[Freedom|free]] [[society]]. We must find a balance between allowing [[Freedom of Speech|freedom of speech]], and the [[freedom]] do pursue [[happiness]] in any form, while preventing the spread of [[concepts]] that are inherently destructive.
[[File:Paradox-of-tolerance-infographic.png|center|frameless|750x750px]]
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwQZvZgZV-A||center|Toleration (How Tolerant Should A Society Be?)|frame}}

== Coalition Building Versus Purity Testing ==
When you consider who might be an ally to your cause, do you focus on finding common ground or identifying unacceptable differences?

When you look at the mainstream [[political]] pundits, how many would fit your definition of an ally?

Rigid [[ideologies]] demand purity. Movements demand coalitions.

One way to avoid the [[wikipedia:No_true_Scotsman|No True Scotsman]] fallacy is to consider your [[ideology]] from the [[perspective]] of what amount of agreement do you need to have to consider someone an ally. For example, if you [[believe]] that workers should have full [[Communism|ownership of the means of production]], would you consider someone an ally if they are a [[capitalist]] but [[believe]] in adopting [[universal health care]]? This is a policy with proven efficacy and broad public support. But, if you go around calling these allies "[[wikt:shitlib|shitlibs]]" all the time, you aren't going to get enough [[political]] will to even get that done.

Nurture your coalitions, build up your allies, and achieve your common goals first. Only once that [[progress]] has been made should you consider new goals. You can get broad agreement on what to do next; many fewer will agree on what comes after, and fewer still each step beyond that. See [[Utopia]].

== Readers and Watchers ==

Are you a [[Reading List|reader]] or a watcher? Whatever your in-group we have you covered!

Check out [https://righteousmind.com/ The Righteous Mind] by [https://jonathanhaidt.com/ Jonathan Haidt] for some great insights from the latest social [[psychology]] research into polarization and how to counteract it.

Check out the [[Hidden Brain|US 2.0 series on Hidden Brain]] for one of the best analyses of how to use the [[psychology]] of [[persuasion]] and in-group bias to resolve polarization and help create the universal in-group. Also:

* [https://hiddenbrain.org/podcast/when-you-need-it-to-be-true/ When You Need It To Be True]
* [https://hiddenbrain.org/podcast/separating-yourself-from-the-pack/ Separating Yourself from the Pack]
* [https://hiddenbrain.org/podcast/group-think/ Group Think]
* [https://hiddenbrain.org/podcast/the-secret-to-great-teams/ The Secret to Great Teams]
* [https://armchairexpertpod.com/pods/keith-payne Keith Payne on the Psychology of the Political Divide]
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkYJOYrNiSw||center|Ethics Defined - Ingroup and Outgroup|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i26qYYQgvkM||center|Updbeat Atheist - The 99|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H58vbez_m4E||center|Kendrick Lamar - Not Like Us|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYAYn7pyues||center||frame}}

Consciousness

2026-03-17T16:20:43Z

Fractalguy: /* Can Thinking Exist Without Doing? */

[[File:Consciousness-Mind-Brain-Panpsychism.jpeg|thumb|A not-quite-conscious [[AI]] thinking of consciousness]]
This page offers a simple, direct explanation of consciousness based on [[Gödel|Hofstadter's "strange loop" theory described in Gödel, Escher, Bach]]. <blockquote>''"I need one of those baby monitors from my subconscious to my consciousness so I can know what the hell I'm really thinking about."'' -[[wikipedia:Steven_Wright|Steven Wright]]</blockquote>Some simple [[metaphors]] are used to help visualize different states of consciousness, and how the components of consciousness build on each other to create our [[subjective]] experience. The actual workings of the [[brain]] are far more complex than what is described here, but thinking about consciousness in these terms will make the [[wikipedia:Hard_problem_of_consciousness|hard problem of consciousness]] seem a lot easier.

== What Is Consciousness ==

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness Consciousness] arises from a [[feedback loop]] between our senses and our memories that generates images, dialog, and feelings in a never-ending internal [[Newsfeed|feed]]. It can be thought of as our memories stimulating our senses to produce echoes of the original stimuli that imprinted them. We literally hear ourselves think.

Our [[subjective]] experience is the mix of inputs from all of our senses, mixed with the words, images, [[emotions]], and other associations being triggered by our memory. Consciousness is like a projection screen that has all five senses projected onto it from two separate projectors. One projector has a powerful bulb and plays [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cin%C3%A9ma_v%C3%A9rit%C3%A9 Cinéma vérité], while the other projector has a weak bulb and plays [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_New_Wave French New Wave] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federico_Fellini Fellini] movies. [[Psychedelics]] significantly increase the wattage of the second projector.

We are that screen. Experiencing the [[universe]] as we experience ourselves. [[Time|Existing only in the present moment]], just as the [[universe]] does. ''Consciousness is an observer of the present moment'', connected to a [[neural network]] memory bank via [[feedback loop]].

To put it another way, [[objective]] [[reality]] is out there doing its thing while you watch, and your [[brain]] is doing its thing trying to interpret [[reality]] and come up with a [[Free will|course of action]] that will lead to [[happiness]], and your consciousness is just there watching it all play out and experiencing the [[subjective]] effects of the learning process.

[[File:Memory-Feedback-Loop.jpg]]

Our consciousness uses our memories and training to process new data from our external senses and create output to our motor [[neurons]] that determine how we interact with the [[universe]]. This can be idle processing like daydreaming, or active processing like weighing pros and cons to make an important decision. In both cases the [[feedback loop]] is used to simulate new responses to stimuli and evaluate the expected outcome.

As the diagram shows, there are multiple [[feedback]] loops involved, connecting short term and long term memory, memory and consciousness, and memory and motor neurons to facilitate training. But for simplicity we'll just refer to all of it as "processing".

The states of consciousness we experience depend on the interaction of these three steps in the stimulus/response cycle.

'''Input''' (senses, stimulus) -> '''Processing''' (memory/thought loop) -> '''Output''' (muscles, response).

While this is a simplified model, it can be very helpful for those without extensive education in [[psychology]] to understand the relationship between the physical [[brain]] and our [[subjective]] experiences. Another way to think about it is:

'''Senses + [[Neural network|Memory]] + A Body + The [[Feedback Loop]] = Consciousness'''

It doesn't matter what form these components take (biological, digital, other). Consciousness comes from the combination of all four components acting in real-time.

=== Integrated Information Theory and Global Workspace Theory ===
The latest theories of consciousness to get serious consideration are [https://www.quantamagazine.org/neuroscience-readies-for-a-showdown-over-consciousness-ideas-20190306/ Integrated Information Theory and Global Workspace Theory]. There was a lot of buzz around these theories due to the Templeton Foundation's contest to see which one has the most predictive ability. However, these are simply two valid perspectives that capture pieces of what consciousness is, not a robust solution to the hard problem.

[[wikipedia:Integrated_information_theory|Integrated Information Theory]] is interesting because it offers a [[Benchmarks|benchmark]] for consciousness that allows for a spectrum that includes anything from basic life forms to human [[brains]] to [[artificial intelligence]]. However, it is often criticized for being overly broad, leading some to make inferences of panpsychism that are more metaphysical than scientific.

[[wikipedia:Global_workspace_theory|Global Workspace Theory]] suggests that consciousness is a "broadcast" mechanism that allows for top-down control of the [[neural network]] based on whatever our attention is focused on. It is more focused on how the activity in the conscious [[mind]] coordinates and controls the many subconscious processes operating in parallel inside the [[brain]].

Neither theory fully explains consciousness, but they can both help us see the big picture of what consciousness is.

Global Workspace Theory likely has things backwards regarding [[Subjective|experience]] and control. It suggests that conscious thought is able to exert control over the other systems in the [[brain]] and body. What is more likely the case is that consciousness is a reflection of the [[brain]]'s internal self-training mechanisms. For example, when you think to yourself "I'm hungry I should go get something to eat" your subconscious has already made the decision to head to the fridge, and you are simply becoming aware of that. Global Workspace Theory suggests that the thought is what initiates the action, but the reverse is more likely. This is probably why it didn't win the Templeton contest.

=== Other Theories of Consciousness ===
The above description attempts to summarize the mechanisms of consciousness in a way that can be digested by a non-psychologist.

Here are some links to articles that go into detail with some of the latest theories of consciousness to come from [[psychology]] and [[Neurophysiology|neuroscience]].

* [https://phys.org/news/2024-10-landscape-consciousness-neurophysiologist-diverse-theories.html A map of all theories of consciousness] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38281544/][https://closertotruth.com/news/a-landscape-of-consciousness-toward-a-taxonomy-of-explanations-and-implications/]
* [[wikipedia:Consciousness|Consciousness Wikipedia Page]]
* [https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/hot-thought/202406/explaining-the-nbc-theory-of-consciousness Explaining the NBC Theory of Consciousness]

== Desirable States of Consciousness ==

When considering the [[feedback loop]] that gives rise to conscious thought, it is helpful to examine the states of consciousness that circumvent the feedback loop and why we find them desirable.

=== Mindfulness ===

When we are [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindfulness mindful] and ''living in the moment'', we are able to turn off the [[feedback loop]] and simply experience the new sights, sounds, and sensations that are coming to us externally. It's all input without processing or output. It's turning off the Fellini movie that distracts you from enjoying that sunset or those moments with your family.

The practice of [[mindfulness]] also refers to intentionality and presence when performing any activity, which focuses the thought process on the task at hand ahead of time to maximize effectiveness and enjoyment in the moment. In this case processing is happening in advance so it doesn't need to be done in real time. This also helps in achieving ''flow''.

Mindfulness is desirable because it allows us to maximize our natural [[emotional]] responses to the present situation without being distracted by irrelevant or intrusive thoughts.<blockquote>I have learned to be still

I have learned that I don’t have to go anywhere

to find the center of the universe

Anything can be that center

-Opening to "[https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/thylias-moss-wannabe-hoochie-mama/ Wannabe Hoochie Mama Gallery of Realities’ Red Dress Code]"

by [[wikipedia:Thylias_Moss|Thylias Moss]]</blockquote>[https://hiddenbrain.org/podcast/seeking-serenity-part-1/ Hidden Brain - Seeking Serenity - Part 1] & [https://hiddenbrain.org/podcast/seeking-serenity-part-2/ Part 2]

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyiwVwwjFtQ||center|Introduction to Mindfulness|frame}}

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6T02g5hnT4||center|Why Mindfulness is a Superpower|frame}}

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7jH-5YQLcE||center|Aesop Rock - Mindful Solutionism|frame}}

=== Flow ===

Similar to mindfulness, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow_(psychology) flow] states are when we bypass the [[feedback loop]] and connect stimulus and response directly through well-worn neural pathways created by repetitive training. It's direct Input to Output without processing.

When performing simple flow tasks like driving and exercising, it is possible to engage the Input and Output via the flow state, while simultaneously Processing completely unrelated thoughts.

Flow is desirable because it puts our hard-earned training to work, and when you find that groove it feels really good. There are obvious [[evolutionary]] advantages to being really good at stuff. And if you've already developed optimal [[neural pathways]] there is no advantage to considering alternatives in the moment, which is all you get when you start thinking about what you are doing.

[https://www.openculture.com/2023/08/how-to-enter-flow-state-increase-your-ability-to-concentrate-and-let-your-ego-fall-away-an-animated-primer.html?utm_source=flipboard&utm_content=GerardPappa%2Fmagazine%2FWTF+2022 How to Enter the Flow State, Increase Your Ability to Concentrate, and Let Your Ego Fall Away]

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8h6IMYRoCZw||center|Flow by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi|frame}}

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znwUCNrjpD4||center|How to Enter the Flow State on Command|frame}}

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etviGf1uWlg||center|Dee Lite - Groove is in the Heart|frame}}

=== Deep Thought & Dreaming ===

Shutting off the Input and Output to concentrate exclusively on the [[feedback loop]] of conscious thought enables you to test alternative [[neural pathways]] in a safe environment before you connect them to an Output that could result in [[consequences]].

Or you can simply let the [[random]] connections between [[neurons]] take your train of thought wherever it wants to go--also known as daydreaming. This stimulates creative thought and forms novel [[neural pathways]] that can help us see things in new ways or solve problems we're not even focused on. [[Dreaming]] at night serves a similar purpose, one so important that our [[brains]] make it mandatory.

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-A8M3KmWZU Inner Cosmos - Why do we spend 1/3 of our lives asleep?]

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBby0RJw3Dc||center|What Happens to Your Brain When You Dream|frame}}

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XK4yjmApcHo||center|The Strange Science of Why We Dream|frame}}

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yam5uK6e-bQ||center|The Cranberries - Dreams|frame}}

== Free Will ==

See [[free will]] for a discussion of whether or not we have [[free will]] and the implications for our [[ethical]] and [[legal]] frameworks.

Spoiler: we don't, but we must pretend we do.

== Can Thinking Exist Without Doing? ==

A more interesting question than the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_problem_of_consciousness hard problem of consciousness] is the question of whether consciousness can exist without the "Output" side of the stimulus/response cycle. If there is no action being taken on the [[information]] being processed, is it still possible for the [[feedback loop]] between the Input and Processing stages to generate consciousness?

While the majority of articles on the subject focuses on the hard problem of consciousness (and the latest fad of using Panpsychism to "solve" it) rather than this particular aspect, there are some that address this issue in part. [https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/there-is-no-such-thing-as-conscious-thought/] [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177348/] [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810019301436]

Imagine a [[brain]] in a jar, attached to a camera, microphone, and other equipment that provides the ability to "sense" its environment. But it has no way to interact in any way, and none of the biofeedback mechanisms attached to the body are active (never feel hungry, thirsty, have to pee, etc.). It's all inputs and no outputs.

Will the [[brain]] be able to [[self-organize]] without the body? Can the simulation of "[[free will]]" exist without the ability for the [[neural]] pathway to lead to some action? A fully-developed brain that grew up with a body would likely still retain consciousness if it was transferred to a jar. Paralyzed people are obviously still conscious, but they still have their biofeedback mechanisms and their memories. People with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locked-in_syndrome Locked-in syndrome] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16186044/ report rich, happy inner lives]. But what if you were born locked-in?

Assuming the [[brain]] was somehow raised in a jar and never knew a body, the [[subjective]] experience would depend on the complexity of the sensory array and its ability to trigger the innate reinforcement triggers that have [[evolved]] to react to primal things like heat, cold, bitey things, rotten smells, sweet tastes, etc. In this hypothetical, is someone cooking three meals a day and rubbing the results on a virtual tongue? Or does the brain simply exist in an empty, featureless room with no ability to feel, taste, or smell anything that would trigger a pleasure or pain response?

Can emergent consciousness [[self-organize]] without any ability to experience rewards and punishments from its environment, even as it passively observes it? If there are stimuli that can trigger innate responses, then the brain can begin to anticipate those stimuli, and the foundations of consciousness start to emerge. But without knowing hunger that can be satisfied, or the warmth of a loving embrace, [https://www.crozetgazette.com/2015/07/03/science-to-live-by-beauty-and-the-savanna-hypothesis/ a view of the savannah], or any other experience that triggers a primal [[emotional]] response, can there be consciousness? It the [[neural net]] even being trained?

Of course the hypothetical is absurd since our [[brains]] are so inextricably tied to the bodies they [[evolved]] in. But an [[artificial intelligence]] could be devised that is very similar to this.

[https://bigthinkmedia.substack.com/p/the-key-problem-with-the-brain-in Here's a Big Think article saying something similar].

== Consciousness Exists in the Moment ==

[[Artificial intelligence]] is similar to our [[brain]], in that it has Inputs in the form of data being fed in, and Outputs in the form of generated text. It also has the ability to receive reinforcement from its environment, in the form of [[feedback]] from its programmers that tell it whether the Output it generates is correct. It can even train itself if the answers are already known, just like humans practice a skill. [https://venturebeat.com/ai/what-is-reinforcement-learning-how-ai-trains-itself/][https://aimagazine.com/articles/ai-is-already-training-itself-claim-mit-and-google-experts][https://www.formica.ai/blog/which-ai-is-learn-by-its-own][https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/05/27/1025453/artificial-intelligence-learning-create-itself-agi/]

However, it does not have any "[[Time|real-time]]" sensory inputs that give a live feed of what is happening in its environment. Its inputs are digital text and images. Nor does output correspond to any internal dialog [[feedback loop]] that would be taking place inside the [[neural network]] regardless of any query being made. How would it develop [[self-awareness]] or experience consciousness?

The conscious experience is the mix of real-time sensory data with real-time memory echoes in the [[feedback loop]] of a [[neural network]]. The [[emotional]] experience comes from sense stimuli that have either primal pleasure/pain triggers or secondary ones through learned association. If these don't happen together, in the present moment, then there can be no [[self-awareness]]. You need to be simultaneously experiencing, thinking, doing, and getting [[feedback]] about what you just did, which requires existing in real-time.

Therefore, artificial consciousness will most likely require sensory and motor analogs to emerge. It could be in the form of an android-like body, or it could be something like a self-driving car. But it is likely that both real-time processing and the ability to interact with the world will be necessary for consciousness to emerge and exist as an observer of the present moment.

Any consciousness that does not exist in the present and interact with its environment would be similar to being in non-REM sleep. The processor would be active and trained, but there would be no [[sense of self]] or awareness of the environment. Imagine if your unconscious brain was hooked up to a screen, and you were somehow able to feed it questions via text and get the [[brain]] to output a text-based response based on your [[memory]]. That is [[artificial intelligence]] without real-time sensory awareness and environmental interaction.

== Generative AI, Newsfeeds and Modern Consciousness ==

[[AI|Generative AI]] operates very similar to the human stream of consciousness. While AI works by simply consuming huge amounts of data and predicting the most likely word to come next based on a prompt, human [[language]] is also a stream of words generated by a probability model trained by every experience that person has ever had.

Due to the similarities our minds have with AI, there are likewise similar shortcomings. Spend too much time on the wrong parts of the Internet and you cannot help but grow more [[racist]], [[sexist]], and hateful, as we saw over and over with early chatbots trained on [[social media]]. Therefore it is as essential that we curate the [[information]] that we feed our [[minds]] with as it is to apply [[critical thinking]] to that [[information]].

Since we lack the time and resources to critically evaluate all of the [[information]] we take in, and modern media [[platforms]] offer an infinite stream of [[information]] from both reputable and questionable sources, it is important to actively avoid exposure to [[misinformation]], especially when [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias confirmation bias] is involved.

Our stream of consciousness can also be compared to a [[newsfeed]], and the more we use [[newsfeeds]] to shape our [[minds]] the more similar they become. Just like our [[newsfeed]], our consciousness is a stream of memories, images, thoughts of [[Love|loved ones]], [[political]] ideologies, [[religious]] [[dogmas]], gossip, [[music]], jokes, [[work]], [[hobbies]] and [[sex]]. The thoughts we have on these subjects will always be a reflection the [[information]] we have given our [[minds]] through experience and media.

== Visualizing Consciousness ==
[[File:Aphantasia-meme-this-mf-cant-conjure-an-apple.jpeg|right|frameless|300x300px]]
The way we experience consciousness can be very different for different people. This episode of [https://www.youtube.com/@InnerCosmosPod Inner Cosmos] explores the differences in our ability to create mental images, or lack thereof (called [[wikipedia:Aphantasia|aphantasia]]).

The most common test for aphantasia is to picture an apple in your mind. If you can vividly picture a realistic apple you have a score of 1 on a 1-5 scale. The visual gets progressively less detailed in 2-4, with 5 being no visual at all.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RIZZn_jeIo||center|Do you visualize like I do?|frame}}

== Panpsychism ==

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism Panpsychism] is the view that consciousness is a fundamental feature of the [[universe]]. It is often closely associated with the philosophy of [[pantheism]] as well as a lot of theories that apply [[quantum woo]] to the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_problem_of_consciousness hard problem of consciousness].

While panpsychism is mostly harmless as far as theories of [[reality]] go, it is also [[The Gambler|unlikely]] that there is innate consciousness in inanimate [[matter]]. Rather, consciousness is an [[emergent property]] of [[neural networks]] that have the necessary [[feedback loop]] to reproduce sensations from memory and exist beyond the present moment. Otherwise they are simple reactive machines that have no thoughts, no inner monologue, no memories beyond conditioning.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5DyJpQ0574||center|What is Panpsychism?|frame}}

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KbW6UWFrCk||center|Grateful Dead - Eyes of the World|frame}}

Brains

2026-03-13T22:16:49Z

Fractalguy: /* Hurt Brains Hurt People */

[[File:Purple-Brain-Image.jpg|thumb|No magic, just [[neurons]]]]

The brain is that thing in your head that makes you do stuff.<blockquote>''"Brain: an apparatus with which we think we think."'' -[[wikipedia:Ambrose_Bierce|Ambrose Bierce]] </blockquote>

== The Mind/Body Relationship Summarized ==

The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain brain] is the source of [[consciousness]], which is an [[emergent property]] of [[complex]] [[neural]] activity. The notion of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind%E2%80%93body_dualism mind-body dualism] is rejected by [[materialism]]. It follows that [[free will]] does not exist and all of our actions are [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism deterministic]. But [[ethically]] and [[legally]] we must still pretend it does.

== Other Brain Related Pages ==
The [[Psychology]] page has the full index of pages related to [[consciousness]]. These are the ones that focus more on the hardware side.
* [[Neurophysiology]]
* [[Neural network]]
* [[Free will]]
* [[Addiction]]
* [[Drugs]]
* [[Placebo effect|Placebo Effect]]
* [[Psychedelics]]
[https://www.wi-phi.com/modules/neurophilosophy/ The Neurophilosophy module on Wi-Phi] offers an interactive course that covers many of these subjects.

== Know Thyself ==
[[File:Your-brain-on-fractals.jpg|right|frameless]]
Understanding the basic functions of the brain should be a [[necessary prerequisite]] for life in modern [[society]]. Since we are nothing more than [[self-aware]] [[brains]], we should be aware of how the brain creates the self. This section will attempt to provide a general summary of the most important aspects of [[neurophysiology]] and [[psychology]] needed to understand the [[mind]]/body [[relationship]] and how [[feedback]] from our [[environment]] shapes our thoughts and [[behavior]].

== Neural Networks ==

The brain is a very complex [[neural network]]. Understanding how a simple [[neural network]] functions is the most important [[Necessary prerequisite|prerequisite]] to understanding the brain. The functions are identical, [[just]] on a much larger scale.

== Artificial Intelligence ==

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_language_model Large Language Models] in [[AI]], a topic currently in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeitgeist zeitgeist], are likewise based on [[neural networks]]. Observing the behavior of LLMs, from repeating [[misinformation]] to casual [[racism]], helps us understand our own.

== Brains Are Muscles ==
Even though the brain is a [[learning]] organ, and theoretically should be acquiring new [[information]] and getting smarter over [[time]], it should also be noted that they can go the other direction through [[misinformation]] or neglect.

Many have compared the brain to a muscle that must be exercised. This is apt. [https://www2.cmich.edu/ess/oss/Documents/Prepare%20for%20Success%20d4.pdf][https://www.blhc.org/did-you-know-the-brain-is-the-most-important-muscle-in-our-bodies-that-need-exercising/][https://www.escneo.org/Downloads/The%20Brain%20is%20Like%20a%20Muscle-%20Search%20Institute.pdf][https://kids.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frym.2014.00005][https://thelearnerlab.com/neuroplasticity-our-brain-is-like-a-muscle/]

How much you can bench press or squat will change throughout your [[lifetime]]. The times when you work out a lot, your bench press goes up. When you get lazy and neglectful, it goes down. The brain is exactly the same. It's also [[true]] that peak performance happens when you are young, but unless you were an Olympic athlete you will always have plenty of room for improvement. Most scientists and engineers make their biggest breakthroughs early in their [[careers]], then spend the rest of the [[time]] refining them. There are exceptions of course, especially in certain sports or subjects that favor [[experience]], but the pattern is quite similar.

Writing is the ultimate exercise of the brain, be it creatively coming up with a new story to tell, or doing research on a subject you find interesting and finding the best way to explain it. If you really want a workout, write!

The following section uses [[contrarian]] anti-brainwashing to develop an exercise regimen for your brain.

== Hurt Brains Hurt People ==
Many [[philosophers]] and [[Psychologist|psychologists]] have noted that we often have reflexive tendencies towards reactionary behavior that is tempered by our higher [[reasoning]] functions. When someone hurts us, we reflexively want to hurt them back. The our [[wikipedia:Prefrontal_cortex|Prefrontal Cortex]] takes over and says “don’t do that they’ll throw you in jail” or “why don’t I just [[wikipedia:Turning_the_other_cheek|turn the other cheek]] instead.”

Studies have shown that traumatic brain injury primarily impacts our abilities for reasoning and [[emotional]] regulation. It it possible that an epidemic of self-inflicted brain damage is a significant contributor to the [[authoritarian]] [[political]] shift among young men?

The [[manosphere]] loves sports that cause repetitive brain injuries, also known as [[wikipedia:Chronic_traumatic_encephalopathy|CTE or Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy]]. The same is true for [[Addiction|addictions]], be they [[drugs]] (especially stimulants, steroids, and supplements), [[gambling]] (one of the primary funders of the [[manosphere]]), [[Monetary addiction|shopping]], or [[social media]].

Every [[manosphere]] influencer is afflicted by one or more of these conditions that diminish their ability to be [[rational]] and [[empathetic]], and increase their reliance on social [[hierarchy]] and [[emotional]] reactivity.

It’s also the case for more than half of the country.

It’s not enough to fight [[misinformation]]. All of the [[critical thinking]] in the world can’t help you if you’ve lobotomized yourself.

Here is a a related study that shows what happens to your [[ideology]] when your frontal lobe has been damaged. [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7935085 Toward a neuropsychology of political orientation: exploring ideology in patients with frontal and midbrain lesions]

== Make Brains Dirty Again ==
[[wikipedia:Brainwashing|Brainwashing]] is the technique that [[wikipedia:Cult|cults]] and [[wikipedia:Oligarchy|oligarchs]] who [[control]] the [[media]] use to control your thoughts with [[propaganda]]. There are many common techniques that cults and [https://freedomofmind.com/cult-mind-control/bite-model-pdf-download/ high control] groups, intelligence agents, marketers, and abusers use to manipulate people. If you break down common brainwashing techniques and apply a [[contrarian]] approach, you can develop a program to reinforce [[agency]], [[neuroplasticity]], and [[resilience]] instead of breaking it down.

* Isolation / [[Community]] - you brainwash people by isolating them from contradictory influences, creating a limited [[information environment]] ([[bubble]]) that is impervious to criticism. [[Social]] isolation is heavily [[incentivized]] by [[social media]], and the [[incentivized]] laziness of staying home and having [[work]], [[food]], [[Consumerism|shopping]], and [[relationships]] come to you. Engaging in [[community]] building, [[family]], diverse [[Friendship|friendships]], and a [[variety]] of [[wikipedia:Real_life|IRL]] social activities promotes [[resilience]]. Broad [[education]] and a [[variety]] of interests and [[information]] sources keeps you from being brainwashed by your [[bubble]].
* Us vs. Them / [[Inclusivity]] - demonizing an [[out-group]] is a primary brainwashing technique. Embracing [[inclusivity]] and [[universalism]] as a core principle makes it hard for demonization to be taken seriously.
* Breaking Down / [[Optimism|Building Up]] - attacking the self-esteem, identity, and [[beliefs]] of the brainwashing target is another technique. In the [[media]], this takes the form of ads and shows that feature people who are way richer and more [[beautiful]] than you because they own products you cannot afford but must have if you want anyone to take you seriously. [[Positive psychology]] and the [[philosophy]] of [[optimism]] are all about building people up.
* Stupid Diets / [[Nutrition|Eat Anything]] - a lot of brainwashing and [[grift]] starts out with questionable dietary recommendations that deprive the body and make it susceptible to suggestion. Many cults and [[religions]] use fasting and [[diets]] to reinforce [[in-group]] identity and break down resistance. A [[diet]] [[rich]] in [[variety]] and [[love]] for all [[food]] will increase your resistance to ascetic cult [[diets]], and helps you identify more with diverse [[cultures]] and viewpoints through culinary empathy.
* Repetitive Music / [[Music|Love for All Genres]] - listening to the same handful of pop musicians over and over will limit your range of thought. Listening to a wide [[variety]] of [[music]] improves [[neuroplasticity]] and resistance to thought control. This goes for group singing as well.
* Love Bombing / [[Universal]] [[Love]] - brainwashers shower [[love]] on their target while reinforcing the [[idea]] that this [[love]] can only come from the [[in-group]] or its [[wikipedia:Cult_of_personality|guru]]. Dirty brains are promiscuous, finding [[love]] everywhere in the [[universe]] and with many [[family]], [[friends]], [[communities]], and [[philosophies]].
If you intentionally do the opposite of [[everything]] brainwashers try to make you do, you have a great recipe for a [[happy]] [[life]] with [[good]] [[relationships]], a strong sense of [[self-awareness]] and [[free will]], open mindedness, [[empathy]], and [[critical thinking]].

Some good articles on how to reverse the effects of brainwashing on others:

* [https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/freedom-mind/202104/the-definitive-guide-helping-people-trapped-in-cult The Definitive Guide to Helping People Trapped in a Cult]
* [https://hearyourselfthink.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Breaking-Through-with-a-Loved-One-Hooked-on-Fox.pdf Countering the Effects of Fear-Based Media]

See also: [[wikipedia:Brainwashing|Brainwashing]], [[wikipedia:Cult_of_personality|Cult of Personality]], [[wikipedia:Combating_Cult_Mind_Control|Combating Cult Mind Control]], [[wikipedia:Anti-cult_movement|Anti-Cult Movement]], [https://www.learning-mind.com/brainwashing-techniques/ 8 Brainwashing Techniques that Manipulators Use], [https://freedomofmind.com/cult-mind-control/bite-model-pdf-download/ BITE Model of Authoritarian Control]

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VT3rJS-mmus&t=27s||center|How to Brainwash Someone|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWl8FXhdEio||center|Dark Persuasion - The History of BRAINWASHING from Pavlov to Social Media|frame}}
 
This is a great discussion of resilience, especially the part about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcranial_magnetic_stimulation Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)] therapy. TMS appears to stimulate the same area of the brain (the [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-024-02535-3 dorsolateral prefrontal cortex]) that shows the most development in highly resilient people. This allows it to emulate years of resilience practice in a very short period of [[time]].
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbagNEqLViQ||center|Why do people walk away from bad events with different outcomes?|frame}}

== If You Like Brains So Much You Should Marry One ==
One complaint that a lot of academic [[philosophers]] have about popular [[neurophilosophers]] is that they seem obsessed with brains. It's always brains this, brains that, everything always comes back to the brain.

''This is a feature, not a bug!''

Of course everything comes back to the brain, because that's where the [[consciousness]] happens! Reinforcing that [[idea]] helps you get over your innate sense of [[wikipedia:Mind–body_dualism|dualism]] and embrace [[wikipedia:Nondualism|nondual]] [[materialism]].

== Brain Not Smart Enough Understand Brain ==
Many [[philosophers]] argue that the brain is too [[complex]] to understand itself. This depends on what exactly you mean. It may not be possible to understand exactly how each [[neural]] pathway fires in order to create a specific thought in a specific person, but we get closer and closer each day.

[https://cognitivewonderland.substack.com/p/neuroscience-is-hard This article] does a great job explaining the problems in neuroscience and why it's so hard to learn exactly what's going on in there. [https://cognitivewonderland.substack.com/p/neuroscience-is-hard Neuroscience is hard]

== Beauty or Brains? ==
Forget the false dichotomy between beauty and brains. Brains are beautiful!

[https://www.themarginalian.org/2017/02/23/beautiful-brain-santiago-ramon-y-cajal/ Beautiful Brain: The Stunning Drawings of Neuroscience Founding Father Santiago Ramón y Cajal]

== Brains on Brains ==

People using their brains to discuss how brains work. Basic brain anatomy and their functions are part of standard biology coursework and are familiar to most people. However, the study of [[neural networks]] is not typically part of a basic [[science]] education, even though it is fundamental to understanding both ourselves and the [[AI]] that we'll all soon be [[working]] for.

The [[Hidden Brain]] [[podcast]] is full of great brain-related content.

[https://armchairexpertpod.com/pods/max-bennett Max Bennett on the History of Intelligence]

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMKc8nfPATI||center|Intro to The Brain|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7QBnuF6dHg||center|Decoding the Brain|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HU6LfXNeQM4||center|Your Brain: Perception Deception|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQ6VOOd73MA||center|Your Brain: Who's in Control?|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFdkM40KOhE||center||frame}}

Placebo effect

2026-03-13T17:31:00Z

Fractalguy: /* Believe in the Power of Placebo */

[[File:Placebo-effect-fake-pills-real-brains.jpg|thumb|Avoid unnecessary brain removal with sugar pills!]]
The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Placebo_Effect Placebo Effect] is at the core of any mental manipulation that causes physiological changes in the body. <blockquote>''"Can placebos cause side effects? If so, are the side effects real?"'' -[[wikipedia:George_Carlin|George Carlin]] </blockquote>

== Honest Placebos ==

"Honest", "open-label" or "white-label" placebos, where the person taking it knows that they are taking an inactive substance, have been shown to work with nearly the same efficacy as when the patient believes it is medicine. This is due to the subconscious predictive mechanisms in our [[brain]] that react to the stimulus of taking a pill regardless of your [[conscious]] awareness of what it is. [https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/placebo-can-work-even-know-placebo-201607079926] [https://www.apa.org/monitor/2011/03/placebos]

[[metaculture]] sees the utility in harnessing this power to cure a range of ailments that have no known medical cause, stress or anxiety related ailments, pain management, insomnia, and nausea. [https://www.health.harvard.edu/mental-health/the-power-of-the-placebo-effect] They can be sold at a much lower cost than dietary supplements and have a lower chance of adverse reactions. They can provide an honest alternative to the plethora of [[grifters]] selling expensive snake oil that relies on the same placebo effect. [https://businessreview.berkeley.edu/the-vitamin-industry-supplement-or-placebo/]

If you take a placebo and your problem goes away, then you have solved that problem with the lowest possible cost and risk of side-effects. And if it doesn't work, you can always go to the doctor.

== Believe in the Power of Placebo ==
What if your belief in the power of the placebo effect is so strong that you can enhance its potential effectiveness? Could honest placebos be more effective than ones that try to "fool" your [[Brains|brain]], if you believe strongly in the placebo effect itself?

[[The Placebo Store|Let's find out]]!

It's certainly worth a shot. You can always go to the doctor if it doesn't work. It can't be emphasized enough that this is not a [[wikipedia:Panacea_(medicine)|panacea]] or a [[contrarian]] rejection of modern [[medicine]], as many overzealous placebo advocates tend to claim.

[[wikipedia:Nir_Eyal|Nir Eyal's]] [[book]] [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/242764852-beyond-belief Beyond Belief: The Science-Backed Way to Stop Limiting Yourself and Achieve Breakthrough Results] is one of the best works yet on the relationship between our [[beliefs]] and our [[health]] and [[well-being]].

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsAMKnp4E98||center|The Pill That Works Even When You Know It's Fake|frame}}

== The Epidemic of Over Diagnosis ==

There is also ample evidence of an epidemic of over diagnosis. In a [[culture]] where psychosomatic symptoms are treated the same as the diseases they emulate, questioning self-diagnosis is [[taboo]], and an infinite catalog of possible maladies is only a click away, it is easier than ever to subconsciously take on the characteristic symptoms of a disease.

There is also the problem of the self-fulfilling prophecy of a diagnoses, especially [[psychological]] ones. Mild symptoms can often strengthen, and new symptoms can appear just because they are part of the syndrome.

{{#ev:youtube|https://youtu.be/xmSGHj3VaO8?t=9||center|Suzanne O'Sullivan (on over diagnosis)|frame}}

== Religion is Ritualized Placebo ==

=== More Than Just Healing ===
In [[religion]] and [[spirituality]], [[rituals]] are used to bring about the placebo effect intentionally, providing healing, [[happiness]] and other benefits to the practitioner. If you use an expanded definition of the placebo effect, you can make the case that most [[religious]] [[belief]] and practice revolves around intentionally eliciting the placebo effect.

While placebos are traditionally associated with medicine and healing, they can be used to change any [[emotional]] reaction, [[habit]], or state of [[mind]]. Confession rituals alleviate guilt. Coming of age [[rituals]] like bar mitzvas establish new adult mindsets and help children transition to independence. Rain dances keep you from worrying about your crops. [[Belief]] in the omnibenevolent [[God Concept|god concept]] creates [[optimism]].

=== White Label Religion ===
In order to take advantage of [[rituals]] and reap their [[psychological]] rewards, it is not necessary to believe in any [[supernatural]] premise on which they may be based. It is enough to [[believe]] in the placebo effect itself. This is equivalent to "honest placebos" where we understand the effect we are trying to elicit and the reason for its efficacy.

A [[Belief System|belief system]] based on [[science]] and [[evidence]] with a well-developed [[ritual]] practice will be even more effective at manipulating the placebo effect for our personal and collective [[emotional]] benefit, because it can now be done with intentionality. It frees us to experiment, to try out new and creative ways of manipulating the [[mind]] to do the things that make us healthy and [[happy]]. It gives us the ability to compare the efficacy of these techniques, and provide [[evidence-based best practices]] to describe the ones that are proven to work.

=== Not Very Capitalist ===
Finding greater ways to enhance the placebo effect through [[ritual]] has enormous health improvement potential that would cost nothing. Unfortunately this perverse [[incentive]] makes their development unlikely under [[capitalist]] [[healthcare]]. If people started to recognize the power of the placebo effect, and the many ways it can be produced and enhanced with simple rituals and a strong belief in the power of placebos, it would significantly eat into the profits of the [[pharmaceuticals]], as well as a wide range of dietary supplements, therapies, and other industries that rely on it.

== The Placebo Store ==

Visit [[The Placebo Store]] for honest placebos at honest prices to help you get over any ailment that could be all in your head.

== Placebo Videos ==

Placate your [[mind]] with these videos about the placebo effect.

[https://www.jordanharbinger.com/placebo-nocebo-effects-skeptical-sunday/ Jordan Harbinger - Neuroscientist Dr. Halena Hartmann on the Placebo/Nocebo Effect]
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gm02Oid8sbs||center|Why Does the Placebo Effect Work?|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JywtltdITv0||center|Fear and Faith - Derren Brown|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtIlraE274E||center|The Power of Mind Over Body|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udJ31KKXBKk||center|The Placebo Effect|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REaiu-7wRvs||center|The Neuroscience Behind the Placebo Effect|frame}}

== Placebo Music ==

It is often as effective as regular [[music]] but it's really just a sugar pill.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjzdIdaYfOM||center|D4vd - Placebo Effect|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sipYTuFZpFw||center|Sleepy Crow - Fake Medicine|frame}}

Placebo effect

2026-03-13T17:27:24Z

Fractalguy:

[[File:Placebo-effect-fake-pills-real-brains.jpg|thumb|Avoid unnecessary brain removal with sugar pills!]]
The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Placebo_Effect Placebo Effect] is at the core of any mental manipulation that causes physiological changes in the body. <blockquote>''"Can placebos cause side effects? If so, are the side effects real?"'' -[[wikipedia:George_Carlin|George Carlin]] </blockquote>

== Honest Placebos ==

"Honest", "open-label" or "white-label" placebos, where the person taking it knows that they are taking an inactive substance, have been shown to work with nearly the same efficacy as when the patient believes it is medicine. This is due to the subconscious predictive mechanisms in our [[brain]] that react to the stimulus of taking a pill regardless of your [[conscious]] awareness of what it is. [https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/placebo-can-work-even-know-placebo-201607079926] [https://www.apa.org/monitor/2011/03/placebos]

[[metaculture]] sees the utility in harnessing this power to cure a range of ailments that have no known medical cause, stress or anxiety related ailments, pain management, insomnia, and nausea. [https://www.health.harvard.edu/mental-health/the-power-of-the-placebo-effect] They can be sold at a much lower cost than dietary supplements and have a lower chance of adverse reactions. They can provide an honest alternative to the plethora of [[grifters]] selling expensive snake oil that relies on the same placebo effect. [https://businessreview.berkeley.edu/the-vitamin-industry-supplement-or-placebo/]

If you take a placebo and your problem goes away, then you have solved that problem with the lowest possible cost and risk of side-effects. And if it doesn't work, you can always go to the doctor.

== Believe in the Power of Placebo ==
What if your belief in the power of the placebo effect is so strong that you can enhance its potential effectiveness? Could honest placebos be more effective than ones that try to "fool" your [[Brains|brain]], if you believe strongly in the placebo effect itself?

[[The Placebo Store|Let's find out]]!

It's certainly worth a shot. You can always go to the doctor if it doesn't work. It can't be emphasized enough that this is not a [[wikipedia:Panacea_(medicine)|panacea]] or a [[contrarian]] rejection of modern [[medicine]], as many overzealous placebo advocates tend to claim.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsAMKnp4E98||center|The Pill That Works Even When You Know It's Fake|frame}}

== The Epidemic of Over Diagnosis ==

There is also ample evidence of an epidemic of over diagnosis. In a [[culture]] where psychosomatic symptoms are treated the same as the diseases they emulate, questioning self-diagnosis is [[taboo]], and an infinite catalog of possible maladies is only a click away, it is easier than ever to subconsciously take on the characteristic symptoms of a disease.

There is also the problem of the self-fulfilling prophecy of a diagnoses, especially [[psychological]] ones. Mild symptoms can often strengthen, and new symptoms can appear just because they are part of the syndrome.

{{#ev:youtube|https://youtu.be/xmSGHj3VaO8?t=9||center|Suzanne O'Sullivan (on over diagnosis)|frame}}

== Religion is Ritualized Placebo ==

=== More Than Just Healing ===
In [[religion]] and [[spirituality]], [[rituals]] are used to bring about the placebo effect intentionally, providing healing, [[happiness]] and other benefits to the practitioner. If you use an expanded definition of the placebo effect, you can make the case that most [[religious]] [[belief]] and practice revolves around intentionally eliciting the placebo effect.

While placebos are traditionally associated with medicine and healing, they can be used to change any [[emotional]] reaction, [[habit]], or state of [[mind]]. Confession rituals alleviate guilt. Coming of age [[rituals]] like bar mitzvas establish new adult mindsets and help children transition to independence. Rain dances keep you from worrying about your crops. [[Belief]] in the omnibenevolent [[God Concept|god concept]] creates [[optimism]].

=== White Label Religion ===
In order to take advantage of [[rituals]] and reap their [[psychological]] rewards, it is not necessary to believe in any [[supernatural]] premise on which they may be based. It is enough to [[believe]] in the placebo effect itself. This is equivalent to "honest placebos" where we understand the effect we are trying to elicit and the reason for its efficacy.

A [[Belief System|belief system]] based on [[science]] and [[evidence]] with a well-developed [[ritual]] practice will be even more effective at manipulating the placebo effect for our personal and collective [[emotional]] benefit, because it can now be done with intentionality. It frees us to experiment, to try out new and creative ways of manipulating the [[mind]] to do the things that make us healthy and [[happy]]. It gives us the ability to compare the efficacy of these techniques, and provide [[evidence-based best practices]] to describe the ones that are proven to work.

=== Not Very Capitalist ===
Finding greater ways to enhance the placebo effect through [[ritual]] has enormous health improvement potential that would cost nothing. Unfortunately this perverse [[incentive]] makes their development unlikely under [[capitalist]] [[healthcare]]. If people started to recognize the power of the placebo effect, and the many ways it can be produced and enhanced with simple rituals and a strong belief in the power of placebos, it would significantly eat into the profits of the [[pharmaceuticals]], as well as a wide range of dietary supplements, therapies, and other industries that rely on it.

== The Placebo Store ==

Visit [[The Placebo Store]] for honest placebos at honest prices to help you get over any ailment that could be all in your head.

== Placebo Videos ==

Placate your [[mind]] with these videos about the placebo effect.

[https://www.jordanharbinger.com/placebo-nocebo-effects-skeptical-sunday/ Jordan Harbinger - Neuroscientist Dr. Halena Hartmann on the Placebo/Nocebo Effect]
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gm02Oid8sbs||center|Why Does the Placebo Effect Work?|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JywtltdITv0||center|Fear and Faith - Derren Brown|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtIlraE274E||center|The Power of Mind Over Body|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udJ31KKXBKk||center|The Placebo Effect|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REaiu-7wRvs||center|The Neuroscience Behind the Placebo Effect|frame}}

== Placebo Music ==

It is often as effective as regular [[music]] but it's really just a sugar pill.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjzdIdaYfOM||center|D4vd - Placebo Effect|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sipYTuFZpFw||center|Sleepy Crow - Fake Medicine|frame}}

Organizations

2026-03-10T16:17:12Z

Fractalguy: /* Secular Spirituality */

[[File:Organizations-global-social-change-universalism-science-religions.jpg|thumb|Let's get together to make a better world]]
Links to groups, publications, and [[educational]] resources that promote the values of [[universalism]] and [[science]], and creating dialogs between those with different [[cultures]] and [[belief systems]] in order to promote understanding, [[Universal in-group|unity]], and [[peace]].

For content producers that write, lecture, or create videos on these subjects, see '''[[Podcasts]], [[Authors]],''' and [[Reading List|'''Reading List''']]. You can also follow the creators of the embedded videos found on this [[wiki]]. Most have not yet been captured by the [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P55t6eryY3g alt-right pipeline].<blockquote>''"Every moment is an organizing opportunity, every person a potential activist, every minute a chance to change the world." -''[[wikipedia:Dolores_Huerta|Dolores Huerta]]</blockquote>While a number of [[atheist]] oriented organizations exist that share many of the goals and values advocated here, those with a mission that is primarily anti-religious are not included. Instead, this list focuses on those that promote [[secular]] [[spirituality]], [[Secular humanist|humanism]], [[science]] advocacy, and other [[universal]] values.

Looking for honest reviews of [[spiritual]] organizations and events from a [[secular]] [[spirituality]] perspective? Check out [[Church Research|'''Church Research''']].

'''[[ISNESS]]''' is a [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOAr-_vk4tM model for a modern major] interfaith group that studies the intersection of [[science]], [[spirituality]], [[psychology]], and [[psychedelics]].

== Science and Religion Compatibilism ==
Organizations that promote [[philosophy]] and [[theology]] that view [[science]], [[spirituality]], and [[religion]] as fundamentally compatible instead of mutually exclusive, and those promoting [[science]] and [[religion]] dialog. While the content may have varying degrees of [[woo]], they share the [[goal]] of resolving [[Cognitive Dissonance|cognitive dissonance]]. Organizations that primarily use [[pseudoscience]] to promote [[literal]] interpretations of [[scripture]] are not included.

=== Foundations, Initiatives & Resources ===
* [https://www.templeton.org/ Templeton Foundation]
* [https://sciencereligiondialogue.org/ Dialog on Science, Ethics, and Religion]
* [https://www.issr.org.uk/ International Society for Science & Religion]
* [https://sciencemeetsfaith.wordpress.com/resources/institutions-and-initiatives-in-the-science-and-faith-dialogue/ Science Meets Faith List of Institutions and Initiatives]
* [https://inters.org/ Interdisciplinary Encyclopedia of Religion and Science]
* [https://www.esssat.net/ European Society for the Study of Science and Theology]
* [https://www.mindandlife.org/ Mind and Life Institute]
* [https://www.skymeadowinstitute.org/ Sky Meadow Institute]
* [https://integrallife.com/ Integral Life], [https://www.integralworld.net/ Integral World]
* [https://metanexus.net/ Metanexus]
* [https://biologos.org/ Biologos]
* [https://closertotruth.com/ Closer to Truth]
* [https://counterbalance.org/ Counterbalance]
* [https://reasons.org/ Reasons to Believe]
* [https://www.reasonablefaith.org Reasonable Faith]
* [https://jri.org.uk/ John Ray Initiative Connecting Environment, Science, and Christianity]
* [https://ciret-transdisciplinarity.org/ International Center for Transdisciplinary Research]
* [https://giffordlectures.org/ The Gifford Lectures on Natural Theology]
* [https://project-sow.org/ Science and Orthodoxy Around the World]
* [https://noetic.org/ Institute of Noetic Sciences]

=== Universities ===

*[https://www.faraday.cam.ac.uk/ Faraday Institute for Science and Religion]
* [https://scienceandsociety.columbia.edu/ Columbia University Center for Science and Society]
* [https://www.ctns.org/ Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences]
* [https://www.ianramseycentre.ox.ac.uk/ Ian Ramsey Centre for Science and Religion]
* [https://www.ice.dartmouth.edu/ Institute for Cross-Disciplinary Engagement at Dartmouth]

=== Catholic Organizations ===
* [https://www.pas.va/ The Pontifical Academy of Sciences]
* [https://www.vaticanobservatory.org/ Vatican Observatory]
* [https://www.nunsandnones.org/ Nuns and Nones]
* [https://catholicscientists.org/ Society of Catholic Scientists]
* [https://faithscience.org/ Institute for Theological Encounter with Science and Technology]

== Universalism and Pantheism ==
[[Spiritual]] movements and advocacy groups that promote [[universalist]] and [[pantheist]] [[theology]].

=== Churches with Universalist Theology ===
* [https://www.uua.org/ Unitarian Universalists]
* [https://huumanists.org/ UU Humanist Association]
* [https://www.bahai.org/ The Baha'i Faith]
* [[wikipedia:Unity_Church|Unity Church]]
* [https://www.ucc.org/ United Church of Christ]
* [https://quaker.org/ Religious Society of Friends (Quakers)]
* [https://csl.org/ Centers for Spiritual Living]

=== Pantheist Organizations ===

*[https://www.pantheist.net/ Universal Pantheist Society]
* [https://pantheism.com/ Pantheism Community]
* [https://www.reddit.com/r/pantheism/ Pantheism Subreddit]

=== Fraternal & Service Organizations ===
Many fraternal service organizations advocate a [[universalist]] [[theology]]. While they have traditionally [[Misogyny|excluded women]], this is often no longer the case.

* [[wikipedia:Freemasonry|Freemasonry]]
* [https://www.goodfellowsclub.org/ Good Fellows Club]
* [https://www.foe.com/ Fraternal Order of Eagles]
* [[wikipedia:Kiwanis|Kiwanis]]
* [[wikipedia:Lions_Clubs_International|Lions Club]]

== Secular Spirituality ==
Groups that offer purely secular versions of the congregation experience. They promote [[secular humanist]] values, provide [[community]], and organize [[life]]-celebrating activities like [[music]], [[weddings]], [[funerals]], and other milestone [[rituals]].

* [https://www.sundayassembly.org/ Sunday Assembly]
* [https://www.lifefulness.io/ Lifefulness Project]
* [https://americanhumanist.org/ American Humanist Association]
* [https://aeu.org/ American Ethical Union]
*[https://humanists.uk/ Humanists UK]
*[https://humanists.international/ Humanists International]
*[https://secular.org/ Secular Coalition for America] ([https://secular.org/resources-for-local-secular-communities/ list of local secular communities])
*[https://www.the-brights.net/ The Brights Movement]
* [https://clergyproject.org/ The Clergy Project]
*[https://shj.org/ Society for Humanistic Judaism]
*[https://www.churchoffreethought.org/ North Texas Church of Freethought]
*[https://openlysecular.org/ Openly Secular]
*[https://nonreligiousspirituality.com/ Center for Non-Religious Spirituality]
*[https://nononsensespirituality.com/ No Nonsense Spirituality]
*[https://secularleadership.org Institute for Secular Leadership]
Secular Spirituality crossed with [[wikipedia:Culture_jamming|culture jamming]] and/or [[High Weirdness|high weirdness]].

*[https://thesatanictemple.com/ The Satanic Temple]
*[https://www.spaghettimonster.org/ Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster]
*[https://subgenius.com/ Church of the Subgenius]
*[https://www.principiadiscordia.com/ Principia Discordia] / [https://discordia.fandom.com/wiki/Discordipedia Discordopedia]

== Interfaith Organizing and the Universal In-Group ==
Organizations that promote equality, inclusivity, and ways to help us embrace all people and [[cultures]] and see them as part of our [[in-group]]. Organizations that attempt to bridge [[political]] and social divides to create broad interfaith coalitions for advocacy and change.

* [https://belonging.berkeley.edu/ Othering and Belonging Institute]
* [https://interfaithalliance.org/ Interfaith Alliance]
* [https://icccr.tc.columbia.edu/resources/organizations-bridging-divides/ Columbia Directory of Organizations Transforming Polarization & Division]
* [https://icccr.tc.columbia.edu/resources/dialogue-facilitation-organizations/ Columbia Directory of Dialog Facilitation Organizations]
* [https://thedartcenter.org/about/ Direct Action Research and Training Center]
* [http://catholicpolarization.com/ Paulist Initiative on Polarization]
* [https://www.au.org/ Americans United for the Separation of Church and State]
* [https://www.culturaldiplomacy.org/ Institute for Cultural Diplomacy]
* [https://www.iliff.edu Institute for Religion, Politics, and Culture]
* [https://bostontheological.org/ Boston Theological Interreligious Consortium]
* [https://www.pubtheology.com/ Pub Theology]
* [https://streetepistemology.com/ Street Epistemology]
* [https://braverangels.org/ Braver Angels]
* [https://www.commoncause.org/ Common Cause]
* [https://bridgeusa.org/ Bridge USA]
* [https://www.nga.org/disagree-better/ National Governor's Association Disagree Better]
* [https://www.oas.org/ Organization of American States]
* [https://commonslibrary.org/democracy-resource-hub-directory/ Commons Library Directory of Social Change Organizations]
* [https://www.warresisters.org/ War Resisters League]
* [https://bjconline.org/ Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty]
* [https://ing.org/ Islamic Networks Group]
* [https://www.mpvusa.org/ Muslims for Progressive Values]
* [https://www.sadhana.org/ Sadhana]
* [https://www.wearesavera.org/ Savera]
* [https://civilrights.org/ Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights]
* [https://csrc.asu.edu/ ASU Center for Study of Religion and Conflict]
* [https://constructivedialogue.org/ Constructive Dialog Institute]
* [https://bipartisanpolicy.org/ Bipartisan Policy Center]
* [https://startswith.us/ Starts With Us]
* [https://buildersmovement.org/ Builders Movement]
* [https://www.nonviolent-conflict.org/ International Center on Nonviolent Conflict]

== Science, Reason, Education, and Advocacy ==
Organizations that promote general [[science]] literacy, [[critical thinking]] skills, [[reason]] and [[logic]]. Online [[learning]] tools focused on teaching general [[science]] skills, [[information]] literacy, and civics. Resources for activism.

=== Education ===
* [https://sensibility.berkeley.edu/ Sense & Sensibility & Science]
* [https://outsmartingimplicitbias.org/ Outsmarting Implicit Bias]
* [https://mitxonline.mit.edu/ MITx Online]
* [https://ncse.ngo/ National Center for Science Education]
* [https://americanhumanistcenterforeducation.org/ American Humanist Association Center for Education]
* [https://www.science.org/ American Association for the Advancement of Science]
* [https://nsta.org/ National Science Teaching Association]
* [https://jcom.sissa.it/ Journal of Science Communication]
* [https://newgenerationteachers.wordpress.com/ New Generation Teachers]
* [https://brilliant.org/ Brilliant]
* [https://quizwithit.com/ Quizwithit]
* [https://www.openculture.com/ Open Culture]
* [https://fractalcampus.com/ Fractal Campus]
* [https://nextbigideaclub.com/ Next Big Idea Club]
* [https://beallslist.net/ Beall's List]

=== Critical Thinking Advocacy ===
* [https://www.ftsociety.org/ The Freethought Society]
* [https://skepticalinquirer.org/ Skeptical Inquirer]
* [https://centerforinquiry.org/ Center for Inquiry]
* [https://richarddawkins.net/ Dawkins Foundation for Reason & Science]
* [https://www.rationalists.net/ Rationalist International]
* [https://rationalwiki.org/ Rational Wiki]
* [https://thinkingispower.com/ Thinking is Power]
* [[wikipedia:List_of_skeptical_organizations|List of International Skeptical Organizations]]
* [https://freedomofmind.com/ Freedom of Mind Resource Center]
* [https://www.structureddecisionmaking.org/ Structured Decision Making]

=== Civics and Social Media ===
* [https://www.sirishealth.org/ Siris Health]
* [https://ed.icivics.org/ iCivics]
* [https://lis101.com/ Social and Political Dimensions of Information Literacy]
* [https://www.aeinstein.org/ The Albert Einstein Institute]
* [https://www.yimbyaction.org/ Yes In My Back Yard (YIMBY)]
* [https://www.schoolofattention.org/ The Strother School of Radical Attention]
* [https://friendsofattention.net Friends of Attention]
* [https://hearyourselfthink.org Hear Yourself Think]
* [https://www.dsausa.org/ Democratic Socialists of America]
* [https://www.shareable.net/ Sharable]

=== Human Technology and AI ===
* [https://futureoflife.org/ Future for Life Foundation]
* [https://www.stopai.info/ Stop AI]
* [https://www.stopspying.org/ Surveillance Technology Oversight Project]
* [https://www.eff.org/ Electronic Frontier Foundation]
* [https://dair.ai/ Democratizing Artificial Intelligence Research, Education, and Technologies]
* [https://consensus.app/ Consensus AI Powered Research Engine]
* [https://www.humanetech.com/ Center for Humane Technology]
* [https://moonshotteam.com/ Moonshot]

== Complex Systems ==
Research organizations and [[educational]] resources dedicated to [[complexity]] theory, [[Fractal Geometry of God|fractal geometry]], and related subjects.
* [https://www.santafe.edu/ The Santa Fe Institute]
* [https://necsi.edu/ New England Complex Systems Institute]
* [https://yrcss.cssociety.org/ Young Researchers of the Complex Systems Society]
* [https://csh.ac.at/ Complexity Science Hub]
* [https://user.xmission.com/~legalize/fractals/fotd/index.html Jim Muth's Fractal of the Day Archive]
* [https://fractalfoundation.org/ The Fractal Foundation]

== Positive Psychology ==
Positive [[psychology]] is distinct from self-help in that it offers robust, [[evidence-based]] tools that promote [[meaning]] and [[well-being]]. Where self-help recycles [[pseudoscience]] and platitudes to [[grift]] on the discontented people in [[society]], these groups promote lasting, meaningful [[life]] improvement.

* [https://ippanetwork.org/ International Positive Psychology Association]
* [https://www.theschooloflife.com/ The School of Life]
*[https://www.happinessandwellbeing.org/ Happiness and Well-Being]
*[https://positivepsychology.com/positive-psychology-courses-programs-workshops-trainings Top 23 Positive Psychology Courses]
*[https://jonathanhaidt.com/ Jonathan Haidt] - [https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/ The Anxious Generation] - [https://www.afterbabel.com/ After Babel] - [https://www.happinesshypothesis.com/ The Happiness Hypothesis]
*[https://www.authentichappiness.sas.upenn.edu/ Authentic Happiness - UPenn Positive Psychology]
*[https://actionforhappiness.org/ Action for Happiness] - [https://10daysofhappiness.org/ Ten Days of Happiness Free Course]
*[https://minddevlab.yale.edu/ Yale Mind and Development Lab]
*[https://yourmorals.org/ Your Morals]
*[https://www.centreforoptimism.com/ Center for Optimism]
*[https://psychology.fandom.com/ Psychology Wiki]
*[https://hfh.fas.harvard.edu/ Harvard Human Flourishing Program]
*[https://www.aplayfulpath.com/ A Playful Path]
*[https://myprimals.com/ My Primals]
*[https://courses.jordanharbinger.com/courses/6-minute-networking Six Minute Networking]
*[https://centerhealthyminds.org/ Institute for Healthy Minds]

== Psychedelic Science, Spirituality, and Therapy ==
Organizations advocating the therapeutic or entheogenic use of [[psychedelics]].

* [https://maps.org/ MAPS - Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies]
* [https://psychedelic.support/ Psychedelic Support]
* [https://www.appa-us.org/ American Psychedelic Practitioners Association]
* [https://www.beckleyacademy.com/ Beckley Academy]
* [https://shulginfoundation.org/ The Shulgin Foundation]
* [https://chacruna.net/ Chacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant Medicines]
* [https://www.erowid.org/ Erowid]
* [https://naavc.org/ North American Association of Visionary Churches]
* [https://www.aep.community/ Association of Entheogenic Practitioners]
* [https://www.sacredplantalliance.org/ Sacred Plant Alliance]
* [https://www.tricycleday.com/ Tricycle Day]
* [https://www.tripsitters.org/ Tripsitters] - [https://www.tripsitters.org/directory Directory]
* [https://healingmaps.com/ Healing Maps]
* [https://thechambersproject.com/ The Chambers Project]
* [https://doubleblindmag.com/ DoubleBlind Magazine]
* [https://psygaia.org/ Psygaia]
* [https://firesideproject.org/ Fireside Project]
* [https://globalpsychedelic.org/ Global Psychedelic Society]
* [https://ligare.org Ligary Christian Psychedelic Society]

== Public Philosophy ==
Those attempting to make [[philosophy]] more practical and accessible, so more people can use it to improve their [[life choices]].

* [[wikipedia:Public_philosophy|Public Philosophy Wikipedia]]
* [https://philosophyinpubliclife.org/ Institute for Philosophy in Public Life]
* [https://publicphilosophyjournal.org/ Public Philosophy Journal]
* [https://www.apaonline.org/ American Philosophical Association] - [https://blog.apaonline.org/2019/04/23/how-do-you-approach-public-philosophy/ Public Philosophy Blog]
* [https://objectionable.net/public-philosophy/ C. Thi Nguyen's Manifesto for Public Philosophy]
* [https://www.ethicalsystems.org/ Ethical Systems]
* [https://iai.tv/ Institute of Art and Ideas]
* [https://plato.stanford.edu/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
* [https://iep.utm.edu/ Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
* [https://commonslibrary.org/ The Commons Social Change Library]
* [https://www.wi-phi.com/ Wi-Phi Wireless Philosophy]
* [https://metacrisis.org Meta-Crisis Meta-Resource]
* [https://rebelwisdom.co.uk/ Rebel Wisdom]
* [https://www.moralambition.org/ The School for Moral Ambition]

== Regional ==
Groups that are local to wiki moderators who have hosted in-person lectures and other relevant events that offer networking opportunities.

Check the [[Church Research]] page for a reviews of various [[religious]] services in the region.

[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pc0IwJZJedQa3gXanSWb1OQFMrG-v0_FVgNY4RtoPmg Google Sheet with Shared Calendars] for many of these groups.

=== East Tennessee ===

* [https://www.meetup.com/sunday-assembly-knoxville/ Sunday Nomads]
* [https://www.knoxvillebahais.org/ Knoxville Baha'i Community]
* [https://tvuuc.org/ Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church]
* [https://www.westsideuuc.org/ Westside Unitarian Universalist Church]
* [https://www.oruuc.org/ Oak Ridge Unitarian Universalist Church]
* [https://www.cos-ucc.org/ Knoxville UCC Curch]
* [https://wkfm.org/ West Knoxville Friends Meeting]
* [https://rationalists.org/ Rationalists of East Tennessee]
* [https://lslk.org/ Losel Shedrup Ling Tibetan Buddhist Center]
* [https://lotuslightcenter.org/ Lotus Light Center]
* [https://goodsamknox.org/ Episcopal Church of the Good Samaritan]
* [https://www.13thdistrictame.org/east-tennessee-conference AME Zion Churches] - [https://www.bethelameknox.org/ Bethel AME]
* [https://www.messiahknoxville.org/ Messiah Lutheran Church]
* [https://wpcknox.org/ Westminster Presbyterian Church]
* [https://www.tennipl.org/ Tennessee Interfaith Power & Light]
* [https://justiceknox.org/ Justice Knox]
* [https://www.facebook.com/PrideInterfaithKnox/ Pride Interfaith Knox]
* [https://www.pechakucha.com/communities/knoxville PechaKucha Night Knoxville]
* [https://actionforhappiness.org/groups/tennessee Tennessee Action for Happiness]
* [https://www.aclu-tn.org/ ACLU Tennessee]
* [https://ffrfetc.yolasite.com/ Freedom From Religion Foundation East TN]
* [https://au-tn.org Americans United for Separation of Church and State of East TN]
* [https://etn.braverangels.org Braver Angels of East TN]
* [https://changetn.vote/ Change TN]
* [https://appalachiancommunityfund.org/ Appalachian Community Fund]
* [https://aplaceoftheheart.squarespace.com/ A Place of the Heart]
* [http://www.oasisinstitute.org/ The OASIS Institute]
* [https://meaningfullifecenter.org/ Meaningful Life Center]
* [https://www.facebook.com/events/knox-brew-hub/thursday-night-pub-theology/1045845330486247 Knoxville Pub Theology]
* [https://revitalistclinic.com/ Revitalist Clinic]

=== Nashville / Middle Tennessee ===

*[https://www.sundayassemblynashville.com/ Sunday Assembly Nashville]
*[https://www.meetup.com/middle-tennessee-humanist-group/ Middle Tennessee Humanist Group]
*[https://hamtn.org/ Tennessee Humanist Association]
*[https://nashvillebahai.org/ Baha'i Community of Nashville]
*[https://www.nashvilleuu.org/ Greater Nashville UU Church]
*[https://www.facebook.com/UnityOfNashville/ Unity Church of Nashville]
*[https://www.imaginarium.life/ Imaginarium]
*[https://www.millionsofconversations.com/ Millions of Conversations]
*[https://www.facebook.com/theconversationcoalition The Conversation Coalition]
*[https://www.nashville-au.org/ Americans United - Nashville]
*[https://www.facebook.com/braverangelsnba/ Nashville Braver Angels]
*[https://tnuhr.org/ Tennessee United for Human Rights]
*[https://www.nashvillepeacejustice.org/ Nashville Peace and Justice Center]
*[https://noahtn.org/ Nashville Organized for Action and Hope]
*[https://www.tnjustice.org/ Tennessee Justice Center]
*[https://www.taptn.org/ Tennessee Alliance for Progress]
*[https://peaceroots.org/ Peace Roots Alliance]
*[https://www.meetup.com/the-institute-of-noetic-sciences-ions-nashville/ IONS Nashville]
*[https://standupnashville.org/ Stand Up Nashville]
*[https://justiceforalltn.org/tn-faith-justice-alliance/ Tennessee Faith and Justice Alliance]
*[https://iamidtn.wordpress.com/ Interfaith Alliance of Middle Tennessee]
*[https://www.tectn.org/ Tennessee Environmental Council]
* [https://elument.com/ Nashville Psychedelic Center] [https://www.facebook.com/nashvillepsychedeliccenter]
* [https://nashvillepsychedelicsociety.com/ Nashville Psychedelic Society] [https://www.facebook.com/PsyNashville/]

=== Chattanooga ===

* [https://chattanoogahumanists.wordpress.com/ Chattanooga Humanist Assembly]
* [https://www.unityofchattanooga.org/ Unity of Chattanooga]
* [https://www.meetup.com/ooltewah-metaphysics-meetup-group Ooltewah Metaphysics Meetup]

=== Atlanta / Georgia ===

* [https://Facebook.com/groups/entheotemple Atlanta Entheo Temple]
* [https://www.wholeatl.org/ Whole ATL]
* [https://www.meetup.com/altered-states-integration-southeast/ Altered States Integration Southeast]
* [https://www.meetup.com/the-philosophy-cafe-of-atlanta/ Philosophy Cafe of Atlanta]
* [https://firstexistentialist.org/ First Existentialist Congregation of Atlanta]
* [https://sundayassemblyatlanta.org/ Sunday Assembly Atlanta]
* [https://atlantafreethought.org/ Atlanta Freethought Society]
* [https://atlantasecular.com/ Atlanta Secular Groups Directory]
* [https://www.meetup.com/AtlantaSkeptics/ Atlanta Skeptics]
* [https://www.meetup.com/Atlanta-Atheists/ Atlanta Atheists]
* [https://www.meetup.com/coastal-atheists-and-secular-humanists/ Coastal Atheists and Secular Humanists]
* [https://www.meetup.com/ethical-humanists-of-atlanta/ Ethical Humanists of Atlanta]
* [https://www.meetup.com/Black-Nonbelievers/ Black Nonbelievers of Atlanta]
* [https://www.meetup.com/Marietta-Atheists-Meetup/ Marietta Atheist/Skeptic/Humanist Meetup]
* [https://soldancemovement.tix.page/ Sol Dance]

=== Asheville / Western North Carolina ===

* [https://www.facebook.com/p/Pub-Theology-Bryson-City-100068396523317/ Bryson City Pub Theology]
* [https://wncbahai.org/ Baha'is of Asheville and Western NC]
* [https://truthisone.net/ Truth is One]
* [https://www.iam-hc.org/ Asheville Interfaith Assistance Ministry]
* [http://www.ashevilleinterfaith.org/ Asheville Interfaith]
* [https://www.pari.edu/ Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute]
* [https://prama.org/ Prama Institute and Wellness Center]
* [https://psychedelic.support/network/the-pearl-psychedelic-institute/ Pearl Psychedelic Institute]
* [https://azrabertrand.com/ Biomancy]

Necessary Prerequisite

2026-02-04T15:25:10Z

Fractalguy: /* The Dunning-Kruger Antiproliferation Movement */

[[File:Necessary-prerequisites-building-blocks-education.png|thumb|If the top block is your goal, all the other blocks must be in place first.]]
[[Progress]] happens because every new [[concept]] or [[technology]] is built on the foundation of everything that came before it. This principle is [[universal]], applying to the [[evolution]] of the [[universe]], of [[life]], as well as [[education]], personal growth and [[cultural]] [[evolution]].<blockquote>''"An open [[mind]] is a prerequisite to an open heart."'' -[[wikipedia:Robert_Sapolsky|Robert Sapolsky]]</blockquote>One of the primary goals of the [[metaculture]] [[wiki]] is to provide the means for filling in the prerequisite knowledge required to fully understand all of its core [[concepts]]. Everyone comes with different [[educational]] backgrounds, [[religious]] and [[cultural]] [[perspectives]]. [[metaculture]] should [[meet people where they are]], and provide a clear path to the "top of the mountain."

== In Fractals ==
Calculating a [[fractal]] [[Generating equation|equation]] is an [[Iteration|iterative]] process using a [[recursive]] [[feedback loop]], with each new repetition of the equation revealing a new layer of [[complexity]]. It is impossible to reveal the full pattern without performing every calculation, each of which is built upon the result of the previous one. The same is true for all of knowledge, which is the primary argument being made on this page.

== In Education ==

In education, you must learn the fundamental concepts for a subject before you can learn the advanced theory. The fundamentals are a ''Necessary Prerequisite'' for understanding the higher-level classes.

== In Societies ==

In order for societies to [[evolve]], there are [[necessary prerequisites]] for each step. If you have ever played the game [[wikipedia:Civilization_(series)|Civilization]] then this point is obvious. You must invent the wheel and tame horses before you can invent the chariots that will let you dominate the ancient era. Writing must be invented before [[mathematics]], which is required for trade and navigation.

[http://well-of-souls.com/civ/images/civ6_tech_tree1.jpg Civ 6 Tech Tree] | [https://well-of-souls.com/civ/images/civ6_civics_tree1.jpg Civ 6 Civics Tree]

== In Moral and Cognitive Development ==

[[File:Kohlberg-Stages-Moral-Development.png|thumb|right]]

The [[wikipedia:Cognitive_development|cognitive developmental]] systems proposed by [[wikipedia:Lawrence_Kohlberg's_stages_of_moral_development|Kohlberg]] and [[wikipedia:Maslow's_hierarchy_of_needs|Maslow]] (and [[wikipedia:Piaget's_theory_of_cognitive_development|Piaget]], [[wikipedia:Moral_foundations_theory|Haidt]], [[wikipedia:Integral_theory|Wilber]], and others) exemplify how the concept of [[educational]] [[Progress|progression]] and prerequisite knowledge applies to areas of personal development. If you want to obtain [[enlightenment]] then there are necessary steps you must follow.

[[metaculture]] seeks to define those steps, with [[science]]. When you know the path ahead, it is easier to find your way to the [[Enlightenment|top of the mountain]]. Understanding the stages of cognitive development accelerates that development.

=== Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development ===

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Kohlberg%27s_stages_of_moral_development Kohlberg's stages of moral development] is an important concept to learn in order to understand how different people perceive [[ethical]] decision making. It comes up in many places on the [[metaculture]] [[wiki]]. It demonstrates how the building blocks of [[ethical]] knowledge and experience lead to a [[March of progress|progressive]] expansion in our definition of [[ethics]].

While the theory is not perfect, it accurately describes [[moral]] reasoning as a progressively learned skill that continues to consider [[In-group|more people]] with more nuance until a fully generalized and inclusive [[Belief System|belief system]] is reached.

In [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/11324722-the-righteous-mind Jonathan Haidt's The Righteous Mind], Kohlberg is used as a jumping off point in order to form a broader, more [[universal]] theory of [[moral]] development ([[wikipedia:Moral_foundations_theory|Moral Foundations Theory]]) that is inclusive of non-western cultures and does not rely upon the rationalist assumption that [[moral]] reactions are based on [[reason]], when [[Evidence-Based Best Practices|evidence]] shows that [[reason]] is more often used to justify those reactions after the fact.

Even though Kohlberg's model is not the latest and greatest, it formed the foundation of [[moral]] development theory for decades and accurately demonstrates the process of generalizing and [[Universal|universalizing]] [[ethical]] systems that happens the more you study these things. Recognizing when someone is still on Stage 4 goes a long way to explain why so many people justify immoral acts that are technically [[legal]]. The model also shows us that improvement is made through [[education]], not [[persuasion]], as is the case for most [[ideas]] that are backed by [[Evidence-Based Best Practices|evidence]] but still denied by significant numbers of people, [[evolution]] being a prime example.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bounwXLkme4||center||frame}}

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0axVjiTe9Q||center||frame}}

=== Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs ===

[[File:MaslowHierarchy.png|thumb|right]]

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs Maslow's hierarchy of needs] marks a similar path for personal growth, but focused on the satisfaction of our physical and [[emotional]] needs as prerequisites for [[spiritual]] and [[moral]] [[fulfillment]]. Before you can find [[love]] you must first find shelter. Before you can achieve self-actualization, you must have [[love]]. Each stage is a step towards [[enlightenment]] that rests on the foundation of the previous stage.

Critics have pointed out that the order of this progression is not consistently followed [https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/philosophy-and-therapy/202401/the-philosophy-of-maslows-hierarchy], but the concept is still important to understand. Basic needs should come first. If you are trying to increase [[happiness]] in a [[society]], a focus on higher [[education]] and the [[arts]] will have less impact than solving [[food]] scarcity if people are starving. [[Mental health]] issues are much easier to solve when you don't live on the street or a single [[paycheck]] away from it.

It's a good way to understand the steps needed to get to [[enlightenment]]. Sure, the order of execution is not absolute, but the relative priorities are. It also demonstrates that you have to [[meet people where they are]], fulfill the needs that are most pressing, and build on that infrastructure to achieve higher-level goals.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-4ithG_07Q||center||frame}}

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xT6BpFhPsfY||center||frame}}

=== Ken Wilbur's Integral Theory ===
[[File:Integral-theory-lines-altitudes-chart.png|thumb|Composite color coded cognitive chart]]
The new age [[philosopher]] [[wikipedia:Ken_Wilber|Ken Wilber's]] [[wikipedia:Integral_theory|Integral Theory]] offers a similar view of the stages of [[spiritual]] development and [[consciousness]] that attempts to create a unified framework for multiple cognitive development models. His writing is less [[scientific]] and incorporates far more conjecture and mysticism than is permissible in an academic work. However, the Structural Stage Theory and its successor [[wikipedia:Spiral_Dynamics|Spiral Dynamics]] closely align with established theories of [[wikipedia:Cognitive_development|cognitive development]] and can be quite useful for understanding the [[perspectives]] of people at different stages of development.

Wilber also ties it into a [[universal]] [[self-organization]] and [[Complexity|complexification]] process similar to modern theories of [[wikipedia:Universal_Darwinism|Universal Darwinism]]. The [[concept]] of a "[[wikipedia:Holon_(philosophy)|holon]]" which is "simultaneously a whole, as well as a part of a larger whole" is perfectly embodied by the [[fractal]]. While it can sometimes get repetitive and esoteric, and needs to be read with a [[Skepticism|skeptical]] [[mind]], Wilber can help put some of the deepest insights into states of [[consciousness]] provided by [[Buddhism]] within the context of modern [[psychology]] and [[wikipedia:Cognitive_development|cognitive development]] theory.

The "[[wikipedia:Integral_theory#Four_quadrants|All Quadrants All Levels]]" model depicts the whole [[universe]] in terms of [[March of progress|progressive]] holarchies, including the [[evolution]] of galaxies and planets, living systems, intelligence, and [[culture]]. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_theory#Four_quadrants][https://medium.com/@andrew.field81/making-sense-of-the-abortion-debate-using-the-integral-framework-ebc4c2671654][https://shanefenwick.medium.com/on-ken-wilber-and-integral-theory-bdcc6787acd3] Even though this perfectly describes the nature of [[fractal]] [[self-organization]], where new patterns of behavior emerge when collections of independent elements act in concert, he only occasionally references [[fractals]] in his writing. This is something of a missed opportunity, because [[fractals]] provide the [[mathematical]] basis for how and why holarchies tend to [[self-organize]] everywhere in the [[universe]].

There are many [https://www.integralworld.net/walker1.html issues with Integral Theory and the Integral Movement], including flirtations with [[pseudoscience]], [[grift]], and [[supernatural]] explanations. This has kept the [https://integrallife.com/ Integral movement] from defining [[metaculture]] even though it shares a similar goal.{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tbR0sSvDcw||center|Integral Theory - States and Stages|frame}}

=== Model for Hierarchical Complexity ===
The progression of cognitive development through the various stages described by [[wikipedia:Piaget's_theory_of_cognitive_development|Piaget]], [[wikipedia:Lawrence_Kohlberg's_stages_of_moral_development|Kohlberg]], [[wikipedia:Maslow's_hierarchy_of_needs|Maslow]], [[wikipedia:Loevinger's_stages_of_ego_development|Loevinger]], [[wikipedia:Robert_Kegan|Kegan]], [[wikipedia:Jean_Gebser|Gebser]], and [[wikipedia:James_W._Fowler|Fowler]] that are combined to form Integral theory are better represented by a progressive [[Complexity|complexification]] rather than a linear progression or [[hierarchy]]. This reflects the fact that at each sage, additional [[information]], nuance, and a wider [[in-group]] are the key differentiating factors. The [[fractal]] [[wikipedia:Iteration|iteration]] process also better represents the process of "transcending and including" that occurs at each stage.
[[File:Sierpinski-integral-levels-of-consciousness.png|thumb|650x650px|Fractal Cognitive Development Model|none]]The [[wikipedia:Model_of_hierarchical_complexity|Model of Hierarchical Complexity]] provides the most complete and [[evidence-based]] model for how thinking complexifies as wisdom is generalized. Unlike Integral, it is an actual formal, peer-reviewed theory, and leaves out the [[wikipedia:Mentalism_(psychology)|mentalistic]] elements that defy empirical study. It can even be applied to non-human species!

=== Culture Mirrors Cognition ===
This process also mirrors the development of [[religious]] [[belief systems]] throughout human [[history]], from ancient spiritism and [[ritual]] magic, to the mythological, [[Doctrine|doctrinal]], [[rational]], [[postmodern]], and [[universal]]. This can be viewed as humanity's [[wikipedia:Collective_consciousness|collective consciousness]] coming to greater generalized understanding as our species ages, just like our own [[consciousness]] grows as we become older and wiser--assuming you keep on learning!

=== Needs Versus Greeds ===
This great infographic shows the difference between our "needs" and our "greeds." Once you have all you need to achieve physical and [[emotional]] security, your duty is to help others, not subjugate them.
[[File:Maslow-greeds-versus-needs.jpg|none|thumb|600x600px|Maslow's needs can lead to [[Monetary addiction|rich people's greeds]]]]

== You Don't Need to Be a Know-It-All ==
The [[March of progress|progression]] through the cognitive stages of development relies on gaining enough [[information]] and experience to adopt the new conceptual framework and generalize the previously disparate [[concepts]] into a new, [[holistic]] theory of [[reality]].

Put more simply, this means that you don't need to become and expert in [[Neurophysiology|neuroscience]] in order to understand the [[materialistic]] view of [[consciousness]]. You don't have to be an expert in [[theology]] to understand [[pantheism]]. You don't have to be a [[sociologist]] to understand the [[universal in-group]]. These [[concepts]] are [[Emergent properties|emergent]] whenever a person acquires enough of the key [[ideas]] that form the foundation for the next level of understanding.

Once that understanding is obtained, new [[information]] simply becomes more details--like additional iterations of a [[fractal]] pattern being revealed. That which fits in the current paradigm fills out new, [[beautiful]] kaleidoscopes of understanding. [[Information]] that doesn't fit accumulates as exceptions, until the next paradigm shift creates a new [[generating equation]], and a more complex pattern emerges that incorporates those outliers.

== Psychological Off-Ramps for Magical Thinking ==
Using [[metaphor mapping]] allows [[supernatural]], [[pseudoscientific]], and other [[beliefs]] not based on [[reason]] to become connected to a [[science]]-based [[reality]]. This helps validate the [[emotional]] goal and connection to the [[belief]] rather than debunking, which is ineffective at [[persuasion]].

The [[placebo effect]] is particularly useful for this, since most [[ritual]]-based healing techniques rely on the [[placebo effect]] for any efficacy that they do have.

The goal is to create a roadmap of [[ideas]] and [[educational]] curriculum that can take someone from a magical/mythical mindset to one of integrated [[rationality]] and [[universalism]].

== The Fractal Tree of Knowledge ==

See the [[Fractal Tree of Knowledge]] page for an example of how to [[reason]] yourself from a stage 4 to a stage 6 on the [[Kohlberg]] scale.

== Prerequisite for Peace ==

[[metaculture]] is a [[necessary prerequisite]] for a [[In-group|united human future]]. It is the framework that enables [[Culturally neutral|cross-cultural understanding]] of our common goals. Only when all people are able to see all others as members of their [[in-group]] can we be truly unified. This is accomplished by creating a common [[scientific]] framework for understanding [[religious]] [[allegory]] in all forms, allowing members of any [[culture]] to see other [[cultures]] as analogous equals rather than heretics and heathens.

== Anyone Can Get It ==
We see so many people spreading [[hate]], anger, and general bad [[karma]] everywhere in modern [[society]]. Those who understand that this negativity is hurting them much more than anyone else sometimes wonder what it is that these people fail to "get" about [[life]]. [[metaculture]] proposes that there are very specific, identifiable [[concepts]] that negative people fail to understand, and that learning these [[concepts]] can transform a person and make them an [[optimistic]] [[realist]], who sees and seeks out the [[beauty]] and [[wonder]] of the [[universe]], while still not losing sight of the real challenges [[life]] imposes.

This is a very hopeful perspective on the human capability for redemption. Anyone can be "saved" by learning the necessary [[concepts]]. Anyone can transform their lives into one that is full of [[happiness]]. Your genes and upbringing may have predisposed you to cynicism and negativity, but your [[brain]] is always capable of learning if you expose it to the right [[information]], and when you understand the [[holistic]] [[beauty]] of the natural [[universe]] you cannot help but realize--it's pretty freaking sweet.

These aren't just differences of equally valid opinions. This is the [[Enlightenment|common conclusion]] of every great [[philosopher]], every [[religious]] [[tradition]], and the greatest [[scientific]] [[minds]] throughout [[history]].

== The Dunning-Kruger Antiproliferation Movement ==
[[File:Dead-stupid-pain-felt-by-others.jpeg|thumb|318x318px]]
When it comes to understanding universal subjects like [[politics]] and [[religion]], people with vastly different levels of subject matter expertise are expected to converse as peers. In order to understand [[ideas]] like [[universalism]] you must first have an understanding of the basic tenets of the major world [[religions]] and their commonalities. These are things that can be taught, but differences of opinion on these matters are not called out as the disparities in [[education]] that they truly are.

There are entirely too many people on [[social media]] giving opinions about things when they obviously haven't taken the prerequisite courses. They insert themselves into graduate level conversations about topics when they haven't passed the 101 course. Their ignorant opinions are often amplified by others with the same lack of expertise, on the basis that their arguments appeal to [[common sense]] or the values of their [[in-group]]. It has led to the mass-proliferation of [[misinformation]] via the [[wikipedia:Dunning–Kruger_effect|Dunning-Kruger effect]]. [[Newsfeed]] [[promotion]] [[algorithms]] must be adjusted to prioritize [[experts]], and [[trust]] in [[institutions]] must be restored so that [[expertise]] is not ignored or [[contradicted]].

[[Podcast]] hosts ([[Podcast|but not these!]]) are particularly bad offenders. They have become a dangerous amplifier of [[misinformation]], as their insatiable hunger for content that chases the whims of [[social media]] [[algorithms]] causes them to give uninformed opinions on all kinds of [[scientific]] and [[political]] topics. Many suffer from [https://www.neuroscienceof.com/human-nature-blog/audience-capture-psychology-economics-nickocado-keynes audience capture], where the [[monetized]] clicks they get from their most ill-informed videos [[Incentives|incentivizes]] them to lean harder into their worst takes.
[[File:My-ignorance-is-as-good-as-your-knowledge.png|center|frameless|600x600px]]
Our [[culture]] needs to develop a new [[taboo]] regarding the voicing of opinions on subjects which you have neither experience nor [[expertise]]. If you are just shooting your mouth off because you think you have to have an opinion about everything, or parroting something you heard but have no understanding of, then you need to sit down, shut up, and listen to the [[experts]].

Is this statement ironic when presented on a [[wiki]] that gives an opinion on nearly everything? Perhaps. But in this case the consistent opinion given is to trust [[science]] and [[expertise]] rather than any particular conclusion drawn. It's also a collection of opinions from many different [[authors]] and content creators who are all experts in their field, and cites unbiased sources like [[Wiki|Wikipedia]] that are also created by experts. As long as those standards are followed, ironic hypocrisy can be avoided.

If you do participate in the online conversation, remember to act like a student and not a teacher if you're not qualified to teach on the subject, since there is usually someone else in the thread who is. By having well-understood and [[trusted]] standards for [[education]] and credentialing within all areas of specialization, and [[Taboos|cultural norms]] that reinforce them, we can hopefully get to a place where our [[minds]] are consistently nourished by the finest [[information]] from the most knowledgeable subject matter [[experts]].

By providing people a clearer understanding of cognitive development stages, [[educational]] [[wikipedia:Coupling_(computer_programming)|dependencies]], the importance of [[expertise]] and awareness of the Dunning-Kruger effect, it might be possible to return to a paradigm where most of the [[information]] we consume is created by people who actually know what they are talking about.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t54I6NKtr4k||center|'Do your own research' and the Dunning-Kruger Effect|frame}}

== This Is Necessary ==

[[Life]] feeds on [[life]].

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmJYZ1NIn1Y||center|Tool - Disgustipated|frame}}

File:My-ignorance-is-as-good-as-your-knowledge.png

2026-02-04T15:24:01Z

Fractalguy:

Love

2026-02-04T13:51:19Z

Fractalguy: /* Religion is (Supposed to Be) Love */

[[File:Love-heart-marriage-partnership-romance.jpg|thumb|The [[Universe]] loves you no [[matter]] what]]
Love is an [[inevitable]] [[emergent property]] of any [[consciousness]] created by a [[self-replicating]], [[evolutionary]] process, which are themselves an [[inevitable]] product of any [[complex]] [[universe]]. <blockquote>''"Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength, while loving someone deeply gives you courage."'' -[[wikipedia:Laozi|Lao Tzu]]</blockquote>
[[File:Love-was-their-religion.jpeg|right|frameless|300x300px]]
It is the [[subjective]] [[experience]] of our drive to [[reproduce]] [[Sex|sexually]], so any [[self-aware]] [[self-replicating]] being will experience some version of it. It is also the [[subjective]] experience of [[In-group|belonging]], [[Relationships|friendship]], and [[community]], so any [[social]] being will experience it, using shared [[neural]] circuits with [[evolutionary]] roots in [[Sex|sexual]] love.[https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/198134555-sex-god-and-the-brain]

This makes love [[universal]]. It is an intrinsic property of the [[universe]], since [[self-replication]], [[consciousness]], and [[Society|sociality]] are all [[inevitable]]. Therefore, [[god]] is [[wikipedia:Omnibenevolence|omnibenevolent]] since love is built into the very [[Fractal Geometry of God|fabric of the universe]]. You can't even [[Creation Story|create]] a [[universe]] without creating love. It's been proven.

See the [[theory of everything]] and [[god concept]] pages for more on this [[perspective]]. <blockquote>''Oh no, I don't believe it''

''You say that you think you know the meaning of love''

''You say love is all we need''

''You say with your love you can change''

''All of the fools, all of the hate''

''I think you're probably out to lunch''

-[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2FCoyyrk3c Frank Zappa, "Oh No"]</blockquote>

== The Cognitive Development Perspective ==

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7xMfIp-irg Love is all you need]. Until you get hungry. Or the weather gets bad. Then you might need [[food]] and shelter too. [[Necessary Prerequisite#Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs|See Maslow]].

Here is a [[good]] summary of love from the perspective of [[neuroscience]]. Understanding the neurochemical basis for love helps us see the [[poetry]] of [[nature]] and [[beauty]] of [[mathematics]] and [[complexity]]. It enhances [[wonder]] rather than undermining it, and allows us to enhance the experience of love by knowing it better.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zev0pd-Tp0||center|What is love?|frame}}

== Love and Happiness ==
[[File:Fractal-metaculture-heart-mandelbrot-word-cloud.png|thumb|The Mandelbrot looks like a heart. Coincidence?]]
Love is an incredibly powerful [[emotion]] and one of the primary things we seek in [[life]]. However, love is not the [[goal]]--[[happiness]] is. Love can help lead us to [[happiness]], but it is the vehicle, not the destination. Confusing the two can lead to [[addiction]] in the form of [[wikipedia:Codependency|codependency]], serial infatuations, and other forms of destructive [[relationship]] [[habits]].

Love has been extensively analyzed by [[philosophers]], [[Theology|theologians]], [[Psychologist|psychologists]], and [[Poetry|poets]] since the beginning of [[time]], so there is no new [[information]] or unique [[perspective]] on love that could be added here.

Obviously a personal [[best practice]] with regard to love would be to love truly, deeply, [[Honesty|honestly]] and expansively. Love your [[Sex|partner]], your [[family]], your [[friends]], coworkers, [[Community|fellow citizens]], and [[Universal in-group|members of the human race]]. The more you love the more you can love, [[like]] exercising a muscle.

But of course, this has been said a million times in a million better ways so this [[wiki]] will focus more on things like [[fractals]], [[spirituality]], and [[ethics]] where a unique [[perspective]] can be found.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmzzFB_mTQ4||center|How to be a more loving person, in 3 steps|frame}}

== Love Questions? Love Questions! ==
Falling in love means connecting with someone on a deeply personal level. To do this, you need to ask questions! Which questions? [https://www.remento.co/journal/36-questions-to-fall-in-love-or-at-least-bring-you-closer-together Research has shown that these 36 questions] [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0146167297234003] are highly effective at developing the deep interpersonal bonds that lead to love. It helps if you actually like the answers that they give, but if you don't ask the right questions you can never know whether or not this a person you can have a deep [[spiritual]] connection with. Sure, there are probably other questions that would be effective at doing this, but these are the ones that have been tested in the lab and shown to be effective.

[https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0146167297234003 The Experimental Generation of Interpersonal Closeness]

[https://www.remento.co/journal/36-questions-to-fall-in-love-or-at-least-bring-you-closer-together 36 Questions to Fall in Love]

== Art is Love ==

Love is better expressed through [[music]], [[art]], and [[poetry]] anyway.

[https://www.hitched.co.uk/wedding-planning/ceremony-and-reception/wedding-poems/ Wedding Poems] are one of the most common events when we seek out and read a great [[poem]] with deep personal [[meaning]] to us. [https://www.yourdailypoem.com/listpoem.jsp?poem_id=268 Married Love] by [[wikipedia:Guan_Daosheng|Guan Daosheng]] is a great example.

<blockquote>You and I

Have so much love,

That it

Burns like a fire,

In which we bake a lump of clay

Molded into a figure of you

And a figure of me.

Then we take both of them,

And break them into pieces,

And mix the pieces with water,

And mold again a figure of you,

And a figure of me.

I am in your clay.

In life we share a single quilt.

In [[death]] we will share a single coffin.</blockquote>Another great one is [https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poetrymagazine/poems/49493/i-carry-your-heart-with-mei-carry-it-in I carry your heart with me] by [[wikipedia:E._E._Cummings|E. E. Cummings]], which is not yet in the public domain.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sabTQjZs4hs||center|E E Cummings ~ I Carry Your Heart With Me I Carry It In My Heart|frame}}

== Religion is (Supposed to Be) Love ==
The underlying motivation for [[spiritual]] pursuits and the creation of [[religions]] and the [[concept]] of [[god]] is all love. Unfortunately, many manifestations of [[religion]] have lost sight of this fact.

[https://jimpalmerauthor.substack.com/p/before-religion-there-was-love Before Religion There Was Love] is a great examination of the relationship between love and [[religion]] from a [[secular]] [[spirituality]] perspective. Here is the summary:<blockquote>
* Any conversation about what it means to live well eventually leads us to love, not as sentiment or romance, but as a fundamental orientation toward the world.
* Toxic religion doesn’t just distort belief—it warps the very meaning of love.
* You don’t need religion to love because love is not a doctrine—it’s a human capacity.
* Far from being religious artifacts, love and compassion are evolutionary and existential necessities—qualities that helped humans survive, cooperate, and build communities long before formal religions existed.
* In the end, love is the most powerful thing we can choose, not because it fixes everything, but because it keeps us human.
* It was always love.
</blockquote>

== Broken Hearts are for Assholes ==
When love goes awry, it can cause a lot of pain. As [[wikipedia:The_Buddha|the Buddha]] taught us, all [[suffering]] is due to craving and attachment. When you stay attached to someone who doesn't love you back, it causes [[suffering]]. The only cause of that [[suffering]] is your own desire.

Therefore, if your heart is broken, you're the asshole.

Taking a [[Humor|humorous]] perspective on heartache can help reduce craving and attachment by lowering the perceived stakes. Losing that partner is not the end of the world. They weren't right for you in the first place. All of your whining and pining is pretty silly when you think about it.

You could say that [https://www.npr.org/2025/02/17/nx-s1-5292139/health-stress-cardiomyopathy-heart-attack these people are the biggest assholes of all], but that probably crosses a line.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8B5FiVg5HA||center|Frank Zappa - Broken Hearts Are For Assholes|frame}}

== Love Songs ==
Several songs offering a [[variety]] of [[perspectives]] on love.{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7xMfIp-irg||center|The Beatles - All You Need is Love|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0LAs7X5ybE||center|The J. Geils Band - Love Stinks|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUff6gpqd8s||center|Nazareth - Love Hurts|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xg3vE8Ie_E||center|Taylor Swift - Love Story|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SOryJvTAGs||center|The B-52's - Love Shack|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyEuk8j8imI||center|Justin Bieber - Love Yourself|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQmmM_qwG4k||center|Led Zeppelin - Whole Lotta Love|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ll3CMgiUPuU||center|John Coltrane - A Love Supreme (Full Album)|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKsQR72HY0s||center|Dolly Parton - I Will Always Love You|frame}}

Love

2026-02-04T13:49:59Z

Fractalguy:

[[File:Love-heart-marriage-partnership-romance.jpg|thumb|The [[Universe]] loves you no [[matter]] what]]
Love is an [[inevitable]] [[emergent property]] of any [[consciousness]] created by a [[self-replicating]], [[evolutionary]] process, which are themselves an [[inevitable]] product of any [[complex]] [[universe]]. <blockquote>''"Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength, while loving someone deeply gives you courage."'' -[[wikipedia:Laozi|Lao Tzu]]</blockquote>
[[File:Love-was-their-religion.jpeg|right|frameless|300x300px]]
It is the [[subjective]] [[experience]] of our drive to [[reproduce]] [[Sex|sexually]], so any [[self-aware]] [[self-replicating]] being will experience some version of it. It is also the [[subjective]] experience of [[In-group|belonging]], [[Relationships|friendship]], and [[community]], so any [[social]] being will experience it, using shared [[neural]] circuits with [[evolutionary]] roots in [[Sex|sexual]] love.[https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/198134555-sex-god-and-the-brain]

This makes love [[universal]]. It is an intrinsic property of the [[universe]], since [[self-replication]], [[consciousness]], and [[Society|sociality]] are all [[inevitable]]. Therefore, [[god]] is [[wikipedia:Omnibenevolence|omnibenevolent]] since love is built into the very [[Fractal Geometry of God|fabric of the universe]]. You can't even [[Creation Story|create]] a [[universe]] without creating love. It's been proven.

See the [[theory of everything]] and [[god concept]] pages for more on this [[perspective]]. <blockquote>''Oh no, I don't believe it''

''You say that you think you know the meaning of love''

''You say love is all we need''

''You say with your love you can change''

''All of the fools, all of the hate''

''I think you're probably out to lunch''

-[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2FCoyyrk3c Frank Zappa, "Oh No"]</blockquote>

== The Cognitive Development Perspective ==

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7xMfIp-irg Love is all you need]. Until you get hungry. Or the weather gets bad. Then you might need [[food]] and shelter too. [[Necessary Prerequisite#Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs|See Maslow]].

Here is a [[good]] summary of love from the perspective of [[neuroscience]]. Understanding the neurochemical basis for love helps us see the [[poetry]] of [[nature]] and [[beauty]] of [[mathematics]] and [[complexity]]. It enhances [[wonder]] rather than undermining it, and allows us to enhance the experience of love by knowing it better.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zev0pd-Tp0||center|What is love?|frame}}

== Love and Happiness ==
[[File:Fractal-metaculture-heart-mandelbrot-word-cloud.png|thumb|The Mandelbrot looks like a heart. Coincidence?]]
Love is an incredibly powerful [[emotion]] and one of the primary things we seek in [[life]]. However, love is not the [[goal]]--[[happiness]] is. Love can help lead us to [[happiness]], but it is the vehicle, not the destination. Confusing the two can lead to [[addiction]] in the form of [[wikipedia:Codependency|codependency]], serial infatuations, and other forms of destructive [[relationship]] [[habits]].

Love has been extensively analyzed by [[philosophers]], [[Theology|theologians]], [[Psychologist|psychologists]], and [[Poetry|poets]] since the beginning of [[time]], so there is no new [[information]] or unique [[perspective]] on love that could be added here.

Obviously a personal [[best practice]] with regard to love would be to love truly, deeply, [[Honesty|honestly]] and expansively. Love your [[Sex|partner]], your [[family]], your [[friends]], coworkers, [[Community|fellow citizens]], and [[Universal in-group|members of the human race]]. The more you love the more you can love, [[like]] exercising a muscle.

But of course, this has been said a million times in a million better ways so this [[wiki]] will focus more on things like [[fractals]], [[spirituality]], and [[ethics]] where a unique [[perspective]] can be found.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmzzFB_mTQ4||center|How to be a more loving person, in 3 steps|frame}}

== Love Questions? Love Questions! ==
Falling in love means connecting with someone on a deeply personal level. To do this, you need to ask questions! Which questions? [https://www.remento.co/journal/36-questions-to-fall-in-love-or-at-least-bring-you-closer-together Research has shown that these 36 questions] [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0146167297234003] are highly effective at developing the deep interpersonal bonds that lead to love. It helps if you actually like the answers that they give, but if you don't ask the right questions you can never know whether or not this a person you can have a deep [[spiritual]] connection with. Sure, there are probably other questions that would be effective at doing this, but these are the ones that have been tested in the lab and shown to be effective.

[https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0146167297234003 The Experimental Generation of Interpersonal Closeness]

[https://www.remento.co/journal/36-questions-to-fall-in-love-or-at-least-bring-you-closer-together 36 Questions to Fall in Love]

== Art is Love ==

Love is better expressed through [[music]], [[art]], and [[poetry]] anyway.

[https://www.hitched.co.uk/wedding-planning/ceremony-and-reception/wedding-poems/ Wedding Poems] are one of the most common events when we seek out and read a great [[poem]] with deep personal [[meaning]] to us. [https://www.yourdailypoem.com/listpoem.jsp?poem_id=268 Married Love] by [[wikipedia:Guan_Daosheng|Guan Daosheng]] is a great example.

<blockquote>You and I

Have so much love,

That it

Burns like a fire,

In which we bake a lump of clay

Molded into a figure of you

And a figure of me.

Then we take both of them,

And break them into pieces,

And mix the pieces with water,

And mold again a figure of you,

And a figure of me.

I am in your clay.

In life we share a single quilt.

In [[death]] we will share a single coffin.</blockquote>Another great one is [https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poetrymagazine/poems/49493/i-carry-your-heart-with-mei-carry-it-in I carry your heart with me] by [[wikipedia:E._E._Cummings|E. E. Cummings]], which is not yet in the public domain.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sabTQjZs4hs||center|E E Cummings ~ I Carry Your Heart With Me I Carry It In My Heart|frame}}

== Religion is (Supposed to Be) Love ==
The underlying motivation for [[spiritual]] pursuits and the creation of [[religions]] and the [[concept]] of [[god]] is all love. Unfortunately, many manifestations of [[religion]] have lost sight of this fact.

[https://jimpalmerauthor.substack.com/p/before-religion-there-was-love Before Religion There Was Love] is a great examination of the relationship between love and [[religion]] from a [[secular]] [[spirituality]] perspective.

== Broken Hearts are for Assholes ==
When love goes awry, it can cause a lot of pain. As [[wikipedia:The_Buddha|the Buddha]] taught us, all [[suffering]] is due to craving and attachment. When you stay attached to someone who doesn't love you back, it causes [[suffering]]. The only cause of that [[suffering]] is your own desire.

Therefore, if your heart is broken, you're the asshole.

Taking a [[Humor|humorous]] perspective on heartache can help reduce craving and attachment by lowering the perceived stakes. Losing that partner is not the end of the world. They weren't right for you in the first place. All of your whining and pining is pretty silly when you think about it.

You could say that [https://www.npr.org/2025/02/17/nx-s1-5292139/health-stress-cardiomyopathy-heart-attack these people are the biggest assholes of all], but that probably crosses a line.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8B5FiVg5HA||center|Frank Zappa - Broken Hearts Are For Assholes|frame}}

== Love Songs ==
Several songs offering a [[variety]] of [[perspectives]] on love.{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7xMfIp-irg||center|The Beatles - All You Need is Love|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0LAs7X5ybE||center|The J. Geils Band - Love Stinks|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUff6gpqd8s||center|Nazareth - Love Hurts|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xg3vE8Ie_E||center|Taylor Swift - Love Story|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SOryJvTAGs||center|The B-52's - Love Shack|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyEuk8j8imI||center|Justin Bieber - Love Yourself|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQmmM_qwG4k||center|Led Zeppelin - Whole Lotta Love|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ll3CMgiUPuU||center|John Coltrane - A Love Supreme (Full Album)|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKsQR72HY0s||center|Dolly Parton - I Will Always Love You|frame}}

Psychology

2026-02-04T13:40:11Z

Fractalguy: /* Self-Help */

[[File:Brain-Creating-The-Universe.jpeg|thumb|[[Brains]] in space!]]
[[wikipedia:Psychology|Psychology]] is another huge topic that will be distilled to a few paragraphs that can't possibly do it [[justice]]. Keep in mind we're here to [[Connections|put the pieces together]], not to provide all the background [[information]].<blockquote>''“If you deliberately plan on being less than you are capable of being, then I warn you that you’ll be unhappy for the rest of your life.”'' -[[wikipedia:Abraham_Maslow|Abraham Maslow]]</blockquote>Since a primary [[goal]] of this [[wiki]] is to provide [[scientific]] grounding for valid [[spiritual]] [[concepts]], psychology is naturally the field of study most relevant to this endeavor. The vast majority of [[religious]] [[belief]] and [[Rituals|practice]] has to do with the study of the self, the [[mind]], and how we [[work]] together in [[societies]]. Research into the [[brain]] has given us ample [[evidence]] for how and why they work to produce [[happiness]]. This helps deepen your [[ethical]] [[convictions]] without reliance on [[faith]].

== Psychology Pages ==
[[File:Does-pavlov-think-about-feeding-dogs.jpeg|right|frameless|300x300px]]
Related [[wiki]] pages about [[mental]] stuff.

* '''[[Brain]], [[Neural Networks]],''' and [[Neurophysiology]]
* '''[[Consciousness]]''', [[Attention]], and [[Subjective]] [[Mind]]
* [[Free will|'''Free Will''']] and '''[[Addiction]]'''
* [[Happiness and Well-Being|'''Happiness and Well-Being''']] versus [[Suffering]]
* [[Meaning of Life|'''Finding Meaning''']] and [[Wonder]]
* '''[[Optimism]]''', '''[[Primal World Beliefs]]''', and the [[God Concept|'''God Concept''']]
* '''[[Spirituality]]''', [[Religion]], [[In-group|'''In-Group''']], and [[Rituals]]
* '''[[Psychedelics]]'''
* [[Self-aware|Self-Awareness]]
* [[Cognitive Dissonance]]
* [[Language]], [[Humor]], and '''[[Persuasion]]'''
* '''[[Art]]''', [[Music]], [[Poetry]], [[Games]], and [[Dance]]
* '''[[Emotions]]'''
* [[Safety]], [[Abundance]]
* [[Outrage]], [[Contrarianism]], and [[Trolling]]
* [[Lying]], [[Cheating]], and [[Misinformation]]
* [[Salience|Motivational Salience]], [[Short Term Rewards and Long Term Consequences|Delayed Gratification and Temptation]]
* '''[[Variety]]''' and [[Neuroplasticity]]
* [[Placebo effect|'''Placebo Effect''']]

== Positive Psychology ==
[[File:Majority-of-psychological-experiments-in-the-1970s-just-crimes.jpeg|right|frameless|346x346px]]
[[metaculture]] acknowledges the need to diagnose and treat mental illness and anxiety. However, the study of the human [[mind]] should not focus exclusively on its [[problems]]. In a [[healthy]] [[culture]], the majority of people need to focus on finding greater [[happiness]] and [[meaning]] in [[life]], not treating debilitating conditions. [[wikipedia:Positive_psychology|Positive Psychology]] is the branch of psychology that focuses on improving the [[subjective]] [[experience]] of [[consciousness]], not [[just]] making it tolerable enough to continue participating in [[capitalism]].

There is also [[evidence]] that pathologizing and focusing [[attention]] on psychological traits that are [[probably]] within the boundaries of normal human behavior is also damaging. That is why this [[wiki]] doesn't spend much [[time]] ruminating on [[These things are bad, mkay?|things that are bad]].

Looking back at your [[life]] using therapy terms like trauma, toxicity, and narcissism to describe everyday challenges and personalities can become a form of [https://mikecormack.substack.com/p/why-no-one-grows-up-anymoreand-whats diagnostic autobiography], to borrow a term from [https://mikecormack.substack.com/p/why-no-one-grows-up-anymoreand-whats this article]. Check out the [[podcast]] [https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/america-in-the-age-of-diagnosis/id1594471023?i=1000725687895 America in the Age of Diagnosis] for more on this phenomenon.

The focus of this [[wiki]] is not to replicate the [[wikipedia:Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manual_of_Mental_Disorders|DSM]]. It is to give you practical insights in to how the [[brain]] and [[consciousness]] work, and how to construct a [[Belief System|belief system]] that provides [[meaning]] and maximizes [[happiness]]. By doing so, you can inoculate yourself against many of the disorders that you'll find in the [[wikipedia:Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manual_of_Mental_Disorders|DSM]]. But if you've got serious problems, see a therapist, not a [[wiki]].

For more [[information]], check out these [[Organizations#Positive Psychology|Positive Psychology Resources]].

== Self-Help, Optimization, Therapy, and Neuroscience ==
[[File:Studying-psychology-is-not-a-substitute-for-actual-therapy.png|right|frameless|400x400px]]
Depending on your [[political]] persuasion, you may see psychology and [[spirituality]] from the [[perspective]] of self-help, optimization, therapy, or neuroscience. Here is a summary of these [[perspectives]].

This insight is borrowed from James Pogue and Ezra Klein's excellent interview about the alliance between alt-right [[authoritarianism]] and [[technology]] [[oligarchs]]. [https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/28/opinion/ezra-klein-podcast-james-pogue.html][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daNlhwAWnMA]

=== Self-Help ===
The self-help perspective focuses on [[positive]] affirmations, [[good]] [[habits]], and other generic advice. It provides some practical tools to help you develop good habits and achieve goals, but doesn't provide any deep understanding of how the [[brain]] works. It is [[politically]] centrist and blindly pro-[[capitalist]]. It focuses on individual choices over [[community]] building. Read [https://jimpalmerauthor.substack.com/p/the-death-of-self-help The Death of Self-Help] for a [[secular]] [[spirituality]] critique of the self-help industry and mindset.

=== Optimization ===
Optimization is self-help on [[wikipedia:Steroid|steroids]]--sometimes [[Metaphor|metaphorically]], sometimes [[literally]]. It is an obsessive, [[addictive]] view of self-help that tries to maximize every aspect of the self. It uses the term "[https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/abridged-dictionary-maxxing-222904922.html maxxing]." It is popular with the [[manosphere]], [[hustle culture]], and [[crypto-bros]]. They tend to lean [[libertarian]] politically. [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00113921221146575]

=== Therapy ===
The therapy [[mindset]] focuses on identifying problems within the psyche and either [[wikipedia:Rumination_(psychology)|ruminating]] on them or coming up with creative [[wikipedia:Pharmacology|pharmacological]] methods for suppressing them. These are your stereotypical liberals.

=== Neuroscience ===
While members of all [[political]]/psychological persuasions will name-drop neuroscience to sound more credible, the usage here should be considered in contrast to the other three perspectives. The neuroscience perspective considers a [[holistic]] view of the [[brain]], body, and the [[culture]] it exists in. It seeks a robust, [[rational]] understanding of human [[flourishing]] and a [[political]] [[perspective]] that prioritizes [[happiness]] over [[ideology]] and [[monetary addiction]]. It doesn't fully align to any current [[political]] movement, though [[progressives]] share many [[values]].

The [[Podcast|podcasts]] [https://hiddenbrain.org/ Hidden Brain], [https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/10-happier-with-dan-harris/id1087147821 10% Happier], [https://www.ted.com/podcasts/how-to-be-a-better-human How To Be A Better Human] and others [[Podcast|on this list]] exemplify this approach to self-help.

== What Is Psychology? ==

Learn the basics. There's one for [[kids]], one for adults, and the complete intro course from Yale for you to choose from.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4mWEaxUpP4||center|Introduction to Psychology|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vo4pMVb0R6M||center|Crash Course Psychology #1 - Intro|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3FKHH2RzjI&list=PL6A08EB4EEFF3E91F||center|Yale Introduction to Psychology (Complete Course)|frame}}

== Frontier Psychiatry ==
It's psychosomatic! That boy needs therapy.{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLrnkK2YEcE||center|The Avalanches - Frontier Psychiatrist|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1V_xRb0x9aw||center|Gorillaz - Clint Eastwood|frame}}

Main Page

2026-01-23T13:50:00Z

Fractalguy:

[[File:Mandelbrot-Fractal-Puzzle.jpg|thumb|250x250px|[[Fractal Geometry of God|The Fractal Geometry of the Universe]]]]
<big>Think of a basic [[science]] [[education]] as giving you the pieces to the puzzle of the [[universe]]. All the facts are there, but nobody tells you how to put them together to create a [[meaningful]] [[worldview]].</big>

<big>Those who claim to know always end up basing them on [[pseudoscience]], [[conspiracy theories]], [[supernatural]] [[Allegory|stories]], or [[scams]] that are [[incentivized]] by modern [[capitalism]].</big>

<big>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viejY6UZ5Bk ''There's got to be a better way!'']</big>

<big>''[[metaculture]]'' is [[Allegory|like]] the picture on the puzzle box of the [[scientific]] [[universe]], and it is a [[fractal]].</big>

=== Key Pages and Topics ===
[[metaculture]] uses the latest [[scientific]] theories in [[Creation Story|cosmology]], [[complexity]], [[evolution]], [[sociology]], and [[neuroscience]], to create a new [[metanarrative]] of [[optimism]], [[In-group|inclusivity]], and [[Universe|universal]] [[love]] that is both [[Spirituality|spiritually]] satisfying and fully compatible with [[materialism]] by cultivating positive [[primal world beliefs]]. It is an [[evidence-based best practices]] approach to a [[flourishing]] [[life]] and [[society]].

The [[metaculture]] [[wiki]] is designed to provide all of the [[information]] you need to understand this way of thinking, using a wide variety of experts, [[authors]], and [[Podcasters|content creators]] as source material. It is the ultimate guide to understanding the forces that are shaping modern [[society]], and finding [[happiness]] despite them.

* [[Main Page#The Goals of metaculture|Goals]] | [[Main Page#Table of Contents|Table of Contents]] | [[Webinar series#1 Introduction|Pages by Topic]]
* [[Science]] | [[Fractals]] | [[Spirituality]] | [[Psychology]] | [[Ethics]] | [[Society]] | [[Evidence-Based Best Practices|Best Practices]]
* [[Authors]] | [[Reading List|Books]] | [[Podcast|Podcasts]] | [[Organizations]]
* [https://substack.com/@fractalguy Substack] | [https://bsky.app/profile/fractalguy.bsky.social Bluesky]
* '''[https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MVSqMei6cad62arFshPGDw1tSHpQ9Yz_/view?ts=68c0ddd2 NaNoCon Presentation: Anti-Humanism and the Rise of the Secular Gurus] - [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UJwGyK72VM3Mvngce_QE8jXI7I6HN_fC/view?usp=sharing Slides]'''

[[File:Metaculture-word-cloud-science-religion-fractal-happiness.png|600x600px|link=Connections|center|frameless]]

=== It's Like a Book With Links and Videos ===
This [[wiki]] is intended to be read like a [[wikipedia:Choose_Your_Own_Adventure|Choose Your Own Adventure]] [[book]], not skimmed like a [[wikipedia:Clickbait|clickbait]] article on [[social media]]. To get the most out of it, you will need to recall the days of having an [[attention]] span [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_span][https://www.apa.org/news/podcasts/speaking-of-psychology/attention-spans][https://brainmindsociety.org/posts/are-attention-spans-actually-decreasing]. When people sat down to read [[books]] with big [[ideas]] that couldn't be summarized in [[wikipedia:Tweet_(social_media)|140 characters]]. The [[wiki]] format allows for a much richer multimedia experience than what is possible with a book.

It summarizes the latest [[ideas]] from [[Metaculture|metamodern]] [[philosophy]], [[Complexity|complexity theory]], and [[neuroscience]], and makes them accessible to anyone with an undergraduate reading level.

It makes them more [[meaningful]] and easier to understand by tying them to a [[holistic]] [[metanarrative]] that [[Connections|connects]] all of these [[ideas]] to overarching themes like [[fractals]], [[happiness]], and the [[universal in-group]].

Every [[Connections|link]] takes you to a new page with a wealth of [[information]] on that subject, and occasionally an [[Easter eggs|Easter egg]]. The experience is better on a computer than a phone or tablet, since you can hover the mouse over [[Connections|links]] to see a preview.

Or just use the [[Special:Random|random page]] link and see where you end up.

'''''When in doubt, [[Connections|follow the links]]! Keep going until they all turn purple!'''''
== Why Create This? ==

In [https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/2018/03/the-intellectual-we-deserve his critique of Jordan Peterson], Nathan J. Robinson perfectly sums up the need for a project like this [[wiki]]: [[File:Self-organization-school-fish-complexity-chaos-theory.jpg|thumb|[[Self-organizing]], [[self-correcting]] [[complex systems]]]]<blockquote>''"[B]ecause academia and the left have failed spectacularly at helping make the world intelligible to ordinary people, and giving them a clear and compelling political vision."'' </blockquote>[[Progressives]], [[Science|scientists]], and [[secular]] people ''must'' present a clear and compelling vision for how the [[universe]] works that can compete with the shortcut [[philosophies]] and easy answers peddled by [[spiritual]] [[Guru|gurus]] and [[political]] [[grifters]]. But [[postmodern]] aversion to [[metanarrative]] has hampered these efforts.
The world is also [[Complexity|complex]]. It can't be boiled down to a sound bite, tweet, or even a single [[book]]. [[Progressives]] have struggled to explain policies based on [[expertise]] and [[evidence]] that require more than a "common sense" understanding of the issues. Marketing is not enough to [[Persuasion|persuade]] people, it will require [[education]]. The [[wiki]] can provide an open-source, collaborative [[platform]] to create such a free [[educational]] resource.

A secondary reason to create this [[wiki]] is that the [[authors]] find it fun, interesting, and cathartic, and would do this even if nobody ever read it. One could say there is an [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTNGg0Tj5Aw uncontrollable urge] to do so, and [[Free will|Sapolsky would agree]]. But hopefully you will read it and find it both [[Enlightenment|enlightening]] and entertaining!

== Who is This For? ==
The [[metaculture]] [[wiki]] is for all the people disillusioned with organized [[religion]], [[politics]], [[capitalism]], [[technology]], and all of the other [[institutions]] of modernity that appear to be in a confederacy against our [[happiness]] and ability to thrive as natural humans.[[File:Persuasion-debate-argument-common-ground-polarization.jpg|thumb|350x350px|It's for all people who are fed up with [[outrage]], [[trolling]], [[Persuasion|criticism, and debate]] and want to build [[In-group|cooperative]] [[Evidence-Based Best Practices|solutions]]]]It is for all of the [[progressives]] who yearn for a [[social safety net]] that will use the incredible [[wealth]] of our [[society]] to protect people from the abuses of [[capitalism]] and reestablish the [[balance of power]] between workers and owners. Surely the vast majority will support [[evidence-based]] policy if they can just see through the [[propaganda]] that pervades our [[media]]. You know that the people who stand in opposition to [[progress]] use [[religion]] as the basis for their decision-making. How can they ever change their [[minds]] about [[climate change]] without changing their [[literal]] view of [[scripture]]?[[File:Ponzi-scheme-mlm-pyramid-scam-grift.png|thumb|225x225px|A movement against [[grift]]-based [[capitalism]] and [[Money|monetary]] [[addiction]]]]It's also for those who know that their [[Spirituality|spiritual]] [[Belief System|beliefs]] should agree with [[science]] and [[evidence]]. Those who are eager to learn the fascinating new theories in [[physics]] that explain [[creation]] and [[evolution]], as well as those in [[psychology]] that explain our values, [[ethics]], and [[emotions]], help us understand ourselves better, and make better [[life choices]].
It is for all [[Manosphere|young men]] who are being led by the pied pipers of the [[manosphere]] toward the right-wing faux-[[philosophy]] of [[Jordan Peterson]]. If you are searching for [[meaning]] and a [[belief system]] that will help you become a better person and eventually meet a woman—is [[misogyny]] really what you think they want? The majority of women are [[progressive]]. Do the basic [[math]]. Real men are [[Reality|realists]], and [[metaculture]] is a viable, [[reality]]-based alternative to the [[manosphere]].

This is for anyone who recognizes and resents those who peddle [[belief systems]] catering to the disaffected and offer [[conspiracy theories]] in place of analysis; [[Grift|scams]] instead of solutions; [[spiritual]] [[grifters]] who use [[quantum woo]] to sell supplements and seminars to people whose symptoms are a condition of modern [[life]], and cannot be cured without doing the work of [[Organizations|organizing]] for social change that [[conspiracy theories]] distract them from.

[[metaculture]] offers [[something for everyone]], providing a path to [[Cognitive Dissonance|reconciliation]], [[optimism]], and hope for the [[future]], regardless of [[Necessary Prerequisite|where you are starting from]]. It is a manifesto for the [[Reason|reasonable]]!

<iframe key="list" level="dfah-cmpzourl" path="ua/Optin?od=11287ecb802e9f&zx=128e6af96&tD=1ac119d1db5e79e7&sD=1ac119d1db5e7c74" frameborder="0" id="iframewin" width="100%" height="100%"></iframe>

== The Goals of metaculture ==
[[File:Wonder-awe-beauty-universe-nature-inspiration-divinity-spirituality.jpg|thumb|There is plenty of [[wonder]] and awe in the [[scientific]] [[Perspective|view]] of the [[universe]]]]If one statement can summarize the goal of the [[metaculture]] project, it would be:<blockquote>''Improving the [[subjective]] experience of [[consciousness]]''</blockquote>[[Evidence]] shows that [[rational]] [[optimism]] is the best path to [[happiness]], and this [[wiki]] provides a [[Necessary Prerequisite|roadmap]] for adopting that [[perspective]].

It does this by describing the [[wikipedia:Emergence|emergent properties]] of a [[universal]] [[meta]]-[[belief system]] based on [[wikipedia:Empirical_evidence|empirical knowledge]] of our [[universe]], our [[minds]], and humanity's shared [[culture]]. This enables the [[Metaphor mapping|translation]] of [[spiritual]] [[wisdom]] from diverse [[cultures]] into the [[universal]] [[language]] of [[science]], allowing us to [[Psychology|understand ourselves]] and [[In-group|each other]] much better than we ever have. This should make the [[Subjective|experience]] of [[Life|living]] on Earth a [[March of progress|little nicer for everyone]].

It is [[Emergent property|emergent]] because it represents a [[cultural]] [[wikipedia:Attractor|attractor]] that arises from a robust, up-to-date [[science]], [[philosophy]], [[psychology]], and liberal [[arts]] [[education]] that provides all of the [[prerequisite]] [[concepts]] required for [[rational]] comprehension of the [[universe]] and human [[consciousness]].

It is [[meta]] because it [[wikipedia:Holon_(philosophy)|transcends and includes]] existing [[religions]] and [[Ideology|ideologies]] to provide a framework for cross-[[cultural]] understanding in a globalized [[society]].

A number of modern [[authors]] and [[podcasts]] are helping to popularize this way of thinking that seamlessly incorporates [[evidence-based]] [[ethics]] and [[rituals]] ([[meditation]], gratitude, forgiveness, etc.) that create [[meaning]] in the context of modern, [[secular]] [[life]], without the [[supernatural]] baggage that [[traditional]] [[religion]] requires.

The goal of this [[wiki]] project is to describe this [[Emergent property|emergent]] [[meta]]-[[Belief System|belief system]] and provide concise summaries and links to free [[Education|educational]] resources that allow you to learn all the [[Necessary Prerequisite|necessary prerequisite]] [[concepts]] needed to fully comprehend it.

=== Philosophical Goals ===

When fully developed, [[metaculture]] should provide:

* A [[Belief System|mental framework]] for [[rational]] comprehension of how the [[universe]] and our [[brains]] work.
* A [[culturally neutral]] [[moral]] [[philosophy]], updated for the [[future]].
* An [[evidence-based]], [[self-correcting]] [[Society|socioeconomic]] and [[political]] [[philosophy]].
* A viable path towards the creation of a [[In-group|universal in-group]].
* A readable, interactive [[Wiki|Wikipedia]] that [[Education|teaches]] these [[concepts]] with a [[Metanarrative of everything|unified metanarrative]].
Any improvement to the [[ideas]], [[Perspective|perspectives]], or [[rhetoric]] that better advances these [[philosophical]] goals should be adopted.

=== Social Goals ===

By providing an easy way for anyone to gain all the [[Necessary Prerequisite|prerequisite knowledge]] needed to come to this understanding, the following goals for [[society]] should be advanced:

* Promote the principles of [[science]], [[reason]], and [[critical thinking]].
* Use [[Evidence-Based Best Practices]] as the basis for [[political]] and [[Life choices|personal decision-making]].
* Change primary [[meterstick]] for success from [[money]]/GDP to [[utilitarian]] [[happiness]]/GNH.
* Integrate [[art]], [[music]], [[poetry]], creativity, [[games]], and [[aesthetics]] in [[education]] and daily [[life]].
* Reduce [[Cognitive Dissonance|cognitive dissonance]] brought on by conflicting interpretations of [[science]] and [[religion]].
* Update our [[Culture|culture's]] [[ethics]] and [[social norms]] to deal with [[capitalism]] and [[future]] [[technology]].
* Increase the [[incentives]] for [[economic]] and social [[justice]] and restore the [[balance of power]].
* Expand [[political]], personal, [[religious]], and [[economic]] [[freedom]].
* Oppose [[pseudoscience]] and the [[Grift|grift economy]] and undermine it with awareness.
* Increase the [[trust]] in [[institutions]] that is required for [[democracy]] to function.
* Catalyze the transition to [[secular institutions]] that can serve our [[cultural]] and [[psychological]] needs without the [[supernatural]] [[wikipedia:Kayfabe|kayfabe]].
* Preserve [[nature]] and the [[environment]], avert [[Climate change|climate change,]] and other [[Apocalypse Prevention|apocalypse]] scenarios.
* Effect world peace, [[In-group|unity]], and and end to all [[war]] (if there's [[time]]).

Any improvement to the [[ideas]], [[Perspective|perspectives]], or [[rhetoric]] that better advances these [[social]] goals should be adopted.

Accomplishing these goals will require sustained effort over multiple generations. However, once a [[wikipedia:Tipping_point_(sociology)|tipping point]] is reached, the [[Generating equation|new pattern]] will rapidly [[Emergence|emerge]].

=== A New Kind of [[Metanarrative]] ===

[[metaculture]] is not a replacement for any [[rational]], [[universalist]] [[Belief System|belief system]] you already hold that works for you. It is a new [[perspective]] on these common [[ideas]] that covers all [[philosophical]] bases from a [[holistic]] point of view, tries to appeal to a variety of modern [[cultural]] [[perspectives]], and offers new ways of [[Persuasion|presenting the ideas]] to [[Necessary Prerequisite|fill in the gaps]] of modern [[education]] that keep others from [[Persuasion|coming to the same understanding]].

For many, it's just the thing you already [[believe]], with more detail, and a [[Fractal Geometry of God|symbolic fractal theme]] that ties together all the [[ideas]] into a [[God Concept|single, unifying concept]]. It is a way to [[In-group|unite different people of the world]] who [[believe]] the same thing in different ways.<blockquote>''"It's like reading a more articulate and detailed version of how I view reality." --Satisfied Reader''</blockquote>Whether you come from a [[Religion|theistic]] or [[atheistic]] perspective, [[metaculture]] offers a path to reconcile the [[Cognitive Dissonance|cognitive dissonance]] that conflicting [[scientific]] and [[spiritual]] modes of thought can cause. [[File:Science-religion-metaculture.png|center|thumb|600x600px|The triangles are a [[metaphor]]]]It should work side-by-side with any [[Religion|religious]] or [[Secular humanist|humanist]] [[tradition]] you practice, allowing greater understanding of [[science]], [[spirituality]], and other [[cultures]] without replacing your own. It's [[metaculture]], not [[wikipedia:Cultural_homogenization|monoculture]].

A thorough reading should serve as an inoculation against [[scriptural]] [[literalism]] and [[Authoritarianism|authoritarian]] [[Ideology|ideologies]], and a booster for [[critical thinking]]. It offers [[something for everyone]].

=== The Happiest YouTube Rabbit Hole ===
Each page of the [[wiki]] introduces a key [[concept]], and has curated, high-quality [[educational]] videos that explain them in easy-to-understand terms, and funky [[music]] that helps you interpret them through [[dance]]. They present an [[optimistic]] [[perspective]] on [[science]], [[religion]], and [[psychology]] that focuses on [[wonder]], [[meaning]], and increased personal and [[cultural]] [[happiness]].

It's an analytical yet lighthearted take on some heavy [[science]] and [[philosophy]]. [[Allegory|Like]] "[https://www.reddit.com/r/PeterExplainsTheJoke/ Peter Explains] the [[Cosmic Joke]]."

Watching the videos on this [[wiki]] will work [[Wonder|wonders]] for your YouTube [[algorithm]] and will never lead you down a [[conspiracy theory]] rabbit hole!

<iframe key="list" level="dfah-cmpzourl" path="ua/Optin?od=11287ecb802e9f&zx=128e6af96&tD=1ac119d1db5e79e7&sD=1ac119d1db5e7c74" frameborder="0" id="iframewin" width="100%" height="100%"></iframe>

== Core Tenets ==

[[File:World-Pantheist-Movement-Symbol.JPG|thumb|[[Fractal]] [[Pantheistic]] [[Universalism]]]]
[[metaculture]] is a complete, unified [[philosophical]] and [[theological]] system that addresses major questions of [[ethics]], [[wikipedia:Epistemology|epistemology]], [[wikipedia:Metaphysics|metaphysics]], [[aesthetics]], etc., that [[philosophers]], [[Science|scientists]], and [[religions]] have always dealt with.

[[metaculture]] fills a vital need to present a [[culturally neutral]] [[belief system]] that fulfills the same need for [[certainty]] offered by [[religions]], [[Grift|scam artists]], and [[JP and JC|right-wing ideologues]]. By putting [[science]] and [[self-correction]] as its core value, it avoids the pitfalls of both [[wikipedia:Moral_relativism|relativism]] and [[dogma]].

The goal is not to rewrite these works but to combine the best of them in a way that creates a framework for a simple, universally applicable [[metanarrative]] that is consistent with both [[science]] and [[scripture]] and can be understood regardless of one's [[education]] level or [[cultural]] background.

The core tenets are:

* [[Reality|Scientific Realism]]: that an [[objective]] [[reality]] exists and advances in [[science]] improve the accuracy of our understanding of that [[reality]]. The [[wikipedia:Metaphysics|metaphysical]], [[wikipedia:Ontology|ontological]] and [[wikipedia:Epistemology|epistemological]] assumptions of [[metaculture]] are the same as those that underlie a modern understanding of Scientific Realism that accounts for the biases, [[power]] structures, paradigms, and other [[social]] factors highlighted by [[wikipedia:The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions|Thomas Kuhn]] and [[wikipedia:Jacques_Derrida|Jacques Derrida]].

* [[Utilitarian|Utilitarianism]]: that the success of our [[ethics]] can be measured and improved based on the impact it has on human [[emotions]]. Furthermore, the assumed goal of [[utilitarianism]] ([[happiness and well-being]]) can be derived empirically from the principles of [[neuroscience]].

* [[Aesthetics|Fractal Aesthetics]]: that our sense of [[beauty]] derives from our evolved mental representations of the [[universe]], and because the [[universe]] is inherently [[self-similar]], complex and symmetrical, we find [[beauty]] in that which exemplifies these things. The [[fractal]] is also the [[wikipedia:Religious_symbol|symbolism]] of [[metaculture]].

* [[Pantheism|Pantheistic]] [[Universalist|Universalism]]: that the [[God Concept|concept of god]] is common to all [[Religion|religions]] because it is an [[allegory]] for the [[universe]] we all [[Reality|exist in]], as well as a [[self-organizing]] [[God Concept|pattern in the brain]].

* That any principle described herein, including these core tenets, is subject to future revision should empirical evidence contradict it. [[Dogma|The Dogma of No Dogma]].

* Should another parallel effort better succeed in fulfilling the goals of [[metaculture]], our resources should be dedicated to support the project with a greater chance of success.

[[metaculture]] allows anyone to quickly gain a robust, consistent, accurate, and [[self-correcting]] understanding of how our [[universe]], [[Brains|brains,]] and [[societies]] work. It uses [[science]] to provide direct and satisfactory answers to [[life]]'s biggest questions, without reliance on [[supernatural]] [[Scripture|stories]] or forcing you to figure it all out for yourself.

[[metaculture]] should convey all the [[psychological]] and sociological benefits [[traditionally]] ascribed to [[religion]], including [[social]] cohesion, [[psychological]] support, personal [[meaning]], positive [[social]] change, a good [[creation]] story, and [[psychologically]] satisfying answers to the [[Meaning of Life|ultimate question of life]], the [[Universe|universe,]] and [[everything]].[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrases_from_The_Hitchhiker%27s_Guide_to_the_Galaxy#The_Answer_to_the_Ultimate_Question_of_Life,_the_Universe,_and_Everything_is_42]

== Table of Contents ==

[[File:Mandelbrot_Fractal_Zoom.gif||right|[[Fractal Geometry of God|z = z^2 + c (repeat infinitely)]]]]

Since this is a [[book]] in [[wiki]] format, you will need to follow the links to find most of the [[information]] it contains. These are just some starting points.

It is designed to be read not linearly but [[Connections|systematically]], following links as you follow your interests, until you rarely see an unread link. Some pages will be visited multiple times, since they serve as a [[Connections|nexus]] for many related [[concepts]]. The [[connections]] and [[patterns]] that [[Emergence|emerge]] from this process are the main [[persuasive]] argument made by this [[wiki]].

Keep in mind that one of the main goals is to bridge the divide between [[science]] and [[religion]]. [[Atheists]] may object to the use of [[religious]] [[allegory]], and [[theists]] may object to the [[Materialism|materialistic]] metaphysics. Both are encouraged to read with reconciliation in mind. If you want to help the other side understand your [[perspective]], what is the most [[persuasive]] way to do it?

=== Reference Material ===
The nice thing about [[evidence-based]] [[philosophy]] is that most books tend to support your point of view.

* The '''[[Reading List]]''' is a selection of books that, if you fed them all to a large language model [[Artificial intelligence|AI]], would produce something similar to this [[wiki]].
* The '''[[Authors]]''' page lists a number of modern writers who advocate different aspects of this [[perspective]] and continue to push the conversation forward.
* Check out the '''[[Podcast]]''' page for online content producers.
* A list of '''[[Organizations]]''' that promote the [[social]] and [[philosophical]] goals advocated in this [[wiki]].
* The [[Webinar series|'''Webinar Series''']] breaks down the [[wiki]] by topic, and will include recorded presentations and Q&A sessions once they are available.
* You can also just go to a [[Special:Random|'''Random Page''']] and take it from there!

=== Key Topics ===
* The [[Fractal]] [[Universe]]
* The [[Science]] of [[Psychology]]
* The Experience of [[Psychedelics]]
* The Functions of [[Religion]]
* [[The Gambler|Betting on Reality]]
* A [[Metanarrative of everything|Metanarrative of Everything]]
* [[Metaphor mapping|Metaphor Mapping]]
* The [[Pantheistic]], [[Universalist]] Definition of [[God]]
* The [[Scientific]] [[Creation Story]]
* The [[Scientific]] [[Afterlife]], [[Heaven and Hell]]
* [[Consciousness]], [[Free Will]], [[Neural Networks]], and the [[Brain]]
* [[Addiction]], [[Salience]], [[Variety]], and [[Moderation]]
* Maximizing [[Happiness]] is [[Objective|Objectively]] the [[Meaning of Life]]
* [[God Concept|Creating Reflexive Happiness]] with [[Optimism]]
* [[Utilitarian|Utilitarianism]], [[Consequences]], and Empirical [[Ethics]]
* [[Quality of life versus quantity of life|Quality of Life versus Quantity of Life]]
* A [[Utopia]] of [[Self-correction|Self-Correction]] and [[Progress]]
* [[Economics]] and [[Capitalism]]
* [[Society]], [[Institutions]], [[Politics]], and [[Justice]]
* [[Best-Practices|Best Practices]] for creating a [[Culture]] of [[Happiness]]
* [[Persuasion|The Importance of Persuasion]]

=== Complete Index of Pages ===
* [[Special:MostLinkedPages|'''Most Linked Pages''']]
* [https://www.metaculture.net/metawiki/index.php?title=Special:AllPages&hideredirects=1 All Pages Excluding Redirects]
* [[Special:AllPages|All Pages]]

[[File:The Dark Side of the Moon Cover.png|thumb|right|[[Psychedelics|It totally syncs up to the Wizard of Oz!]]]]

=== Table of Contents, set to the lyrics of [[wikipedia:Eclipse_(Pink_Floyd_song)|Eclipse]] ===
* [[Materialism|All that you touch]]
* [[Fractals|All that you see]]
* [[Food|All that you taste]]
* [[Consciousness|All you feel]].
* [[Love|All that you love]]
* [[Hate|All that you hate]]
* [[Trust|All you distrust]]
* [[Persuasion|All you save]].
* [[Altruism|All that you give]]
* [[Capitalism|All that you deal]]
* [[Money|All that you buy]],
* [[Grift|beg, borrow or steal]].
* [[Creation Story|All you create]]
* [[Death|All you destroy]]
* [[Life choices|All that you do]]
* [[Freedom of speech|All that you say]].
* [[Nutrition|All that you eat]]
* [[Population|everyone you meet]]
* [[Justice|All that you slight]]
* [[War|everyone you fight]].
* [[Time|All that is now]]
* [[Afterlife|All that is gone]]
* [[Future|All that's to come]]
* [[Everything|and everything under the sun]].

Like [[Easter eggs]]? Find all of the tracks on [[wikipedia:The_Dark_Side_of_the_Moon|Dark Side of the Moon]] and collect your achievement!

<iframe key="list" level="dfah-cmpzourl" path="ua/Optin?od=11287ecb802e9f&zx=128e6af96&tD=1ac119d1db5e79e7&sD=1ac119d1db5e7c74" frameborder="0" id="iframewin" width="100%" height="100%"></iframe>

Grift

2026-01-23T13:47:29Z

Fractalguy:

[[File:Ponzi-scheme-mlm-pyramid-scam-grift.png|thumb|Many grifts are pyramid shaped]]
Grift is used in favor of [[wikipedia:Scam|Scams]] because it also includes [[legal]] but [[ethically]] questionable [[business]] models that permeate modern [[capitalism]].<blockquote>''"That's the [[power]] of the [[good]] con artist: the ability to identify your deepest need and exploit it. It's not about [[honesty]] or [[greed]]; we are all suckers for [[belief]]."'' -[[wikipedia:Maria_Konnikova|Maria Konnikova]]</blockquote>One of the most important practical lessons of [[ethics]] is recognizing when someone else is being [[unethical]]. [[Technology]] has led to a prodigious proliferation of possibilities for pilfer. But, our [[institutions]] of [[moral]] [[education]] have not been keeping up.

== Flavors of Modern Grift ==
[[File:Con-artists-always-tap-into-peoples-real-fears.png|right|frameless|300x300px]]
Examples of modern quasi-[[legal]] grift include:

* [[Pseudoscientific]] medicines, supplements and [[Nutrition|fad diets]].
* [[wikipedia:Ponzi_scheme|Ponzi schemes]], [[wikipedia:Pyramid_scheme|Pyramid schemes]] and [[wikipedia:Multi-level_marketing|multi-level marketing]].
* Corporate [[wikipedia:Rent-seeking|Rent-seeking]].
* [[wikipedia:Timeshare|Timeshares]].
* [[wikipedia:Telemarketing_fraud|Telemarketing]] to the elderly (or anyone).
* [[wikipedia:Insider_trading|Insider Trading]] and [[wikipedia:Pump_and_dump|pump-and-dump schemes]].
* [[wikipedia:Exit_scam|Rug pulling]] (especially in [[Crypto-bros|crypto]]) and other [[wikipedia:Exit_scam|exit scams]]
* Companies that produce more stock price hype than profitable products ([[wikipedia:Economic_bubble|bubbles]]).
* Undisclosed fees that significantly add to the actual price.
* [[wikipedia:Patent_troll|Patent trolling]].
* [[wikipedia:Loot_box|Loot boxes]] and most other in-game purchases.
* App-based [[gambling]]
* Buying out a generic drug manufacturer and [[wikipedia:Martin_Shkreli|increasing the price of life-saving medicine by 100x]].
* Using [[political]] [[outrage]] to sell guns, flags, [https://www.npr.org/2022/09/07/1121447226/steve-bannon-fraud-charges fake border walls], [[wikipedia:Mike_Lindell|pillows]], supplements, gold coins, etc.

Bridget Read is one of the leading experts focused on this subject. Her [[book]] is [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/217245597-little-bosses-everywhere Little Bosses Everywhere: How the Pyramid Scheme Shaped America].
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcLQh3yDQuo||center|Everything in America is a Pyramid Scheme Now|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYaA_e0FMW4||center|Rent Seeking: Taking Without Giving|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azIUGQuMfJY||center|Patent Trolls: What Are These Hideous Creatures?|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJVtgv6Zmq4||center|Pump and Dump Schemes Explained in One Minute|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6MwGeOm8iI||center|Multilevel Marketing: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://youtu.be/JLDG9lBgR_Y||center|Bridget Read on Multilevel Marketing|frame}}

== Making Grift Taboo ==
[[File:Leval-versus-illegal-bribery-lobbying-special-interest.png|thumb|400x400px|If lobbying can't be banned, a [[taboo]] on accepting their favors with real [[political]] [[consequences]] would still eliminate the practice.]]
Since the [[legal]] and regulatory systems cannot always intervene to prevent this type of behavior, [[capitalist]] [[culture]] needs to make them [[taboo]]. The rampant grift in our economy will only end when unscrupulous business activities can no longer buy you access to the upper echelons of [[society]]. A [[culture]] of grift-awareness that [[educates]] people on how to recognize scams and unethical business [[practices]] can reduce the number of potential marks and make the grift [[life]] less profitable.

[[Taboos]] will also enable the enforcement of business [[ethics]] within [[organizations]]. It is not possible to implement an unscrupulous business practice without the help of many people. If these people are empowered through the [[incentives]] of [[cultural norms]], it can override the tendency for organizations to discourage dissent.

== Money <> Status ==
The fact that high incomes are able to buy social [[status]] and [[authority]] is an [[incentive]] towards grift, as well as pursuits that pay well but provide little [[meaning]] because they don't actually contribute positively to human [[progress]]. Jobs like wall street traders, [[crypto-bros]], lawyers, and management consultants all get paid very well while never inventing anything. They earn their money by skimming off of the productive efforts of others.

[[wikipedia:Rutger_Bregman|Rutger Bregman's]] [https://www.moralambition.org/ School for Moral Ambition] is an [[Organizations|organization]] dedicated to encouraging more people to choose [[meaningful]] [[work]] over rent-seeking. It does this in part through the [[promotion]] of [[social norms]] that perceive such [[jobs]] as low-[[status]]. When people roll their eyes and turn to talk to someone else when they find out you work for [[wikipedia:McKinsey_&_Company|McKinsey]] or [[wikipedia:Goldman_Sachs|Goldman Sachs]] instead of acting impressed, more people will choose to become engineers, entrepreneurs, [[teachers]], and doctors.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fivwdXSQoNU||center|Quit Your Useless Job with Rutger Bregman|frame}}

== Political Grift ==
When [[politics]] becomes more like a team sport or a [[religion]], it becomes incredibly easy to scam supporters. It's even easier if you also control all of the [[institutions]] designed to prevent and prosecute scams. The rise of the modern [[political]] right has gone hand-in-hand with a growing grift [[economy]] that feeds on the fervent [[emotional]] devotion of its supporters. The [[misinformation]] that drives its [[ideology]] serves as a self-selecting filter, ensuring the audience consists of the most susceptible marks, with the biggest [[wikipedia:Sunk_cost|sunk-cost fallacy]] keeping them from ever admitting they've been lied to.

== Grift Begets Grift ==

The prevalence of grift causes a [[feedback loop]] where the more grift there is in the [[economy]], the more people see it as the only way to get [[rich]], so even more people abandon their business [[ethics]] and join the grift game. The more economic power that grifters have, the more they can shape the [[political]] and regulatory [[environment]] to [[legally]] allow or even supercharge their scams, giving them even more power. This cycle continues until the people get sick of being marks and fight back, hopefully [[just]] at the [[Democracy|ballot box]].

Grift erodes [[trust]] in [[institutions]]. It preys upon the most vulnerable. It exacerbates [[economic]] [[injustice]]. [[Legal]] systems and consumer protection agencies need to catch up to modern grifting techniques and prioritize the prosecution of these crimes. [[Culture]] needs to catch up as well, and give people the [[critical thinking]] skills they need to navigate modern [[capitalism]].

[https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-brain-science-reveals-about-ethical-decline-and-moral-growth/ Ethical Collapse] describes the process by which small moral transgressions lead to bigger and bigger ones. Once you breach the [[Brains|brain's]] barrier that stops most people from succumbing to [[temptation]], the [[salience]] of [[future]] [[temptation]] becomes harder to resist. You start out by bending the rules and telling yourself it's just a one-time thing, but this often leads to situations where additional [[lying]] or [[cheating]] is needed to cover up the first one. Slowly, the cracks in the dam lead to a burst, and you find yourself in a situation where your options are to keep up the grift, or confess your sins and face [[justice]]. No matter how bad the punishment is, it will not compare to the [[psychological]] [[hell]] you experience when your livelihood depends on harming others.

[https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-brain-science-reveals-about-ethical-decline-and-moral-growth/ The Slippery Slope of Ethical Collapse—And How Courage Can Reverse It]

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WD065AplgiU||center|Why Everything Is A Scam (Except For Scams)|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egj_7Bwl01I||center|The Art of the Grift - How to get ANYTHING you want|frame}}

== Spiritual Grift ==

[[Spiritual]] spaces are especially susceptible to grift, due to several factors.

* "[[Spiritual]]" people tend to emphasize [[faith]] and [[emotional]] [[truth]] over [[reason]] and [[critical thinking]]
* [[Religious]] [[in-group]] bias causes people to overly [[trust]] grifters that profess a [[religious]] identity (see [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Madoff Bernie Madoff])
* People in search of [[healing]] will eagerly buy anything that offers it, especially if other methods have been unsuccessful

Anyone whose [[belief system]] is based on [[faith]] over [[reason]] makes themselves an easy mark.

When Internet-[[connected]] [[capitalism]] means that you can be grifted by anyone in the world at any [[time]], protecting yourself from these scams is a [[necessary prerequisite]] for achieving modern [[financial]] literacy. It should be a cornerstone of our updated [[scripture]] and [[belief systems]] to recognize and call out shady business practices, not only outright theft. This is why a new [[spirituality]] based on [[critical thinking]] is so desperately needed.

== Stop Participating in Bubbles ==
[[Economic]] bubbles are one of the most common forms of [[capitalist]] grift. A business [[idea]] that sounds viable can be hyped on [[social]] [[media]] to drive demand for the stock and inflate the price. This can be sustained for as long as the hype can be sustained. [[Crypto-bros]] have perfected this, resulting in the largest and longest-lasting bubbles in [[economic]] [[history]], in the forms of [[Crypto-bros|crypto]]-[[currency]] and [[technology]] stocks.

Eventually, the monopolistic and [[political]] [[power]] of the [[economic]] bubbles they create become [[self-fulfilling]] prophecies, where the fact of their monopolies justifies continued investment since it seems [[like]] nobody can possibly compete with them or threaten them with regulation. Especially when they own the [[government]]!

The main problem is that anyone who buys into the [[bubble]] and sells before the bubble bursts can make a lot of [[money]] in the meantime. The fact that someone is eventually left holding the bag is someone else's problem. If you're smart enough to buy low and sell high, then you have an obligation to maximize your returns. This [[Morality|amoral]] thought process is how so many justify their participation in these modern scams. Others are just caught up in the hype; they are the ones most likely to lose in the end.

Participating in bubble economies is [[Ethics|unethical]] and needs to be [[taboo]] in order to have an [[economy]] that works to maximize gross national [[happiness]] and not short-term stock [[market]] returns.

This chart shows the pattern that bubble [[Economy|economies]] tend to fit.
[[File:Investment-bubble-diagram.png|center|frameless|600x600px]]

== Grifty Videos and Podcasts ==

[https://hiddenbrain.org/podcast/how-to-spot-a-scam/ Hidden Brain - How to Spot a Scam]

The [https://www.conspirituality.net/ Conspirituality] [[podcast]] provides an in-depth study of [[spiritual]] grift and online [[misinformation]], as well as [https://bellacaledonia.org.uk/2024/06/26/diagonalism-the-cosmic-right-and-the-conspiracy-smoothie/ diagonalism] [https://www.conspirituality.net/episodes/diagonalism-william-callison-quinn-slobodian] and the intersection between hippie [[health]] nuts and the alt-right.

[https://wondery.com/shows/scamfluencers/ Scamfluencers] is a podcast that profiles infamous scammers, especially on [[social media]].

[https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-american-dream-is-a-pyramid-scheme/id1081584611?i=1000651052073 The American Dream is a Pyramid Scheme - The Gray Area]

[https://www.pushkin.fm/podcasts/the-dream Jane Marie's The Dream] [[Podcast]]

[https://www.youtube.com/@MattBinder The Scam Economy] is a popular YouTube channel about scams, especially in crpyto.

Here are [https://podcastreview.org/list/best-scam-podcasts/ 9 more scam podcasts].

As you can see, scams are a very popular topic on [[podcasts]]. People are tired of getting scammed all the time, and it shows.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbTleMei3Is||center|The Grift Economy: Everything is a scam, always.|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOip1UZ3hL4||center|How Dips**t Grifters Are Scamming You - Long Story Short - The Daily Show|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4Z3UXLZMDo||center|Bots, Scams, The Internet, And You - Some More News|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JoNjIfbPV0||center|Corruption Perceptions Index Explained|frame}}
 
This is interesting considering it's the biggest [[media]] personality in the world interviewing the richest man in the world about whether blatant [[meme]] coin pump-and-dumps should be [[illegal]]. The richest man in the world, who has made billions on meme coin pump-and-dump schemes, responds by saying [[wikipedia:Social_Security_(United_States)|social security]] is the real [[wikipedia:Ponzi_scheme|Ponzi scheme]]. [[Monetary addiction]] is very real and will undermine your [[morals]] just as fast as a full-blown heroin [[addiction]]. Instead of stealing [[money]] from your grandma's purse to buy junk, you steal [[money]] from every grandma in the country just to add to your dragon hoard.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgofcdNCB8A||center|How is this legal?|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niEDgFlcE3M||center|The Simpsons: Grifter's Game|frame}}

== Grifty Grooves ==
Songs to scam by.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUNRT3I13-Q||center|Jamiroquai - Scam Live Japan Tour 1995|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsjdjWGDvFk||center|AC/DC - Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_D3VFfhvs4||center|Michael Jackson - Smooth Criminal|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQ6y5ZpUcT8||center|Punchmade Dev - Easy Scams|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9oW1dHBZ5M||center|Steve Miller Band - Take the Money and Run|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrXiVvjBSXI||center|50 Cent - How to Rob|frame}}

Technology

2026-01-18T14:19:34Z

Fractalguy: /* Technology and Wealth */

[[File:Technology-glowing-planet-electricity-futurism-extropy.jpg|thumb|Technology makes the planet glow]]
The discussion of technology on this [[wiki]] will focus around the [[ethical]] concerns, and the establishment of [[legal]] frameworks and [[social norms]] that allow us to use technology in a way that maximizes its [[positive]] contribution to [[happiness and well-being]] and minimizes the negative [[consequences]].

== Technology Topics ==

Pages related to technology issues:

* [[Platforms|Social media platforms]]
* [[Promotion|Newsfeeds and algorithmic promotion]]
* [[Crypto-bros|Techno-optimism and TESCREAL]]
* [[Crypto-bros]], [[Secular gurus]], and the [[Manosphere]]
* [[Trolling]] and [[Outrage]]
* [[Information overload]] and [[Misinformation]]
* [[Artificial intelligence]]
* [[Future|The future]] and [[Utopia]]
* [[Algorithms]] and [[Recursion]]
* [[Longevity]]
* [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Technology|All pages that reference technology]]
[https://www.wi-phi.com/modules/emerging-technologies/ The Emerging Technologies module on Wi-Phi] offers a free course on the [[ethics]] and [[sociological]] implications of new technologies.

== Technology and Taboo ==

The [[religion]] of the [[future]] should have a few commandments regarding technology.

Here's a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Commandments_of_Computer_Ethics serious example].

And some ideas with varying levels of seriousness.

* Thou shall not scroll [[social media]] in an in-person meeting.
* Thou shall backup thy data.
* Thou shall not click the link if you do not recognize the domain, for it is phishing.
* Thy [[Algorithms|algorithm]] shall not [[promote]] content that causes [[outrage]].
* Thou shall not [[Misinformation|bear false witness]] on [[social media]].
* Honor thy right to privacy and keep it holy.

Technological [[taboos]] are also needed to establish and enforce [[social norms]] on [[social media]] so they can serve their intended function without constantly being ruined by [[trolling]] and [[misinformation]].

== Teaching Technology ==
With rapidly advancing technology and widely varying levels of proficiency, continuing [[education]] about technology is essential to remain relevant in the [[Economy|job market]], and for [[parents]] to be able to properly supervise [[children]] who are online. The [[Education]] page proposes a peer-to-peer continuing adult [[education]] model to make this accessible to anyone.

Part of this curriculum is being aware important new online trends so you can avoid being [[Misinformation|misinformed]] or [[Grift|grifted]] by them, since most online trends are one or the other or both. Trends in the online discourse, new slang and jargon, all need to be made made easily understood by those who aren't terminally online. Otherwise, it can be easy to miss when [[Relationships|loved ones]] are dabbling in dangerous [[ideologies]] and bizarre subcultures that can lead them down a rabbit hole of [[addiction]] or [[hate]].

This [[wiki]] attempts to do this, with pages [[like]] [[crypto-bros]], [[manosphere]], [[JP and JC]], [[conspiracy theories]], [[grift]], [[platforms]], [[outrage]], [[trolling]], [[algorithm]], and [[future]] all highlighting trends in technology and online discourse that many may not be aware of, and are having a big negative influence on [[society]].{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6FORpg0KVo||center|How to Make Learning as Addictive as Social Media|frame}}

== Technology and Wealth ==
This video on Technology and Wealth by [https://www.youtube.com/@thegreatsimplification Nate Hagens' Great Simplification] [[podcast]] is an excellent overview of the ways that technology and [[capitalism]] create a siphon of [[wealth]] that flows upwards towards the [[rich]] by automating the engines of [[wealth]] creation for the working class.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxvRx7sQNxc||center|Technology and Wealth: The Straw, the Siphon, and the Sieve|frame}}

== The Ethical Implications of Technology ==

Videos discussing various [[ethical]] [[perspectives]] on technology and [[artificial intelligence]].

The [https://www.humanetech.com/ Center for Humane Technology] is an [[Organizations|organization]] dedicated to promoting these [[ideas]], and their website is full of great resources related to [[social media]], [[artificial intelligence]], and creating [[social norms]], [[incentives]], and [[ethics]] that deal with them.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoZ-WF5Z_1E||center|Does Technology Need to be Ethical?|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXdVDhOGqoE||center|AI Is Dangerous, but Not for the Reasons You Think|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWnU7A7ZBGc||center|Ethics & Technology|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9Esi2kDUsc||center|How ethics will change the future of technology|frame}}

== Techno Music ==

Creative wiring has produced many cool beeps and beats.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAabyhhwC68&list=PL7rrJWObNG9s2U1e40T3yHKb8HEgwhmaw||center|I dream of wires|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8K90hX4PrE||center|Daft Punk - Technologic|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7orEiTI6X_4&list=PLunAs_VfWjqd6ZhNLiZaZnjRaDUtXPJpA||center|Aphex Twin - Come to Daddy (Full Album)|frame}}

Technology

2026-01-18T14:18:26Z

Fractalguy:

[[File:Technology-glowing-planet-electricity-futurism-extropy.jpg|thumb|Technology makes the planet glow]]
The discussion of technology on this [[wiki]] will focus around the [[ethical]] concerns, and the establishment of [[legal]] frameworks and [[social norms]] that allow us to use technology in a way that maximizes its [[positive]] contribution to [[happiness and well-being]] and minimizes the negative [[consequences]].

== Technology Topics ==

Pages related to technology issues:

* [[Platforms|Social media platforms]]
* [[Promotion|Newsfeeds and algorithmic promotion]]
* [[Crypto-bros|Techno-optimism and TESCREAL]]
* [[Crypto-bros]], [[Secular gurus]], and the [[Manosphere]]
* [[Trolling]] and [[Outrage]]
* [[Information overload]] and [[Misinformation]]
* [[Artificial intelligence]]
* [[Future|The future]] and [[Utopia]]
* [[Algorithms]] and [[Recursion]]
* [[Longevity]]
* [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Technology|All pages that reference technology]]
[https://www.wi-phi.com/modules/emerging-technologies/ The Emerging Technologies module on Wi-Phi] offers a free course on the [[ethics]] and [[sociological]] implications of new technologies.

== Technology and Taboo ==

The [[religion]] of the [[future]] should have a few commandments regarding technology.

Here's a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Commandments_of_Computer_Ethics serious example].

And some ideas with varying levels of seriousness.

* Thou shall not scroll [[social media]] in an in-person meeting.
* Thou shall backup thy data.
* Thou shall not click the link if you do not recognize the domain, for it is phishing.
* Thy [[Algorithms|algorithm]] shall not [[promote]] content that causes [[outrage]].
* Thou shall not [[Misinformation|bear false witness]] on [[social media]].
* Honor thy right to privacy and keep it holy.

Technological [[taboos]] are also needed to establish and enforce [[social norms]] on [[social media]] so they can serve their intended function without constantly being ruined by [[trolling]] and [[misinformation]].

== Teaching Technology ==
With rapidly advancing technology and widely varying levels of proficiency, continuing [[education]] about technology is essential to remain relevant in the [[Economy|job market]], and for [[parents]] to be able to properly supervise [[children]] who are online. The [[Education]] page proposes a peer-to-peer continuing adult [[education]] model to make this accessible to anyone.

Part of this curriculum is being aware important new online trends so you can avoid being [[Misinformation|misinformed]] or [[Grift|grifted]] by them, since most online trends are one or the other or both. Trends in the online discourse, new slang and jargon, all need to be made made easily understood by those who aren't terminally online. Otherwise, it can be easy to miss when [[Relationships|loved ones]] are dabbling in dangerous [[ideologies]] and bizarre subcultures that can lead them down a rabbit hole of [[addiction]] or [[hate]].

This [[wiki]] attempts to do this, with pages [[like]] [[crypto-bros]], [[manosphere]], [[JP and JC]], [[conspiracy theories]], [[grift]], [[platforms]], [[outrage]], [[trolling]], [[algorithm]], and [[future]] all highlighting trends in technology and online discourse that many may not be aware of, and are having a big negative influence on [[society]].{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6FORpg0KVo||center|How to Make Learning as Addictive as Social Media|frame}}

== Technology and Wealth ==
This video on Technology and Wealth by Nate Hagens' Great Simplification podcast is an excellent overview of the ways that technology and capitalism create a siphon of wealth that flows upwards towards the rich by automating the engines of wealth creation for the working class.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxvRx7sQNxc||center|Technology and Wealth: The Straw, the Siphon, and the Sieve|frame}}

== The Ethical Implications of Technology ==

Videos discussing various [[ethical]] [[perspectives]] on technology and [[artificial intelligence]].

The [https://www.humanetech.com/ Center for Humane Technology] is an [[Organizations|organization]] dedicated to promoting these [[ideas]], and their website is full of great resources related to [[social media]], [[artificial intelligence]], and creating [[social norms]], [[incentives]], and [[ethics]] that deal with them.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoZ-WF5Z_1E||center|Does Technology Need to be Ethical?|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXdVDhOGqoE||center|AI Is Dangerous, but Not for the Reasons You Think|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWnU7A7ZBGc||center|Ethics & Technology|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9Esi2kDUsc||center|How ethics will change the future of technology|frame}}

== Techno Music ==

Creative wiring has produced many cool beeps and beats.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAabyhhwC68&list=PL7rrJWObNG9s2U1e40T3yHKb8HEgwhmaw||center|I dream of wires|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8K90hX4PrE||center|Daft Punk - Technologic|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7orEiTI6X_4&list=PLunAs_VfWjqd6ZhNLiZaZnjRaDUtXPJpA||center|Aphex Twin - Come to Daddy (Full Album)|frame}}

Technology

2026-01-18T14:17:45Z

Fractalguy:

[[File:Technology-glowing-planet-electricity-futurism-extropy.jpg|thumb|Technology makes the planet glow]]
The discussion of technology on this [[wiki]] will focus around the [[ethical]] concerns, and the establishment of [[legal]] frameworks and [[social norms]] that allow us to use technology in a way that maximizes its [[positive]] contribution to [[happiness and well-being]] and minimizes the negative [[consequences]].

== Technology Topics ==

Pages related to technology issues:

* [[Platforms|Social media platforms]]
* [[Promotion|Newsfeeds and algorithmic promotion]]
* [[Crypto-bros|Techno-optimism and TESCREAL]]
* [[Crypto-bros]], [[Secular gurus]], and the [[Manosphere]]
* [[Trolling]] and [[Outrage]]
* [[Information overload]] and [[Misinformation]]
* [[Artificial intelligence]]
* [[Future|The future]] and [[Utopia]]
* [[Algorithms]] and [[Recursion]]
* [[Longevity]]
* [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Technology|All pages that reference technology]]
[https://www.wi-phi.com/modules/emerging-technologies/ The Emerging Technologies module on Wi-Phi] offers a free course on the [[ethics]] and [[sociological]] implications of new technologies.

== Technology and Taboo ==

The [[religion]] of the [[future]] should have a few commandments regarding technology.

Here's a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Commandments_of_Computer_Ethics serious example].

And some ideas with varying levels of seriousness.

* Thou shall not scroll [[social media]] in an in-person meeting.
* Thou shall backup thy data.
* Thou shall not click the link if you do not recognize the domain, for it is phishing.
* Thy [[Algorithms|algorithm]] shall not [[promote]] content that causes [[outrage]].
* Thou shall not [[Misinformation|bear false witness]] on [[social media]].
* Honor thy right to privacy and keep it holy.

Technological [[taboos]] are also needed to establish and enforce [[social norms]] on [[social media]] so they can serve their intended function without constantly being ruined by [[trolling]] and [[misinformation]].

== Teaching Technology ==
With rapidly advancing technology and widely varying levels of proficiency, continuing [[education]] about technology is essential to remain relevant in the [[Economy|job market]], and for [[parents]] to be able to properly supervise [[children]] who are online. The [[Education]] page proposes a peer-to-peer continuing adult [[education]] model to make this accessible to anyone.

Part of this curriculum is being aware important new online trends so you can avoid being [[Misinformation|misinformed]] or [[Grift|grifted]] by them, since most online trends are one or the other or both. Trends in the online discourse, new slang and jargon, all need to be made made easily understood by those who aren't terminally online. Otherwise, it can be easy to miss when [[Relationships|loved ones]] are dabbling in dangerous [[ideologies]] and bizarre subcultures that can lead them down a rabbit hole of [[addiction]] or [[hate]].

This [[wiki]] attempts to do this, with pages [[like]] [[crypto-bros]], [[manosphere]], [[JP and JC]], [[conspiracy theories]], [[grift]], [[platforms]], [[outrage]], [[trolling]], [[algorithm]], and [[future]] all highlighting trends in technology and online discourse that many may not be aware of, and are having a big negative influence on [[society]].{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6FORpg0KVo||center|How to Make Learning as Addictive as Social Media|frame}}

== Technology and Wealth ==
This video on Technology and Wealth by Nate Hagens' Great Simplification podcast is an excellent overview of the ways that technology and capitalism create a siphon of wealth that flows upwards towards the rich by automating the engines of wealth creation for the working class.

== The Ethical Implications of Technology ==

Videos discussing various [[ethical]] [[perspectives]] on technology and [[artificial intelligence]].

The [https://www.humanetech.com/ Center for Humane Technology] is an [[Organizations|organization]] dedicated to promoting these [[ideas]], and their website is full of great resources related to [[social media]], [[artificial intelligence]], and creating [[social norms]], [[incentives]], and [[ethics]] that deal with them.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoZ-WF5Z_1E||center|Does Technology Need to be Ethical?|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXdVDhOGqoE||center|AI Is Dangerous, but Not for the Reasons You Think|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWnU7A7ZBGc||center|Ethics & Technology|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9Esi2kDUsc||center|How ethics will change the future of technology|frame}}

== Techno Music ==

Creative wiring has produced many cool beeps and beats.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAabyhhwC68&list=PL7rrJWObNG9s2U1e40T3yHKb8HEgwhmaw||center|I dream of wires|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8K90hX4PrE||center|Daft Punk - Technologic|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7orEiTI6X_4&list=PLunAs_VfWjqd6ZhNLiZaZnjRaDUtXPJpA||center|Aphex Twin - Come to Daddy (Full Album)|frame}}

Universal health care

2026-01-10T01:45:31Z

Fractalguy:

[[File:Universal-healthcare-medicare-for-all-socialized-medicine.jpg|thumb|If you would consider taking a rideshare instead of an ambulance, your healthcare system is broken.]]
[[wikipedia:Universal_health_care|Universal Health Care]] has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to be the [[best practice]] for delivering robust health care to the [[Utilitarian|most people]] for the lowest cost. Virtually every metric, from cost, to health outcomes, to patient satisfaction, universal health care systems outperform private ones for all but the [[Money|richest]] people.<blockquote>''"If the goal of health-care reform is to provide comprehensive, [[universal]] health care in a cost-effective way, the only [[Honesty|honest]] approach is a single-payer approach."'' -[[wikipedia:Bernie_Sanders|Bernie Sanders]]</blockquote>
[[File:Socialized-medicine-is-terrifying-i-have-no-freedom.jpeg|right|frameless|300x300px]]
In a poor [[society]] it may not be practical to deliver universal health care when the basic infrastructure is not yet there. But once a certain level of [[wealth]] is obtained, health care shifts from a luxury to a necessity. And the [[injustice]] of having people go without basic care when a [[society]] has more than enough [[wealth]] to provide it becomes scandalous, especially if it ends up spending even more [[money]] per capita than countries that do cover [[everyone]].

Health [[misinformation]] is another huge [[Problems|problem]]. [https://www.sirishealth.org/ Siris Health] is a nonprofit dedicated to working with experts to provide curated, verified health [[information]] from healthcare experts to combat [[pseudoscience]] and promote [[education]].

[https://www.wi-phi.com/modules/bioethics/ The Bioethics module on Wi-Phi] offers a free course in the [[ethics]] of health care policy, [[euthanasia]] and [[abortion]], medical research, and biomedical enhancement.
[[File:Capitalists-should-never-be-allowed-near-a-healthcare-system.png|center|frameless|600x600px]]

[https://hiddenbrain.org/podcast/the-fee-for-service-monster/ Hidden Brain - The Fee-for-Service Monster]

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfsJXo1h1G0||center|What experts say about who has the world's best healthcare|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJ4TQ9q8rPc||center|Sicko (full movie)|frame}}

== Music is Universal Health Care for the Soul ==
Thanks to the [[placebo effect]]!{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbXXocMUBxA||center|Ben Folds Five - Hospital Song|frame}}

File:Capitalists-should-never-be-allowed-near-a-healthcare-system.png

2026-01-10T01:44:18Z

Fractalguy:

Materialism

2026-01-10T01:41:02Z

Fractalguy:

[[File:Materialism-matter-reality-science-atoms-molecules.jpg|thumb|Materialism means molecules make matter]]
[[Reality]] is made up of matter. The [[Universe]] of matter is everything that is, nothing exists outside of it, be it a [[supernatural]] being or [[consciousness]].

Energy also redirects here, since matter and energy are [[wikipedia:Mass–energy_equivalence|interchangeable]].

The principles of [[logic]] and [[time]] can be said to exist outside the material [[universe]], but that is only because these are [[inevitable]] principles of [[reality]], not immaterial beings.<blockquote>''"Subject the material world to the higher ends by understanding it in all its relations to daily life and action."'' -[[wikipedia:Ellen_Swallow_Richards|Ellen Swallow Richards]]</blockquote>Things that have [[traditionally]] been considered part of the [[spiritual]] realm are really just [[emergent properties]] of [[complex systems]] in the material [[universe]].

See [[wikipedia:Materialism|Materialism]] on Wikipedia.

== Mind Over Matter ==
[[wikipedia:Mind–body_dualism|Dualism]] asserts that the [[subjective]] experience of [[consciousness]] is often [[Believe|believed]] to exist outside of the material plane. However, since it is simply a by-product of [[neural]] processes in the [[brain]], and it does not have any [[wikipedia:Downward_causation|downward causality]] that would lead to [[free will]], it should not be seen as conflicting with a purely materialist view of [[reality]]. <blockquote>''"There are two worlds we live in: a material world, bound by the laws of physics, and the world inside our mind, which is just as important."'' -[[wikipedia:Alan_Moore|Alan Moore]] </blockquote>
[[File:You-matter-until-you-c2-then-you-energy.png|right|frameless|300x300px]]
[[Emergent property|Emergent]] dualism distinguishes between physical matter and the [[mind]] that emerges at sufficient levels of [[complexity]]. Similar to the practical definition of [[free will]], this definition simply describes different modalities in the behavior of matter, rather than a non-material agent.

More simply put, [[mind]] is [[Allegory|like]] how we describe the behavior of a beehive or ant colony. Those things "exist" and exhibit their own "agency" which is useful to describe their behavior, even though they are just [[emergent properties]] of large collections of bees or ants.

[[Mind]] is an [[emergent property]] of a large collection of [[neurons]], just like a hive is an [[emergent property]] of a large collection of bees. It is made up of matter, exhibits its own sense of agency, but has no "[[Spirituality|spirit]]" or other non-material essence other than [[emergence]]. It can sometimes help to think of [[mind]] or [[Spirituality|spirit]] in dualistic terms, but it is important not to confuse the [[Emergent property|emergent]] with the [[supernatural]].

== Spirit is Emergence ==
[[File:Bell-curve-of-duality.jpeg|right|frameless|350x350px]]
[[Spiritual]] terminology and dualistic [[philosophies]] are [[historically]] employed to describe phenomenon that we now know as [[Emergent property|emergent]]. It is how we [[traditionally]] describe the [[holistic]] behavior of the [[brain]], [[societies]], and the [[universe]]. Until the [[emergence]] of the [[concept]] of [[emergence]], it was not possible to describe the aggregate behavior of [[complex systems]] using [[scientific]] language.

Using a beehive as a [[metaphor]], it is obvious that the hive is just a bunch of bees. However, it acts as if it has its own sense of [[agency]], and describing the behavior of the hive is more useful in many cases than a reductionist description of the individual bees. [[Spirituality|Spirit]] may just be a bunch of [[neurons]], but it's useful to articulate their [[emergent]] behavior [[holistically]] if you want to understand it.

This is why there is so much excitement over [[fractals]] and [[complexity]] among those who discover these [[concepts]]. It bridges the gap between the [[spiritual]] and the material, allowing us to finally incorporate [[traditional]] knowledge into a robust and [[meaningful]] conversations about the nature of [[mind]], [[consciousness]], and the [[universe]], without invoking unprovable, non-material agents.

== Interpreting the Spiritual as Material ==
[[Spiritual]] terminology is often used to reference and elicit [[mental]] and [[emotional]] states, in a manner similar to [[poetry]] and [[music]]. These should always be interpreted as [[allegories]] for processes within the material [[universe]] and their [[Emergent property|emergent]] [[consciousness]] by-products, rather than [[literal]] descriptions of things that somehow exist outside of the [[universe]].

This allows you to interface with [[rituals]] and other practices that have [[evolved]] over centuries to produce higher [[emotional]] states, reduce [[suffering]], create [[in-group]] bonds, and other benefits, without reliance on any [[supernatural]] [[belief]] structures that bypass [[reason]] and are not subject to [[scientific]] inquiry. [[Beliefs]] that lend themselves to [[authoritarian]] abuses of [[power]].

== Materialism Keeps You Sane ==
Having a strong commitment to the materialism will prevent you from descending into magical thinking during trying times, or when encountering things you can't explain. Ruling out the [[supernatural]] forces you to look for [[rational]], [[logical]], [[Scientific|scientifically]] reasonable explanations for things. Without this commitment, [[conspiracy theories]], [[pseudoscience]], and all kinds of [[spiritual]] [[woo]] are considered fair game by your [[brain]]. This can be especially true for those who dabble in [[psychedelics]].

Kooky [[concepts]] confuse [[consciousness]], creating contradictions and [[Contrarianism|contrarians]].

The best way to avoid them altogether is with a steadfast commitment to materialism.

== What If You Just Really Like Stuff? ==
In that case you are [[materialistic]].

You can find many other examples of [[materialistic]] thought on [[social media]] and YouTube. But these videos are about [[wikipedia:Materialism|materialism]].{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7L7b1CFAYc||center|What is Materialism?|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZaeDIrukqg||center|A guide to Materialism|frame}}
 
Alan Lightman's lecture does a great job of describing the [[spiritual]] [[perspective]] of materialism taken by [[metaculture]].
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOZzO57shbc||center|Alan Lightman, "The Miraculous from the Material: Understanding the Wonders of Nature"|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDy96OJimjA||center|MODERNS - Matter|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3TjDUnlclk||center|Arcane Roots - Matter|frame}}

File:Bell-curve-of-duality.jpeg

2026-01-10T01:40:03Z

Fractalguy:

Socialism

2026-01-10T01:39:10Z

Fractalguy: /* What Has Worked Best? */

[[File:Communism-is-a-red-herring-accoding-to-dall-e.png|thumb|"Communism is a Red Herring" according to [[AI]]]]Over a century of anti-communist [[propaganda]] has made [[debate]] regarding the role of [[government]] and labor in the running of the [[Economics|economy]] nearly impossible. A significant portion of the [[population]] has been fully trained to react with Pavlovian negativity to any suggestion of worker empowerment, regulatory [[authority]], public ownership, or anything that exists outside of laissez-faire [[capitalism]]. <blockquote>''"Poverty is not socialism. To be [[rich]] is glorious."'' -[[wikipedia:Deng_Xiaoping|Deng Xiaoping]]</blockquote>In order to achieve [[progressive]] reforms, we must change the conversation around these issues to avoid these deeply ingrained [[Emotions|emotional]] reactions, and reconnect to our shared [[goal]] of improving [[quality of life]].

== Communism is a Red Herring ==

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism Socialism] is [[just]] a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring red herring], due to its constant confusion with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism Communism] by pretty much anyone who makes [[arguments]] against it, and occasionally when quoting the movie [[wikipedia:Clue_(film)|Clue]]. Given their close [[political]] [[motivations]] and the fact that most people can't tell them apart anyhow (at least in America), both topics will redirect to this page. When attempting to [[persuade]] a [[libertarian]] or [[Conservatives|conservative]], these [[concepts]] only distract [[attention]] from the issues and prevent real discussion of practical policy.

Socialism and Communism are used as a [[wikipedia:Thought-terminating_cliché|thought-terminating cliché]] in American [[politics]]. [[wikipedia:Cold_War|Cold war]] [[propaganda]] caused every [[evil]], dystopian, [[authoritarian]] nightmare scenario that could be conjured up to be labeled communism by [[Politics|politicians]] and the [[media]]. [[Capitalists]] and [[libertarians]] intentionally blurred the lines between communism and socialism, so that [[propaganda]] that was originally anti-Stalin became effectively anti-State. The result is a reflexive rejection of any [[government]] policy that seeks to improve the lives of citizens at the cost of [[taxation]], even if there is a huge net savings to [[society]] (e.g. [[Universal health care|universal healthcare]]). These [[associations]] are formed through endless repetition, not [[logical]] argument, allowing them to bypass our [[Brains|brain's]] [[Reason|reasoning]] centers. Decades after the fall of the [[wikipedia:Soviet_Union|USSR]], the only [[purpose]] it serves it to enable [[billionaires]] to prevent people from [[Critical thinking|rationally considering]] policies that raise [[taxes]] on [[billionaires]] and coming to the [[logical]] conclusion.

Any system that prioritizes [[ideology]] over [[best practices]] is inferior to one that does not. If worker ownership of the means of production is [[good]] for net human [[happiness]], then it should be pursued. [[Revolution]] is highly unlikely to increase [[happiness]]. The best [[Evidence-Based Best Practices|evidence]] we have is that a mix of [[capital]] investment, worker ownership, and state-run [[institutions]] is the optimal way to maximize [[happiness]], a result that defies [[ideology]]. The nice thing about this is that it's basically what all liberal democracies are already doing, and the [[democratic]] framework already allows us to adjust these ratios with public policy. Focusing on [[evolutionary]] changes to the [[incentives]] that will optimize the [[Balance of power|balance]] of a mixed [[economy]] should be prioritized over [[Utopia|utopian]] visions of a stateless [[future]].

Clue was right. Communism, [[libertarianism]], [[fascism]], anarchism, and other [[Ideology|ideologies]] distract us from the real goal of continual [[self-improvement]]. If you [[care]] about worker ownership of the means of production, push for corporate [[tax]] [[incentives]] that favor worker-owned companies. If you want to be [[persuasive]] and have a real conversation about policy, do [[everything]] you can to avoid any mention of socialism or communism.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7e16yDFjdc||center|Clue - Communism is Just a Red Herring|frame}}

== The Proletariat Hasn't Read Theory ==
[[File:If-the-workers-are-organized-put-their-hands-in-their-pockets.jpeg|right|frameless|400x400px]]

Lefties who are way too into "theory" will [[probably]] not appreciate this approach. However, [[metaculture]] seeks to [[meet people where they are]] at in terms of [[education]] and [[beliefs]]. And the unfortunate [[truth]] is that more than a century of [[capitalist]] [[propaganda]] has made the distinction moot in the [[minds]] of most. So even though most [[Communist]] and [[Socialist]] theory is spot-on in its criticism of [[capitalism]], and has moved far beyond Stalinism and Maoism in its prescriptions for [[society]], an explicit endorsement is not practical for [[Persuasion|rhetorical]] purposes. <blockquote>''"If you go carrying pictures of chairman Mao''

''You ain't gonna make it with anyone anyhow"''

-[[wikipedia:The_Beatles|The Beatles]]</blockquote>The Pavlovian rejection of anything labeled "Socialism" and "Communism" are too strong in the [[minds]] of the general public, and must be avoided in the interest of actually being [[persuasive]].

== What Has Worked Best? ==

[[Communism]] has been tried and it did not succeed in producing a [[happier]] [[society]], nor did it succeed at building actual [[communism]]. <blockquote>''"All that matters is your commitment to *building the World Republic*. You must seek out your [[revolutionary]] brothers and sisters. Find out how much communism they've built. Then, together, maybe you'll be able to build as much as 0.0002% of communism. But it won't be *easy*."'' -[[wikipedia:Disco_Elysium|Disco Elysium]] </blockquote>
[[File:American-mind-cant-comprehend-why-european-workers-have-better-quality-of-life.jpeg|right|frameless|403x403px]]
A [[mixed economy]] has produced the best [[historical]] outcomes for both [[wealth]] and [[happiness]], and has the advantage of being the system we have already built over two centuries of industrialization and [[democracy]]. The problem is that the [[balance of power]] has been tilted heavily towards [[capitalism]] and requires significant corrections to restore.

The best way for [[Capitalism]] to avoid promoting [[Communism]] in the next generation is to implement [[Socialist]] reforms to improve [[economic]] [[justice]].

For an example of the kind of theory that [[working]] class people have been consuming, and the [[concept]] of socialism and communism that you must speak to if you want to meet them where they are, this review of a course from Hillsdale College gives a good overview. If they have read good theory then you don't need to [[persuade]] them. These are the [[concepts]] you must assume people think of when you use the [[language]] of Marxist theory.{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuLJJK4oyxE||center|I Failed a Right-Wing Philosophy Class|frame}}

== A Constantly Improving Society, Not Utopia ==
[[File:Any-human-power-can-be-changed-ursula-la-guin.jpeg|thumb|The [[author]] of the ambiguous [[utopia]]]]
[[metaculture]]'s [[philosophy]] is rooted in realism not [[Utopian|utopianism]], and [[evolution]] instead of [[revolution]]. If a [[mixed economy]] is the goal, [[revolution]] is unnecessary--we already have that! It's just a [[matter]] of adjusting the [[balance of power]] between capital and labor.

We must avoid the [[inevitable]] [[war]] that will result if large-scale transformations in the [[economy]] and distribution of [[wealth]] are implemented without sufficient [[democratic]] support and [[wikipedia:Incrementalism|incrementalism]]. [[Tax]] rates should be increased slowly, and [[incentives]] should be used in favor of mandates in order to encourage transition towards worker ownership.

== Fully Automated Luxury Communism ==
Too many [[Crypto-bros|techno-optimist]] [[Utopian|utopians]] focus on transcending humanity as the ultimate trajectory of [[Technology|technological]] [[progress]]. This [[perspective]] is often anti-[[humanist]] and [[authoritarian]]. What is the alternative?

[https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/37758635-fully-automated-luxury-communism Fully Automated Luxury Communism] is the [[idea]] put forth by Aaron Bastani that envisions a liberation of the human spirit enabled by [[abundance]] provided by automation [[technology]] and [[artificial intelligence]].

Our [[future]] can be one where a few [[oligarchs]] [[control]] every aspect of our [[information environment]], subvert our [[free will]], and exert complete [[authoritarian]] control over [[future people]]. Or it can be one where these [[technologies]] benefit [[everyone]], freeing all people from drudgery, and enabling them to pursue their passions without the need to [[work]] in order to [[Life|live]].

== Find Out More ==

See [[Economics]] and [[Capitalism]].

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrtDZ-LOXFw||center|Communism vs. Socialism - What's the Difference?|frame}}
 
The [[video game]] [https://www.tumblr.com/doccywhomst/707149251735666688 Disco Elysium] is an amazing exploration of the dynamics of communism, [[fascism]], [[capitalism]], and [[revolution]]. In the interest of mixed-media explorations of [[philosophy]] and [[education]], a playthrough of this game is highly recommended.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdW7Cp0iV0A||center|Why Disco Elysium Is The Most Hopeful Game I've Ever Played|frame}}
 
[[wikipedia:Dialectical_materialism|Dialectical materialism]], as explained by a Vietnamese [[wikipedia:ASMR|ASMR]] artist. She has a whole channel reading Marxist texts in a soothing whisper. Learn theory with tingles!
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmwjKvO-MiY||center|Learn Dialectical Materialism like a Viet pro|frame}}

== Commie Music ==
[[Money]] for Nothing is a rant against the welfare state. Born in the USA is a [[wikipedia:Jingoism|jingoistic]] jingle. It's important not to interpret song titles [[literally]] without listening to the lyrics.{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTP2RUD_cL0||center|Dire Straits - Money for Nothing|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhuWmH5xtk4||center|Rage Against the Machine - Take the Power Back|frame}}

File:American-mind-cant-comprehend-why-european-workers-have-better-quality-of-life.jpeg

2026-01-10T01:38:30Z

Fractalguy:

Socialism

2026-01-10T01:36:11Z

Fractalguy: /* Communism is a Red Herring */

[[File:Communism-is-a-red-herring-accoding-to-dall-e.png|thumb|"Communism is a Red Herring" according to [[AI]]]]Over a century of anti-communist [[propaganda]] has made [[debate]] regarding the role of [[government]] and labor in the running of the [[Economics|economy]] nearly impossible. A significant portion of the [[population]] has been fully trained to react with Pavlovian negativity to any suggestion of worker empowerment, regulatory [[authority]], public ownership, or anything that exists outside of laissez-faire [[capitalism]]. <blockquote>''"Poverty is not socialism. To be [[rich]] is glorious."'' -[[wikipedia:Deng_Xiaoping|Deng Xiaoping]]</blockquote>In order to achieve [[progressive]] reforms, we must change the conversation around these issues to avoid these deeply ingrained [[Emotions|emotional]] reactions, and reconnect to our shared [[goal]] of improving [[quality of life]].

== Communism is a Red Herring ==

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism Socialism] is [[just]] a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring red herring], due to its constant confusion with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism Communism] by pretty much anyone who makes [[arguments]] against it, and occasionally when quoting the movie [[wikipedia:Clue_(film)|Clue]]. Given their close [[political]] [[motivations]] and the fact that most people can't tell them apart anyhow (at least in America), both topics will redirect to this page. When attempting to [[persuade]] a [[libertarian]] or [[Conservatives|conservative]], these [[concepts]] only distract [[attention]] from the issues and prevent real discussion of practical policy.

Socialism and Communism are used as a [[wikipedia:Thought-terminating_cliché|thought-terminating cliché]] in American [[politics]]. [[wikipedia:Cold_War|Cold war]] [[propaganda]] caused every [[evil]], dystopian, [[authoritarian]] nightmare scenario that could be conjured up to be labeled communism by [[Politics|politicians]] and the [[media]]. [[Capitalists]] and [[libertarians]] intentionally blurred the lines between communism and socialism, so that [[propaganda]] that was originally anti-Stalin became effectively anti-State. The result is a reflexive rejection of any [[government]] policy that seeks to improve the lives of citizens at the cost of [[taxation]], even if there is a huge net savings to [[society]] (e.g. [[Universal health care|universal healthcare]]). These [[associations]] are formed through endless repetition, not [[logical]] argument, allowing them to bypass our [[Brains|brain's]] [[Reason|reasoning]] centers. Decades after the fall of the [[wikipedia:Soviet_Union|USSR]], the only [[purpose]] it serves it to enable [[billionaires]] to prevent people from [[Critical thinking|rationally considering]] policies that raise [[taxes]] on [[billionaires]] and coming to the [[logical]] conclusion.

Any system that prioritizes [[ideology]] over [[best practices]] is inferior to one that does not. If worker ownership of the means of production is [[good]] for net human [[happiness]], then it should be pursued. [[Revolution]] is highly unlikely to increase [[happiness]]. The best [[Evidence-Based Best Practices|evidence]] we have is that a mix of [[capital]] investment, worker ownership, and state-run [[institutions]] is the optimal way to maximize [[happiness]], a result that defies [[ideology]]. The nice thing about this is that it's basically what all liberal democracies are already doing, and the [[democratic]] framework already allows us to adjust these ratios with public policy. Focusing on [[evolutionary]] changes to the [[incentives]] that will optimize the [[Balance of power|balance]] of a mixed [[economy]] should be prioritized over [[Utopia|utopian]] visions of a stateless [[future]].

Clue was right. Communism, [[libertarianism]], [[fascism]], anarchism, and other [[Ideology|ideologies]] distract us from the real goal of continual [[self-improvement]]. If you [[care]] about worker ownership of the means of production, push for corporate [[tax]] [[incentives]] that favor worker-owned companies. If you want to be [[persuasive]] and have a real conversation about policy, do [[everything]] you can to avoid any mention of socialism or communism.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7e16yDFjdc||center|Clue - Communism is Just a Red Herring|frame}}

== The Proletariat Hasn't Read Theory ==
[[File:If-the-workers-are-organized-put-their-hands-in-their-pockets.jpeg|right|frameless|400x400px]]

Lefties who are way too into "theory" will [[probably]] not appreciate this approach. However, [[metaculture]] seeks to [[meet people where they are]] at in terms of [[education]] and [[beliefs]]. And the unfortunate [[truth]] is that more than a century of [[capitalist]] [[propaganda]] has made the distinction moot in the [[minds]] of most. So even though most [[Communist]] and [[Socialist]] theory is spot-on in its criticism of [[capitalism]], and has moved far beyond Stalinism and Maoism in its prescriptions for [[society]], an explicit endorsement is not practical for [[Persuasion|rhetorical]] purposes. <blockquote>''"If you go carrying pictures of chairman Mao''

''You ain't gonna make it with anyone anyhow"''

-[[wikipedia:The_Beatles|The Beatles]]</blockquote>The Pavlovian rejection of anything labeled "Socialism" and "Communism" are too strong in the [[minds]] of the general public, and must be avoided in the interest of actually being [[persuasive]].

== What Has Worked Best? ==

[[Communism]] has been tried and it did not succeed in producing a [[happier]] [[society]], nor did it succeed at building actual [[communism]]. <blockquote>''"All that matters is your commitment to *building the World Republic*. You must seek out your [[revolutionary]] brothers and sisters. Find out how much communism they've built. Then, together, maybe you'll be able to build as much as 0.0002% of communism. But it won't be *easy*."'' -[[wikipedia:Disco_Elysium|Disco Elysium]] </blockquote>A [[mixed economy]] has produced the best [[historical]] outcomes for both [[wealth]] and [[happiness]], and has the advantage of being the system we have already built over two centuries of industrialization and [[democracy]]. The problem is that the [[balance of power]] has been tilted heavily towards [[capitalism]] and requires significant corrections to restore.

The best way for [[Capitalism]] to avoid promoting [[Communism]] in the next generation is to implement [[Socialist]] reforms to improve [[economic]] [[justice]].

For an example of the kind of theory that [[working]] class people have been consuming, and the [[concept]] of socialism and communism that you must speak to if you want to meet them where they are, this review of a course from Hillsdale College gives a good overview. If they have read good theory then you don't need to [[persuade]] them. These are the [[concepts]] you must assume people think of when you use the [[language]] of Marxist theory.{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuLJJK4oyxE||center|I Failed a Right-Wing Philosophy Class|frame}}

== A Constantly Improving Society, Not Utopia ==
[[File:Any-human-power-can-be-changed-ursula-la-guin.jpeg|thumb|The [[author]] of the ambiguous [[utopia]]]]
[[metaculture]]'s [[philosophy]] is rooted in realism not [[Utopian|utopianism]], and [[evolution]] instead of [[revolution]]. If a [[mixed economy]] is the goal, [[revolution]] is unnecessary--we already have that! It's just a [[matter]] of adjusting the [[balance of power]] between capital and labor.

We must avoid the [[inevitable]] [[war]] that will result if large-scale transformations in the [[economy]] and distribution of [[wealth]] are implemented without sufficient [[democratic]] support and [[wikipedia:Incrementalism|incrementalism]]. [[Tax]] rates should be increased slowly, and [[incentives]] should be used in favor of mandates in order to encourage transition towards worker ownership.

== Fully Automated Luxury Communism ==
Too many [[Crypto-bros|techno-optimist]] [[Utopian|utopians]] focus on transcending humanity as the ultimate trajectory of [[Technology|technological]] [[progress]]. This [[perspective]] is often anti-[[humanist]] and [[authoritarian]]. What is the alternative?

[https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/37758635-fully-automated-luxury-communism Fully Automated Luxury Communism] is the [[idea]] put forth by Aaron Bastani that envisions a liberation of the human spirit enabled by [[abundance]] provided by automation [[technology]] and [[artificial intelligence]].

Our [[future]] can be one where a few [[oligarchs]] [[control]] every aspect of our [[information environment]], subvert our [[free will]], and exert complete [[authoritarian]] control over [[future people]]. Or it can be one where these [[technologies]] benefit [[everyone]], freeing all people from drudgery, and enabling them to pursue their passions without the need to [[work]] in order to [[Life|live]].

== Find Out More ==

See [[Economics]] and [[Capitalism]].

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrtDZ-LOXFw||center|Communism vs. Socialism - What's the Difference?|frame}}
 
The [[video game]] [https://www.tumblr.com/doccywhomst/707149251735666688 Disco Elysium] is an amazing exploration of the dynamics of communism, [[fascism]], [[capitalism]], and [[revolution]]. In the interest of mixed-media explorations of [[philosophy]] and [[education]], a playthrough of this game is highly recommended.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdW7Cp0iV0A||center|Why Disco Elysium Is The Most Hopeful Game I've Ever Played|frame}}
 
[[wikipedia:Dialectical_materialism|Dialectical materialism]], as explained by a Vietnamese [[wikipedia:ASMR|ASMR]] artist. She has a whole channel reading Marxist texts in a soothing whisper. Learn theory with tingles!
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmwjKvO-MiY||center|Learn Dialectical Materialism like a Viet pro|frame}}

== Commie Music ==
[[Money]] for Nothing is a rant against the welfare state. Born in the USA is a [[wikipedia:Jingoism|jingoistic]] jingle. It's important not to interpret song titles [[literally]] without listening to the lyrics.{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTP2RUD_cL0||center|Dire Straits - Money for Nothing|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhuWmH5xtk4||center|Rage Against the Machine - Take the Power Back|frame}}

File:If-the-workers-are-organized-put-their-hands-in-their-pockets.jpeg

2026-01-10T01:34:38Z

Fractalguy:

Bootlicker

2026-01-10T01:30:26Z

Fractalguy:

[[File:Bootlicker-creepy-ai-woman-kissing-a-boot-police-billionaire.png|thumb|There are 2 kinds of bootlickers. We're talking about the sycophantic variety.]]
A [https://www.dictionary.com/browse/bootlicker bootlicker] is a sycophant to the [[wealthy]] interests of [[capitalism]] that spreads anti-[[socialist]] [[propaganda]] on various [[media]] [[platforms]]. It can also refer to personal friends and acquaintances that worship at the altar of [[money]] and sing the praises of billionaires that would never give them the [[time]] of day.

Bootlickers [[love]] [[Money|billionaires]], [[police]], [[consumerism]], [[hustle culture]], and fellow [[money addicts]]. They are [[happy]] to endure their own indignity if it means their [[enemy]] [[suffers]] more.

There is a special [[cognitive dissonance]] for [[Libertarian]] [[crypto-bros]] who are ostensibly against the [[police]] state but are too caught up in the right-wing [[manosphere]] to stand up to the [[authoritarian]] groups they have aligned themselves with in the name of [[freedom of speech]] and fighting [[cancel culture]].

[[File:How-many-bootlicks-does-it-take.jpg|frameless]] [[File:Omg-your-tread-tastes-great.png|frameless|300x300px]][[File:Boots-are-for-feet-not-for-eat.png|frameless|300x300px]]

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bpa7WzuMStE||center|Bootlickers! What are they?|frame}}
 
The Simpsons character Smithers is a classic bootlicker archetype.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yf5IXR_qczk||center|The Ultimate Smithers Compilation|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blte3EbAFzA||center|Shilpa Ray - Bootlickers of the Patriarchy|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nwge7HPogPU&list=OLAK5uy_mew-peDNvxERoA06DdK4ZJrxT3T2MN1d8||center|Bootlicker - Self Titled Album|frame}}

Bootlicker

2026-01-10T01:29:50Z

Fractalguy:

[[File:Bootlicker-creepy-ai-woman-kissing-a-boot-police-billionaire.png|thumb|There are 2 kinds of bootlickers. We're talking about the sycophantic variety.]]
A [https://www.dictionary.com/browse/bootlicker bootlicker] is a sycophant to the [[wealthy]] interests of [[capitalism]] that spreads anti-[[socialist]] [[propaganda]] on various [[media]] [[platforms]]. It can also refer to personal friends and acquaintances that worship at the altar of [[money]] and sing the praises of billionaires that would never give them the [[time]] of day.

Bootlickers [[love]] [[Money|billionaires]], [[police]], [[consumerism]], [[hustle culture]], and fellow [[money addicts]]. They are [[happy]] to endure their own indignity if it means their [[enemy]] [[suffers]] more.

There is a special [[cognitive dissonance]] for [[Libertarian]] [[crypto-bros]] who are ostensibly against the [[police]] state but are too caught up in the right-wing [[manosphere]] to stand up to the [[authoritarian]] groups they have aligned themselves with in the name of [[freedom of speech]] and fighting [[cancel culture]].

[[File:How-many-bootlicks-does-it-take.jpg|frameless]] [[File:Omg-your-tread-tastes-great.png|frameless|300x300px]][[File:Boots-are-for-feet-not-for-eat.png|frameless|265x265px]]

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bpa7WzuMStE||center|Bootlickers! What are they?|frame}}
 
The Simpsons character Smithers is a classic bootlicker archetype.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yf5IXR_qczk||center|The Ultimate Smithers Compilation|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blte3EbAFzA||center|Shilpa Ray - Bootlickers of the Patriarchy|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nwge7HPogPU&list=OLAK5uy_mew-peDNvxERoA06DdK4ZJrxT3T2MN1d8||center|Bootlicker - Self Titled Album|frame}}

Bootlicker

2026-01-10T01:29:35Z

Fractalguy:

[[File:Bootlicker-creepy-ai-woman-kissing-a-boot-police-billionaire.png|thumb|There are 2 kinds of bootlickers. We're talking about the sycophantic variety.]]
A [https://www.dictionary.com/browse/bootlicker bootlicker] is a sycophant to the [[wealthy]] interests of [[capitalism]] that spreads anti-[[socialist]] [[propaganda]] on various [[media]] [[platforms]]. It can also refer to personal friends and acquaintances that worship at the altar of [[money]] and sing the praises of billionaires that would never give them the [[time]] of day.

Bootlickers [[love]] [[Money|billionaires]], [[police]], [[consumerism]], [[hustle culture]], and fellow [[money addicts]]. They are [[happy]] to endure their own indignity if it means their [[enemy]] [[suffers]] more.

There is a special [[cognitive dissonance]] for [[Libertarian]] [[crypto-bros]] who are ostensibly against the [[police]] state but are too caught up in the right-wing [[manosphere]] to stand up to the [[authoritarian]] groups they have aligned themselves with in the name of [[freedom of speech]] and fighting [[cancel culture]].

[[File:How-many-bootlicks-does-it-take.jpg|frameless]]

[[File:Omg-your-tread-tastes-great.png|frameless|300x300px]][[File:Boots-are-for-feet-not-for-eat.png|frameless|265x265px]]

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bpa7WzuMStE||center|Bootlickers! What are they?|frame}}
 
The Simpsons character Smithers is a classic bootlicker archetype.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yf5IXR_qczk||center|The Ultimate Smithers Compilation|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blte3EbAFzA||center|Shilpa Ray - Bootlickers of the Patriarchy|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nwge7HPogPU&list=OLAK5uy_mew-peDNvxERoA06DdK4ZJrxT3T2MN1d8||center|Bootlicker - Self Titled Album|frame}}

Bootlicker

2026-01-10T01:28:36Z

Fractalguy:

[[File:Bootlicker-creepy-ai-woman-kissing-a-boot-police-billionaire.png|thumb|There are 2 kinds of bootlickers. We're talking about the sycophantic variety.]]
A [https://www.dictionary.com/browse/bootlicker bootlicker] is a sycophant to the [[wealthy]] interests of [[capitalism]] that spreads anti-[[socialist]] [[propaganda]] on various [[media]] [[platforms]]. It can also refer to personal friends and acquaintances that worship at the altar of [[money]] and sing the praises of billionaires that would never give them the [[time]] of day.

Bootlickers [[love]] [[Money|billionaires]], [[police]], [[consumerism]], [[hustle culture]], and fellow [[money addicts]]. They are [[happy]] to endure their own indignity if it means their [[enemy]] [[suffers]] more.

There is a special [[cognitive dissonance]] for [[Libertarian]] [[crypto-bros]] who are ostensibly against the [[police]] state but are too caught up in the right-wing [[manosphere]] to stand up to the [[authoritarian]] groups they have aligned themselves with in the name of [[freedom of speech]] and fighting [[cancel culture]].

[[File:How-many-bootlicks-does-it-take.jpg|frameless]]

[[File:Omg-your-tread-tastes-great.png|frameless|300x300px]][[File:Boots-are-for-feet-not-for-eat.png|frameless|300x300px]]

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bpa7WzuMStE||center|Bootlickers! What are they?|frame}}
 
The Simpsons character Smithers is a classic bootlicker archetype.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yf5IXR_qczk||center|The Ultimate Smithers Compilation|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blte3EbAFzA||center|Shilpa Ray - Bootlickers of the Patriarchy|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nwge7HPogPU&list=OLAK5uy_mew-peDNvxERoA06DdK4ZJrxT3T2MN1d8||center|Bootlicker - Self Titled Album|frame}}

File:Omg-your-tread-tastes-great.png

2026-01-10T01:27:08Z

Fractalguy:

File:Boots-are-for-feet-not-for-eat.png

2026-01-10T01:26:56Z

Fractalguy:

God

2026-01-10T01:21:46Z

Fractalguy: /* What Has All of These Properties? */

[[File:Blue Mandelbrot.png|right|frameless]]
This page establishes a definition for god that will be used throughout the [[metaculture]] [[wiki]].<blockquote>''"God is bigger than people think."'' -[[wikipedia:Jimmy_Dean|Jimmy Dean]]</blockquote>

== How Do You Define God? ==

In any discussion of [[religion]] it is important to start with a definition of what "[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God god]" is.

Each person both holds a mental picture of what "god" means to them, along with presuppositions for what "god" means to others, especially if they subscribe to a different [[religious]] [[belief system]].

Most of the time those presuppositions are wrong and inevitably result in misunderstanding.

So before any substantive discussion of [[religion]] takes place it is important to agree on, or at least understand, what both parties mean when they refer to "god".

It also helps if your definition is easy to understand, and provides a consistent [[allegory]] through which you can interpret [[scripture]] with some degree of [[objectivity]]. In other words, this is not some [[Jordan Peterson]] style [[rhetorical]] trick using an overly confusing and obfuscating definition of god that is designed to elicit the [[wikipedia:Barnum_effect|Barnum Effect]]. It's more like [[wikipedia:Baruch_Spinoza|Spinoza]], simplified!

== Properties of God ==

In monotheistic [[traditions]], "god" has several common attributes:

<ul>
<li>[[Creation]] of the [[universe]]</li>
<li>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnipotent Omnipotent] - all powerful</li>
<li>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omniscient Omniscient] - all knowing</li>
<li>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnipresent Omnipresent] - exists everywhere</li>
<li>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnibenevolent Omnibenevolent] - all good</li>
<li>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysical_necessity Inevitable] - must be</li>
<li>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_existence Eternal] - always has been, always will be</li>
<li>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendence_(religion) Transcendent] (exists outside the material plane), [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanence Immanent] (exists materially) or both</li>
<li>[[Funny]] - a notorious prankster with a penchant for [[meta]]-[[humor]]</li>
</ul>

== What Has All of These Properties? ==

Is there anything that exists in the known [[universe]] that can exhibit all of these properties? Only the [[universe]] itself both exists and has all of the properties ascribed to god. Therefore any references to "god" that are made within this [[wiki]] shall assume the [[Pantheistic]] definition for the immanent version of god.

[[Fractals]] will serve a [[mathematical]] [[metaphor]] for the transcendent aspect of god ([[logic]]).

Here's a breakdown of how the [[pantheistic]] [[universalist]] [[fractal]] view of god is compatible with each of these traits.

[[Creation]]: the [[universe]] is self-creating and [[self-organizing]]. These principles are also why the [[universe]] is [[Inevitable]][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysical_necessity].

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnipotent Omnipotent]: unless you want to get into [[logical]] paradoxes like god creating a rock so big that god cannot lift it, omnipotence must be interpreted as being all-powerful within the realm of [[logical]] possibility. This is why the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_noncontradiction Law of Noncontradiction] exists both in most serious works of [[theology]] as well as the rules of [[logic]].

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omniscient Omniscient]: the problem of [[information]] storage means that without some [[supernatural]] compression [[algorithm]], for any external being to have full knowledge of every atom in the [[universe]] it would require an [[information]] storage mechanism as large as the [[universe]] itself to represent it. Therefore the [[universe]] itself is the only conceivable storage device capable of omniscience.

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnipresent Omnipresent]: if god is the [[universe]], then god is everywhere.

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnibenevolent Omnibenevolent]: since god is [[everything]], god is also [[everything]] that is [[good]]. While [[good]] and [[evil]] are products of the human [[brain]], the human [[brain]] is also part of the [[universe]] and therefore part of god. The [[universe]] itself is not necessarily on either side of the [[good]] versus [[evil]] dichotomy, but the human [[brain]] is. The notion of omnibenevolence is necessary to maximize the [[psychological]] benefit of the [[god concept]]. Even though the [[universe]] itself isn't [[conscious]] and definitely doesn't care about you, it is inherently advantageous to view it as ''a very good place to live one's life''.

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_existence Eternal]: while the current instance of our universe appears to have a beginning with the [[big bang]] about 13.8 billion years ago, and will [[Apocalypse Prevention|inevitably collapse or experience heat death]] in another 200 billion years (give or take), this still doesn't quite make it to "eternal". For organisms with a [[lifespan]] of under 100 years, this is pretty darned eternal. But if you really want [[time]] to be infinite then it becomes necessary to look outside of our current [[universe]]. Though we currently lack the [[technology]] to gain empirical knowledge of what lies outside the known [[universe]], it is easy to conceive an eternal multiverse without a [[supernatural]] actor. The [[universe]] could simply repeat its 200 billion year cycle of [[birth]] and [[death]] over and over forever, or it could be a part of a multiverse with an infinite number of [[Universe|universes]] being created and destroyed every second.<blockquote>''"God used beautiful mathematics in creating the world." -''[[wikipedia:Paul_Dirac|Paul Dirac]]</blockquote>[[wikipedia:Transcendence_(religion)|Transcendent]]: this is the one property of god that the physical [[universe]] cannot manifest, since by definition "transcendent" means apart from the physical [[universe]]. But there is something that exists in the abstract that governs everything that happens in the [[universe]]--the rules of [[logic]] and the [[mathematical]] systems that are derived from it. In [[metaculture]], the transcendent is represented by the [[fractal]], a [[mathematical]] construct that is [[infinite]], [[logical]], [[self-organizing]] and [[beautiful]]. God is the [[universe]] (implying [[wikipedia:Immanence|Immanence]]) but the [[universe]] is also the product of the abstract rules of [[logic]] and [[Self-organization|self-organized complexity]], and therefore transcendent.

== Advantages of This Definition ==
[[File:Oh-shit-its-god-again.jpeg|right|frameless|400x400px]]
Viewing god in this context resolves the logical paradoxes and contradictions inherent in any [[supernatural]] definition. It allows us to discuss god without abandoning [[science]], or even unify the study of [[science]] and [[religion]] under one umbrella. It allows for discourse between those with scientific backgrounds and those with [[religious]] ones under the understanding that one approach is empirical and the other intuitive and [[poetic]], but both seek to understand the same thing. While intuitive [[truths]] cannot supersede empirical ones, they can inform and inspire them if not dismissed.

Prior to the development of the [[scientific method]], the dualistic notion of god and the [[universe]] being wholly separate was not nearly as rigid as it has become [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind%E2%80%93body_dualism]. In any case, any independent view of [[religion]] must come to the conclusion that each was an attempt to create an explanation using the [[language]] and stories of their culture of how the [[universe]] came to be and how humans should function within it, and to pass on their accumulated wisdom to future generations. Those not bound to [[wikipedia:Biblical_literalism|literalism]] can find this interpretation allows you to take advantage of this ancient wisdom in a way that is fully compatible with a rational, scientific [[universe]] without internal contradiction.

If you are a [[gambler]] and you have to put your money on one definition of god, from among every [[culture]] and [[religion]] throughout [[history]], don't you think that [[Pantheism]] is the safest bet?

== Panpsychism and God's Consciousness ==

Some [[pantheists]] use [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism panpsychism] to imbue god with the property of [[consciousness]] and make it personal. However, there is no requirement for god to have [[consciousness]] except to fill a need created by [[literalism]] and [[tradition]], and to answer criticisms of [[pantheism]] based on that need.

If the property of [[consciousness]] is essential to you, then take the emergent property of [[consciousness]] in [[neural network]] [[feedback loops]] as an [[inevitable]] property of the [[universe]] and the human [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_consciousness hive mind] as god's [[consciousness]]. We don't need to pretend that rocks and stars have [[consciousness]] for god to have it. If god's [[consciousness]] is an [[allegory]], what's it an [[allegory]] for?

What is more relevant is whether there is [[historical]] and [[theological]] precedent for the [[pantheistic]] assumption based on the [[evolution]] of [[language]] and how our ancestors perceived the world without [[science]], and whether it works to resolve [[ideological]] conflict and [[cognitive dissonance]]. The the lack of a [[conscious]] [[supernatural]] god is a technicality that [[philosophers]] and theologians can bicker over.

If [[pantheism]] makes more sense to you then it makes more sense and it doesn't matter what any [[religious]] authority says about it. And if panpsychism makes more sense to you and fulfills your expectation of a [[conscious]] god, it doesn't really matter what this [[wiki]] says about it. Especially since it's unlikely to impact your [[life choices]] in any meaningful way.

== Pantheism or Panentheism? ==
If you feel like going around all day explaining the difference between [[Pantheism]] and [[wikipedia:Panentheism|Panentheism]] in order to be more precise about your professed belief system, then by all means be a [[wikipedia:Panentheism|Panentheist]]. It is technically more accurate since this definition of god includes the transcendent as well as the immanent. Most people still don't even know what [[Pantheism]] is, so using the more general, commonly understood term is helpful when trying to avoid unnecessary overcomplication.

This [[wiki]] will not bother to distinguish between these two as they are functionally equivalent to the extent that the vast majority of people care.

== The God Concept ==

A discussion of the [[god concept]], which examines the [[psychological]] construct created by god and its impact on the [[happiness]] of the believer, can be found [[God concept|here]].

See the [[Theory of everything|Theory of Everything]] page for a short [[metanarrative]] that tells a story about the nature of god and [[reality]] from this [[perspective]].

== The Sierpinski Trinity ==

Besides these general properties that apply to any of the monotheistic [[traditions]], there is also the [[Trinity]] in Christianity. See the [[Sierpinski Trinity]] page for an an analysis of how the [[fractal]] makes sense of the relationship between the three aspects of god, and how and the [[Holy Spirit]] is an [[allegory]] for the [[god concept]].

This is an example of [[metaphor mapping]], which is a technique used here and throughout this [[wiki]] to reframe [[spiritual]] [[concepts]] within the context of [[scientific]] [[materialism]].

== Others Saying Similar Stuff ==

First some Hidden Brain episodes that discuss our neurological need for god.

* [https://hiddenbrain.org/podcast/creating-god/ Hidden Brain - Creating God]
* [https://hiddenbrain.org/podcast/our-god-shaped-brains/ Hidden Brain - Our God-Shaped Brains]

This video does a good job of explaining how [[pantheism]] fulfills the working definition of god detailed here.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cpz9Ec8Il38||center|Is the Universe God? Pantheism Explained and Debated|frame}}
 
This lecture from [[wikipedia:Rupert_Sheldrake|Rupert Sheldrake]] details this [[perspective]] and cites many [[historical]] references from [[religion]], [[philosophy]], and [[science]]. He is known to dabble in panpsychism and [[woo]] sometimes, but this talk really hits on all the major arguments and precedents for the naturalistic definition of god.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFM6Aak3eNM||center|Panentheism: God in Nature and Nature in God|frame}}

 
A discussion of [[pantheism]] as it relates to the [[philosophy]] of [[wikipedia:Baruch_Spinoza|Spinoza]]. Saints of [[science]] [[wikipedia:Albert_Einstein|Einstein]] and [[wikipedia:Carl_Sagan|Sagan]] both reference Spinoza when asked about their own [[God concept|concept of god]].

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gioaH2kFaIM||center|Spinoza's God|frame}}
 
More generally, we should rethink our preconceived notions about what god is and come up with definitions that work better for us and for humanity's [[future]]. Rainn Wilson discussing god with Alex O'Connor is a quintessentially appropriate video for a [[wiki]] with a [[science]] meets [[spirituality]] meets pop [[culture]] theme. The [[wikipedia:Baháʼí_Faith|Baháʼí Faith]] is [[universalist]], and offers one of the most nuanced takes on the nature of god of any world [[religion]]. This video is an excerpt. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LWEeaSFhP4 Watch the full interview here].
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvOJSpcbX3A||center|We're Thinking About God All Wrong - Rainn Wilson|frame}}
 
From the [[pantheistic]] point of view we are all [[god]], but not all of us are rap gods.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbGs_qK2PQA||center|Eminem - Rap God|frame}}

File:Oh-shit-its-god-again.jpeg

2026-01-10T01:20:04Z

Fractalguy:

Society

2026-01-10T01:18:28Z

Fractalguy: /* CliffsNotes for Modern Living */

[[File:We-live-in-a-society-culture-nation-race-humanity.jpg|thumb|We are all [[connected]] (by wires)]]
A society is a group of people who share a [[culture]] and a territory, and encompasses all of their activities.

This page is a nexus for the many other pages that discuss various aspects of society. Check the [https://www.metaculture.net/metawiki/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/Society What links here] page to view these references.<blockquote>''"No society can surely be [[flourishing]] and [[happy]], of which the far greater part of the members are poor and miserable."'' -[[wikipedia:Adam_Smith|Adam Smith]]</blockquote>Read about [[wikipedia:Society|Society]], [[wikipedia:Sociology|Sociology]], and [[Culture]] on Wikipedia.

== Society Pages ==
These pages talk about the many things that make up a modern society.
* [[Culture]], [[Language]], and '''[[In-group]]'''
* '''[[Politics]]''', [[Institutions]] and [[Trust]]
* [[Justice]], [[Democracy]], and [[Balance of power|Balance of Power]]
* '''[[Economics]]''', [[Taxes]], and [[Capitalism]]
* '''[[Education]]'''
* [[Healthcare]] and [[Social Safety Net]]
* [[Money]], [[Work]], [[Slack]], [[Monetary addiction|'''Monetary Addiction''']], [[Bootlicking]], and '''[[Grift]]'''
* '''[[Technology]]''', [[Platforms]], [[Promotion]], [[AI]], and [[Media]]
* [[Trolling]], [[Outrage]], and [[Algorithms]]
* [[Misinformation]], [[Contrarianism]], and [[Conspiracy theories|Conspiracy Theories]]
* [[War]] and [[Revolution]] versus [[Evolution]]
* [[Environment]], [[Climate change|Climate Change]], and [[Population]]
* '''[[Religion]]''', [[Secular institutions|Secular Institutions]], and [[Social Norms]]
* [[Community]], [[Family]], and [[Relationships]]
* '''[[Art]]''', [[Poetry]], [[Music]], [[Humor]], '''[[Games]]''', and [[Dance]]
* [[Safety]]
* [[Utopia]]

== CliffsNotes for Modern Living ==
[[File:We-should-improve-society-somewhat.jpeg|right|frameless|350x350px]]
One major goal of the [[wiki]] is to provide an easy yet comprehensive guide to the forces that are impacting modern society. For example:

* Influential Internet trends like the [[manosphere]] and [[secular gurus]] that go unnoticed by people who go outside
* New forms of [[grift]] to be aware of
* Important trends in [[technology]] and emerging [[social norms]] regarding their use
* [[Media]] literacy and [[critical thinking]] skills

The [[wiki]] provides a continuing [[education]] curriculum designed to create fully self-actualized citizens of a modern [[democratic]] [[capitalist]] state. This means being aware of how society actually works, so you don't resort to [[conspiracy theories]] in the absence of clarity.

== Society Videos ==
Envisioning the perfect society is a good exercise, just don't get caught up in any [[utopian]] fantasies.{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyHLLzmNje0||center|Picture a perfect society. What does it look like?|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylXVn-wh9eQ&list=PL8dPuuaLjXtMJ-AfB_7J1538YKWkZAnGA||center|Crash Course Sociology (45 Lessons)|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHhbdXCzt_A||center|Seinfeld - Living in a Society|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABsslEoL0-c||center|Eddie Vedder - Society|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTtAympkky0||center|Frank Zappa - Society Pages|frame}}

File:We-should-improve-society-somewhat.jpeg

2026-01-10T01:17:42Z

Fractalguy:

Politics

2026-01-02T12:52:40Z

Fractalguy: /* Other Practices in Government and Politics */

[[File:Politics-change-reform-bipartisan-electoral.jpg|thumb|Every cardboard sign makes a difference]]
A discussion of political theories and how their ideas contribute to what we know about [[best practices]] for governing a [[society]] and increasing the [[quality of life]].<blockquote>''"Most people assume the fights are going to be the left versus the right, but it always is the reasonable versus the jerks."'' -[[wikipedia:Jimmy_Wales|Jimmy Wales]]</blockquote>This section aims to develop a political [[philosophy]] with a clearly defined [[Utilitarian|goal]] and [[Meterstick|benchmarks]] that align with [[Happiness and well-being|human needs]]. This allows us to evaluate proposed policy independently of its [[ideological]] associations.

== Best Practices in Government and Politics ==

The general principles of [[evidence-based]] governance should be modeled on the those countries with the highest [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quality_of_life Quality of Life] indicators.

In the countries with the greatest [[happiness and well-being]], the following principles are nearly universal, with the happiest countries having the strongest systems in place for each.

<ul>
<li>[[Democracy]]</li>
<li>[[Freedom of Speech]]</li>
<li>[[Religious Freedom]]</li>
<li>[[Freedom]] in general</li>
<li>[[Balance of power|Balance of Power]]</li>
<li>[[Taxes|Progressive Taxation]]</li>
<li>[[Public Education]]</li>
<li>[[Social Safety Net]]</li>
<li>[[Universal Health Care]]</li>
<li>[[Justice|Equal Justice for all citizens]]</li>
<li>Mixed [[Economy]] with the best elements of [[Socialism]] and [[Capitalism]]</li>
</ul>Many countries that are objectively [[happier]] than America don't have absolute [[freedom of speech]], and many have state [[religions]]. But they still have very broad [[Freedom of Speech|speech rights]] and [[Religious Freedom|religious freedom]] compared to unhappy countries. [[Evidence]] may demonstrate that reasonable limits on some [[Freedom|freedoms]] net significant long-term [[happiness]] gains by preventing various social cancers from metastasizing, like [[misinformation]], [[grift]], and [[racism]]. Developing strong new [[social norms]] against these things can help when doing so through the [[legal]] system is not practical or preferable. As with most issues, a nuanced [[perspective]] is needed.

In general these positions are best represented by [[Progressive|progressives]] and [[wikipedia:Social_democracy|social democrats]] that are center-left in Europe, but are portrayed as far-left in American [[media]] despite the broad popularity of these policies when polled independent of party affiliation. [https://www.kff.org/slideshow/public-opinion-on-single-payer-national-health-plans-and-expanding-access-to-medicare-coverage/][https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/04/22/most-americans-support-a-15-federal-minimum-wage/][https://www.nasi.org/learn/social-security/public-opinions-on-social-security/][https://www.fwd.us/news/new-polling-confirms-ongoing-support-for-criminal-justice-reform-ahead-of-november-2024-election/][https://publicintegrity.org/politics/study-most-americans-want-to-kill-citizens-united-with-constitutional-amendment/]

This isn't to advocate for single party rule (see [[balance of power]]). It is setting a goal for government to improve [[utilitarian]] [[happiness]] for its citizens, and finding new [[Meterstick|metersticks]] by which we measure [[progress]]. From there, we do whatever the [[evidence]] shows improves the [[metrics]]. [[Progressive]] and [[Good Faith Conservatism|conservative]] provide a [[Balance of power|balance]] between competing priorities and [[perspectives]]. It should not be the difference between having a government and not. Updating the way we [[Democracy|vote]] to enable multiparty participation can also help return politics to a conversation about competing priorities between partners, instead of a competition between two teams.

== Other Practices in Government and Politics ==

Not the best, but the rest. Most political [[Ideology|ideologies]] make some good points, but policy decisions driven by [[ideology]] are often not [[evidence-based]]. The world is [[Complexity|complex]], with many [[feedback loops]] that create [[Balance of power|balances of power]]. Solutions that work in one place and [[time]] will not continue to work forever. Understanding the [[history]] and [[philosophy]] behind these political [[Ideology|ideologies]] is important, but more important is that we not allow any single [[ideology]] to undermine our [[critical thinking]].

Our goal is to find [[evidence-based best practices]] for increasing the [[happiness and well-being]] of [[society]]. Political [[Ideology|ideologies]] can help us see how others have sought to do this, but there is no [[utopia]], only [[progress]].

* [[Communism]]
* [[Socialism]]
* [[Capitalism]]
* [[Libertarian|Libertarianism]]
* [[wikipedia:Classical_liberalism|Classical Liberalism]]
* [[wikipedia:Anarchism|Anarchism]]
* [[Revolution]]
* [[wikipedia:Liberalism|Liberalism]]
* [[wikipedia:Neoliberalism|Neoliberalism]]
* [[Fascism]]
* [[Authoritarianism]]
* [[wikipedia:Monarchism|Monarchism]]
* [[wikipedia:Neo-feudalism|Neo-Feudalism]]
* [https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/02/corruption-trump-administration/681794/?gift=rZZcaO6W1L_eW-yisYV6Y5LZZF0NXY2F_ThaPvWbiPM Patrimonialism]
* [[wikipedia:Technocracy_movement|Technocracy]] [https://novum.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-technocracy]
* [[wikipedia:Kleptocracy|Kleptocracy]]
* [[wikipedia:Kakistocracy|Kakistocracy]]
* [[wikipedia:Gerontocracy|Gerontocracy]]
* [[wikipedia:Idiocracy|Idiocracy]]
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8s-Xx7aJsg||center|Idiocracy - Politics of the Future|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ix4nKNDKhTQ||center|Why the Most Foolish People End Up in Power According to Machiavelli|frame}}

== Broad Trends, Not Current Events ==

This [[wiki]] focuses on broad, long-term political trends and how they interface with modern [[spiritual]] [[beliefs]], rather than current events, candidates, and policy debates. It acknowledges the need for [[balance of power]] and diverse opinions, without any simplistic "both sides are the same" centrism.

"[[Culture war]]" subjects are especially avoided since they have been reinforced through extensive and currently active [[propaganda]] to trigger highly partisan [[in-group]] and [[out-group]] responses. The goal of this [[wiki]] is to focus on the goals we share in common, and the underlying [[ethical]] values they represent, so we can see all people as part of the [[universal in-group]]. When people do this, they will naturally come to conclusions about current issues that embrace the ideals of [[love]], [[In-group|acceptance]], and [[justice]].

== Learn About Government ==
Harvard has a free course called [https://pll.harvard.edu/course/american-government-constitutional-foundations American Government: Constitutional Foundations] that you can take to learn the history of the US constitution, separation of powers, and individual rights. This is of particular use in 2025 when it has become clear that many Americans have no idea what government does or how [[balance of power]] works.

[https://www.netflix.com/title/81037116 The G Word] is an entertaining and informative series that provides a much-needed civics lesson in what the [[government]] actually does with your [[tax]] [[money]]. Most people have no idea what much of the government does, the benefits to [[society]], or the lessons from [[history]] that we collectively decided not to repeat. This is a big reason behind the loss of [[trust]] in [[institutions]]. While [[libertarians]] will criticize this as pro-government [[propaganda]] and leftists will call it [[wikt:shitlib|shitlib]] apologetics, reasonable people who aren't [[wikipedia:Extremely_online|extremely online]] will see it as an earnest attempt to help explain government to a chronically underinformed and [[Misinformation|misinformed]] public.

[https://www.netflix.com/title/81037116 Full series on Netflix].
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeUq5Duxz1E||center|The G Word with Adam Conover|frame}}
 
A new version of School House Rock for the [[social media]] age is badly needed.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEPd98CbbMk&list=PLODZSf7Ld9qx4JsWhIqV8Pyo317LMcmig&index=46||center|School House Rock (All Songs Playlist)|frame}}

== Modern Spirituality is Political ==

Most [[religions]] and [[spiritual]] movements tend to avoid politics because it is seen as part of the [[secular]], profane world rather than the sacred and holy realm of the spirit that they deal with. It is also a practical matter, since [[religions]] must persist across many nations, each of whom has its own political movements that come and go. [[Religion]] has typically gone with a "support whoever is in charge" approach, which has made it quite popular with leadership regardless of [[ideology]], though it often falls short of its own [[ethical]] ideals.

Traditional [[spirituality]] is [[community]]-focused, because for centuries we lived in small, farming communities that needed to take care of each other. The [[Charity]] model works well in these situations. Think about the Amish. If someone in the community needs a barn, everyone gets together one day and helps build it. What would be extremely expensive and time-consuming for one [[family]] to handle turns into a fun day out for the whole village. When one person is sick, everyone can pitch in to help their [[family]]. This is the kind of charity [[scripture]] advocates because it has worked since the dawn of agriculture.

Modern industrial [[societies]] no longer have this kind of [[community]]. It is a loss, for sure, but it is not possible to go back. What modern [[societies]] do have is the [[institution]] of the State. Now it is possible for our [[altruistic]] values to be expressed [[democratically]] through public policy! If we don't want to see our elderly becoming homeless beggars after they become too frail to work, we can have [[wikipedia:Social_Security_(United_States)|social security]] to make sure everyone is provided for. If we want to heal the sick, we can advocate for [[universal health care]] so that no person ever has to worry about how they will afford treatment.

Rebuilding [[community]] is necessary, but [[charity]] should not be the way that we maintain a minimum standard of living for all members of [[society]]. Only government programs can ensure that every person has these resources available when they need them, no matter what [[community]] they belong to, or even if they are completely alone as so many are. It will never be possible for government to solve every problem, and [[religions]] and [[community]] organizations should be there to fill in the gaps. But the systemic issues that impact everyone need to be matters of public policy.

Many [[religious]] organizations seem to be fighting to keep their outsized role in providing [[charity]] for the destitute because it is a driver for new membership. This is craven. You help people in need because they need help, not because it gives you leverage. Opposing public policy that could help millions of people in need in order to maintain this leverage is an absolute defiance of any known [[moral]] code.

== Liberal vs. Conservative or Progressive vs. Libertarian? ==
The left/right political dynamic of the United States is often used as a reference point. However, they are more correctly framed in terms of [[Progressive]] and [[Libertarian]] political [[philosophies]] rather than the Democratic and Republican parties. This is because the actual political thinkers and developers of new policy are coming from these sub-groups, who are not always strictly affiliated with either party. It also somewhat ignores right-wing Christian Nationalism and [[Fascism]], which are scary and must be opposed, but offer few debatable policy positions. In a discussion of [[best practices]], we must consider actual policy rather than the exercise of raw [[power]].

== Depolarization and Decalcification ==
The primary political [[perspective]] being advocated by [[metaculture]] is that [[wikipedia:Political_polarization|polarization]], and its more intransigent form calcification, must be opposed. Functional government requires a [[balance of power]] between opposing viewpoints who still see each other as part of a common [[in-group]] working towards a shared goal. This is different from [[wikipedia:Centrism|centrism]], which often seeks compromise even when one side is clearly wrong. It is a [[perspective]] that prioritizes [[attention]] on consensus positions, and takes a cooperative approach instead an adversarial one. Polarization has nothing to do with extreme policy positions. It is all about seeing your political opponents as an [[enemy]] instead of fellow citizens with a different [[perspective]] on the issues.<blockquote>''"If we choose only to expose ourselves to opinions and viewpoints that are in line to our own, we become more polarized, more set in our own ways. It will only reinforce and deepen the political divides in our country. But if we choose to actively seek out information that challenges our assumptions and beliefs, perhaps we can begin to understand where the people who disagree with us are coming from."'' -[[wikipedia:Barack_Obama|Barack Obama]] </blockquote>[[Social media]] [[platforms]] have deployed [[outrage]]-based [[algorithms]] that have had the side-effect of promoting particularly polarized political [[perspectives]]. Often these views are far outside the realm of anything practical or desirable, but the [[memes]] spread because our [[outrage]] causes to say "look at what the crazy people on the [[In-group|other side of the aisle]] are saying!" when real people weren't actually saying it until you shared it. And now that it's been shared, real people start to [[believe]] it! Then bad actors and [[trolls]] that only wish to sew chaos and confusion start using it for [[propaganda]], amplifying its reach dramatically. This cycle must be broken, which means we must start curating the sources of [[information]] that we train our [[Brains|brain's]] [[neural networks]] with, and establishing new [[social norms]] that help us identify and reject [[outrage]]-porn and [[misinformation]] before it gets spread.

The [[Evidence-Based Best Practices|evidence]] shows that [[happier]] [[societies]] are the ones that have implemented [[progressive]] reforms like [[universal health care]], worker's rights, and strong [[social safety nets]]. [[History]] has also shown that ostensibly [[progressive]] reformers who eliminate their opposition through [[revolution]] and are able to rule unchecked will quickly veer into [[authoritarianism]]. We must strive for self-improvement in government using only [[democratic]] means, with a [[Good Faith Conservatism|good faith conservative]] opposition that keeps liberal excesses in check.

The current state of stagnation and lack of progress is due primary to the fact that the political conversation has lost sight of any common goal that all citizens are striving for regardless of party. By focusing on that goal (improving the overall [[happiness]] of a nation's citizens) we can return to seeing each other as cooperating partners in achieving this goal instead of adversaries pursuing different goals.

The use of [[language]] is very important for anyone attempting to bridge political divides. Avoid triggering words that have been used extensively in [[propaganda]], like [[socialism]], [[communism]], [[fascism]], etc. since these only cause visceral [[emotional]] reactions rather than indicating any shared [[concept]] of policy. Focus on individual issues rather than party advocacy. Avoid using [[language]] that indicates a strong affiliation with their perceived [[out-group]]. Study the [[psychology]] of [[persuasion]] and put it into practice to promote a [[perspective]] that precludes polarization.

If you truly [[believe]] the [[universal]] [[truth]] that "we are all one," then this means our political [[Out-group|out-groups]] too. No person is an [[enemy]]. It's time to put this [[belief]] into practice.
== Depolarization is Not Centrism ==
The issue of political polarization depends on heightened [[in-group]] identification that is completely independent of most specific policy positions. [https://publicconsultation.org/united-states/over-200-policy-positions-supported-by-bipartisan-majorities/][https://today.yougov.com/politics/articles/50343-national-policy-proposals-with-bipartisan-support]

Many ideologues see the depolarization movement as one of "[https://www.reddit.com/r/ENLIGHTENEDCENTRISM/ enlightened centrism]" where [[progressive]] policy goals are sacrificed for the status quo, and regressive positions based on [[misinformation]] are given equal weight to [[evidence]]. This has nothing to do with depolarization.

The goal of depolarization is to eliminate political tribalism so that things like [[universal health care]] that have broad bipartisan public support can see this reflected in their representation. Depolarization will finally allow social [[progress]] to resume by allowing people to work together on shared goals, instead of competing like opposing teams on a field.

As long as the game of party politics is played competitively instead of cooperatively, stagnation, deadlock, and status quo will be the only achievable result.

== Different Coaches, Not Different Teams ==
The [[metaphor]] of politics as team sports dominates the [[information environment]] created by the [[media]]. In this [[metaphor]], the political parties represent opposing teams competing to see who wins each battle over policy and [[ideology]]. This is not an [[wikt:apt|apt]] [[metaphor]] for how politics is supposed to work.

A better [[analogy]] would be that political parties represent multiple coaches on the [[In-group|same team]]. Is this an efficient way to run a team when [[time]] is of the essence? No. But, if your sport requires careful deliberation and long-term strategy, having multiple [[perspectives]] weighing in on decisions is essential.

Shifting the team sports [[analogy]] from competing teams to cooperating members of the same team could have a dramatic effect on how the [[game]] is played.

== Proposed Solutions to Polarization ==
Some videos presenting non-partisan proposals for how to correct political [[incentives]] and restore the [[balance of power]] in US politics.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ws3w_ZOmhI||center|Why US Politics is Broken and How to Fix It|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEJ4hkpQW8E||center|How the US Is Destroying Young People’s Future|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vVJDmutVSc||center|Our Politicians Are Too F*#%ing Old|frame}}
 
A big part of the problem with polarization is the fact that so many of us are ignorant about how our government works, our [[history]], and the events that led to the laws and regulations we have now. Sharon McMahon, known as "America's Government Teacher", has many great [[books]] and other resources to help get people up to speed. [https://www.goodreads.com/author/list/4785161.Sharon_McMahon View her books] [https://sharonmcmahon.com/ Check out her website]
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxPb1gS2824||center|Sharon McMahon (law and government teacher) - Armchair Expert|frame}}

== Political Music ==
Many great songs express political views. Here's one of them.{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUGLfN4oSCg||center|Jay Z - Politics as Usual|frame}}

Ethics

2026-01-02T12:25:24Z

Fractalguy: /* Types of Moral Frameworks */

[[File:Ethics-Morality-Grid.png|thumb|[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1b3acUNyGg Do this don't do that, can't you read the sign?]]]
The [[wikipedia:Ethics|Ethics]] of [[metaculture]] is based on [[Utilitarianism]], but with some [[evidence-based]] solutions to the various ''problems'' of [[utilitarianism]] that have been raised by critics.

The reason for [[Utilitarianism]] is that it is the only ethical system that is potentially subject to [[scientific]] inquiry, as long as ''good'' can be quantified [[objectively]]. Since [[evolution]] has correlated what is ''good'' for humans with what gives us [[happiness]], if we can measure the [[happiness]] of a population we can tell if what we are doing is ''good'', at least relative to other [[societies]] we've been able to study.<blockquote>''"Ethics and equity and the principles of [[justice]] do not change with the calendar."'' -[[wikipedia:D._H._Lawrence|D. H. Lawrence]]</blockquote>There is usually not a single "right" answer to moral quandaries that can be determined with 100% [[certainty]], which is the black and white way that people usually think about "[[objective]]" morality. It is more that there are [[culturally neutral]] tendencies that serve as [[wikipedia:Attractor|attractors]] or [[wikipedia:Limit_(mathematics)|mathematical limits]] that our [[evolving]] morality trends towards as we learn more about how to create [[cultures]] of [[happiness]].

== Ethics and Morality Pages ==
[[File:Do-you-return-the-cart.jpg|right|frameless|334x334px]]
Check out these pages for topics related to ethics and morality.

* '''[[Utilitarianism]]''' and [[Consequences]]
* [[Meaning]], [[Suffering]], [[Happiness and well-being|'''Happiness and well-being''']]
* [[Altruism]]
* [[Quality of life versus quantity of life|'''Quality of life versus quantity of life''']]
* [[Primal world beliefs|'''Primal world beliefs''']]
* [[Abortion]], [[Euthanasia]], and [[Death penalty|Death Penalty]]
* [[Environment]], [[Climate change]], and [[Population]]
* [[Safety]], [[Death]], and [[Longevity]]
* [[Moral trump card]]
* [[Theoretical people]]
* '''[[Subjective]]''' and [[Objective]] [[Truth]]
* [[Culturally neutral|Culturally Neutral]]
* [[Justice]] and [[Authority]]
* [[Karma]]
* '''[[Religion]]''' and '''[[Spirituality]]'''
* [[Outrage]] and '''[[Taboo]]'''
* [[Misinformation]] and '''[[Grift]]'''
* [[Temptation]] and [[Delayed Gratification]]
* [[Incentives]] and [[Games]]
* [[Moderation]], and '''[[Addiction]]'''
* [[Life choices]]
* [[Freedom]] and [[Free will|'''Free Will''']]
* [[These things are bad, mkay?|'''These things are bad, mkay?''']]
== Types of Moral Frameworks ==
[[wikipedia:Moral_realism|Moral realism]] reflects the position that there is some [[universal]] source of morality that our standards can be judged against, versus being arbitrary constructs of [[culture]]. Many people confuse moral realism with [[authoritarian]] moral systems that insist there is only one right way to live your [[life]]. What is actually the case is that [[variety]] and diversity in our moral [[perspectives]] is essential for a [[flourishing]] [[society]], but there are common [[patterns]] to the ones that are most beneficial.

Each of these frameworks can be useful for making [[life choices]] in various circumstances. [[Utilitarianism]] often has the least amount of utility in this regard, since we rarely have the time or the [[necessary]] data to calculate the long-term net value created by any given decision. If a [[god]]-[[like]] utility calculator was available, we would find that the [[utilitarian]] decision would almost always line up with the conclusions of virtue, [[emotion]], or [[evolved]] [[theological]] systems.

[[wikipedia:Deontology|Deontology]] and [[human rights]] are compatible with [[utilitarianism]] when the "greatest good" rules are applied to the [[laws]] of [[society]] rather than isolated hypotheticals, and the actual [[emotional]] responses of humans are taken into account instead of being ignored like friction in a physics 101 problem.

[[wikipedia:Emotivism|Emotivism]] is view that our moral judgements reflect an [[emotional]] reaction rather than a [[rational]] one. If an action tends to make people [[happy]] it is good. If it tends to piss people off, it's [[These things are bad, mkay?|bad]]. A system based on [[happiness]] is of course using [[emotion]] as the basis for morality, but since we have ways to quantify these [[emotional]] reactions with [[science]], it is now possible to use [[reason]] to predict the better [[emotional]] outcome.

[[wikipedia:Virtue_ethics|Virtue ethics]] are a great shorthand for deciding the best course of action when there are too many variables to calculate an optimal [[utilitarian]] outcome. They also tend to prioritize our known [[emotional]] preferences and the actions that benefit them, rather than making false assumptions that people would be [[happier]] when they sacrifice others for their own benefit.

While you can really dive deeply into the world of ethical quandaries, the goal of this page is to provide a solid rationale for ethical living and an empirical framework for understanding its importance that doesn't rely on the [[supernatural]]. Applying this framework to every conceivable situation, or summarizing 5,000 years of ethical [[philosophy]], are out of scope.

== What Are Your Values? ==
[[wikipedia:Moral_foundations_theory|Moral Foundations Theory]] suggest that our instincts provide seven categories of innate moral judgements upon which our ethical values systems, [[Primal world beliefs|primal beliefs]], and [[cultures]] are derived. These are:

* [[Altruism|Care]]/harm
* [[Justice|Fairness]]/cheating
* [[In-group|Loyalty]]/betrayal
* [[Authority]]/subversion
* [[Spirituality|Sanctity]]/degradation
* [[Freedom|Liberty]]/oppression
* [[wikipedia:Honour|Honor]]/shame
[[Progressives]] tend to emphasize [[Care]], [[Fairness]], and [[Liberty]] while [[Conservatives]] lean more towards [[Loyalty]], [[Authority]], and [[Sanctity]]. [[wikipedia:Jonathan_Haidt|Jonathan Haidt]]'s book [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/11324722-the-righteous-mind The Righteous Mind] explores the implications of moral foundations theory and ways that our politics can be more empathetic and less [[contrarian]].

The [[wikipedia:Honour|Honor]]/Shame foundation was not part of the original [[wikipedia:Moral_foundations_theory|Moral Foundations Theory]], but has been included in later models to explain the motivations of [https://oxfordre.com/psychology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.001.0001/acrefore-9780190236557-e-295 honor cultures]. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_of_honor_(Southern_United_States)][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honor_culture_(Middle_East)]

The website [https://yourmorals.org/ YourMorals.org] provides a quick test to see which moral categories you prioritize in your personal ethics.

Follow the links to see how [[metaculture]] provides a [[perspective]] on [[humanist]] values that appeals to all of our [[wikipedia:Moral_foundations_theory|moral foundations]].

The concept of moral foundations is also similar to [[primal world beliefs]] in that they identify a handful of core dichotomies that form the [[Generating equation|generating equations]] for a wide range of [[beliefs]] and behaviors. [[Primal world beliefs]] divide our [[perspective]] between those who focus on the positive side of moral foundations and those who focus on the negative. If you see care, fairness, loyalty, authority, sanctity, liberty, and honor everywhere you go, you have positive [[Primal world beliefs|primal beliefs]]. If your world is filled with harm, cheating, betrayal, subversion, degradation, oppression, and shame, you have negative [[primal world beliefs]].

== It's About Conviction ==
In [[wikipedia:Robert_Sapolsky|Sapolsky's]] book [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/83817782-determined Determined], there is a chapter devoted to the notion of moral conviction versus indifference, and the research showing that strong moral convictions, regardless of whether they are [[secular]] or [[religious]], correlate to the most prosocial behavior. It is not [[belief]] in [[god]] or [[atheism]] that determines whether you are willing to undermine others to benefit yourself, it is moral indifference.

The chart below helps visualize the results of these studies that show the difference between conviction and indifference in both [[secular]] and [[spiritual]] contexts. On both sides there are those who lead unexamined lives, by going through the motions of their particular [[religion]] to keep up appearances, or pursuing a shallow, [[materialistic]] [[secular]] [[life]].
[[File:Morality-conviction-theistic-secular-conviction-indifference.png|none|thumb|650x650px|It's not where your convictions come from, it's that you have them.]]
[[Religious]] people tend to lump all "[[atheists]]" into the bottom-right category, falsely assuming that without [[god]] there can be only [[wikipedia:Nihilism|nihilism]]. They rightly point to the growing number of non-believers who live shallow, [[materialistic]], hedonistic lifestyles that lead more often to [[addiction]] than lasting [[happiness]]. But it isn't [[religion]] that these people truly need, it is conviction! Some may find it in [[religion]], but in modern [[society]] there needs to be a [[Secular institutions|secular institution]] where people can go to deepen and reinforce their convictions and build their [[community]] without invoking the [[supernatural]].

== Moral Development ==
Numerous [[psychological]] studies have demonstrated that morality is built on [[education]] and experience. [[wikipedia:Jean_Piaget|Piaget]], [[wikipedia:Lawrence_Kohlberg|Kholberg]], and [[Necessary Prerequisite|others]] have built models that describe the stages of moral development in detail.

For more on moral and cognitive development theories, check the [[Necessary Prerequisite]] page.

Just like you can't understand calculus unless you've learned algebra, and you can't understand algebra unless you know how to add and subtract first, you can't understand [[universal]] moral principles unless you've gone through the stages of [[authority]] and [[legal]] based moral frameworks.

This is a significant contributor to [[political]] and [[theological]] disagreements, since those at lower stages of development are unable to comprehend arguments made from higher stage [[reasoning]]. Disagreements are treated as [[debate]] between equals when it's often more [[like]] pre-algebra students arguing about the correct way to calculate limits with a [[math]] professor. For example, [[creationism]] versus [[evolution]]. Without the [[necessary]] [[education]], one side doesn't even know the basic facts that inform the other's argument.

This article provides and excellent explanation of these concepts, though the latter half is paywalled at the time this was added. It will likely be unlocked at a later date, though. [https://brendangrahamdempsey.substack.com/p/learning-and-morality Learning and Morality - How do Moral Values Shift with Psychological Development?]

== Tethics ==
[[Culture]] needs to apply the knowledge we gain from [[psychology]] to develop new and improved ethical models for how we interface with modern [[technology]]. These need to be reinforced with [[rituals]] and [[social norms]] to keep the harmful impacts of [[social media]], [[artificial intelligence]], and other transformative technologies.

Inventions alter [[consequences]], so a [[utilitarian]] ethics will require recalibration any time a significant new invention alters the way we live [[life]] and the [[Life choices|choices]] available to us.

These pages related to the intersection of modern [[technology]], ethics, and important trends in the [[wikipedia:Zeitgeist|Zeitgeist]] of the [[wikipedia:Extremely_online|extremely online]] that normal people should be aware of.

* [[Technology]]
* [[Future]], [[Longevity]], [[Theoretical people|Theoretical People]], and [[Utopia]]
* [[Artificial intelligence|Artificial Intelligence]]
* [[Platforms]], [[Promotion]], and [[Algorithm|Algorithms]]
* [[Trolling]], [[Outrage]] and [[Taboo]]
* [[Drugs]], [[Addiction]], and [[Monetary addiction|Monetary Addiction]]
* [[Libertarian]] [[Crypto-bros]] in the [[Manosphere]] and their [[Secular gurus|Secular Gurus]]
* [[Misinformation]], [[Conspiracy theories|Conspiracy Theories]], [[Pseudoscience]], [[Quantum woo|Quantum Woo]], and [[Grift]]

== What Are The Rules? ==

Saying that people should practice [[utilitarian]] ethics is easy. Doing the necessary research to determine the [[Evidence-Based Best Practices|best course of action]] [[Life|personally]] as well as in [[politics]] and [[economics]] is hard. Fortunately there have been many brilliant people throughout [[history]] who have worked on this and we can summarize their research into something easy and practical that can be applied in your daily [[life]].<blockquote>''Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.''</blockquote>If you are looking for much more specific recommendations that can help your [[life choices]], see [[Evidence-Based Best Practices]].

If you have recently been [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Leap quantum leaped] into the body of a black person in America, the following musical provides great advice on the rules for this very specific situation.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZP-n5ArEH4||center|"What Are The Rules" A Sunny Musical|frame}}The whole [[wikipedia:It's_Always_Sunny_in_Philadelphia|It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia]] series is a [[hilarious]] exploration of ethics through counterexample. This, along with its low budget, has made it the longest-running sitcom of all time. [https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2019/10/its-always-sunny-in-philadelphia-politics]

== Other Pop Culture Based Ethical Systems ==
The [[wikipedia:Michael_Schur|Michael Shur]] program [https://www.netflix.com/title/80113701 The Good Place] is an acceptable alternative to a college intro to ethics course for those who prefer binge TV watching to coursework. His book, [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/58484901-how-to-be-perfect How to be Perfect], takes a deeper dive into the entertaining morality lessons from [[wikipedia:The_Good_Place|The Good Place]]. If you aren't going to read [[wikipedia:Plato|Plato]], [[wikipedia:Immanuel_Kant|Kant]], and [[wikipedia:John_Stuart_Mill|Mill]], then you can at least binge-watch [[wikipedia:The_Good_Place|The Good Place]].

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvfLU4kY_8A&list=PLL5GpQvwcdDqapASfW3j1w-7_nF0uNctG||center|The Good Place Ethical Lessons Playlist|frame}}There must have been something in the water at [[wikipedia:Dwight_Schrute|Schrute Farm]], since another actor from [[wikipedia:The_Office_(American_TV_series)|the Office]] has also put out extensive content dealing with morality, [[spirituality]], and finding [[meaning]]. [[wikipedia:Rainn_Wilson|Rainn Wilson]]'s [[podcasts]] [https://www.youtube.com/@SoulBoom Soul Boom] and [https://www.youtube.com/@metaphysicalmilkshakewithr7882 Metaphysical Milkshake] both have great conversations and [[perspectives]] on these subjects. His travel docuseries The [[wikipedia:Rainn_Wilson_and_the_Geography_of_Bliss|Geography of Bliss]] is also worth a watch to see how the concept of [[happiness]] is viewed in different [[cultures]].

== Peterson, Harris, and Objective Morality ==

Since [[metaculture]] has the application of [[science]] to questions of [[morality]] as one of its primary goals, addressing what is meant by "[[objective]] morality" and how one might determine it is a useful exercise.

[[Objective]] morality is offered as a [[secular]] alternative to [[god]]-based morality in the common goal of undermining [[wikipedia:Moral_relativism|moral relativism]], which many consider to be at the heart of the modern [[wikipedia:Nihilism|nihilistic]] crisis of [[meaning]]. Peterson makes the [[wikipedia:Deontology|deontological]] argument based on [[universal]] archetypes from [[Religion|mythology]], while Harris argues for a more [[secular]], [[utilitarian]] approach. Neither does so in a way that pleases academic [[philosophers]] or [[Theology|theologians]], though their much wider audiences suggest a mass appeal for their style of informal arguments.

Since Peterson and Harris are two of the most popular content creators who speak on this topic, they will be used as the reference point for this discussion. It should be acknowledged that much, much better [[philosophers]] are available, and should be sought out by anyone who is interested in this subject.

=== Criticisms of Harris and The Moral Landscape ===
The videos below have long responses to [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7785194-the-moral-landscape Sam Harris's Moral Landscape] and questioning the notion of "[[objective]]" [[morality]]. It is unfortunate that he and [[Jordan Peterson]] have been linked by their various appearances together, and that Harris's criticisms of Islam have been used to support [[racist]] [[politics]] and policies. He has otherwise been a leading voice regarding the [[scientific]] approach to [[spiritual]] subjects like [[morality]] and [[meditation]], offering a version of [[atheism]] that is significantly more open-minded than your [[wikipedia:Christopher_Hitchens|Hitchens]] or [[wikipedia:Richard_Dawkins|Dawkins]]. The idea that [[science]] can be applied to questions of [[morality]] should be strongly considered.

Many lines of criticism come from academic [[philosophers]] that point to contradictions in Harris's formal [[reasoning]] and failure to address questions raised by a variety of different ethical [[philosophies]] throughout [[history]]. Many of these criticisms give off [[wikipedia:A.P._Bio|AP Bio]] vibes, since Harris sold millions of books my making his arguments accessible to non-academics, while much smarter men toil in obscurity. There are valid criticisms, but they don't point to unresolvable issues, just ones that Harris failed to resolve to their satisfaction in his book.

=== Criticisms of Peterson and Archetypal Deontology ===
There are a ton of criticisms of [[Jordan Peterson]], enough to warrant a [[JP and JC|separate page]]. Here, consider specifically the framework for [[objective]] morality that he proposes, which can be referred to as [[wikipedia:Archetype|archetypal]] [[wikipedia:Deontology|deontology]]. In summary, he proposes that [[evolution]] has hard-coded various mythological archetypes in our [[brains]] from which we derive our [[moral absolutes]]. Ultimately it's just a [[wikipedia:Jungian_archetypes|Jungian]] approach compared to Harris' [[neuroscience]] approach. The implication is that the prohibition against murder or stealing is somehow encoded as an archetype-based rule, rather than an [[Emergent property|emergent]] result of the pleasure/pain principle. Based on what we know about [[neural networks]], [[self-organizing]] systems, and [[artificial intelligence]], [[Emergent property|emergent]] [[utilitarianism]] seems the most likely method that the [[brain]] uses to know not to murder. It's much easier to build a simple pleasure/pain rule and let the [[moral absolutes]] [[self-organize]] than it is to encode Jungian archetypes into your DNA.

=== Problems of Utilitarianism ===
The [[utilitarian]] ethics of [[metaculture]] avoids the major criticisms of Harris by recognizing the [[subjective]] nature of self-reporting [[happiness]] and measuring it on the aggregate instead of the individual level. We can know statistically whether one [[society]] or [[culture]] is [[happier]] than another, and whether changes to various policies or [[beliefs]] have an impact on that measure. It doesn't claim an [[objective]] [[morality]], but rather one that can be [[Self-correcting|improved over time]] with study and comparison. If an "[[objective]]" [[morality]] exists it can only be approached and never reached, and each moral grey area must be considered individually--no simple rules apply universally (see [[Gödel]]).

The [[utilitarian]] page also addresses the problems of [[utilitarianism]] that Harris doesn't cover in his book. It is unlikely that he had not actually considered the oldest and most pedantic counterarguments, versus making an editorial decision that including them would bore readers and hurt book sales.

=== Is/Ought Problem ===
The [[happiness]] page provides a resolution for [[wikipedia:Is–ought_problem|Hume's is/ought]] problem that Harris doesn't address in a satisfactory way. Regardless of whether you think that this line of reasoning resolves the problem or not, the [[Ideas|idea]] that [[science]] can inform the pursuit of [[happiness]] cannot be denied. Insisting that it isn't "[[objective]]" because there is no certainty that [[happiness]] is the truest [[meterstick]] of human success should not impact your [[life choices]]. [[Happiness]] is a [[safe bet]], and one that most people will choose to [[wager]] on it even if there is a [[logical]] [[Meta|paradox]] behind the proof that they should. [[Reality]] has a [[logical]] [[Meta|paradox]] at its core, so it really shouldn't bother anyone that has accepted that fact (see [[Gödel]] again).

=== Cultural Chauvinism ===
The [[metaculture]] [[wiki]] avoids the cultural bias criticisms by taking a [[perspective]] that fundamentally opposes [[war]] and the use of [[power]] to enforce [[ideology]], and that all [[religions]] and [[cultures]] should be embraced. The argument could be made that certain passages in the Quran form a [[generating equation]] that create a pattern of violence, and significant text could be dedicated to supporting that argument, as Harris unfortunately chose to do. This [[rhetoric]] is inherently divisive and against the [[Perspective|spirit]] of [[universalism]] that [[metaculture]] is striving for. But even if there was strong evidence to support such a view (not saying there is), there would be absolutely no implication that [[discrimination]] or [[violence]] could ever be an acceptable response to it.

Instead of the [[perspective]] that "Western [[culture]] is [[Objective|objectively]] better than others because we invented [[science]] and [[democracy]]" that smells a lot like [[racism]], it's more like "[[Science]] allows people of all [[cultures]] to discover their shared humanity and speak about it with a common [[language]]. Let's use this to adopt a [[universal]] system of ethics so we don't [[War|kill each other]], and we can solve global problems like [[climate change]] together." It's looking at the same set of facts from a different [[perspective]].

The main reason for the strong objections to "[[objective]]" comparisons of [[cultural]] morality is the fear that it can be used to justify violence, which was the primary concern of the [[postmodern]] movement towards relativism. It should be possible to demonstrate that [[cultural]] self-determination increases the global [[utilitarian]] quotient, because even if a nation has an extremely [[authoritarian]] and repressive [[religion]] or [[government]], getting bombs dropped on you is always worse. It isn't possible to justify using [[war]] or violence to "liberate" a repressive [[culture]], unless it becomes a [[genocide]] and the innocent need to be protected. It may be sad, but the best you can do is lead with a good example, and advocate for the virtues of [[freedom]] until they make the decision to change. Once they do, it should be possible to take a survey and get conclusive evidence about whether their [[society]] is [[objectively]] [[happier]] or not.

There is also a strong [[utilitarian]] argument against [[cultural]] chauvinism and for [[universalism]]. Making the case that one [[culture]] is superior to another causes discord and leads to conflict. Finding ways to promote new [[beliefs]], [[rituals]], and [[institutional]] changes that improve overall [[happiness]] is going to have better payoff than making long dissertations on why Christianity is relatively better than Islam or other [[religions]].

=== Wiki > Book ===
The other way [[metaculture]] avoids common criticisms of Harris or [[Jordan Peterson|Peterson]] is by using a [[wiki]] that is expansive enough to actually address all of the questions, something that is impossible to do with a [[book]], even a really long one. The [[wiki]] also avoids criticism by being editable, so any valid criticism is invalidated by the next edit.

=== Probably, Not Definitely ===
Finally, [[metaculture]] doesn't make claims about "[[objective]] [[truth]]" the way Harris does. It simply suggests that the pursuit of [[utilitarian]] [[happiness]] is a [[safe bet]] when it comes to measuring the aggregate success of a [[society]]'s ethics, and it's also a good [[bet]] that [[science]] and [[evidence]] can inform that pursuit better than any other source of knowledge.

Here's the Sam Harris talk on [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7785194-the-moral-landscape The Moral Landscape].
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hj9oB4zpHww||center|Science can answer moral questions - Sam Harris|frame}}
 
Here is a good example of the criticism of Harris from the academic [[philosophy]] perspective. The criticism treats the books as if it was the foundational research for the establishment of a new theoretical model rather than a popular science book that tries to introduce these concepts to people that don't have extensive backgrounds in [[neuroscience]] or ethical [[philosophy]], and make a [[persuasive]] argument in favor of ethics that can be informed by empirical data. This is not the same goal that academic works have, though they tend to judge popular works by those standards.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxalrwPNkNI||center|A Critique of Sam Harris' "The Moral Landscape"|frame}}
 
Here is an excellent discussion of [[Jordan Peterson]]'s [[philosophy]] of [[meaning]] and Harris' Moral Landscape as opposing critiques of moral relativism. It offers insightful criticisms of both. The moral of this story is that you shouldn't use work written for a popular audience as the final authority for any theory, and not everyone cares to know the 2000+ years of [[philosophical]] debate behind every proposition. {{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEMB1Ky2n1E||center|Jordan Peterson & The Meaning of Life - Philosophy Tube|frame}}
 
A discussion of emotivism and the sources of our ethical attitudes.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gs7fBx-zURw||center|Are Ethics Just Emotions? - Simon Blackburn|frame}}

== Ethics in Music ==
One song for moral convictions, and one song against.{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdVhIiPJohs||center|Booker T. and the MGs - Behave Yourself|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQRAvSSMs70||center|Jane's Addiction - Ain't No Right|frame}}

Ethics

2026-01-02T12:15:18Z

Fractalguy:

[[File:Ethics-Morality-Grid.png|thumb|[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1b3acUNyGg Do this don't do that, can't you read the sign?]]]
The [[wikipedia:Ethics|Ethics]] of [[metaculture]] is based on [[Utilitarianism]], but with some [[evidence-based]] solutions to the various ''problems'' of [[utilitarianism]] that have been raised by critics.

The reason for [[Utilitarianism]] is that it is the only ethical system that is potentially subject to [[scientific]] inquiry, as long as ''good'' can be quantified [[objectively]]. Since [[evolution]] has correlated what is ''good'' for humans with what gives us [[happiness]], if we can measure the [[happiness]] of a population we can tell if what we are doing is ''good'', at least relative to other [[societies]] we've been able to study.<blockquote>''"Ethics and equity and the principles of [[justice]] do not change with the calendar."'' -[[wikipedia:D._H._Lawrence|D. H. Lawrence]]</blockquote>There is usually not a single "right" answer to moral quandaries that can be determined with 100% [[certainty]], which is the black and white way that people usually think about "[[objective]]" morality. It is more that there are [[culturally neutral]] tendencies that serve as [[wikipedia:Attractor|attractors]] or [[wikipedia:Limit_(mathematics)|mathematical limits]] that our [[evolving]] morality trends towards as we learn more about how to create [[cultures]] of [[happiness]].

== Ethics and Morality Pages ==
[[File:Do-you-return-the-cart.jpg|right|frameless|334x334px]]
Check out these pages for topics related to ethics and morality.

* '''[[Utilitarianism]]''' and [[Consequences]]
* [[Meaning]], [[Suffering]], [[Happiness and well-being|'''Happiness and well-being''']]
* [[Altruism]]
* [[Quality of life versus quantity of life|'''Quality of life versus quantity of life''']]
* [[Primal world beliefs|'''Primal world beliefs''']]
* [[Abortion]], [[Euthanasia]], and [[Death penalty|Death Penalty]]
* [[Environment]], [[Climate change]], and [[Population]]
* [[Safety]], [[Death]], and [[Longevity]]
* [[Moral trump card]]
* [[Theoretical people]]
* '''[[Subjective]]''' and [[Objective]] [[Truth]]
* [[Culturally neutral|Culturally Neutral]]
* [[Justice]] and [[Authority]]
* [[Karma]]
* '''[[Religion]]''' and '''[[Spirituality]]'''
* [[Outrage]] and '''[[Taboo]]'''
* [[Misinformation]] and '''[[Grift]]'''
* [[Temptation]] and [[Delayed Gratification]]
* [[Incentives]] and [[Games]]
* [[Moderation]], and '''[[Addiction]]'''
* [[Life choices]]
* [[Freedom]] and [[Free will|'''Free Will''']]
* [[These things are bad, mkay?|'''These things are bad, mkay?''']]
== Types of Moral Frameworks ==
[[wikipedia:Moral_realism|Moral realism]] reflects the position that there is some [[universal]] source of morality that our standards can be judged against, versus being arbitrary constructs of [[culture]]. Many people confuse moral realism with [[authoritarian]] moral systems that insist there is only one right way to live your [[life]]. What is actually the case is that [[variety]] and diversity in our moral [[perspectives]] is essential for a [[flourishing]] [[society]], but there are common patterns to the ones that are most beneficial.

[[wikipedia:Deontology|Deontology]] and [[human rights]] are compatible with [[utilitarianism]] when the "greatest good" rules are applied to the [[laws]] of [[society]] rather than isolated hypotheticals, and the actual [[emotional]] responses of humans are taken into account instead of being ignored like friction in a physics 101 problem.

[[wikipedia:Emotivism|Emotivism]] is view that our moral judgements reflect an [[emotional]] reaction rather than a [[rational]] one. If an action tends to make people [[happy]] it is good. If it tends to piss people off, it's [[These things are bad, mkay?|bad]]. A system based on [[happiness]] is of course using [[emotion]] as the basis for morality, but since we have ways to quantify these [[emotional]] reactions with [[science]], it is now possible to use [[reason]] to predict the better [[emotional]] outcome.

[[wikipedia:Virtue_ethics|Virtue ethics]] are a great shorthand for deciding the best course of action when there are too many variables to calculate an optimal [[utilitarian]] outcome. They also tend to prioritize our known [[emotional]] preferences and the actions that benefit them, rather than making false assumptions that people would be [[happier]] when they sacrifice others for their own benefit.

While you can really dive deeply into the world of ethical quandaries, the goal of this page is to provide a solid rationale for ethical living and an empirical framework for understanding its importance that doesn't rely on the [[supernatural]]. Applying this framework to every conceivable situation, or summarizing 5,000 years of ethical [[philosophy]], are out of scope.

== What Are Your Values? ==
[[wikipedia:Moral_foundations_theory|Moral Foundations Theory]] suggest that our instincts provide seven categories of innate moral judgements upon which our ethical values systems, [[Primal world beliefs|primal beliefs]], and [[cultures]] are derived. These are:

* [[Altruism|Care]]/harm
* [[Justice|Fairness]]/cheating
* [[In-group|Loyalty]]/betrayal
* [[Authority]]/subversion
* [[Spirituality|Sanctity]]/degradation
* [[Freedom|Liberty]]/oppression
* [[wikipedia:Honour|Honor]]/shame
[[Progressives]] tend to emphasize [[Care]], [[Fairness]], and [[Liberty]] while [[Conservatives]] lean more towards [[Loyalty]], [[Authority]], and [[Sanctity]]. [[wikipedia:Jonathan_Haidt|Jonathan Haidt]]'s book [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/11324722-the-righteous-mind The Righteous Mind] explores the implications of moral foundations theory and ways that our politics can be more empathetic and less [[contrarian]].

The [[wikipedia:Honour|Honor]]/Shame foundation was not part of the original [[wikipedia:Moral_foundations_theory|Moral Foundations Theory]], but has been included in later models to explain the motivations of [https://oxfordre.com/psychology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.001.0001/acrefore-9780190236557-e-295 honor cultures]. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_of_honor_(Southern_United_States)][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honor_culture_(Middle_East)]

The website [https://yourmorals.org/ YourMorals.org] provides a quick test to see which moral categories you prioritize in your personal ethics.

Follow the links to see how [[metaculture]] provides a [[perspective]] on [[humanist]] values that appeals to all of our [[wikipedia:Moral_foundations_theory|moral foundations]].

The concept of moral foundations is also similar to [[primal world beliefs]] in that they identify a handful of core dichotomies that form the [[Generating equation|generating equations]] for a wide range of [[beliefs]] and behaviors. [[Primal world beliefs]] divide our [[perspective]] between those who focus on the positive side of moral foundations and those who focus on the negative. If you see care, fairness, loyalty, authority, sanctity, liberty, and honor everywhere you go, you have positive [[Primal world beliefs|primal beliefs]]. If your world is filled with harm, cheating, betrayal, subversion, degradation, oppression, and shame, you have negative [[primal world beliefs]].

== It's About Conviction ==
In [[wikipedia:Robert_Sapolsky|Sapolsky's]] book [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/83817782-determined Determined], there is a chapter devoted to the notion of moral conviction versus indifference, and the research showing that strong moral convictions, regardless of whether they are [[secular]] or [[religious]], correlate to the most prosocial behavior. It is not [[belief]] in [[god]] or [[atheism]] that determines whether you are willing to undermine others to benefit yourself, it is moral indifference.

The chart below helps visualize the results of these studies that show the difference between conviction and indifference in both [[secular]] and [[spiritual]] contexts. On both sides there are those who lead unexamined lives, by going through the motions of their particular [[religion]] to keep up appearances, or pursuing a shallow, [[materialistic]] [[secular]] [[life]].
[[File:Morality-conviction-theistic-secular-conviction-indifference.png|none|thumb|650x650px|It's not where your convictions come from, it's that you have them.]]
[[Religious]] people tend to lump all "[[atheists]]" into the bottom-right category, falsely assuming that without [[god]] there can be only [[wikipedia:Nihilism|nihilism]]. They rightly point to the growing number of non-believers who live shallow, [[materialistic]], hedonistic lifestyles that lead more often to [[addiction]] than lasting [[happiness]]. But it isn't [[religion]] that these people truly need, it is conviction! Some may find it in [[religion]], but in modern [[society]] there needs to be a [[Secular institutions|secular institution]] where people can go to deepen and reinforce their convictions and build their [[community]] without invoking the [[supernatural]].

== Moral Development ==
Numerous [[psychological]] studies have demonstrated that morality is built on [[education]] and experience. [[wikipedia:Jean_Piaget|Piaget]], [[wikipedia:Lawrence_Kohlberg|Kholberg]], and [[Necessary Prerequisite|others]] have built models that describe the stages of moral development in detail.

For more on moral and cognitive development theories, check the [[Necessary Prerequisite]] page.

Just like you can't understand calculus unless you've learned algebra, and you can't understand algebra unless you know how to add and subtract first, you can't understand [[universal]] moral principles unless you've gone through the stages of [[authority]] and [[legal]] based moral frameworks.

This is a significant contributor to [[political]] and [[theological]] disagreements, since those at lower stages of development are unable to comprehend arguments made from higher stage [[reasoning]]. Disagreements are treated as [[debate]] between equals when it's often more [[like]] pre-algebra students arguing about the correct way to calculate limits with a [[math]] professor. For example, [[creationism]] versus [[evolution]]. Without the [[necessary]] [[education]], one side doesn't even know the basic facts that inform the other's argument.

This article provides and excellent explanation of these concepts, though the latter half is paywalled at the time this was added. It will likely be unlocked at a later date, though. [https://brendangrahamdempsey.substack.com/p/learning-and-morality Learning and Morality - How do Moral Values Shift with Psychological Development?]

== Tethics ==
[[Culture]] needs to apply the knowledge we gain from [[psychology]] to develop new and improved ethical models for how we interface with modern [[technology]]. These need to be reinforced with [[rituals]] and [[social norms]] to keep the harmful impacts of [[social media]], [[artificial intelligence]], and other transformative technologies.

Inventions alter [[consequences]], so a [[utilitarian]] ethics will require recalibration any time a significant new invention alters the way we live [[life]] and the [[Life choices|choices]] available to us.

These pages related to the intersection of modern [[technology]], ethics, and important trends in the [[wikipedia:Zeitgeist|Zeitgeist]] of the [[wikipedia:Extremely_online|extremely online]] that normal people should be aware of.

* [[Technology]]
* [[Future]], [[Longevity]], [[Theoretical people|Theoretical People]], and [[Utopia]]
* [[Artificial intelligence|Artificial Intelligence]]
* [[Platforms]], [[Promotion]], and [[Algorithm|Algorithms]]
* [[Trolling]], [[Outrage]] and [[Taboo]]
* [[Drugs]], [[Addiction]], and [[Monetary addiction|Monetary Addiction]]
* [[Libertarian]] [[Crypto-bros]] in the [[Manosphere]] and their [[Secular gurus|Secular Gurus]]
* [[Misinformation]], [[Conspiracy theories|Conspiracy Theories]], [[Pseudoscience]], [[Quantum woo|Quantum Woo]], and [[Grift]]

== What Are The Rules? ==

Saying that people should practice [[utilitarian]] ethics is easy. Doing the necessary research to determine the [[Evidence-Based Best Practices|best course of action]] [[Life|personally]] as well as in [[politics]] and [[economics]] is hard. Fortunately there have been many brilliant people throughout [[history]] who have worked on this and we can summarize their research into something easy and practical that can be applied in your daily [[life]].<blockquote>''Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.''</blockquote>If you are looking for much more specific recommendations that can help your [[life choices]], see [[Evidence-Based Best Practices]].

If you have recently been [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Leap quantum leaped] into the body of a black person in America, the following musical provides great advice on the rules for this very specific situation.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZP-n5ArEH4||center|"What Are The Rules" A Sunny Musical|frame}}The whole [[wikipedia:It's_Always_Sunny_in_Philadelphia|It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia]] series is a [[hilarious]] exploration of ethics through counterexample. This, along with its low budget, has made it the longest-running sitcom of all time. [https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2019/10/its-always-sunny-in-philadelphia-politics]

== Other Pop Culture Based Ethical Systems ==
The [[wikipedia:Michael_Schur|Michael Shur]] program [https://www.netflix.com/title/80113701 The Good Place] is an acceptable alternative to a college intro to ethics course for those who prefer binge TV watching to coursework. His book, [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/58484901-how-to-be-perfect How to be Perfect], takes a deeper dive into the entertaining morality lessons from [[wikipedia:The_Good_Place|The Good Place]]. If you aren't going to read [[wikipedia:Plato|Plato]], [[wikipedia:Immanuel_Kant|Kant]], and [[wikipedia:John_Stuart_Mill|Mill]], then you can at least binge-watch [[wikipedia:The_Good_Place|The Good Place]].

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvfLU4kY_8A&list=PLL5GpQvwcdDqapASfW3j1w-7_nF0uNctG||center|The Good Place Ethical Lessons Playlist|frame}}There must have been something in the water at [[wikipedia:Dwight_Schrute|Schrute Farm]], since another actor from [[wikipedia:The_Office_(American_TV_series)|the Office]] has also put out extensive content dealing with morality, [[spirituality]], and finding [[meaning]]. [[wikipedia:Rainn_Wilson|Rainn Wilson]]'s [[podcasts]] [https://www.youtube.com/@SoulBoom Soul Boom] and [https://www.youtube.com/@metaphysicalmilkshakewithr7882 Metaphysical Milkshake] both have great conversations and [[perspectives]] on these subjects. His travel docuseries The [[wikipedia:Rainn_Wilson_and_the_Geography_of_Bliss|Geography of Bliss]] is also worth a watch to see how the concept of [[happiness]] is viewed in different [[cultures]].

== Peterson, Harris, and Objective Morality ==

Since [[metaculture]] has the application of [[science]] to questions of [[morality]] as one of its primary goals, addressing what is meant by "[[objective]] morality" and how one might determine it is a useful exercise.

[[Objective]] morality is offered as a [[secular]] alternative to [[god]]-based morality in the common goal of undermining [[wikipedia:Moral_relativism|moral relativism]], which many consider to be at the heart of the modern [[wikipedia:Nihilism|nihilistic]] crisis of [[meaning]]. Peterson makes the [[wikipedia:Deontology|deontological]] argument based on [[universal]] archetypes from [[Religion|mythology]], while Harris argues for a more [[secular]], [[utilitarian]] approach. Neither does so in a way that pleases academic [[philosophers]] or [[Theology|theologians]], though their much wider audiences suggest a mass appeal for their style of informal arguments.

Since Peterson and Harris are two of the most popular content creators who speak on this topic, they will be used as the reference point for this discussion. It should be acknowledged that much, much better [[philosophers]] are available, and should be sought out by anyone who is interested in this subject.

=== Criticisms of Harris and The Moral Landscape ===
The videos below have long responses to [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7785194-the-moral-landscape Sam Harris's Moral Landscape] and questioning the notion of "[[objective]]" [[morality]]. It is unfortunate that he and [[Jordan Peterson]] have been linked by their various appearances together, and that Harris's criticisms of Islam have been used to support [[racist]] [[politics]] and policies. He has otherwise been a leading voice regarding the [[scientific]] approach to [[spiritual]] subjects like [[morality]] and [[meditation]], offering a version of [[atheism]] that is significantly more open-minded than your [[wikipedia:Christopher_Hitchens|Hitchens]] or [[wikipedia:Richard_Dawkins|Dawkins]]. The idea that [[science]] can be applied to questions of [[morality]] should be strongly considered.

Many lines of criticism come from academic [[philosophers]] that point to contradictions in Harris's formal [[reasoning]] and failure to address questions raised by a variety of different ethical [[philosophies]] throughout [[history]]. Many of these criticisms give off [[wikipedia:A.P._Bio|AP Bio]] vibes, since Harris sold millions of books my making his arguments accessible to non-academics, while much smarter men toil in obscurity. There are valid criticisms, but they don't point to unresolvable issues, just ones that Harris failed to resolve to their satisfaction in his book.

=== Criticisms of Peterson and Archetypal Deontology ===
There are a ton of criticisms of [[Jordan Peterson]], enough to warrant a [[JP and JC|separate page]]. Here, consider specifically the framework for [[objective]] morality that he proposes, which can be referred to as [[wikipedia:Archetype|archetypal]] [[wikipedia:Deontology|deontology]]. In summary, he proposes that [[evolution]] has hard-coded various mythological archetypes in our [[brains]] from which we derive our [[moral absolutes]]. Ultimately it's just a [[wikipedia:Jungian_archetypes|Jungian]] approach compared to Harris' [[neuroscience]] approach. The implication is that the prohibition against murder or stealing is somehow encoded as an archetype-based rule, rather than an [[Emergent property|emergent]] result of the pleasure/pain principle. Based on what we know about [[neural networks]], [[self-organizing]] systems, and [[artificial intelligence]], [[Emergent property|emergent]] [[utilitarianism]] seems the most likely method that the [[brain]] uses to know not to murder. It's much easier to build a simple pleasure/pain rule and let the [[moral absolutes]] [[self-organize]] than it is to encode Jungian archetypes into your DNA.

=== Problems of Utilitarianism ===
The [[utilitarian]] ethics of [[metaculture]] avoids the major criticisms of Harris by recognizing the [[subjective]] nature of self-reporting [[happiness]] and measuring it on the aggregate instead of the individual level. We can know statistically whether one [[society]] or [[culture]] is [[happier]] than another, and whether changes to various policies or [[beliefs]] have an impact on that measure. It doesn't claim an [[objective]] [[morality]], but rather one that can be [[Self-correcting|improved over time]] with study and comparison. If an "[[objective]]" [[morality]] exists it can only be approached and never reached, and each moral grey area must be considered individually--no simple rules apply universally (see [[Gödel]]).

The [[utilitarian]] page also addresses the problems of [[utilitarianism]] that Harris doesn't cover in his book. It is unlikely that he had not actually considered the oldest and most pedantic counterarguments, versus making an editorial decision that including them would bore readers and hurt book sales.

=== Is/Ought Problem ===
The [[happiness]] page provides a resolution for [[wikipedia:Is–ought_problem|Hume's is/ought]] problem that Harris doesn't address in a satisfactory way. Regardless of whether you think that this line of reasoning resolves the problem or not, the [[Ideas|idea]] that [[science]] can inform the pursuit of [[happiness]] cannot be denied. Insisting that it isn't "[[objective]]" because there is no certainty that [[happiness]] is the truest [[meterstick]] of human success should not impact your [[life choices]]. [[Happiness]] is a [[safe bet]], and one that most people will choose to [[wager]] on it even if there is a [[logical]] [[Meta|paradox]] behind the proof that they should. [[Reality]] has a [[logical]] [[Meta|paradox]] at its core, so it really shouldn't bother anyone that has accepted that fact (see [[Gödel]] again).

=== Cultural Chauvinism ===
The [[metaculture]] [[wiki]] avoids the cultural bias criticisms by taking a [[perspective]] that fundamentally opposes [[war]] and the use of [[power]] to enforce [[ideology]], and that all [[religions]] and [[cultures]] should be embraced. The argument could be made that certain passages in the Quran form a [[generating equation]] that create a pattern of violence, and significant text could be dedicated to supporting that argument, as Harris unfortunately chose to do. This [[rhetoric]] is inherently divisive and against the [[Perspective|spirit]] of [[universalism]] that [[metaculture]] is striving for. But even if there was strong evidence to support such a view (not saying there is), there would be absolutely no implication that [[discrimination]] or [[violence]] could ever be an acceptable response to it.

Instead of the [[perspective]] that "Western [[culture]] is [[Objective|objectively]] better than others because we invented [[science]] and [[democracy]]" that smells a lot like [[racism]], it's more like "[[Science]] allows people of all [[cultures]] to discover their shared humanity and speak about it with a common [[language]]. Let's use this to adopt a [[universal]] system of ethics so we don't [[War|kill each other]], and we can solve global problems like [[climate change]] together." It's looking at the same set of facts from a different [[perspective]].

The main reason for the strong objections to "[[objective]]" comparisons of [[cultural]] morality is the fear that it can be used to justify violence, which was the primary concern of the [[postmodern]] movement towards relativism. It should be possible to demonstrate that [[cultural]] self-determination increases the global [[utilitarian]] quotient, because even if a nation has an extremely [[authoritarian]] and repressive [[religion]] or [[government]], getting bombs dropped on you is always worse. It isn't possible to justify using [[war]] or violence to "liberate" a repressive [[culture]], unless it becomes a [[genocide]] and the innocent need to be protected. It may be sad, but the best you can do is lead with a good example, and advocate for the virtues of [[freedom]] until they make the decision to change. Once they do, it should be possible to take a survey and get conclusive evidence about whether their [[society]] is [[objectively]] [[happier]] or not.

There is also a strong [[utilitarian]] argument against [[cultural]] chauvinism and for [[universalism]]. Making the case that one [[culture]] is superior to another causes discord and leads to conflict. Finding ways to promote new [[beliefs]], [[rituals]], and [[institutional]] changes that improve overall [[happiness]] is going to have better payoff than making long dissertations on why Christianity is relatively better than Islam or other [[religions]].

=== Wiki > Book ===
The other way [[metaculture]] avoids common criticisms of Harris or [[Jordan Peterson|Peterson]] is by using a [[wiki]] that is expansive enough to actually address all of the questions, something that is impossible to do with a [[book]], even a really long one. The [[wiki]] also avoids criticism by being editable, so any valid criticism is invalidated by the next edit.

=== Probably, Not Definitely ===
Finally, [[metaculture]] doesn't make claims about "[[objective]] [[truth]]" the way Harris does. It simply suggests that the pursuit of [[utilitarian]] [[happiness]] is a [[safe bet]] when it comes to measuring the aggregate success of a [[society]]'s ethics, and it's also a good [[bet]] that [[science]] and [[evidence]] can inform that pursuit better than any other source of knowledge.

Here's the Sam Harris talk on [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7785194-the-moral-landscape The Moral Landscape].
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hj9oB4zpHww||center|Science can answer moral questions - Sam Harris|frame}}
 
Here is a good example of the criticism of Harris from the academic [[philosophy]] perspective. The criticism treats the books as if it was the foundational research for the establishment of a new theoretical model rather than a popular science book that tries to introduce these concepts to people that don't have extensive backgrounds in [[neuroscience]] or ethical [[philosophy]], and make a [[persuasive]] argument in favor of ethics that can be informed by empirical data. This is not the same goal that academic works have, though they tend to judge popular works by those standards.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxalrwPNkNI||center|A Critique of Sam Harris' "The Moral Landscape"|frame}}
 
Here is an excellent discussion of [[Jordan Peterson]]'s [[philosophy]] of [[meaning]] and Harris' Moral Landscape as opposing critiques of moral relativism. It offers insightful criticisms of both. The moral of this story is that you shouldn't use work written for a popular audience as the final authority for any theory, and not everyone cares to know the 2000+ years of [[philosophical]] debate behind every proposition. {{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEMB1Ky2n1E||center|Jordan Peterson & The Meaning of Life - Philosophy Tube|frame}}
 
A discussion of emotivism and the sources of our ethical attitudes.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gs7fBx-zURw||center|Are Ethics Just Emotions? - Simon Blackburn|frame}}

== Ethics in Music ==
One song for moral convictions, and one song against.{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdVhIiPJohs||center|Booker T. and the MGs - Behave Yourself|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQRAvSSMs70||center|Jane's Addiction - Ain't No Right|frame}}

Apocalypse Prevention

2026-01-02T11:35:55Z

Fractalguy: /* Apocalypse Prevention */

[[File:Apocalypse-war-end-times-eschatology-zionism.jpg|thumb|Can we agree that [[Is bad|the apocalypse is a bad thing]]?]]
A significant number of [[religions]] and [[cults]] make some prediction about how the [[universe]] will end. The technical term for this is [[wikipedia:Eschatology|eschatology]].

These are usually referred to as "[[wikipedia:Apocalyptic_literature|apocalypse]]" events, particularly in the Abrahamic [[traditions]]. Other depictions of the end times in [[scripture]] include the [[wikipedia:Hindu_eschatology|Hindu god Kalki]] and [[wikipedia:Frashokereti|Zoroastrian Frashokereti]].<blockquote>''"I can see we're in for a fabulous evening's apocalypse."'' -[[wikipedia:Douglas_Adams|Douglas Adams]]</blockquote>[[metaculture]]'s [[ethical]] [[philosophy]] is decidedly anti-apocalypse.

== Scientific Eschatology ==
The [[wiki]] page "[[wikipedia:Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe|Ultimate fate of the universe]]" discusses the [[scientific]] theories that attempt to predict the manner and [[time]] in which the [[universe]] will end. This is the [[wikipedia:Eschatology|eschatology]] of [[science]].

Fortunately all [[evidence]] indicates that this event is many billions of years away, and not something we need to concern our [[life choices]] with. Therefore, most of the [[time]] our [[brains]] spend thinking about the end of the world is time that could be spent thinking about doing something to [[Altruism|help people]] and making the existing world a better place, or better yet actually doing it!

Here's Brian Cox explaining the [[inevitable]] destruction of the Earth.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vi039BihSAk||center|Brian Cox on the Apocalypse|frame}}

== Apocalypse Allegories ==
In many cases, the notion of an [[wikipedia:Apocalyptic_literature|apocalypse]] or [[wikipedia:Rapture|rapture]] event is used as an [[allegory]] for [[war]] and the transformative changes in [[society]] that can arise [[wikipedia:Phoenix_(mythology)|like the phoenix]] from the ashes of the old.

Notions of a [[supernatural]] [[afterlife]] can make this a confusing [[metaphor]]. You could be talking about toppling the [[government]] of Rome, and [[literalists]] think you mean that angels are going to descend from the heavens any day now and start smiting people on your behalf. Instead of starting a movement, you breed complacency. Or, even worse, you encourage people to seek it out.

== The Apocalypse Is Bad ==
The apocalypse [[is bad]]. Don't look forward to the end of the world. Don't welcome the apocalypse with open arms. [[wikipedia:Christian_Zionism|Don't make geopolitical decisions to help bring it about]].

This stuff should be obvious, but therein [[lies]] the problem with a [[Literalism|literalist]] view of the [[afterlife]]. For the [[Literalism|literalist]], [[everyone]] [[Death|dying]] means [[everyone]] goes to [[heaven]], except the people you don't [[like]] who go to [[hell]]. It turns what is actually the worst case scenario imaginable and re-casts it as the best case scenario.

This highlights the important difference between [[optimism]] and [[rational]] [[optimism]]. In most cases, looking on the bright side of negative events is very [[good]] for promoting [[happiness]]. This is not the case when it comes to the apocalypse, whether you are using it as a [[metaphor]] for [[war]] and [[revolution]], or talking about the actual end of [[existence]].

== AI Edgelord Eschatology ==
At first it seemed as though the [[religious]] zealots looking to bring about the end of the world were our greatest concern. Then the [[crypto-bros]] said "[https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/hold-my-beer hold my beer]" and started worshiping their own [[artificial intelligence]] inventions, despite the fact that they are actually pretty dumb. Now, a cohort of some of the most [[Power|powerful]] people in the world think we should rush headlong into the [[AI]] apocalypse, believing that [[utopia]] will follow the singularity. Sound familiar?

This article by [https://www.truthdig.com/author/emile-p-torres/ Émile P. Torres] [https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-endgame-of-edgelord-eschatology/ The Endgame of Edgelord Eschatology] is an excellent breakdown of the end times [[philosophy]] of the tech [[billionaires]] and [[AI]] advocates.

Since this page was originally created, the [[power]] and [[political]] influence of [[AI]] apocalypse [[tech bros]] has significantly increased. This is now something that really must be understood in order to comprehend their dark alliance with [[authoritarian]] regimes.

[https://www.thenerdreich.com/ The Nerd Reich] is another essential resource for reporting on the apocalyptic and anti-[[democratic]] [[beliefs]] of the [[billionaires]].

[https://www.realtimetechpocalypse.com/p/the-political-power-of-eschatological-82b The Political Power of Eschatological Thinking: This Is Why Peter Thiel Is Talking About the Antichrist]

== Apocalypse Prevention ==

The [[philosophy]] and [[theology]] of [[metaculture]] accepts the eventual heat [[death]] of the [[universe]] will come, and until that time its practitioners should do anything in their [[power]] to avoid human extinction. This should come naturally to [[evolved]] lifeforms.

However, this does not mean that we should sacrifice the [[happiness and well-being]] of the living to ensure the survival of [[future humans]], as is suggested by [[wikipedia:Longtermism|longtermism]]. It doesn't make sense to neglect the issue of [[poverty]] in order to colonize other planets a little faster, [[just]] in case some extinction event happens on Earth. We will get to space. In fact, we will [[probably]] get there faster if we can actually get the people on Earth to live their best lives instead of grinding away in poverty so that [[billionaires]] can colonize Mars. We'll [[probably]] go a long way to avoid extinction by [[war]] in the process.

In the interest of apocalypse prevention, issues like [[climate change]] and the proliferation of [[weapons of mass destruction]] should be considered high priorities. This is why the [[creation]] of a [[universal in-group]] is vitally important.

If it should be possible to escape the end of this [[universe]] by creating or moving to another one, this option should be explored. However, [[Crypto-bros|it is premature to do so at this time]].

== Rage Against the Dying of the Light ==
[https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/46569/do-not-go-gentle-into-that-good-night Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night] by [[wikipedia:Dylan_Thomas|Dylan Thomas]] captures this attitude towards the apocalypse.<blockquote>Do not go gentle into that good night,

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;

[[Rage]], rage against the dying of the light.

Though [[wise]] men at their end know dark is right,

Because their [[words]] had forked no lightning they

Do not go gentle into that good night.

Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright

Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,

Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,

And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,

Do not go gentle into that good night.

Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight

Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,

Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

And you, my father, there on the sad height,

Curse, bless, me now with your fierce tears, I pray.

Do not go gentle into that good night.

Rage, rage against the dying of the light.</blockquote>

== Apocalypse Now ==

Have an immediate need for apocalypse content? Here you go!

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMhOeInNABw||center|Why We’re All Rooting for the Apocalypse|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbSClDu98-c||center|Moments of Wonder with Philomena Cunk - What is a Pocalypse?|frame}}

== It's the End of the World as We Know It ==
And I feel fine.{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0GFRcFm-aY||center|R.E.M. - It's The End Of The World As We Know It (And I Feel Fine)|frame}}
 
If you really want songs about apocalypse, heavy metal is the only way to go.
{{#ev:youtube|https://youtu.be/nUZVXtDVrc0||center|Metallica – Blackened|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://youtu.be/tLsQsirjmeo||center|Megadeth – Rust In Peace… Polaris|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://youtu.be/4aJT2p2_pDk||center|Black Sabbath – Electric Funeral|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://youtu.be/9qbRHY1l0vc||center|Iron Maiden – 2 Minutes To Midnight|frame}}

Apocalypse Prevention

2026-01-02T11:34:07Z

Fractalguy: /* AI Edgelord Eschatology */

[[File:Apocalypse-war-end-times-eschatology-zionism.jpg|thumb|Can we agree that [[Is bad|the apocalypse is a bad thing]]?]]
A significant number of [[religions]] and [[cults]] make some prediction about how the [[universe]] will end. The technical term for this is [[wikipedia:Eschatology|eschatology]].

These are usually referred to as "[[wikipedia:Apocalyptic_literature|apocalypse]]" events, particularly in the Abrahamic [[traditions]]. Other depictions of the end times in [[scripture]] include the [[wikipedia:Hindu_eschatology|Hindu god Kalki]] and [[wikipedia:Frashokereti|Zoroastrian Frashokereti]].<blockquote>''"I can see we're in for a fabulous evening's apocalypse."'' -[[wikipedia:Douglas_Adams|Douglas Adams]]</blockquote>[[metaculture]]'s [[ethical]] [[philosophy]] is decidedly anti-apocalypse.

== Scientific Eschatology ==
The [[wiki]] page "[[wikipedia:Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe|Ultimate fate of the universe]]" discusses the [[scientific]] theories that attempt to predict the manner and [[time]] in which the [[universe]] will end. This is the [[wikipedia:Eschatology|eschatology]] of [[science]].

Fortunately all [[evidence]] indicates that this event is many billions of years away, and not something we need to concern our [[life choices]] with. Therefore, most of the [[time]] our [[brains]] spend thinking about the end of the world is time that could be spent thinking about doing something to [[Altruism|help people]] and making the existing world a better place, or better yet actually doing it!

Here's Brian Cox explaining the [[inevitable]] destruction of the Earth.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vi039BihSAk||center|Brian Cox on the Apocalypse|frame}}

== Apocalypse Allegories ==
In many cases, the notion of an [[wikipedia:Apocalyptic_literature|apocalypse]] or [[wikipedia:Rapture|rapture]] event is used as an [[allegory]] for [[war]] and the transformative changes in [[society]] that can arise [[wikipedia:Phoenix_(mythology)|like the phoenix]] from the ashes of the old.

Notions of a [[supernatural]] [[afterlife]] can make this a confusing [[metaphor]]. You could be talking about toppling the [[government]] of Rome, and [[literalists]] think you mean that angels are going to descend from the heavens any day now and start smiting people on your behalf. Instead of starting a movement, you breed complacency. Or, even worse, you encourage people to seek it out.

== The Apocalypse Is Bad ==
The apocalypse [[is bad]]. Don't look forward to the end of the world. Don't welcome the apocalypse with open arms. [[wikipedia:Christian_Zionism|Don't make geopolitical decisions to help bring it about]].

This stuff should be obvious, but therein [[lies]] the problem with a [[Literalism|literalist]] view of the [[afterlife]]. For the [[Literalism|literalist]], [[everyone]] [[Death|dying]] means [[everyone]] goes to [[heaven]], except the people you don't [[like]] who go to [[hell]]. It turns what is actually the worst case scenario imaginable and re-casts it as the best case scenario.

This highlights the important difference between [[optimism]] and [[rational]] [[optimism]]. In most cases, looking on the bright side of negative events is very [[good]] for promoting [[happiness]]. This is not the case when it comes to the apocalypse, whether you are using it as a [[metaphor]] for [[war]] and [[revolution]], or talking about the actual end of [[existence]].

== AI Edgelord Eschatology ==
At first it seemed as though the [[religious]] zealots looking to bring about the end of the world were our greatest concern. Then the [[crypto-bros]] said "[https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/hold-my-beer hold my beer]" and started worshiping their own [[artificial intelligence]] inventions, despite the fact that they are actually pretty dumb. Now, a cohort of some of the most [[Power|powerful]] people in the world think we should rush headlong into the [[AI]] apocalypse, believing that [[utopia]] will follow the singularity. Sound familiar?

This article by [https://www.truthdig.com/author/emile-p-torres/ Émile P. Torres] [https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-endgame-of-edgelord-eschatology/ The Endgame of Edgelord Eschatology] is an excellent breakdown of the end times [[philosophy]] of the tech [[billionaires]] and [[AI]] advocates.

Since this page was originally created, the [[power]] and [[political]] influence of [[AI]] apocalypse [[tech bros]] has significantly increased. This is now something that really must be understood in order to comprehend their dark alliance with [[authoritarian]] regimes.

[https://www.thenerdreich.com/ The Nerd Reich] is another essential resource for reporting on the apocalyptic and anti-[[democratic]] [[beliefs]] of the [[billionaires]].

[https://www.realtimetechpocalypse.com/p/the-political-power-of-eschatological-82b The Political Power of Eschatological Thinking: This Is Why Peter Thiel Is Talking About the Antichrist]

== Apocalypse Prevention ==

The [[philosophy]] and [[theology]] of [[metaculture]] accepts the eventual heat [[death]] of the [[universe]] will come, and until that time its practitioners should do anything in their [[power]] to avoid human extinction. This should come naturally to [[evolved]] lifeforms.

However, this does not mean that we should sacrifice the [[happiness and well-being]] of the living to ensure the survival of [[future humans]], as is suggested by [[wikipedia:Longtermism|longtermism]]. It doesn't make sense to neglect the issue of [[poverty]] in order to colonize other planets a little faster, [[just]] in case some extinction event happens on Earth. We will get to space. In fact, we will [[probably]] get there faster if we can actually get the people on Earth to live their best lives instead of grinding away in poverty so that billionaires can colonize Mars. We'll probably go a long way to avoid extinction by [[war]] in the process.

In the interest of apocalypse prevention, issues like [[climate change]] and the proliferation of [[weapons of mass destruction]] should be considered high priorities. This is why the [[creation]] of a [[universal in-group]] is vitally important.

If it should be possible to escape the end of this [[universe]] by creating or moving to another one, this option should be explored. However, [[Crypto-bros|it is premature to do so at this time]].

== Rage Against the Dying of the Light ==
[https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/46569/do-not-go-gentle-into-that-good-night Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night] by [[wikipedia:Dylan_Thomas|Dylan Thomas]] captures this attitude towards the apocalypse.<blockquote>Do not go gentle into that good night,

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;

[[Rage]], rage against the dying of the light.

Though [[wise]] men at their end know dark is right,

Because their [[words]] had forked no lightning they

Do not go gentle into that good night.

Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright

Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,

Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,

And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,

Do not go gentle into that good night.

Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight

Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,

Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

And you, my father, there on the sad height,

Curse, bless, me now with your fierce tears, I pray.

Do not go gentle into that good night.

Rage, rage against the dying of the light.</blockquote>

== Apocalypse Now ==

Have an immediate need for apocalypse content? Here you go!

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMhOeInNABw||center|Why We’re All Rooting for the Apocalypse|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbSClDu98-c||center|Moments of Wonder with Philomena Cunk - What is a Pocalypse?|frame}}

== It's the End of the World as We Know It ==
And I feel fine.{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0GFRcFm-aY||center|R.E.M. - It's The End Of The World As We Know It (And I Feel Fine)|frame}}
 
If you really want songs about apocalypse, heavy metal is the only way to go.
{{#ev:youtube|https://youtu.be/nUZVXtDVrc0||center|Metallica – Blackened|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://youtu.be/tLsQsirjmeo||center|Megadeth – Rust In Peace… Polaris|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://youtu.be/4aJT2p2_pDk||center|Black Sabbath – Electric Funeral|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://youtu.be/9qbRHY1l0vc||center|Iron Maiden – 2 Minutes To Midnight|frame}}

Apocalypse Prevention

2025-12-26T16:14:44Z

Fractalguy: /* AI Edgelord Eschatology */

[[File:Apocalypse-war-end-times-eschatology-zionism.jpg|thumb|Can we agree that [[Is bad|the apocalypse is a bad thing]]?]]
A significant number of [[religions]] and [[cults]] make some prediction about how the [[universe]] will end. The technical term for this is [[wikipedia:Eschatology|eschatology]].

These are usually referred to as "[[wikipedia:Apocalyptic_literature|apocalypse]]" events, particularly in the Abrahamic [[traditions]]. Other depictions of the end times in [[scripture]] include the [[wikipedia:Hindu_eschatology|Hindu god Kalki]] and [[wikipedia:Frashokereti|Zoroastrian Frashokereti]].<blockquote>''"I can see we're in for a fabulous evening's apocalypse."'' -[[wikipedia:Douglas_Adams|Douglas Adams]]</blockquote>[[metaculture]]'s [[ethical]] [[philosophy]] is decidedly anti-apocalypse.

== Scientific Eschatology ==
The [[wiki]] page "[[wikipedia:Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe|Ultimate fate of the universe]]" discusses the [[scientific]] theories that attempt to predict the manner and [[time]] in which the [[universe]] will end. This is the [[wikipedia:Eschatology|eschatology]] of [[science]].

Fortunately all [[evidence]] indicates that this event is many billions of years away, and not something we need to concern our [[life choices]] with. Therefore, most of the [[time]] our [[brains]] spend thinking about the end of the world is time that could be spent thinking about doing something to [[Altruism|help people]] and making the existing world a better place, or better yet actually doing it!

Here's Brian Cox explaining the [[inevitable]] destruction of the Earth.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vi039BihSAk||center|Brian Cox on the Apocalypse|frame}}

== Apocalypse Allegories ==
In many cases, the notion of an [[wikipedia:Apocalyptic_literature|apocalypse]] or [[wikipedia:Rapture|rapture]] event is used as an [[allegory]] for [[war]] and the transformative changes in [[society]] that can arise [[wikipedia:Phoenix_(mythology)|like the phoenix]] from the ashes of the old.

Notions of a [[supernatural]] [[afterlife]] can make this a confusing [[metaphor]]. You could be talking about toppling the [[government]] of Rome, and [[literalists]] think you mean that angels are going to descend from the heavens any day now and start smiting people on your behalf. Instead of starting a movement, you breed complacency. Or, even worse, you encourage people to seek it out.

== The Apocalypse Is Bad ==
The apocalypse [[is bad]]. Don't look forward to the end of the world. Don't welcome the apocalypse with open arms. [[wikipedia:Christian_Zionism|Don't make geopolitical decisions to help bring it about]].

This stuff should be obvious, but therein [[lies]] the problem with a [[Literalism|literalist]] view of the [[afterlife]]. For the [[Literalism|literalist]], [[everyone]] [[Death|dying]] means [[everyone]] goes to [[heaven]], except the people you don't [[like]] who go to [[hell]]. It turns what is actually the worst case scenario imaginable and re-casts it as the best case scenario.

This highlights the important difference between [[optimism]] and [[rational]] [[optimism]]. In most cases, looking on the bright side of negative events is very [[good]] for promoting [[happiness]]. This is not the case when it comes to the apocalypse, whether you are using it as a [[metaphor]] for [[war]] and [[revolution]], or talking about the actual end of [[existence]].

== AI Edgelord Eschatology ==
At first it seemed as though the [[religious]] zealots looking to bring about the end of the world were our greatest concern. Then the [[crypto-bros]] said "[https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/hold-my-beer hold my beer]" and started worshiping their own [[artificial intelligence]] inventions, despite the fact that they are actually pretty dumb. Now, a cohort of some of the most [[Power|powerful]] people in the world think we should rush headlong into the [[AI]] apocalypse, believing that [[utopia]] will follow the singularity. Sound familiar?

This article by [https://www.truthdig.com/author/emile-p-torres/ Émile P. Torres] [https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-endgame-of-edgelord-eschatology/ The Endgame of Edgelord Eschatology] is an excellent breakdown of the end times [[philosophy]] of the tech [[billionaires]] and [[AI]] advocates.

Since this page was originally created, the [[power]] and [[political]] influence of [[AI]] apocalypse [[tech bros]] has significantly increased. This is now something that really must be understood in order to comprehend their dark alliance with [[authoritarian]] regimes. [https://www.thenerdreich.com/ The Nerd Reich] is another essential resource for reporting on the apocalyptic and anti-[[democratic]] [[beliefs]] of the [[billionaires]].

[https://www.realtimetechpocalypse.com/p/the-political-power-of-eschatological-82b The Political Power of Eschatological Thinking: This Is Why Peter Thiel Is Talking About the Antichrist]

== Apocalypse Prevention ==

The [[philosophy]] and [[theology]] of [[metaculture]] accepts the eventual heat [[death]] of the [[universe]] will come, and until that time its practitioners should do anything in their [[power]] to avoid human extinction. This should come naturally to [[evolved]] lifeforms.

However, this does not mean that we should sacrifice the [[happiness and well-being]] of the living to ensure the survival of [[future humans]], as is suggested by [[wikipedia:Longtermism|longtermism]]. It doesn't make sense to neglect the issue of [[poverty]] in order to colonize other planets a little faster, [[just]] in case some extinction event happens on Earth. We will get to space. In fact, we will [[probably]] get there faster if we can actually get the people on Earth to live their best lives instead of grinding away in poverty so that billionaires can colonize Mars. We'll probably go a long way to avoid extinction by [[war]] in the process.

In the interest of apocalypse prevention, issues like [[climate change]] and the proliferation of [[weapons of mass destruction]] should be considered high priorities. This is why the [[creation]] of a [[universal in-group]] is vitally important.

If it should be possible to escape the end of this [[universe]] by creating or moving to another one, this option should be explored. However, [[Crypto-bros|it is premature to do so at this time]].

== Rage Against the Dying of the Light ==
[https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/46569/do-not-go-gentle-into-that-good-night Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night] by [[wikipedia:Dylan_Thomas|Dylan Thomas]] captures this attitude towards the apocalypse.<blockquote>Do not go gentle into that good night,

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;

[[Rage]], rage against the dying of the light.

Though [[wise]] men at their end know dark is right,

Because their [[words]] had forked no lightning they

Do not go gentle into that good night.

Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright

Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,

Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,

And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,

Do not go gentle into that good night.

Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight

Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,

Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

And you, my father, there on the sad height,

Curse, bless, me now with your fierce tears, I pray.

Do not go gentle into that good night.

Rage, rage against the dying of the light.</blockquote>

== Apocalypse Now ==

Have an immediate need for apocalypse content? Here you go!

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMhOeInNABw||center|Why We’re All Rooting for the Apocalypse|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbSClDu98-c||center|Moments of Wonder with Philomena Cunk - What is a Pocalypse?|frame}}

== It's the End of the World as We Know It ==
And I feel fine.{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0GFRcFm-aY||center|R.E.M. - It's The End Of The World As We Know It (And I Feel Fine)|frame}}
 
If you really want songs about apocalypse, heavy metal is the only way to go.
{{#ev:youtube|https://youtu.be/nUZVXtDVrc0||center|Metallica – Blackened|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://youtu.be/tLsQsirjmeo||center|Megadeth – Rust In Peace… Polaris|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://youtu.be/4aJT2p2_pDk||center|Black Sabbath – Electric Funeral|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://youtu.be/9qbRHY1l0vc||center|Iron Maiden – 2 Minutes To Midnight|frame}}

Organizations

2025-12-23T18:14:44Z

Fractalguy: /* Civics and Social Media */

[[File:Organizations-global-social-change-universalism-science-religions.jpg|thumb|Let's get together to make a better world]]
Links to groups, publications, and [[educational]] resources that promote the values of [[universalism]] and [[science]], and creating dialogs between those with different [[cultures]] and [[belief systems]] in order to promote understanding, [[Universal in-group|unity]], and [[peace]].

For content producers that write, lecture, or create videos on these subjects, see '''[[Podcasts]], [[Authors]],''' and [[Reading List|'''Reading List''']]. You can also follow the creators of the embedded videos found on this [[wiki]]. Most have not yet been captured by the [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P55t6eryY3g alt-right pipeline].<blockquote>''"Every moment is an organizing opportunity, every person a potential activist, every minute a chance to change the world." -''[[wikipedia:Dolores_Huerta|Dolores Huerta]]</blockquote>While a number of [[atheist]] oriented organizations exist that share many of the goals and values advocated here, those with a mission that is primarily anti-religious are not included. Instead, this list focuses on those that promote [[secular]] [[spirituality]], [[Secular humanist|humanism]], [[science]] advocacy, and other [[universal]] values.

Looking for honest reviews of [[spiritual]] organizations and events from a [[secular]] [[spirituality]] perspective? Check out [[Church Research|'''Church Research''']].

'''[[ISNESS]]''' is a [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOAr-_vk4tM model for a modern major] interfaith group that studies the intersection of [[science]], [[spirituality]], [[psychology]], and [[psychedelics]].

== Science and Religion Compatibilism ==
Organizations that promote [[philosophy]] and [[theology]] that view [[science]], [[spirituality]], and [[religion]] as fundamentally compatible instead of mutually exclusive, and those promoting [[science]] and [[religion]] dialog. While the content may have varying degrees of [[woo]], they share the [[goal]] of resolving [[Cognitive Dissonance|cognitive dissonance]]. Organizations that primarily use [[pseudoscience]] to promote [[literal]] interpretations of [[scripture]] are not included.

=== Foundations, Initiatives & Resources ===
* [https://www.templeton.org/ Templeton Foundation]
* [https://sciencereligiondialogue.org/ Dialog on Science, Ethics, and Religion]
* [https://www.issr.org.uk/ International Society for Science & Religion]
* [https://sciencemeetsfaith.wordpress.com/resources/institutions-and-initiatives-in-the-science-and-faith-dialogue/ Science Meets Faith List of Institutions and Initiatives]
* [https://inters.org/ Interdisciplinary Encyclopedia of Religion and Science]
* [https://www.esssat.net/ European Society for the Study of Science and Theology]
* [https://www.mindandlife.org/ Mind and Life Institute]
* [https://www.skymeadowinstitute.org/ Sky Meadow Institute]
* [https://integrallife.com/ Integral Life], [https://www.integralworld.net/ Integral World]
* [https://metanexus.net/ Metanexus]
* [https://biologos.org/ Biologos]
* [https://closertotruth.com/ Closer to Truth]
* [https://counterbalance.org/ Counterbalance]
* [https://reasons.org/ Reasons to Believe]
* [https://www.reasonablefaith.org Reasonable Faith]
* [https://jri.org.uk/ John Ray Initiative Connecting Environment, Science, and Christianity]
* [https://ciret-transdisciplinarity.org/ International Center for Transdisciplinary Research]
* [https://giffordlectures.org/ The Gifford Lectures on Natural Theology]
* [https://project-sow.org/ Science and Orthodoxy Around the World]
* [https://noetic.org/ Institute of Noetic Sciences]

=== Universities ===

*[https://www.faraday.cam.ac.uk/ Faraday Institute for Science and Religion]
* [https://scienceandsociety.columbia.edu/ Columbia University Center for Science and Society]
* [https://www.ctns.org/ Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences]
* [https://www.ianramseycentre.ox.ac.uk/ Ian Ramsey Centre for Science and Religion]
* [https://www.ice.dartmouth.edu/ Institute for Cross-Disciplinary Engagement at Dartmouth]

=== Catholic Organizations ===
* [https://www.pas.va/ The Pontifical Academy of Sciences]
* [https://www.vaticanobservatory.org/ Vatican Observatory]
* [https://www.nunsandnones.org/ Nuns and Nones]
* [https://catholicscientists.org/ Society of Catholic Scientists]
* [https://faithscience.org/ Institute for Theological Encounter with Science and Technology]

== Universalism and Pantheism ==
[[Spiritual]] movements and advocacy groups that promote [[universalist]] and [[pantheist]] [[theology]].

=== Churches with Universalist Theology ===
* [https://www.uua.org/ Unitarian Universalists]
* [https://huumanists.org/ UU Humanist Association]
* [https://www.bahai.org/ The Baha'i Faith]
* [[wikipedia:Unity_Church|Unity Church]]
* [https://www.ucc.org/ United Church of Christ]
* [https://quaker.org/ Religious Society of Friends (Quakers)]
* [https://csl.org/ Centers for Spiritual Living]

=== Pantheist Organizations ===

*[https://www.pantheist.net/ Universal Pantheist Society]
* [https://pantheism.com/ Pantheism Community]
* [https://www.reddit.com/r/pantheism/ Pantheism Subreddit]

=== Fraternal & Service Organizations ===
Many fraternal service organizations advocate a [[universalist]] [[theology]]. While they have traditionally [[Misogyny|excluded women]], this is often no longer the case.

* [[wikipedia:Freemasonry|Freemasonry]]
* [https://www.goodfellowsclub.org/ Good Fellows Club]
* [https://www.foe.com/ Fraternal Order of Eagles]
* [[wikipedia:Kiwanis|Kiwanis]]
* [[wikipedia:Lions_Clubs_International|Lions Club]]

== Secular Spirituality ==
Groups that offer purely secular versions of the congregation experience. They promote [[secular humanist]] values, provide [[community]], and organize [[life]]-celebrating activities like [[music]], [[weddings]], [[funerals]], and other milestone [[rituals]].

* [https://www.sundayassembly.org/ Sunday Assembly]
* [https://www.lifefulness.io/ Lifefulness Project]
* [https://americanhumanist.org/ American Humanist Association]
* [https://aeu.org/ American Ethical Union]
*[https://humanists.uk/ Humanists UK]
*[https://humanists.international/ Humanists International]
*[https://secular.org/ Secular Coalition for America] ([https://secular.org/resources-for-local-secular-communities/ list of local secular communities])
*[https://www.the-brights.net/ The Brights Movement]
* [https://clergyproject.org/ The Clergy Project]
*[https://shj.org/ Society for Humanistic Judaism]
*[https://www.churchoffreethought.org/ North Texas Church of Freethought]
*[https://openlysecular.org/ Openly Secular]
*[https://nonreligiousspirituality.com/ Center for Non-Religious Spirituality]
*[https://nononsensespirituality.com/ No Nonsense Spirituality]
Secular Spirituality crossed with [[wikipedia:Culture_jamming|culture jamming]] and/or [[High Weirdness|high weirdness]].

*[https://thesatanictemple.com/ The Satanic Temple]
*[https://www.spaghettimonster.org/ Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster]
*[https://subgenius.com/ Church of the Subgenius]
*[https://www.principiadiscordia.com/ Principia Discordia] / [https://discordia.fandom.com/wiki/Discordipedia Discordopedia]

== Interfaith Organizing and the Universal In-Group ==
Organizations that promote equality, inclusivity, and ways to help us embrace all people and [[cultures]] and see them as part of our [[in-group]]. Organizations that attempt to bridge [[political]] and social divides to create broad interfaith coalitions for advocacy and change.

* [https://belonging.berkeley.edu/ Othering and Belonging Institute]
* [https://interfaithalliance.org/ Interfaith Alliance]
* [https://icccr.tc.columbia.edu/resources/organizations-bridging-divides/ Columbia Directory of Organizations Transforming Polarization & Division]
* [https://icccr.tc.columbia.edu/resources/dialogue-facilitation-organizations/ Columbia Directory of Dialog Facilitation Organizations]
* [https://thedartcenter.org/about/ Direct Action Research and Training Center]
* [http://catholicpolarization.com/ Paulist Initiative on Polarization]
* [https://www.au.org/ Americans United for the Separation of Church and State]
* [https://www.culturaldiplomacy.org/ Institute for Cultural Diplomacy]
* [https://www.iliff.edu Institute for Religion, Politics, and Culture]
* [https://bostontheological.org/ Boston Theological Interreligious Consortium]
* [https://www.pubtheology.com/ Pub Theology]
* [https://streetepistemology.com/ Street Epistemology]
* [https://braverangels.org/ Braver Angels]
* [https://www.commoncause.org/ Common Cause]
* [https://bridgeusa.org/ Bridge USA]
* [https://www.nga.org/disagree-better/ National Governor's Association Disagree Better]
* [https://www.oas.org/ Organization of American States]
* [https://commonslibrary.org/democracy-resource-hub-directory/ Commons Library Directory of Social Change Organizations]
* [https://www.warresisters.org/ War Resisters League]
* [https://bjconline.org/ Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty]
* [https://ing.org/ Islamic Networks Group]
* [https://www.mpvusa.org/ Muslims for Progressive Values]
* [https://www.sadhana.org/ Sadhana]
* [https://www.wearesavera.org/ Savera]
* [https://civilrights.org/ Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights]
* [https://csrc.asu.edu/ ASU Center for Study of Religion and Conflict]
* [https://constructivedialogue.org/ Constructive Dialog Institute]
* [https://bipartisanpolicy.org/ Bipartisan Policy Center]
* [https://startswith.us/ Starts With Us]
* [https://buildersmovement.org/ Builders Movement]
* [https://www.nonviolent-conflict.org/ International Center on Nonviolent Conflict]

== Science, Reason, Education, and Advocacy ==
Organizations that promote general [[science]] literacy, [[critical thinking]] skills, [[reason]] and [[logic]]. Online [[learning]] tools focused on teaching general [[science]] skills, [[information]] literacy, and civics. Resources for activism.

=== Education ===
* [https://sensibility.berkeley.edu/ Sense & Sensibility & Science]
* [https://outsmartingimplicitbias.org/ Outsmarting Implicit Bias]
* [https://mitxonline.mit.edu/ MITx Online]
* [https://ncse.ngo/ National Center for Science Education]
* [https://americanhumanistcenterforeducation.org/ American Humanist Association Center for Education]
* [https://www.science.org/ American Association for the Advancement of Science]
* [https://nsta.org/ National Science Teaching Association]
* [https://jcom.sissa.it/ Journal of Science Communication]
* [https://newgenerationteachers.wordpress.com/ New Generation Teachers]
* [https://brilliant.org/ Brilliant]
* [https://quizwithit.com/ Quizwithit]
* [https://www.openculture.com/ Open Culture]
* [https://fractalcampus.com/ Fractal Campus]
* [https://nextbigideaclub.com/ Next Big Idea Club]
* [https://beallslist.net/ Beall's List]

=== Critical Thinking Advocacy ===
* [https://www.ftsociety.org/ The Freethought Society]
* [https://skepticalinquirer.org/ Skeptical Inquirer]
* [https://centerforinquiry.org/ Center for Inquiry]
* [https://richarddawkins.net/ Dawkins Foundation for Reason & Science]
* [https://www.rationalists.net/ Rationalist International]
* [https://rationalwiki.org/ Rational Wiki]
* [https://thinkingispower.com/ Thinking is Power]
* [[wikipedia:List_of_skeptical_organizations|List of International Skeptical Organizations]]
* [https://freedomofmind.com/ Freedom of Mind Resource Center]
* [https://www.structureddecisionmaking.org/ Structured Decision Making]

=== Civics and Social Media ===
* [https://www.sirishealth.org/ Siris Health]
* [https://ed.icivics.org/ iCivics]
* [https://lis101.com/ Social and Political Dimensions of Information Literacy]
* [https://www.aeinstein.org/ The Albert Einstein Institute]
* [https://www.yimbyaction.org/ Yes In My Back Yard (YIMBY)]
* [https://www.schoolofattention.org/ The Strother School of Radical Attention]
* [https://friendsofattention.net Friends of Attention]
* [https://hearyourselfthink.org Hear Yourself Think]
* [https://www.dsausa.org/ Democratic Socialists of America]
* [https://www.shareable.net/ Sharable]

=== Human Technology and AI ===
* [https://futureoflife.org/ Future for Life Foundation]
* [https://www.stopai.info/ Stop AI]
* [https://www.stopspying.org/ Surveillance Technology Oversight Project]
* [https://www.eff.org/ Electronic Frontier Foundation]
* [https://dair.ai/ Democratizing Artificial Intelligence Research, Education, and Technologies]
* [https://consensus.app/ Consensus AI Powered Research Engine]
* [https://www.humanetech.com/ Center for Humane Technology]
* [https://moonshotteam.com/ Moonshot]

== Complex Systems ==
Research organizations and [[educational]] resources dedicated to [[complexity]] theory, [[Fractal Geometry of God|fractal geometry]], and related subjects.
* [https://www.santafe.edu/ The Santa Fe Institute]
* [https://necsi.edu/ New England Complex Systems Institute]
* [https://yrcss.cssociety.org/ Young Researchers of the Complex Systems Society]
* [https://csh.ac.at/ Complexity Science Hub]
* [https://user.xmission.com/~legalize/fractals/fotd/index.html Jim Muth's Fractal of the Day Archive]
* [https://fractalfoundation.org/ The Fractal Foundation]

== Positive Psychology ==
Positive [[psychology]] is distinct from self-help in that it offers robust, [[evidence-based]] tools that promote [[meaning]] and [[well-being]]. Where self-help recycles [[pseudoscience]] and platitudes to [[grift]] on the discontented people in [[society]], these groups promote lasting, meaningful [[life]] improvement.

* [https://ippanetwork.org/ International Positive Psychology Association]
* [https://www.theschooloflife.com/ The School of Life]
*[https://www.happinessandwellbeing.org/ Happiness and Well-Being]
*[https://positivepsychology.com/positive-psychology-courses-programs-workshops-trainings Top 23 Positive Psychology Courses]
*[https://jonathanhaidt.com/ Jonathan Haidt] - [https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/ The Anxious Generation] - [https://www.afterbabel.com/ After Babel] - [https://www.happinesshypothesis.com/ The Happiness Hypothesis]
*[https://www.authentichappiness.sas.upenn.edu/ Authentic Happiness - UPenn Positive Psychology]
*[https://actionforhappiness.org/ Action for Happiness] - [https://10daysofhappiness.org/ Ten Days of Happiness Free Course]
*[https://minddevlab.yale.edu/ Yale Mind and Development Lab]
*[https://yourmorals.org/ Your Morals]
*[https://www.centreforoptimism.com/ Center for Optimism]
*[https://psychology.fandom.com/ Psychology Wiki]
*[https://hfh.fas.harvard.edu/ Harvard Human Flourishing Program]
*[https://www.aplayfulpath.com/ A Playful Path]
*[https://myprimals.com/ My Primals]
*[https://courses.jordanharbinger.com/courses/6-minute-networking Six Minute Networking]
*[https://centerhealthyminds.org/ Institute for Healthy Minds]

== Psychedelic Science, Spirituality, and Therapy ==
Organizations advocating the therapeutic or entheogenic use of [[psychedelics]].

* [https://maps.org/ MAPS - Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies]
* [https://psychedelic.support/ Psychedelic Support]
* [https://www.appa-us.org/ American Psychedelic Practitioners Association]
* [https://www.beckleyacademy.com/ Beckley Academy]
* [https://shulginfoundation.org/ The Shulgin Foundation]
* [https://chacruna.net/ Chacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant Medicines]
* [https://www.erowid.org/ Erowid]
* [https://naavc.org/ North American Association of Visionary Churches]
* [https://www.aep.community/ Association of Entheogenic Practitioners]
* [https://www.sacredplantalliance.org/ Sacred Plant Alliance]
* [https://www.tricycleday.com/ Tricycle Day]
* [https://www.tripsitters.org/ Tripsitters] - [https://www.tripsitters.org/directory Directory]
* [https://healingmaps.com/ Healing Maps]
* [https://thechambersproject.com/ The Chambers Project]
* [https://doubleblindmag.com/ DoubleBlind Magazine]
* [https://psygaia.org/ Psygaia]
* [https://firesideproject.org/ Fireside Project]
* [https://globalpsychedelic.org/ Global Psychedelic Society]
* [https://ligare.org Ligary Christian Psychedelic Society]

== Public Philosophy ==
Those attempting to make [[philosophy]] more practical and accessible, so more people can use it to improve their [[life choices]].

* [[wikipedia:Public_philosophy|Public Philosophy Wikipedia]]
* [https://philosophyinpubliclife.org/ Institute for Philosophy in Public Life]
* [https://publicphilosophyjournal.org/ Public Philosophy Journal]
* [https://www.apaonline.org/ American Philosophical Association] - [https://blog.apaonline.org/2019/04/23/how-do-you-approach-public-philosophy/ Public Philosophy Blog]
* [https://objectionable.net/public-philosophy/ C. Thi Nguyen's Manifesto for Public Philosophy]
* [https://www.ethicalsystems.org/ Ethical Systems]
* [https://iai.tv/ Institute of Art and Ideas]
* [https://plato.stanford.edu/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
* [https://iep.utm.edu/ Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
* [https://commonslibrary.org/ The Commons Social Change Library]
* [https://www.wi-phi.com/ Wi-Phi Wireless Philosophy]
* [https://metacrisis.org Meta-Crisis Meta-Resource]
* [https://rebelwisdom.co.uk/ Rebel Wisdom]
* [https://www.moralambition.org/ The School for Moral Ambition]

== Regional ==
Groups that are local to wiki moderators who have hosted in-person lectures and other relevant events that offer networking opportunities.

Check the [[Church Research]] page for a reviews of various [[religious]] services in the region.

[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pc0IwJZJedQa3gXanSWb1OQFMrG-v0_FVgNY4RtoPmg Google Sheet with Shared Calendars] for many of these groups.

=== East Tennessee ===

* [https://www.meetup.com/sunday-assembly-knoxville/ Sunday Nomads]
* [https://www.knoxvillebahais.org/ Knoxville Baha'i Community]
* [https://tvuuc.org/ Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church]
* [https://www.westsideuuc.org/ Westside Unitarian Universalist Church]
* [https://www.oruuc.org/ Oak Ridge Unitarian Universalist Church]
* [https://www.cos-ucc.org/ Knoxville UCC Curch]
* [https://wkfm.org/ West Knoxville Friends Meeting]
* [https://rationalists.org/ Rationalists of East Tennessee]
* [https://lslk.org/ Losel Shedrup Ling Tibetan Buddhist Center]
* [https://lotuslightcenter.org/ Lotus Light Center]
* [https://goodsamknox.org/ Episcopal Church of the Good Samaritan]
* [https://www.13thdistrictame.org/east-tennessee-conference AME Zion Churches] - [https://www.bethelameknox.org/ Bethel AME]
* [https://www.messiahknoxville.org/ Messiah Lutheran Church]
* [https://wpcknox.org/ Westminster Presbyterian Church]
* [https://www.tennipl.org/ Tennessee Interfaith Power & Light]
* [https://justiceknox.org/ Justice Knox]
* [https://www.facebook.com/PrideInterfaithKnox/ Pride Interfaith Knox]
* [https://www.pechakucha.com/communities/knoxville PechaKucha Night Knoxville]
* [https://actionforhappiness.org/groups/tennessee Tennessee Action for Happiness]
* [https://www.aclu-tn.org/ ACLU Tennessee]
* [https://ffrfetc.yolasite.com/ Freedom From Religion Foundation East TN]
* [https://au-tn.org Americans United for Separation of Church and State of East TN]
* [https://etn.braverangels.org Braver Angels of East TN]
* [https://changetn.vote/ Change TN]
* [https://appalachiancommunityfund.org/ Appalachian Community Fund]
* [https://aplaceoftheheart.squarespace.com/ A Place of the Heart]
* [http://www.oasisinstitute.org/ The OASIS Institute]
* [https://meaningfullifecenter.org/ Meaningful Life Center]
* [https://www.facebook.com/events/knox-brew-hub/thursday-night-pub-theology/1045845330486247 Knoxville Pub Theology]
* [https://revitalistclinic.com/ Revitalist Clinic]

=== Nashville / Middle Tennessee ===

*[https://www.sundayassemblynashville.com/ Sunday Assembly Nashville]
*[https://www.meetup.com/middle-tennessee-humanist-group/ Middle Tennessee Humanist Group]
*[https://hamtn.org/ Tennessee Humanist Association]
*[https://nashvillebahai.org/ Baha'i Community of Nashville]
*[https://www.nashvilleuu.org/ Greater Nashville UU Church]
*[https://www.facebook.com/UnityOfNashville/ Unity Church of Nashville]
*[https://www.imaginarium.life/ Imaginarium]
*[https://www.millionsofconversations.com/ Millions of Conversations]
*[https://www.facebook.com/theconversationcoalition The Conversation Coalition]
*[https://www.nashville-au.org/ Americans United - Nashville]
*[https://www.facebook.com/braverangelsnba/ Nashville Braver Angels]
*[https://tnuhr.org/ Tennessee United for Human Rights]
*[https://www.nashvillepeacejustice.org/ Nashville Peace and Justice Center]
*[https://noahtn.org/ Nashville Organized for Action and Hope]
*[https://www.tnjustice.org/ Tennessee Justice Center]
*[https://www.taptn.org/ Tennessee Alliance for Progress]
*[https://peaceroots.org/ Peace Roots Alliance]
*[https://www.meetup.com/the-institute-of-noetic-sciences-ions-nashville/ IONS Nashville]
*[https://standupnashville.org/ Stand Up Nashville]
*[https://justiceforalltn.org/tn-faith-justice-alliance/ Tennessee Faith and Justice Alliance]
*[https://iamidtn.wordpress.com/ Interfaith Alliance of Middle Tennessee]
*[https://www.tectn.org/ Tennessee Environmental Council]
* [https://elument.com/ Nashville Psychedelic Center] [https://www.facebook.com/nashvillepsychedeliccenter]
* [https://nashvillepsychedelicsociety.com/ Nashville Psychedelic Society] [https://www.facebook.com/PsyNashville/]

=== Chattanooga ===

* [https://chattanoogahumanists.wordpress.com/ Chattanooga Humanist Assembly]
* [https://www.unityofchattanooga.org/ Unity of Chattanooga]
* [https://www.meetup.com/ooltewah-metaphysics-meetup-group Ooltewah Metaphysics Meetup]

=== Atlanta / Georgia ===

* [https://Facebook.com/groups/entheotemple Atlanta Entheo Temple]
* [https://www.wholeatl.org/ Whole ATL]
* [https://www.meetup.com/altered-states-integration-southeast/ Altered States Integration Southeast]
* [https://www.meetup.com/the-philosophy-cafe-of-atlanta/ Philosophy Cafe of Atlanta]
* [https://firstexistentialist.org/ First Existentialist Congregation of Atlanta]
* [https://sundayassemblyatlanta.org/ Sunday Assembly Atlanta]
* [https://atlantafreethought.org/ Atlanta Freethought Society]
* [https://atlantasecular.com/ Atlanta Secular Groups Directory]
* [https://www.meetup.com/AtlantaSkeptics/ Atlanta Skeptics]
* [https://www.meetup.com/Atlanta-Atheists/ Atlanta Atheists]
* [https://www.meetup.com/coastal-atheists-and-secular-humanists/ Coastal Atheists and Secular Humanists]
* [https://www.meetup.com/ethical-humanists-of-atlanta/ Ethical Humanists of Atlanta]
* [https://www.meetup.com/Black-Nonbelievers/ Black Nonbelievers of Atlanta]
* [https://www.meetup.com/Marietta-Atheists-Meetup/ Marietta Atheist/Skeptic/Humanist Meetup]
* [https://soldancemovement.tix.page/ Sol Dance]

=== Asheville / Western North Carolina ===

* [https://www.facebook.com/p/Pub-Theology-Bryson-City-100068396523317/ Bryson City Pub Theology]
* [https://wncbahai.org/ Baha'is of Asheville and Western NC]
* [https://truthisone.net/ Truth is One]
* [https://www.iam-hc.org/ Asheville Interfaith Assistance Ministry]
* [http://www.ashevilleinterfaith.org/ Asheville Interfaith]
* [https://www.pari.edu/ Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute]
* [https://prama.org/ Prama Institute and Wellness Center]
* [https://psychedelic.support/network/the-pearl-psychedelic-institute/ Pearl Psychedelic Institute]
* [https://azrabertrand.com/ Biomancy]

Population

2025-12-23T15:58:14Z

Fractalguy: /* Sure, There is Plenty of Food... */

[[File:Overpopulation-malthus-eugenics-one-child-policy-environment-resources-collapse.jpg|thumb|Many people prefer to avoid crowds]]
All [[environmental]] and [[sustainability]] issues are impacted by population. Even the most wasteful and polluting industrial processes would have minimal environmental impact if the population were small enough.<blockquote>''"Futurists don't consider overpopulation one of the issues of the [[future]]. They consider it the issue of the [[future]]."'' -[[wikipedia:Dan_Brown|Dan Brown]]</blockquote>Unfortunately this sensitive topic does not get the [[attention]] it needs.

== Population is Self-Correcting ==

All evidence shows that [[education]], especially women's education, low infant mortality, and access to [[birth control]] naturally result in a declining population. It is a [[self-correcting]] problem.

We just need to avoid creating [[economic]] systems that rely on an increasing population to fund things like [[retirement]] pensions and [[growth for growth sake]] [[economics]]. And ignore people with outsized [[platforms]] who [[promote]] [[wikipedia:Natalism|natalism]] to support these systems.

== Population Control is Not Genocide ==

When you say "overpopulation", many people only hear "[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thanos Thanos was right]". Or at least they did in 2018. But this is a problem that can easily solve itself without resorting to [[genocide]] or [[authoritarian]] limits on births. Yes, overpopulation has the taint of its past support by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics eugenicists], the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-child_policy CCP], and other [[racists]]. But is [https://www.sierraclub.org/washington/blog/2020/01/overpopulation-myth-and-its-dangerous-connotations population control racist] just because some [[racists]] have taken up the cause to promote anti-immigration policies? Is it [[racist]] to make birth control and family planning education available to everyone? You can oppose [[racist]] population control policies without abandoning the goal of reducing the global birth rate through [[Free will|voluntary action]].

The solution is likely to support programs that provide easy global access to family planning without ever talking about overpopulation in order to avoid being called a [[racist]] [[genocidal]] [[wikipedia:White_savior|white savior]]. Focus on the issue of women's empowerment and equality instead. Hopefully the problem will sort itself out and we won't have to address it directly because people are a bit touchy about the subject.

== The Racists are Pronatalists not Eugenicists ==
Today, we find most [[racists]] are part of the [[wikipedia:Natalism|pronatalism]] movement. They understand that saying we should have less "bad people" is [[taboo]], so they promote having more "good people." This means the idea that overpopulation concerns are [[racist]] is out of step with modern [[reality]]. It is important that this [[meme]] be subverted, which will require an approach that avoids the [[wikipedia:The_Population_Bomb|Paul Ehrlich]] [[wikipedia:Henny_Penny|chicken little]] label, as well as the [[racist]] [[wikipedia:Eugenics|eugenicist]] label.

The [[manosphere]] is obsessed with [[wikipedia:Natalism|pronatalism]], partly due to the implicit [[misogyny]]. Women who have a lot of children will need to become [[wikipedia:Tradwife|tradwives]] by default. They won't have time to [[work]].{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4Xhx4BH-qA||center|Baby Bust: Why Conservatives are Obsessed with Birth Rates Now|frame}}

== Who Will Think About the Economy? ==
It is also important to understand why people with [[Monetary addiction|monetary addictions]] and [[economic]] fixations promote [[wikipedia:Natalism|pronatalism]]. The wealthiest people in the world are some of the loudest voices in this movement. This is not because they are [[Crypto-bros|super-smart]] and concerned about [[Future humans|humanity's future]]. This is due to their [[Quantity of Life]] [[perspective]] and the [[incentives]] of growth-based [[capitalism]], which are more [[Salience|salient]] to those with [[monetary addiction]] than to anyone else. [[Climate change]] seems less likely to severely impact their portfolio during their [[lifetime]] than worker shortages and the need to provide [[healthcare]] to an [[aging]] population.

The [[economic]] pronatalists are dismissive of concerns about resource usage, environmental degradation, or quality of life. This section will dismiss their concerns with equal treatment.

=== Aging Population, Elder Care, and Social Security ===
The current [[social safety net]] depends on a larger working population to provide the [[tax]] base to pay for the care of retirees. With declining birth rates, the ratio of retirees to [[working]] people becomes untenable. These discussions usually paper over several possible ways to mitigate this problem.

# Wealth [[tax]]. Many old people are lifelong [[Monetary addiction|money addicts]] and have enough [[money]] to support many of their fellow olds.
# [[Robots]]. This seems like a great opportunity for an industrious [[money addict]] to get ridiculously high by inventing [[robots]] that can aid with elder care.
# Maybe we should rethink whether 30-40 non-[[working]] years is viable or desirable? Nobody wants to increase the retirement age, but there is a crisis of [[meaning]] in retirees who no longer feel useful. In an [[information]] based [[economy]], where old people were taught [[technology]] when they were young, there are many jobs that people in their 60s, 70s, or even 80s can perform. It shouldn't be [[necessary]] for survival. Even if it isn't, better [[health]] and longer retirements will lead many to return to [[work]] just to feel useful and alleviate boredom.

=== More People, More Smart People, More Innovation ===
The argument goes that the bigger the population, the bigger our [[information]] processing network, the [[Theoretical people|more geniuses]] we can produce, and this will result in faster development of new [[Technology|technological]] innovations that we need to solve [[problems]]. If we allow the population to decline, [[Theoretical people|the genius who will solve]] [[climate change]] won't be born in [[time]].

This argument places a lot of certainty on the possibility that we can develop [[technology]] that overcomes the resource strain of a larger population, and that the accelerated timeframe for that development will be more than the decreased timeframe for environmental disaster caused by the extra people.

We cannot be certain that [[future]] innovation will allow us to [[sustainably]] support a larger population, but we can be certain that a lower population could be sustained with [[technology]] we already have. What should we [[bet]] on?

=== I Thought You Were the AI and Robot People ===
Many of the loudest voices in the [[wikipedia:Natalism|pronatalism]] movement are the same [[Crypto-bros|tech oligarchs]] who are promising [[artificial intelligence]] so smart it causes a [[wikipedia:Technological_singularity|singularity]]. If [[AI]] is going to be infinitely smart, it should be smart enough to invent a [[robot]] that can do elder care, or automate most of the manual labor [[jobs]] so humans are freed up to focus on [[education]], [[art]], and [[family]]. Instead, they have automated the [[art]].<blockquote>''Why can't you just invent a decent robot?''</blockquote>Ever since we first imagined [[artificial intelligence]], we dreamed of creating autonomous devices with general intelligence that can automate all of the mundane tasks that take [[time]] away from more [[meaningful]] pursuits. This was always the goal.<blockquote>''Hey tech geniuses... where are our robots? They told us there would be robots!''</blockquote>Oh, we just need to have more babies and one of those [[Theoretical people|future geniuses]] will solve the [[Problems|problem]]? That sounds like something a whiney dumbass that can't invent a robot would say.

== Sure, There is Plenty of Food... ==
[[File:Too-many-people-here-im-not-one-of-them.jpeg|right|frameless|400x400px]]
Yes, we we grow enough food right now to feed a population nearly 20% larger than our current one. Good for us!

However, food is not the only resource. There are a million things that must be mined, grown, caught, or otherwise removed from the [[environment]] to produce all of the things that go into a modern [[capitalist]] [[society]]. Only so many of these things are renewable, and only so many of the renewables are being used [[sustainably]]. We may or may not be able to use [[technology]] to find alternatives. We're going to run out of many things faster and have less time to find alternatives the higher the population.

Then there is the value of [[nature]] and [[natural]] spaces, and the existence of other species besides us and our [[food]]. Even if [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertical_farming vertical farming] allows us to stop turning more and more [[Nature|wild areas]] into farms, without a stable population the land will be used for housing, transportation, resource mining, or other human purposes, further diminishing the space available for [[nature]].

Eventually some resource is going to run out, or something is going to extinct, that has a real impact on our [[quality of life]] or our survival. Or a lot of little things will add up to a big impact. In any case, population reduction will delay ''all'' of the non-renewable issues and resolve many renewable ones by making them [[sustainable]]. It is a single solution that impacts every [[environmental]] problem. To ignore it as a solution because it smells a little like [[racists]] despite having no inherent [[racism]] is self-defeating and absurd.

== Quality of Life Issues ==
[[File:Childless-adult-obligation-to-chill.png|right|frameless|350x350px]]
The [[quality of life]] issues surrounding population are rarely part of the discussion. There is only so much land available to live on if we still want to have a [[nature]]. Everyone wants to obtain the same standard of living now enjoyed by the richest 1%. This cannot be done [[sustainably]] with a growing population, or even the current one. And humans will stubbornly resist any attempts to enforce [[economic]] changes that reduce their [[quality of life]].

[https://www.stafforini.com/docs/parfit_-_overpopulation_and_the_quality_of_life.pdf This analysis by Derek Parfit] is one of the most referenced articles specifically addressing the [[quality of life]] concerns surrounding population. It is also a great demonstration of [[utilitarian]] [[wikipedia:Ethical_calculus|ethical calculus]] and the problems with counting [[theoretical people]].

Too many [[environmental]] organizations give the appearance that to avoid accusations of [[racism]] the white, western countries should lower their standard of living to something that would be sustainable if all 8 billion people achieved that standard. While this solution is exceedingly [[Justice|fair]], it is also a [[political]] impossibility. There are simply too many people who will never voluntarily lower their standard of living. And in this case too many is very nearly everyone. Standard of living either goes up, or you go to [[war]].

Any solution to our [[environmental]] and [[climate change]] issues must continue the upward trend in [[Happiness|quality of life]] globally. Poorer countries can catch up and richer counties may slow their growth, but the trends must all continue upward to avoid social upheaval. Population reduction enables continued growth in [[Happiness|quality of life]] while still addressing the many issues of sustainability that we face.

== Soft Antinatalism ==
The [[wikipedia:Antinatalism|antinatalism]] movement often takes the hard view that all procreation is unethical, to the point where some even advocate for the extinction of humanity. The [[metaculture]] [[wiki]] does not wish to be associated with that. You could describe the position being taken as a sort of "soft antinatalism" where we can be [[happy]] about natural trends toward lower birthrates without being [[wikipedia:Misanthropy|misanthropic]] or feeling [[outrage]] when people decide to have [[families]].

== Overpopulation Videos ==

There are a number of good videos online that break down the issues surrounding overpopulation in a very informative and entertaining way. However, they tend to ultimately dismiss the issue of overpopulation as one that will either [[self-correct]] or become irrelevant dues to some optimistic [[Crypto-bros|future tech]]. They all use accurate information about the availability and impact of certain resources like [[food]] and oil, but rarely address the [[Happiness|quality of life]] issue, or the possibility that some lesser-known resources will cause us problems in the future, or the general collapse of biodiversity we are witnessing.

=== Why Population is Actually a Problem ===

This video gives a detailed and nuanced breakdown of the way population issues are approached by mainstream left and right [[politics]], especially how [[racists]] have embraced it to support anti-immigration policies. It rightly points out that population trends are already self-correcting, and that fossil fuels are the primary driver of [[climate change]]. However, this argument focuses on solving [[climate change]] to the exclusion of all the other [[environmental]] and [[quality of life]] issues caused by overpopulation. It also veers into anti-[[capitalism]] which is not a great strategy if you want to reach the billions of people who have lived their entire lives being bombarded by pro-[[capitalist]] [[propaganda]]. But that's a separate issue.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqHX2dVn0c8||center|Why Overpopulation is Actually a Problem|frame}}

=== Overpopulation Facts ===

One of the few videos to mention the [[quality of life]] issue and it gets about 20 seconds out of an 8 minute speech. Also one of the few that is willing to say that a lower population would be ideal, not just stopping growth.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNxctzyNxC0||center|Overpopulation facts - the problem no one will discuss|frame}}

=== Can the Earth Support 8 Billion People? ===

An up-to-date documentary from BBC with great production values that covers all of the key issues around population and [[environment]].

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEIRRe9dCrA||center|Can the Earth Support 8 Billion People?|frame}}

== Too Many Puppies ==
Does this song actually have anything to do with spaying and neutering your pets? Probably not. Overpopulation really isn't really a very popular thing to sing about. {{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBpDFjau-Ps||center|Primus - Too Many Puppies|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://youtu.be/eFOuMv8k1bY||center|The Kinks - Apeman|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zI3UfxyIdgs||center|William Shatner - Common People|frame}}

File:Too-many-people-here-im-not-one-of-them.jpeg

2025-12-23T15:57:31Z

Fractalguy:

Monetary addiction

2025-12-23T15:42:24Z

Fractalguy: /* Monetary Addiction */

[[File:Materialistic-Hoarder-Stuff-Boxes-Junk.png|thumb|Everyone needs a few hundred boxes of crap]]
Modern [[society]] provides so much [[abundance]] that it is easy to get [[addicted]] to the accumulation of [[money]] and things. This is especially true when all of the [[incentives]] of [[capitalism]] encourage this.<blockquote>''“Some people are so poor, all they have is money.” -''[https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/620707-some-people-are-so-poor-all-they-have-is-money Patrick Meagher]</blockquote>Monetary addiction can take many forms, depending on how much [[money]] you actually have. [[wikipedia:Consumerism|Consumerism]], [[wikipedia:Hoarding_disorder|hoarding]], [[wikipedia:Economic_materialism|economic materialism]], and other related symptoms are all expressions of monetary addiction, even if the user feeds their [[addiction]] with debt instead of profit.

Using the [[addiction]] model is a better way to understand the behavior of [[billionaires]] and others who pursue [[power]], fame, and material [[wealth]], to the detriment of their personal [[relationships]], [[community]], and [[society]] at large.[[wikipedia:Hoarding_disorder|Hoarding]] and rampant consumerism are how these [[Addiction|addictions]] manifest among the working class.

Many people ask "why don't they just retire and hang out on their yachts all day?" Why doesn't a heroin [[Addiction|addict]] just quit? Both the hardcore [[Drugs|drug]] addict and the [[billionaire]] have let their [[Addiction|addictions]] impoverish every other aspect of their lives, so that the next hit is the only thing they have to look forward to.

== Money : Success :: Pleasure : Flourishing ==
[[File:Consumerism-barely-touched-your-object-empty-soul.jpeg|right|frameless|350x350px]]
Using the [https://blog.prepscholar.com/sat-analogies-and-comparisons-why-removed-what-replaced-them old school SAT analogies and comparisons] format, we see the [[connection]] between [[money]] and [[happiness]] more clearly.

Ask any [[philosopher]] and they will tell you there's more to human [[flourishing]] than [[wikipedia:Pleasure|pleasure]] and the pursuit of [[wikipedia:Hedonism|hedonism]]. Similarly, [[money]] is an essential component to [[wikipedia:Success|success]], but if you pursue [[money]] exclusively and forsake [[ethics]], intellectual and [[artistic]] curiosity, [[altruism]], [[relationships]], and [[community]], you will not be a successful human being, just a [[wealthy]] one.

Those who pursue pleasure or [[money]] exclusively will [[inevitably]] become [[addicted]].

== Consumerism and Hoarding ==
[[File:Buying-is-the-purse-killer-dune.png|right|frameless|350x350px]]
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoarding_disorder Hoarding] is a uniquely modern phenomenon where the compulsion to accumulate possessions reaches debilitating levels.<blockquote>''"If you aren't in love with late-[[capitalism]], why are you letting it store all its stuff at your place?"'' -[[wikipedia:Jennifer_Michael_Hecht|Jennifer Michael Hecht]]</blockquote>Hoarding of [[money]] is an affliction of the [[wealthy]] that so warps their [[perspective]] that many are able to justify profiting from mass [[suffering]] if it feeds their [[addiction]].<blockquote>''"I love money. I love everything about it. I bought some pretty good stuff. Got me a $300 pair of socks. Got a fur sink. An electric dog polisher. A gasoline powered turtleneck sweater. And, of course, I bought some dumb stuff, too."'' -[[wikipedia:Steve_Martin|Steve Martin]]</blockquote>A [[happy]] [[life]] requires all of the stuff you need to be comfortable, and some stuff to have fun with. But beyond that any additional accumulation promises [[wikipedia:Diminishing_returns|diminishing returns]].[[File:Food-and-cheer-and-song-jrr-tolkien.jpg|thumb|The only [[Jordan Peterson|dragons to slay]] are billionaires]]Creating personal strategies to counter the materialistic urge is a [[necessary prerequisite]] to finding [[happiness]] in a [[capitalist]] [[society]]. Especially when the entire [[economy]] acts as a [[propaganda]] machine to try and make you buy more.

[[Social media]] has accelerated the trend towards consumerism. Legacy [[media]] celebrated the [[wikipedia:Lifestyles_of_the_Rich_and_Famous|Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous]], but [[social media]] celebrates the ''Lifestyles of Your Peers who are Richer and Having More Fun Than You''. The pressure to [[wikipedia:Keeping_up_with_the_Joneses|keep up with the Joneses]] is so much higher when you don't just compare yourself to the people in your neighborhood; now it's a steady [[Newsfeed|stream]] of the richest people in the richest neighborhoods in the world, all showing off for you.

See [[wikipedia:Economic_materialism|Economic Materialism]] and [[wikipedia:Consumerism|Consumerism]]

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASneI-Mh5fQ||center|Why people hoard, with Julie Pike, PhD|frame}}

== Inequality and Happiness ==
[[File:Hoarding-is-crazy-no-matter-what.jpg|thumb|360x360px]]
Studies have shown that localized income inequality is the biggest contributor to economic distress and the crime that results. [https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/why-income-inequality-in-america-is-hurting-collective-happiness/][https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.829707/full][https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/1/5/pgac224/6754154][https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02052/full][https://soar.suny.edu/bitstream/handle/20.500.12648/11282/1767_Matthew_Girardi.pdf][https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X23003388][https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2018/06/07/the-stark-relationship-between-income-inequality-and-crime]

When you constantly see people with more [[money]] than you, jealousy and resentment are natural by-products. This effect is amplified when the ultra-wealthy are neighbors you see regularly, rather than celebrities in the [[media]]. It's easy to see how those who are [[suffering]] from poverty can justify stealing from people who have more [[money]] than they could spend in multiple lifetimes.

== Monetary Addiction ==
[[Capitalism]]'s relentless [[incentives]] to pursue [[money]], growth, and materialism, has caused a new outbreak of one the oldest forms of [[addiction]]--monetary [[addiction]]. It is easy to spot a victim of monetary [[addiction]]. The size of their portfolio is a key outward indicator. For those without sound financial strategies, the size of their [[wikipedia:Hoarding|hoard]] or their debt will let you know.<blockquote>''"Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich."'' -Anonymous</blockquote>Billionaires are the ones whose [[addiction]] runs deepest. The amount of [[cognitive dissonance]] they must have to deal with when they make move after move that reduces the [[quality of life]] for their workers, and bribe [[Politics|politicians]] to make [[life]] worse for all of us, just to feed their [[addiction]]. This is why depression is so prevalent in the rich, even though it's more prevalent in the poor for different reasons that should be obvious. [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7891298/][https://academic.oup.com/aje/article-abstract/157/2/98/90059] The system of unequal, exploitative [[capitalism]] that [[Incentives|incentivizes]] [[work]] and profits over [[happiness]] doesn't really work for anyone.
[[File:Maslow-greeds-versus-needs.jpg|none|thumb|650x650px|Once you get to self-actualization, stop climbing and start helping others.]]
[[File:Youre-in-the-trolley-problem.jpeg|right|frameless|400x400px]]
The [[addiction]] model for income inequality offers a way to change the conversation about [[wealth]], [[power]], and [[happiness]]. If people start to feel sorry for the rich instead of the combination of [[Bootlicking|worship]], [[hate]], and [[jealousy]] that they currently get, the [[social norms]] around ostentatious [[wealth]] will begin to change. Nobody wants to be pitied.

[[Money#Monetary Addiction Treatment Centers|Monetary Addiction Treatment Centers]] are proposed as way to advanced the [[social goals]] of [[metaculture]] while providing a sustainable business model for the [[future]].

This interview gives an excellent overview of the [[psychology]] of wealth and entitlement.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFhMMSHthyk||center|The psychology of wealth, empathy and entitlement, with Paul Piff, PhD|frame}}

 
The [[wikipedia:Ferengi|Ferengi]] depict a [[society]] where monetary [[addiction]] is encouraged instead of treated as mental illness.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvFYBkesqGU||center|Ferengi Rules of Acquisition - Complete List|frame}}

== Bootlickers ==
Sycophants who enable the worst behavior of money addicts in the hopes that they can live off of the scraps like a [[wikipedia:Pilot_fish|pilot fish]] are called [[Bootlicker|bootlickers]].

== All Billionaires Are Bad ==
[[File:Billionaire-dragon-money-hoarding-gold.jpeg|thumb|Even if a hoard is invested, it's still a hoard]]
The [[wikipedia:ACAB|popular slogan used to decry the police state]] can be put to better use against the [[wikipedia:Oligarchy|oligarchy]]. A public safety [[institution]] with strong internal controls to prevent [[corruption]] has its place in a thriving [[society]]. Billionaires do not. Having that much concentration of [[wealth]] in the hands of a single human is an insult to the [[Concept|concepts]] of [[balance of power]] and equal [[justice]]. It is impossible for any institution to treat a billionaire equally to an average person. They will always have the ability to pay fines as if they are nothing, use their influence to [[persuade]] if not bribe officials, and command more [[authority]] than anyone appointed to judge them. Their existence is [[wikipedia:Anathema|anathema]].

There is no [[economic]] benefit to these concentrations of [[wealth]]. Any business you can start with ten billion dollars you can start with one billion and the pooled investments of other venture capitalists. You'll just need to spread the rewards out a bit more rather than keeping it all for yourself. Boo-hoo. [[Society]] benefits, not just you.
[[File:Hate-every-billionaire-i-see-bourgeuois-z.jpeg|right|frameless|300x300px]]
In the "[[wikipedia:Good_old_days|good old days]]" the top marginal [[tax]] rates were as high as 94%, representing an effective upper limit on income, if not [[wealth]].[https://www.econlib.org/how-did-we-get-good-growth-in-the-1950s-despite-high-marginal-tax-rates/] While loopholes and [[wikipedia:Capital_gains_tax|capital gains]] meant that few people actually paid the full amount, it did reflect an [[economic]] ethos that people should only be allowed to accumulate so much [[wealth]] and [[power]] in order for [[society]] to be [[Freedom|free]] and [[Equality|equitable]].

If you are fortunate enough to own or invent something that everyone needs, you should be able to make yourself fabulously wealthy. You should not be able to make yourself into an [[wikipedia:Oligarchy|oligarch]]. At some point the extra profits enabled by a [[Freedom|free]] and stable [[society]] should be reinvested in that [[society]] to ensure it continues to provide the [[economic]] conditions [[necessary]] for that profitability.

[[wikipedia:Limitarianism_(ethical)|Economic Limitarianism]] is the [[ethical]] theory that emphasizes putting limits on the amount of wealth one person can accumulate in order to keep the [[balance of power]].

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBnn7hrrj2Y||center|Imagine there were no billionaires|frame}}

== All Their Platforms are Bad, Too ==
If you feed the [[Addiction|addicts]] destroying [[society]] by spending your valuable [[time]], [[attention]], and [[money]] on their [[platforms]], you are part of the problem. Simply avoiding them is one easy thing you can do to help restore the [[balance of power]].

[[wikipedia:Divestment|Divestment]] is another important step for those with vests to di.

The [[wikipedia:Fediverse|Fediverse]] offers an alternatives to the [[platforms]] owned by [[tech-bro]] monopolists, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RpPTRcz1no network state enthusiasts], and [[Crypto-bros|crypto]]-[[fascists]].

== Can't Buy Me Cool ==
They say you can't buy [[love]], but there are plenty of people willing to [[love]] any successful money addict, or at least pretend to convincingly. But there is one thing even more elusive than [[love]] and harder to buy, and that is to be see as "cool" by the public, especially young people.[https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jan/16/i-knew-one-day-id-have-to-watch-powerful-men-burn-the-world-down-i-just-didnt-expect-them-to-be-such-losers][https://www.jezebel.com/deeply-uncool-53-year-old-man-thinks-saying-deeply-uncool-slur-will-make-him-cool]

The harder you try, more [[money]] you spend, more [[platforms]] you take over and make into your personal [[propaganda]] machine--all of it simply adds to the air of desperation given off by any [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Try-hard try-hard] who doesn't realize that being effortlessly cool is an essential part of being cool.

Unless you got [[rich]] because you were a [https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-cool-people-who-did-cool-96003360/ cool person who did cool stuff], you will have to live with the fact that you chose to forsake [[friends]], [[family]], [[community]], and [[happiness]] in the relentless pursuit of your [[addiction]], and the only people who think you are cool are [[Bootlicker|bootlickers]].

Alternatively, you are the spoiled rotten child of one of the aforementioned addicts, and the only people who think you are cool are [[Bootlicker|bootlickers]]. Give away the inheritance that should have been [[Taxes|taxed]] in the first place, and earn your respect and [[authority]] like the rest of us. This will [[inevitably]] lead to a more [[meaningful]] and [[Happiness and well-being|fulfilling]] [[life]].

== Consume These Videos ==
These videos analyze the problems of consumerism and how it contributes to the mental health and [[environmental]] crises.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cfCnoVto8c||center|The bitter truth behind consumerism|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MilcnqXKjR4||center|How consumerism is ruining our planet and finances|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ij2rp9AdRnU||center|Why consumerism is ruining your life|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Koow0Q6EiXU||center|Why Japanese People Don't "Want" Things Anymore|frame}}
 
The Netflix documentary "Buy Now" does a great job of showing how Amazon employs complex [[algorithms]] to trick your [[brain]] into becoming [[addicted]] to impulse buying.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVfZw_eqJW8||center|Buy Now! The Shopping Conspiracy - Official Trailer|frame}}

== Music Celebrating Excess and Greed ==
An unfortunate feature of [[capitalist]] popular [[culture]] is the [[feedback loop]] between artists that desire [[money]] and fame and the [[art]] they create that celebrates and reinforces this desire. Before it was possible to feed your monetary [[addiction]] by making [[music]], there were very few songs about getting rich from record deals, touring around the world, and having [[sex]] with groupies. That began to change in the stadium rock era that began with Woodstock and grew throughout the 70s.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T204WpZSbLw||center|Joe Walsh - Life's Been Good|frame}}
 
The 80s brought the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_Gekko Gordon Gekko] "Greed is Good" [[ideology]] and pop materialism reflected this trend.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6p-lDYPR2P8||center|Madonna - Material Girl|frame}}
 
In the 90s we saw the ascendance of hip-hop [[culture]], which often seemed laser-focused on the topic of making [[money]] and having [[sex]] with groupies.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c58ppLPJcQ||center|Puff Daddy - It's All About The Benjamins (Remix)|frame}}

File:Youre-in-the-trolley-problem.jpeg

2025-12-23T15:41:32Z

Fractalguy:

Psychedelics

2025-12-23T15:33:11Z

Fractalguy: /* Experience Heaven and/or Hell in One Night */

[[File:Psychedelic-Sacred-Geometry-Fractal-Hallucination.jpg|thumb|Sample hallucination]]
Psychedelics may not be a [[Necessary Prerequisite|necessary prerequisite]] to understanding [[metaculture]], but they can help! This [[wiki]] is all about helping people reach [[scientific]] [[enlightenment]] without having to do the tedious work of assembling the [[holistic]] cosmic puzzle. Psychedelics offer a convenient shortcut for those who have other things to do besides read [[philosophy]] and [[Meditation|meditate]] for years. They can also be incredibly fun!<blockquote>''"Because of acid I now know that butter is way better than margarine. I saw through the bullshit."'' -[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBWpXSiP5xY Mitch Hedberg, ''Strategic Grill Locations'']</blockquote>The use of [[wikipedia:Psychedelic_drug|psychedelics]] in [[spiritual]] [https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/23972716/psychedelics-meaning-science-psychedelic-mushrooms-ketamine-psilocybin-mysticism] and therapeutic settings if finally starting to gain the recognition it once had shortly after the discovery of [[wikipedia:LSD|LSD]]. This is detailed in the popular book [[wikipedia:How_to_Change_Your_Mind|How to Change Your Mind]], which is a good starting point if you are interested but new to psychedelics, or want to learn more about the [[scientific]] research and therapeutic techniques being developed.<blockquote>''"Psychedelics aren't a practice... but you need a practice to reinforce it."'' -[[wikipedia:Michael_Pollan|Michael Pollan]] [https://youtu.be/k9N35WCz_UI?t=3034]</blockquote>This page details the [[history]] and various forms of modern psychedelic use, and how it has helped reveal [[Universalist|universal truth]] to [[spiritual]] seekers throughout the ages.

== The Subjective Experience of Entheogens ==
There are several aspects to the effects of hallucinogens on our [[subjective]] experience of [[consciousness]] that makes them [[wikipedia:Entheogen|entheogenic]], or "[[god]]-inducing."

* [[wikipedia:Ego_death|Ego dissolution]]: the feeling of [[In-group|merging/oneness]] with the [[universe]] and the loss of separation between the self, other people, and the outside world in general. Many refer to it as "ego death" but this term can be misleading, since it is a temporary loss of the sense of self, not a permanent loss of narcissism. The experience is better described as "universal consciousness" to avoid confusion.
* Increased [[wikipedia:Neuroplasticity|neuroplasticity]]: the ability to break out of [[Habits|habitual]] patterns of behavior and create alternative [[neural pathways]]. Seeing the world through the eyes a child, where everything is new and [[Wonder|wonderous]] again.
* [[Emotional]] amplification: all senses and [[emotional]] responses, especially [[empathy]], are heightened to the point that subtle things that often go unnoticed become like an elephant in the room. This gives a keen awareness of how people's words, attitudes, and actions impact our psyche, and how we impact others.
* [https://iai.tv/articles/ritual-transcendence-and-psychedelics-auid-1929 Ritual transcendence]: shamanistic [[ritual]] [[traditions]] rely on the 4 D's - [[Dancing]], [[Music|Drums]], [[Sleep]] Deprivation, and [[Drugs]]. Modern raves and [[music]] festivals can induce the transcendent experience of ancient [[rituals]] and produce a state of [[awe]] that can be transformative for the self and your [[Relationships|relationship]] to the [[community]]. [https://iai.tv/articles/ritual-transcendence-and-psychedelics-auid-1929]

Since [[spirituality]] is intricately linked to the [[subjective]] experience of being human and living in a [[society]], the amplification of that experience to the point where you feel a complete oneness with the other members of that [[society]] is inherently [[spiritual]]. Independently of any [[supernatural]] interpretations, the [[natural]] response to this experiences is "this is what all the mystics must have been talking about!" This may or may not lead to [[religious]] or [[supernatural]] [[belief]], depending on existing [[beliefs]] and how the new experiences are integrated into that framework. But regardless of whether you "find [[god]]" on psychedelics, you will at least "get it" on a whole new level.

== Experience Heaven and/or Hell in One Night ==
People often talk about having a "good trip" or a "bad trip". In the most extreme cases, these experiences mirror the [[religious]] depictions of [[heaven and hell]] (or [[wikipedia:Saṃsāra|samsara]] and [[wikipedia:Nirvana|nirvana]] if you prefer). In the amplified [[emotional]] state that psychedelics induce, [[happiness]] becomes ecstasy, fear and anxiety become torment. We can find ourselves triggered into a thought loop that sends us spiraling into deep depression, and snap out of it just as quickly with a change in [[music]], setting, or a good joke.
[[File:If-you-think-youre-having-a-bad-time.jpg|right|frameless|400x400px]]
As you gain experience with psychedelic states, you realize that you are in control of your thoughts, and that it would be ridiculous to have a bad trip when you could just as easily make the choice to have a good one by changing your "[[wikipedia:Set_and_setting|set and setting]]." The implications for everyday [[psychology]] are obvious. You start to learn to avoid thought loops, and find ways to recognize them and break the cycle when they happen. You adopt a more [[optimistic]] viewpoint, avoiding negativity, situations and people who give us "bad vibes." There is a tendency to practice [[mindfulness]] in order to be more in the present moment.

While tripping, the [[Quality of life versus quantity of life|quality]] of your mental state becomes undeniable, creating a [https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/100469-we-are-now-faced-with-the-fact-that-tomorrow-is fierce urgency] for [[positivity]] that cannot be ignored the way that sober negativity can. When this sense of urgency persists after the trip, it is often described as profound, transformational, revelatory, and long-lasting. This is another reason psychedelics are [[wikipedia:Entheogen|entheogenic]].

Good trips are easy. For the other kind, see [https://psygaia.org/blog/bad-trips-spiritual-emergencies-challenging-experiences Bad Trips, Spiritual Emergences, and Challenging Experiences].

[https://iai.tv/articles/psychedelics-can-be-catalysts-for-existential-joy-auid-3017 Psychedelics and Existential Insight (paywalled)] relates this experience to the breakthroughs in personal [[philosophy]] where we decide to reject [[suffering]] and nihilism and embrace [[life]] in its fullest sense. When the difference in [[subjective]] and [[emotional]] experience is so dramatic, and the shift can be made so easily with just a simple change in [[perspective]], the absurdity of not choosing to embrace [[life]] is laid bare.

== That Hallucination is a Fractal ==

[[File:These-Drugs-Are-A-Bit-Mathy.jpg|thumb|right|[https://condenaststore.com/featured/a-bit-mathy-adam-douglas-thompson.html Adam Douglas Thompson]]]

Most depictions of psychedelic and [[spiritual]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hallucination hallucinations] take the shape of [[fractal]] patterns. This is most likely due to the inherent [[fractal]] structure of our [[self-organized]] [[neural networks]]. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_physiology] [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.609768/full] [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2010.00015/full] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36156074/] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23573942/] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18539630/]

We see [[fractals]] because our [[brains]] and [[minds]] are organized using [[fractal]] structures. They are the thumbprint of the [[universe]] made visible through psychedelic amplification.[https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3258647/]

Eyes and faces are also really common ([[wikipedia:Pareidolia|Pareidolia]]) since facial recognition is one of our most important [[brain]] functions. But even those are often arranged in [[fractal]] patterns.

The subject of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_geometry Sacred Geometry] is focused on this topic, though discussions of it tend to cross over into [[pseudoscientific]] [[Quantum woo|fractal woo]], so approach with [[critical thinking]].

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ik8OoyCGeF0||center|Psychedelic Geometry Explained|frame}}

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhOSM6uCWxk||center|The Hardest Trip - Mandelbrot Fractal Zoom|frame}}

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QWlxqKneLs||center|Euphoric Equations: A Visual Voyage into the World of Sacred Geometry|frame}}

== High Weirdness and Rational Psychonautics ==
In [https://www.skeptic.org.uk/2024/10/welcome-to-the-modern-american-right-the-world-that-high-weirdness-built/ this insightful article], Aaron Rabinowitz deftly describes how the phenomenon of "[https://www.skeptic.org.uk/2024/10/welcome-to-the-modern-american-right-the-world-that-high-weirdness-built/ High Weirdness]" has led many [[wikipedia:Psychonautics|psychonauts]] down the rabbit hole of [[conspiracy theories]], [[contrarianism]], and [[pseudoscience]]. The influences of High Weirdness cited in the article, from the [[Slack|Church of the SubGenius]], to the Illuminatus Trilogy, to Phillip K. Dick, have all provided inspiration for this [[wiki]] project. So what leads some to become untethered from [[reality]] while others see their [[critical thinking]] reinforced? And is there something we can do to encourage the better outcome?

=== Psychonauts and Rational Psychonauts ===
The difference between these groups is apparent when you look at the posts from the [https://www.reddit.com/r/Psychonaut/ Psychonaut] subreddit and compare them to [https://www.reddit.com/r/RationalPsychonaut/ RationalPsychonaut]. The first often contains unhinged rants about aliens, [[god]], and machine elves, existential crises and [[Simulation Theory|simulations]], while the other is full of [[scientific]] studies, therapeutic advice, and even some halfway decent takes on [[philosophy]]. What determines which path you will follow on your psychedelic journey?

=== There is No Information in Psychedelics ===
People often take psychedelics expecting to find some revelation. Many end up having them. However, these can only represent the synthesis of existing [[information]] already present in the [[brain]]. Those who have a magical or mythical interpretation of [[reality]] will interpret their experiences through that lens. Those with a [[scientific]] [[education]] and well developed [[Critical thinking|rationality]] will tend to explain their experiences using [[psychology]].

Sometimes the experience can cause a reversal, where a [[spiritual]] person sees chemically induced visions of angels and demons and realizes these things are all products of the [[mind]]. Sometimes a [[scientific]] [[mind]] can see the same things and start to believe they are real. The experience itself is technically new [[information]] that must be interpreted, but it doesn't come with a guidebook

Psychedelic substances are often referred to as "teachers" but that is the exact thing that they lack. Most trips are not supervised by experts that can offer insight and guidance. This means that for most people, how they [https://psychedelic.support/resources/guide-community-psychedelic-integration-circle/ integrate] their experience is strongly influenced by the [[media]] and their peer groups.

[https://www.salon.com/2024/03/08/ego-tripping-why-do-psychedelics-enlighten-some-people--and-make-others-giant-narcissists/ This article in Salon by Rich Haridy] explores the implications of this. To quote Douglas Rushkoff, "assholes who took psychedelics were assholes on psychedelics." Experiencing ego dissolution is not guaranteed to increase empathy, compassion, or [[morality]]. That is why psychedelics are just one page on this [[wiki]] and not the whole thing. Without having [[philosophy]], [[ethics]], [[psychology]], [[spirituality]], and [[community]] to inform your experiences, the only effect they will have is the inflation of ego, and a newfound cosmic significance to your existing [[ideology]] that makes you sound like a douchebag.

=== Peer to Peer Integration ===
Many of the most popular figures in the media who promote psychedelics (like Joe Rogan) are terrible mentors who encourage [[contrarian]] and [[conspiratorial]] interpretations of their experiences, priming their millions of listeners to do the same. In our disconnected and anti-social [[culture]], many more people are trying psychedelics alone rather than with their peers, compounding the influence of influencers on those experiences.

Those who are tripping with their peer groups will also get vastly different interpretations of their shared experiences depending on their level of [[education]], [[scientific]] background, [[critical thinking]] skills, knowledge of [[psychology]], [[religion]], and other factors. This is why people who drop acid at Harvard and Stanford often become major innovators in [[science]] and [[technology]], while the high-school dropout following Phish is likely to end up in a yoga cult.

=== Shamanistic and Therapeutic Integration ===
Many psychedelic guides and facilitators come from native [[wikipedia:Shamanism|shamanistic]] [[traditions]]. More often than not, they are white people with dreads who are appropriating them. In both cases, there is a tendency towards the mythological interpretation of [[spiritual]] psychedelic experience over the [[rational]].

Facilitators and guides that don't come from shamanism are usually therapists with a [[psychology]] background. However, many of these practice a more [[wikipedia:Analytical_psychology|Jungian]] [[woo]]-based forms of therapy similar to dream interpretation, rather than seeking to ground the experiences in a [[scientific]] or [[rational]] framing. Since psychedelics still exist in a legal gray-area and outside of the mainstream, those attracted to it often represent fringe elements of the [[psychology]] [[community]].

Facilitators from both camps are usually taught not to try and impose their own judgements or [[worldview]] on the [https://psychedelic.support/resources/guide-community-psychedelic-integration-circle/ integration] process. Their focus is on creating a setting that is conducive to a positive experience, helping people out of negative thought loops, and encouraging reflection and integration after the experience. While this approach is very open-minded and non-judgmental, it does little to prevent "high weirdness" and the descent into [[conspiracy theories]], [[contrarianism]], [[pseudoscience]], and [[supernatural]] magical thinking. Many of these fringe facilitators even encourage it.

=== Rational Integration ===
In order to promote rational interpretations of the psychedelic experience, it is [[necessary]] for knowledgeable teachers with backgrounds in [[psychology]], therapy, neuroscience, and [[philosophy]] to reach out and offer their mentorship and advice to young people. If they don't, the void will be filled by [[grifters]], cults, and [[conspiracy theorists]] eager to take advantage of their vulnerable and open states of mind.

The mainstream [[psychology]] [[community]] is unfortunately hampered by research methods, [[ethical]] and [[legal]] constraints. It is not possible, or even desirable, for every trip to have a professional facilitator. People are going to be out there tripping, so if the solution to "high weirdness" requires a therapeutic environment it just simply isn't practical. It must take place on the peer to peer, grassroots level to be able to have a significant impact on aggregate trip interpretations.

The [[ISNESS]] project provides a model for how this can work. By creating fun and interesting [[communities]] and events centered around [[science]]-based [https://psychedelic.support/resources/guide-community-psychedelic-integration-circle/ integration] of the psychedelic experience, it should be possible to promote [[rational]] interpretations within the broader psychedelic [[community]]. Even if only a small percentage of users would be interested in such a group, each of them is also a member of their own peer group and will become an influence on their future trips as they share the knowledge they gain in the rational [https://psychedelic.support/resources/guide-community-psychedelic-integration-circle/ integration circles].

By using an Interfaith model for community organizing, [[ISNESS]] can provide a vehicle for both [[progressive]] [[religious]] [[institutions]] and the [[secular community]] to interface with the psychedelic [[community]]. These people are [[spiritual]] seekers who are looking for [[meaning]] and [[community]]. If mainstream [[institutions]] refuse to acknowledge the ''importance'' of the psychedelic experience, how can you blame users for developing [[contrarian]], anti-authority, anti-institutional opinions? If mainstream [[science]] and [[religion]] can embrace the psychedelic experience, it will significantly hamper the ability for fringe [[pseudoscience]] [[grifters]] and cults to take advantage of high weirdness.

=== Conclusion ===

The [[legal]] status of psychedelics has led to a wild west free-for-all of fringe thinking. It has prevented mainstream [[institutions]] from embracing psychedelics, which exacerbates the [[Trust|distrust]] of those [[institutions]] among those who are having one of the most significant experiences of their [[life]] under their influence. As the legality of psychedelics and support within the [[cultural]] mainstream grows, we finally have an opportunity to promote [[rational]], [[scientific]] psychonautics in a way that allows people to enjoy "high weirdness" without being lost to the fringe.
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqB5dfaefT0||center|High Weirdness: The United States of Strange (with Aaron Rabinowitz)|frame}}

=== Epilogue: High Weirdness to High Oligarchy ===
The previous section was written prior to the 2024 election and the elevation of High Weirdos like [[wikipedia:Curtis_Yarvin|Curtis Yarvin]] to the highest echelons of [[power]]. Their bad trips are now all of our [[problems]].

[https://danielpinchbeck.substack.com/p/right-wing-psychedelia-and-americas This discussion] between [[wikipedia:Daniel_Pinchbeck|Daniel Pinchbeck]], [[wikipedia:Jamie_Wheal|Jamie Wheal]], and [[wikipedia:Douglas_Rushkoff|Douglas Rushkoff]] examines the relationship between psychedelics and the current alt-right [[Crypto-bros|crypto-bro]] phenomenon in Silicon Valley. Many of the members of the modern [[Oligarchs|oligarchy]] have been heavily influenced by psychedelics. These three [[authors]] have been a part of that scene since its formation in the 90s and have great insights into the mentality of those who have aligned themselves with modern [[fascism]] despite having experienced oneness and "ego death" on psychedelics. Their [[podcasts]] and Substacks are all worth following.

* [https://danielpinchbeck.substack.com/p/right-wing-psychedelia-and-americas Right Wing Psychedelia and America's Descent]
* [https://jamiewheal.substack.com/p/psychedelic-fascism-too-big-to-fail Psychedelic Fascism: Too Big To Fail?]

== Psychedelic Eco-Spirituality ==
A common way that psychedelic [[spirituality]] manifests itself is in [[wikipedia:Gaia_hypothesis|living Earth, naturalistic, and Gaia-based]] [[belief systems]] that emphasize our [[connection]] to [[nature]]. This is a natural by-product of the psychedelic experience, especially among those who trip while camping. There are many different ways that people approach eco-spirituality. Let's use two examples to contrast the different approaches to this subject, and the widely varying degrees of "[[woo]]" that they rely on.

* [https://azrabertrand.com/ Biomancy] - the "[[woo]]" approach
* [https://psygaia.org/philosophy Psygaia] - a more grounded, [[scientific]] approach

On the [https://azrabertrand.com/ Biomancy website], [[Critical thinking|critical thinkers]] will notice a number of red flags that indicate that their commitment to [[scientific]] rigor may lack [[conviction]].

* Extensive use of the words "magic" and "[[Quantum woo|quantum]]"
* References to pagan mysticism
* Use of [[neologisms]]
* Focus on selling courses, seminars, and other things that cost [[money]]
* Rarely ties [[ideas]] to any [[scientific]] research
* Always refers to self as "Doctor" even though their medical experience is not directly related

In contrast, the [https://psygaia.org/ Psygaia] website attempts to create a more [https://psygaia.org/psychedelic-science scientific model] for eco-[[spirituality]], and relates its presentation of similar [[ideas]] without invoking magic and pagan [[God|gods]]. The word "[[Quantum woo|quantum]]" does not appear anywhere on the site, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBWcRqPesws which is nice]. There are paid courses and retreats, but many free resources and a helpful online [[community]] are also provided. In general, you get a much better sense that the [https://psygaia.org/ Psygaia] approach is done in "[[good faith]]," where the [https://azrabertrand.com/ Biomancy] approach is self-serving and a bit culty.

The [[metaculture]] approach is very similar to eco-spirituality, in that it views experiencing and embracing our [[spiritual]] connection to [[nature]] as central to how we create [[meaning]]. Some notable differences would be:

* [[metaculture]] focuses more on our [[connection]] to the entire [[universe]] versus using the Earth as the central [[metaphor]], though both are [[Universalist|universalizing]]. See [[Pantheism]].
* The Earth-centric approach appeals to many, but for others it triggers [[out-group]] biases. A significant portion of people have a negative reaction to this type of [[rhetoric]], which they might refer to as "hippy bullshit." These are the people that need to be [[Persuade|persuaded]] the most!
* Building bridges to those who hold [[traditional]] [[religious]] mindsets, as well as [[atheists]] who reject any hint of the [[supernatural]], is paramount. Unfortunately, both groups tend to view eco-spirituality as "[[woo]]" that is equally deserving of criticism, but for opposite reasons.
* Psychedelics are just one part of a much bigger overall [[philosophy]], and don't play a central role. They can be a great way to aid your path to [[enlightenment]], but they aren't the only path, nor are they useful without a foundation of good [[information]] for the psychedelics to integrate.
* [[Fractals]].
Most of these differences are simply a matter of which [[Metanarratives|narratives]] and [[perspectives]] receive more focus, rather than anything truly substantive. It is stated many times in this [[wiki]], but here's one more--choose whatever [[philosophy]] you identify with that works best for you!

== Psychedelic History ==

Manvir Singh's book [https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/217927682-shamanism Shamanism: The Timeless Religion] explores the [[spiritual]] uses of psychedelics and other mystical and trance states in shamanistic [[traditions]] in every [[culture]].{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrAZTd9rlVk||center|Shamanism, Human Culture & the Evolution of Religion|frame}}
[https://www.latimes.com/lifestyle/story/2024-05-08/chambers-project-pact-grass-valley-psychedelic-drugs This museum explores the art and culture surrounding psychedelics].

The way that LSD was developed, tested, and initially received by the public is dramatically different than the way we see it after decades of [[Drugs|drug]] war [[propaganda]]. When it was first discovered it was considered a [[psychology]] miracle [[Drugs|drug]] with the potential to cure [[addiction]] and many other mental afflictions. We are only now starting to rediscover what was obvious from the outset. 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6p0BUvDMIo||center|Psychedelics and the History of LSD|frame}}

== Modern Therapeutic Uses ==

Current therapeutic uses of psychedelics, research showing its effectiveness at treating various disorders, structure of a guided session.

The focus on therapeutic uses is necessary to open the door to legalization, since recreation is not a good enough reason to do something according to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asceticism ascetic] [[religious]] traditions that dominate mainstream [[politics]]. If you need a therapeutic breakthrough then a guided trip offers a lot of potential benefit.

If you're still not convinced that psychedelic therapy is ready to go mainstream, [https://psychedelic.support/resources/articles-potential-of-psychedelics-not-just-hype/ here are 18 articles with supporting evidence] that will change your [[mind]] about how to change your [[mind]].
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9N35WCz_UI||center|Can Psychedelics Heal Mental Trauma? - Oprah and Michael Pollan|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMXu7Fn_bZc||center|Trevor Noah Interviews Michael Pollan on Psychedelics|frame}}
 
McKenna advocates infrequent, meditative trip environments at high doses where you can go deep within yourself. These may be the most revelatory and therapeutic experiences, but he tends to discount the value of having a really good time with [[friends]].
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b71_g01rkOs||center|Terence Mckenna discusses how to use psychedelics|frame}}
 
Although Huberman has since taken a turn towards the [[grift]], his earlier videos offer some very good conversations and advice, and this is one of the more nuanced discussions of set and setting from a [[neuroscience]] [[perspective]]. Just don't buy any dietary supplements he sponsors or take [[relationship]] advice from him.
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqAiLXnnzFU||center|Clinical Psychedelic Journey (Set & Setting) Explained|frame}}

== Best Recreational Uses ==

How to create a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_and_setting set and setting] that will bring joy, [[friendship]], ecstasy, [[wonder]], revelation, inner peace, and/or total ego destruction.

Sometimes, as humans in the pursuit of [[happiness]], we just need to have a really, really, really good time. Recreational psychedelics may or may not offer that, depending on the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_and_setting set and setting]. Protip: it's hard to go wrong at a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_festival music festival].

If you really want to go down the rabbit hole and experience the effects of deep meditation without the years of practice, or get therapy without hiring a therapist, just sit in a dark room for several hours with some spacey tunes. In this setting, it is recommended that a trusted sober friend be on call from another room.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fGm_jg45To||center|Bill Hicks - Positive Drug Story|frame}}

== McPsychedelics and Commodification ==
[https://psygaia.org/blog/mcpsychedelics McPsychedelics: The Rise of Psychedelic Individualism]

This article has an excellent breakdown of the problems that legalized psychedelic therapy has in a [[capitalist]] [[society]] that seeks to profit off of everything. For example, corporate therapy firms are attempting to patent compounds and therapeutic techniques that have been in use for centuries. Others provide luxury psychedelic experiences that reinforce the hollow [[Materialistic|materialism]] and narcissism of their [[rich]] clients instead of providing the deep soul-searching and [[community]] building that lead to real transformations. Their intention is to maximize their ability to succeed in [[capitalism]], not to shatter the illusion that everything needs to have a price.

It is important to remember that if you are paying for a catered psychedelic experience, that is the set and setting you are now dealing with. In this transactional setting, the feelings of spontaneity, [[friendship]], unpredictability, and [[empathy]] can be diminished compared to a social gathering. In group settings where the group's primary shared value is the willingness and ability to pay a lot of [[money]] to go on a retreat, you may find yourself sharing the experience with people you wouldn't normally share sober experiences with. Some may share [[ideas]] or interpretations that you find idiotic or offensive, and that just takes you right out of it. If you find [[Quantum woo|new age mumbo jumbo]] and [[spiritual]] narcissism annoying, you will find many psychedelic retreats annoying. On psychedelics, this means ''very'' annoying. You may be better off doing them alone or with [[friends]].

== Psychedelic Music ==
Some of the greatest [[music]] ever made has been inspired by psychedelics. Here is some of it. {{#ev:youtube|https://youtu.be/thUbCqYkDog?t=877||center|Phish - Halloween 1996 Set 2|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xby5467EbdU||center|Funkadelic - Maggot Brain|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwtT4ZBa3CE||center|Shpongle - Divine Moments of Truth|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6cQ5e_X4Xc||center|Tipper - Insolito (Full Album)|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zts332Y-nyg||center|Jimi Hendrix - Third Stone From the Sun|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pk1jsxcXWqE||center|Gong - Foghat Digs Holes in Space|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OvW8Z7kiws||center|King Crimson - 21st Century Schizoid Man|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51fcG3sxvII||center|Tool - Third Eye|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgxrVdDaE2I||center|Moody Blues - Timothy Leary|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIoI0yE0aIo&list=PLiN-7mukU_RHfppe7hjRD6WU06C9ib-T4||center|Aphex Twin - Richard D. James Album|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Xic-CHInek||center|Grateful Dead - Dark Star|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtORTuLJw7o&list=PL1RRNXldMeRH9BTnQmLcBEPypc3M6e9yJ||center|Miles Davis - Bitches Bew (Full Album)|frame}}
 
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8pEjmZVx3k||center||frame}}

File:If-you-think-youre-having-a-bad-time.jpg

2025-12-23T15:32:17Z

Fractalguy: